imaginary crime 中文意思是什麼

imaginary crime 解釋
親情難舍
  • imaginary : adj. 1. 想像中的,假想的 (opp. Actual )。2. 【數學】虛數的。imaginarilyadv. imaginarinessn.
  • crime : n 犯罪;罪惡;〈俚語〉壞事;〈口語〉蠢事。vt 指控犯罪;判定犯罪;處罰軍事犯。 a capital crime死刑...
  1. This paper compares the legal regulations concerning the applicable conditions and the recognition of the crime and proposes : ( 1 ) the prerequisites should be extended to include the acts of robbery. snatch, and deception ; ( 2 ) the " violence " as an objective condition should be interpreted as the violent and forcing actions in robbery, while " on site " should be the site of the stealing, deception, or snatch, or the area involved in the crime with the site as the center ; ( 3 ) the connotation of the subjective condition " harboring the stolen goods, resisting an - eat, destroying criminal evidence " needs expansion ; ( 4 ) dual criteria should be adopted emphasizing on both the act and the consequence in distinguishing the completed crime and the criminal attempt ; and ( 5 ) in case of overlap of law and imaginary concurrence of crimes only by convicting the crime as theft, snatch, and deception can it be regarded as transformed robbery

    本文通過比較不同國家該罪的有關法律規定,對我國轉化型搶劫罪的適用條件及法律認定問題進行分析,認為: ( 1 )前提條件應擴展為實施盜竊、搶奪、詐騙行為; ( 2 )客觀條件中「暴力」應與搶劫罪中的暴力與脅迫行為作同樣理解, 「當場」應是實施盜竊、詐騙、搶奪行為的當場或以犯罪現場為中心、與犯罪分子活動有關的范圍; ( 3 )主觀條件中「窩藏贓物、抗拒抓捕、毀滅罪證」的內涵應有所延伸; ( 4 )既遂與未遂的判定應採用既主張行為又注意結果的雙重標準; ( 5 )在想象競合或法條競合時只有以盜竊、搶奪、詐騙罪論處方可轉化為搶劫罪。
  2. In this part, the author to the traditional justifiable defense constitution " five important documents said " proposed the objection, but advocated new " four important documents said ", and aimed at various important documents to launch the concrete elaboration. compares each viewpoint in the analysis in the foundation, does the author to the imaginary defense crime form and processing, whether violate to the indirect principal offender and the help implements the justifiable defense, how understood justifiable defense question and so on boundary condition proposed is different in the logically coherent argument new position

    在該部分,筆者首先對傳統的正當防衛構成「五要件說」提出了異議,而主張新的「四要件說」 ,並針對各要件展開了具體論述;其次在分析比較各種觀點的基礎上,筆者對假想防衛的罪過形式及處理、對間接正犯和幫助犯能否實行正當防衛、如何理解正當防衛的限度條件等問題提出了不同於通說的新主張。
分享友人