procedural history 中文意思是什麼

procedural history 解釋
程序史
  • procedural : adj （法律）程序上的，程序性的。 procedural details 程序上的細節。 reject on procedural grounds ...
  • history : n. 1. 歷史，歷史學。2. 沿革，來歷；（個人的）履歷，經歷。3. 對過去事件的記載；大事記。4. 對形成未來的進程有影響的事件[思想]。5. 過去的事。6. 歷史劇。
  1. On the basis of reviewing history and comparative study, this paper examines the system of trial by default in our country ; at the same time using foreign experiences for reference, combines the specific situations in our judicial practice, then raises a tentative idea to reconstruct the system of trial by default in our country : to build a system of trial by default making the doctrine of ex parte debate as main part and doctrine of trial by default as supplement part ; at the same time to perfect the legislative stipulations on standards of default determination, procedural applications and remedies of trial by ex parte debate and trial by default, examinations of evidence in trial by default, in pursuit of forming an intact system structure, giving full play to the functions of system of trial by default and fulfilling the value target of civil proceedings

    因此，加強對我國缺席審判制度的研究，具有重要的理論和實踐價值。本文在歷史回顧和比較研究的基礎上，對我國的缺席審判制度進行了審視；同時借鑒國外的經驗，並結合我國司法實踐的具體情況，提出了重構我國缺席審判制度的設想：建立一種以一方辯論主義為主體，缺席判決主義為補充的缺席審判制度；同時完善缺席的認定標準、一方辯論判決與缺席判決程序的適用與救濟、缺席審判中的證據審查等方面的立法規定，以形成一個完整的制度體系，充分發揮缺席審判制度的功能，實現民事訴訟的價值目標。
  2. Looking back on the chinese constitutional history of over 40 years, we can easily find that the constitution has been changed several times, and that neither persons nor national offices have violated the constitution. therefore, there is not any suits about the executing of the constitution and also there is not any courts to adjudicate constitutional cases. since the establishment of the state, no constitutional suit has appeared and no constitution procedural law has been set

    回顧我國40多年的憲政史，國家一方面制定和修改出一部又一部的根本大法；另一方面又好象全國上下都不存在違憲行為，哪個國家機關和哪個國家領導人都不違反憲法，不存在為實施憲法而引起的任何爭論和糾紛，當然也更不存在裁決這些爭議和糾紛是合憲還是違憲的權威機關… …建國以來沒有一件憲法訴訟案件，也沒有建立憲法訴訟制度。
  3. The implications of procedural rationality as opposed to instrumental rationality are far reaching for our understanding of economics and economic history

    程序理性的含義與工具理性相反，更難理解經濟學和經濟史。
  4. Firstly, the author introduces the development history and law of anti - dumping procedural law, then discusses its concept, characteristics, fundamental principles, relation between it and anti - dumping substantive law, finally expounds the jurisdiction, competent authorities, parties and their rights of anti - dumping case. part ii, anti - dumping investigation procedure. this part mainly discusses initiation mechanism, conditions of petition and acceptance, way and content of investigation, preliminary determination, final determination, concerned stipulations of chinese anti - dumping ordinance and its perfection

    筆者首先簡要介紹了國際國內反傾銷程序法的發展歷史以及「其由國內法到統一法，又從統一法到國內法，再由國內法到統一法，且日趨統一」的發展規律，接著重點論述了反傾銷程序法的概念、特徵一基本原則、反傾銷實體法與程序法的關系，最後闡述了反傾銷案件的管轄和主管機關、反傾銷申訴案件的當事人及其權利。
  5. And then chapter makes an analysis of the second substantive criterion of the procedural safeguard purpose which is based on the history of dispute settlement and theory of justice, the maximin rule founded by john rawls. chapter is about the positivist substantive criterion in accordance with the developing of social status

    其次，以羅爾斯的「社會正義理論」和「最大最小原則」為理論基礎，以糾紛解決方式的發展史為事實基礎論證了程序保障目的論的合理性，分析了實質標準之二? ?民事訴訟的目的。
  6. In chapter 1 the history of tprm is intensively reviewed ; in chapter 2 some of the substantial and structural issues of tprm are given a macro - analysis, including the purpose, function, applied standards, coverage and participating parties of tprm so as to come up with a systematical understanding of tprm ; chapter 3 mainly concerns the procedural issues of tprm e. g

    其中第一章重點回顧了貿易政策評審機制的產生與發展。第二章從宏觀角度分析了貿易政策評審機制的一些實體性與結構性問題，包括其評審的目標與功能、適用標準、評審內容以及參加主體等方面的內容，從而構建起對貿易政策評審機制的系統性與規律性的把握。
  7. In the second part, the author analyses the existing issue and reason in the mutual procedure of the two kinds of power. at present, there exist three malice phenomena that are mutual filtrate, mutual evasion and mutual invasion, the author, after deeply analyzing our country ’ s history, cultural tradition, contemporary judicial system ’ s malady and the defects of administrative procedural system, rationally criticizes the malice mutual phenomena in the execution of administrative trial power and administrative power

    闡析當前我國行政審判權與行政權互動過程中存在互相滲透、互相規避、互相僭越等三種惡性互動表現，從我國歷史、文化傳統、現行司法體制的弊端和行政訴訟制度存在的問題等四個方面深入剖析成因，特別是結合當前行政審判實際，對我國《行政訴訟法》頒布以來辦理案件情況進行分析研究，理性批判現實中行政審判權與行政權行使的惡性互動現象。
  8. This article compares the concepts of the two kinds of power and their main features, analyses their mutual relationships and principles that should abide to, explains three malice phenomena, existed in the procedure of administrative trial power and administrative power. then, the author expounds the cause of that form the aspect of history, culture, contemporary judicial system and the defects of administrative procedural system. on the basis of the above analysis, the author points out its harm and puts forward the necessity of constructing the malign mutual relationship between the two kinds of power

    本文從行政審判權與行政權的概念及主要特徵比較入手，分析研究二者之間的關系及其互動過程中應當遵守的原則，剖析我國行政審判權與行政權兩種權力互動過程中存在互相滲透、互相規避、互相僭越三種主要惡性互動現象，並從我國歷史、文化、現行司法體制和行政訴訟制度的缺陷等四個方面闡釋其成因，分析其危害，對構建我國行政審判權和行政權的運行的良性互動關系的必要性及其途徑進行理性思考，提出一些建設性方案。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書