three-level return system 中文意思是什麼
three-level return system
解釋
三能記錄系統-
It was restaurant industry graven topic that that of that of from input / output angle said, how advance restaurant kernel ability to compete, with the purpose of advance business economic benefit, as soon as possible brought return, accelerating demonetization end, abaft experience know clearly near twenty year stodgy state look forward to reform mechanism, our state hotel industry be around by babyhood trend maturity, by seller ' s market trend buyer ' s market, such transit should make part rational consumer enjoy to good value for money, too brought ought to part superficial restaurant taste to inevitable ; the government owned restaurant at multinational restaurant bloc and civilian battalion restaurant enterprise " dual impact down, calendar by know clearly reform of monetary system cum bank commercialization, market open cum solution control, market cum competitive mechanism three phase, owing to planned economy belated issues, structure irrationality wrought a matter of and overlapping investment wrought a matter of wait threefold cause, make government owned restaurant at market competition middle gradualness forfeiture competitive edge, in progression appearance hot water, how advance government owned hotel competitive power a matter of, toward me state tourism possess strong operation significance, hunan lotus hotel namely same family pole tool on government owned three stars level hotel behalf of the for the last years, by way of hotel industry occupy quite specific gravity
從投入產出的角度講，如何提高飯店核心競爭能力，以達到提高企業經濟效益，盡快產生回報，加速貨幣回籠的目的，是飯店業嚴肅的話題。在經歷了近二十年步履艱難的國企改革歷程后，我國飯店業已開始由幼稚走向成熟，由賣方市場走向買方市場，這種轉變將使得部分理性的消費者享受到物有所值，也使部分膚淺的飯店品嘗到必然的失敗；近十年來，作為飯店業占相當比重的國有飯店在跨國飯店集團和民營飯店企業的雙重沖擊下，歷經了金融體制改革及銀行商業化、市場開放及解控、市場及競爭機制三個階段，由於計劃經濟遺留下來的問題、結構不合理造成的問題和重復投資造成的問題等三方面的原因，使得國有飯店在市場競爭中逐漸喪失競爭優勢，相繼出現困境，如何提高國有飯店競爭力的問題，對於我國旅遊業具有強烈的現實意義，湖南芙蓉賓館就是一家極具代表性的國有三星級飯店。 -
Abstract : a new method, collaborative allocation ( ca ), is proposed to solve the large - scale optimum allocation problem in aircraft conceptual design. according to the characteristics of optimum allocation in aircraft conceptual design. the principle and mathematical model of ca are established. the optimum allocation problem is decomposed into one main optimization problem and several sub - optimization problems. a group of design requirements for subsystems are provided by the main system respectively, and the subsystems execute their own optimizations or further provide the detailed design requirements to the bottom components of aircraft, such as spars, ribs and skins, etc. the subsystems minimize the discrepancy between their own local variables and the corresponding allocated values, and then return the optimization results to main optimization. the main optimization is performed to reallocate the design requirements for improving the integration performance and progressing toward the compatibilities among subsystems. ca provides the general optimum allocation architecture and is easy to be carried out. furthermore, the concurrent computation can also be realized. two examples of optimum reliability allocation are used to describe the implementation procedure of ca for two - level allocation and three - level allocation respectively, and to validate preliminarily its correctness and effectiveness. it is shown that the developed method can be successfully used in optimum allocation of design requirements. then taking weight requirement allocation as example, the mathematical model and solution procedure for collaborative allocation of design requirements in aircraft conceptual design are briefly depicted
文摘:探討了一種新的設計指標最優分配方法- -協同分配法，用於處理飛機頂層設計中的大規模設計指標最優分配問題.分析了飛機頂層設計中的設計指標最優分配特徵，據此給出了協同法的原理並建立了數學模型.協同法按設計指標分配關系將最優分配問題分解為主系統優化和子系統優化，主優化對子系統設計指標進行最優分配，子優化以最小化分配設計指標值與期望設計指標值之間的差異為目標，進行子系統最優設計，或對底層元件（如飛機翼梁、翼肋和翼盒等）進行設計指標最優分配，並把最優解信息反饋給主優化.主優化通過子優化最優解信息構成的一致性約束協調分配量，提高系統整體性能，並重新給出分配方案.主系統與子系統反復協調，直到得到設計指標最優分配方案.兩層可靠度指標分配算例初步驗證了本文方法的正確性與可行性，三層可靠度指標分配算例證明了本文方法的有效性.最後，以重量指標分配為例，簡要敘述了針對飛機頂層設計中設計指標協同分配的數學模型和求解思路 -
A new method, collaborative allocation ( ca ), is proposed to solve the large - scale optimum allocation problem in aircraft conceptual design. according to the characteristics of optimum allocation in aircraft conceptual design. the principle and mathematical model of ca are established. the optimum allocation problem is decomposed into one main optimization problem and several sub - optimization problems. a group of design requirements for subsystems are provided by the main system respectively, and the subsystems execute their own optimizations or further provide the detailed design requirements to the bottom components of aircraft, such as spars, ribs and skins, etc. the subsystems minimize the discrepancy between their own local variables and the corresponding allocated values, and then return the optimization results to main optimization. the main optimization is performed to reallocate the design requirements for improving the integration performance and progressing toward the compatibilities among subsystems. ca provides the general optimum allocation architecture and is easy to be carried out. furthermore, the concurrent computation can also be realized. two examples of optimum reliability allocation are used to describe the implementation procedure of ca for two - level allocation and three - level allocation respectively, and to validate preliminarily its correctness and effectiveness. it is shown that the developed method can be successfully used in optimum allocation of design requirements. then taking weight requirement allocation as example, the mathematical model and solution procedure for collaborative allocation of design requirements in aircraft conceptual design are briefly depicted
探討了一種新的設計指標最優分配方法- -協同分配法，用於處理飛機頂層設計中的大規模設計指標最優分配問題.分析了飛機頂層設計中的設計指標最優分配特徵，據此給出了協同法的原理並建立了數學模型.協同法按設計指標分配關系將最優分配問題分解為主系統優化和子系統優化，主優化對子系統設計指標進行最優分配，子優化以最小化分配設計指標值與期望設計指標值之間的差異為目標，進行子系統最優設計，或對底層元件（如飛機翼梁、翼肋和翼盒等）進行設計指標最優分配，並把最優解信息反饋給主優化.主優化通過子優化最優解信息構成的一致性約束協調分配量，提高系統整體性能，並重新給出分配方案.主系統與子系統反復協調，直到得到設計指標最優分配方案.兩層可靠度指標分配算例初步驗證了本文方法的正確性與可行性，三層可靠度指標分配算例證明了本文方法的有效性.最後，以重量指標分配為例，簡要敘述了針對飛機頂層設計中設計指標協同分配的數學模型和求解思路 -
The system consists of three parts, i. e. the risk - return characteristic of funds, the liquidity of their assets, and the level of investment management. this paper establishes an integrated evaluation function by factor analysis and determines the rates of funds by cluster analysis
該系統的指標體系由三個部分組成：基金的風險收益特徵、基金資產的流動性和基金的投資管理水平，然後使用因子分析方法構造綜合評價函數，最後使用聚類分析的方法確定基金的星級。
分享友人