equitable liability 中文意思是什麼

equitable liability 解釋
公平責任
  • equitable : adj. 1. 公平的,公正的,合理的。2. 【法律】衡平法上(有效)的。n. -ness ,-bly adv.
  • liability : n. 1. 責任,義務。2. 〈pl. 〉 負債,債務 (opp. assets). 3. 傾向;易於…的傾向[性質]。4. 不利條件。
  1. For inclusion in a document that establishes or is evidence of any legal or equitable right or interest or legal liability that is not trivial, e. g. in documents that establish an individual s right of ownership of a flat

    為了加入用以確立或證明任何法律或衡平法上的權利或利益或任何法律責任的文件內,而該等權利或利益或法律責任的性質並非是輕微的,
  2. For inclusion in a document that establishes or is evidence of any legal or equitable right or interest or legal liability that is not trivial, e. g. in documents that establish an individual s right of ownership of a flat. do not collect an id card number just to safeguard against a trivial loss

    為了加入用以確立或證明任何法律或衡平法上的權利或利益或任何法律責任的文件內,而該等權利或利益或法律責任的性質並非是輕微的,例如用以確立個人的物業權益的文件。
  3. In particular, a person is interested in a marine adventure where he stands in any legal or equitable relation to the adventure or to any insurable property at risk therein, in consequence of which he may benefit by the safety or due arrival of insurable property, or may be prejudiced by its loss, or by damage thereto, or by the detention thereof, or may incur liability in respect thereof

    一個人與海上冒險有利益關系,尤其是在他與該冒險或處在危險中的任何保險財產,具有任何法律上或衡平的關系,因而若保險財產安全或及時抵達他便能從中獲取利益;反之,如果保險財產滅失,損壞,或被滯留或招致有關責任,他的利益將受到損害。
  4. Second, the writer points the meaning of criterion of liability system. then discusses two central questions : can the equitable liability become an independent criterion of liability ? can the fault - presumption liability become an independent criterion of liability ? furthmore, the writer thinks the criterion of liability including fault liability and no - fault liability

    從而得出:過錯推定責任是過錯責任原則適用中的一種特殊情形,不應從過錯責任原則中獨立出來。過錯推定責任是責任標準,但不是獨立的歸責原則。
  5. According to this paper, when a negotiable instrument is altered, the man who have altered a negotiable instrument, the man whose negotiable instrument have been altered, the signer who have signed subsequent to the alteration, and the signer who can not discern his signature is previous or subsequent to the alteration, should assume consequential legal liability, the holder and payer of bills, and the signer who have signed subsequent to the alteration, all may assume risk responsibility ; and burden - sharing of risk responsibility refer to principle of equitable burden - sharing in civil law, and according to four kinds of recommended measure whose anther advance

    摘要票據變造時,票據變造人、被變造人、變造后簽章人以及不能辨別其簽章在變造之前或之後的簽章人應承擔相應的法律責任;票據持票人、付款人、變造后的簽章人都有負擔風險責任的可能性,而付款人的風險責任分擔上應採取公平原則、禁止反言原則等。
  6. Economic law focused on no - fault liability and responsibility of equitable responsibility, with a particular focus on the equitable responsibility

    經濟法責任側重於無過錯責任和公平責任,尤其側重於公平責任。
  7. That is, namely the existence of liability insurance is specially for the insured who undertakes the responsibility for the third person suffering loss and its basic goal is to compensate the third person. along with the development, people realize gradually the concept that the strong benefits at the cost of the disadvantaged can hardly be regarded as equitable. taking the development of civil liability system and the breakthrough in the relativity principle of the contract as its legal basis, liability insurance is renewing its concept continually and starts to have dual function to protect both the insured and the third person, attaching more importance to the third person

    本文立足我國國情,借鑒國外經驗,以現代責任保險的新理念為基本思考路徑,客觀分析我國責任保險立法對第三人保護的現狀,積極探討對第三人予以保護和救濟的途徑,建議在我國保險法中建立第三人直接請求權制度和事故賠償基金制度,進一步推行強制責任保險,擴展責任保險的適用范圍以及明確規范保險人、被保險人對第三人應當履行的義務,從整體到局部、從制度到措施,力求全面、有效地構築我國責任保險第三人法律保護的屏障,充分實現責任保險基本的制度價值。
  8. And the suitable trademark liability principle of compensation for damages is the doctrine of liability for wrongs and the equitable liability doctrine

    而商標侵權損害賠償適用的是過錯責任原則和公平責任原則。
  9. Third, the essay studys criterion of liability in other foreign countries from the angles of comparative law. lt is worth noticing that the meaning of equitable liability in our country is different from other countries

    特別值得注意的是,我國的公平責任同許多國家的公平責任在內涵上存在著區別。
  10. Fouth, the essay analyses the influence of liability insurance upon the criterion of liabity in tort law. liability insurance ensures and stabilizes the position of no - fault liability. liability insurance has both positive and negative influence upon the applicable scope of no - fault liability. finally, the writer concludes that criterion of liability system in our country should include both the fault liability and no - fault liability. with the case analysis, the writer again rejects to regard the equitable liability as the criterion of liability

    又次,本文從現代工業社會事故激增並趨嚴重,損失分散的思想逐漸取代損失轉移成為侵權行為法的思考方式的角度,從侵權責任體現的正義觀發生變化的角度,審視了責任保險對侵權行為法歸責原則的影響:責任保險肯定並穩定了無過錯責任原則的地位,對無過錯責任原則的適用范圍既是促進也是遏制。
  11. In no event shall either party be liable to the other for any special or other indirect damages of any kind, including but not limited to, loss of profits or damages, however caused and on any theory of liability, whether in any action for contract, strict liability or tort ( including negligence ) or any other legal or equitable grounds

    在任何事件中,對于任何特殊和間接的損害雙方都要承擔責任,包括不受限制的利益損失或損害,無論什麼原因和責任推斷,是否屬于合同規定內的行為,都要以法律和公平為依據,明確責任和民事侵權行為(包括因疏忽造成的後果) 。
  12. Hongkong post shall not in any event be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of or related to the downloading, installation or use of or inability to download, install or use the software, including but not limited to direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages, and damages for loss of business profits, business interruption, loss of business information, or other pecuniary loss, even if hongkong post has been advised of the possibility of such damages, whether such liability is based on contract, tort, warranty, or any other legal or equitable grounds

    在任何情況下香港郵政不會就因下載、安裝或使用,或未能下載、安裝或使用軟體,或相關情況而引致的任何形式損毀負上責任,這些損毀包括但不限於直接、間接、特別、附帶或相關的損毀,以及有關損失商業利潤、業務暫停、損失商業資料或其他金錢上的損失。即使香港郵政事先知悉可能引致損毀(不論這些損毀是基於合約、侵權行為、保證或其他法律或可衡平的理由而引致) ,亦無須負上法律責任。
  13. Hongkong post shall not in any event be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of or related to the downloading, installation or use of or inability to download, install or use the software, including but not limited to direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages, and damages for loss of business profits, business interruption, loss of business information, or other pecuniary loss, even if hongkong post have been advised of the possibility of such damages, whether such liability is based on contract, tort, warranty, or any other legal or equitable grounds

    在任何情況下香港郵政均不會就因下載、安裝或使用,或未能下載、安裝或使用軟體,或相關情況而引致的任何形式損毀負上責任,這些損毀包括但不限於直接、間接、特別、附帶或相關的損毀,以及有關損失商業利潤、業務暫停、損失商業資料或其他金錢上的損失。即使香港郵政事先知悉可能引致損毀(不論這些損毀是基於合約、侵權行為、保證或其他法律或可衡平的理由而引致) ,亦無須負上法律責任。
  14. Hongkong post shall not in any event be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of or related to the use of or inability to use the software, including but not limited to direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages, and damages for loss of business profits, business interruption, loss of business information, or other pecuniary loss, even if hongkong post has been advised of the possibility of such damages, whether such liability is based on contract, tort, warranty, or any other legal or equitable grounds

    在任何情況下香港郵政均不會就因使用或未能使用軟體或相關情況而引致的任何形式損毀負上責任,這些損毀包括但不限於直接、間接、特別、附帶或相關的損毀,以及有關損失商業利潤、業務暫停、損失商業資料或其他金錢上的損失。即使香港郵政事先知悉可能引致損毀(不論這些損毀是基於合約、侵權行為、保證或其他法律或可衡平的理由而引致) ,亦無須負上法律責任。
分享友人