glass-steagall act 中文意思是什麼
glass-steagall act
解釋
格拉斯-斯蒂格爾法案-
But the quid pro quo was the glass - steagall act of 1933, which separated the roles of commercial and investment banking
但取而代之的是1933年《格拉斯? ?斯蒂格爾法》的出臺，該法案規定銀行貸款業務與證券業務嚴格區分。 -
In november 1999, with abolishment of the 66 years implemented the glass - steagall act and adoption of the gramm - leach - bliley act in replacement, the united states has legally ensured the establishment of financial universal operation model and has declared the world has entered into a new era of universal operation
1999年11月美國廢止了已有66年歷史的《格拉斯?斯蒂格爾法》 ，通過了《金融服務現代化法案》 ，從法律上重新確立了金融混業經營的模式，宣告了世界混業經營時代的到來。 -
It focuses on the background and main contents of glass steagall act, the reform of law in the 80 ' s, the enacting of gramm leach bliley act and the regulations concerning mixing financial operations. it also analyses the reason of the changes from divided to mixing financial operations in the usa
重點介紹了美國《格拉斯?斯蒂格爾法》創制的背景、主要內容、 80年代的金融立法改革、 《金融服務現代化法案》的出臺及混業經營有關規定，並就美國從分業經營到混業經營演進的原因進行了分析。 -
Wall street ' s sensitivity to charges that it operates as an underwriting oligopoly dates back at least to the glass - steagall act of 1933 when commercial banks were forced to sell or close their underwriting business, in effect reinforcing the franchises of “ bulge - bracket ” securities firms
華爾街對于指控非常敏感，它作為保險業的寡頭而運轉至少可追溯到1933年的格拉斯-斯蒂格爾法案[ 2 ] ，其時商業銀行被迫出售或者撤銷保險業務，實際上加強了華爾街投資銀行領導集團擔保的公司的特權。 -
In 1998, citibank and travelers group merged into citigroup, which then became a financial holding company providing all kinds of financial services through its subsidiaries. the " financial services act of 1999 " repeals the " glass - steagall act " prohibitions on banks affiliating with securities firms, permitting holding companies to engage in securities underwriting and dealing, without limitation, as well as sponsoring and distributing mutual funds. it creates a framework that will permit the banking, securities, and insurance industries to compete more efficiently and effectively while improving consumer access to financial services, protecting investors, and ensuring a safe and sound banking system
首先，金融控股公司由於佔有金融資源過大，所以面臨的系統風險的危害是非常大的；其次，金融控股公司的各子公司之間進行關聯交易，使得集團內各子公司的經營狀況相互影響，這就增大了金融控股公司的內幕交易和利益沖突的風險；第三，金融控股公司以外來資本撥付給子公司的資本金，在總公司和子公司的資產負債表中都同時反映出來，這可能會使整個集團的實際財務杠桿比率過高，影響到集團的金融安全。 -
In the u. s., the separation of commercial banking and investment banking was set down in the " glass - steagall act " following the economic crisis in 1929 - 1933
在金融控股模式下，子公司仍然是"分業"的，或者說是專業化的，而集團是"全能"的，從而在一定程度上兼顧了安全和效率。 -
Part iii : the author analyses the modes of separating and combi - nating from fairness, right, result, safety, cost and so on, using the glass - steagall act and financial services modernization act of 1999 including their favourite operating modes. in this part, the author refute the grounds for separating, so as to advocate a policy of combinating
該部分以美國《格拉斯? ?斯蒂格爾法》 、 《金融服務現代化法》及其各自確立的分業體制、混業體制為主線，運用法律的經濟分析和經濟的法律分析方法，對分業經營理由進行駁斥、反思，旨在主張混業體制；第四部分：根據中國的實情對銀行經營體制的未來取向加以設想和思考。 -
The " separation system ", which came into being after the " glass - steagall act ", represents the separation of commercial banking, investment banking and insurance services. the " combination system ", which is just the opposite concept, has two meanings. one relates to the combination of financial services in the same legal person, while the other relates to the combination of shareholding rights of several subsidiaries providing difference services
與「分業」相對應的"混業"有兩層意義：第一層含義是金融業務的混合、交叉經營，即業務的混業，典型的代表是德國的全能銀行制； "混業"的第二層含義是金融控股權的混業，即在金融控股公司里有多個法人子公司，它們統一被控制在一個母公司之下，但彼此之間實行"分業經營，分業管理" 。
分享友人