two-party paper 中文意思是什麼
two-party paper
解釋
雙名票據-
Then, the paper puts forward a few points to discuss with the suggestion of quasi - party, and produces that : so called quasi - party, it ' s essence is that the intervening of party posses two status in litigation - intervening in action in chief and one party in intervening action
接著，對準獨立請求權第三人的提法進行了商榷，認為準獨立請求權第三人其實是第三人同時兼具了兩種訴訟身份? ?本訴的無獨立請求權第三人和參加之訴的一方主當事人。 -
The paper refer to the two oil pollution compensation regimes, one is established by the 1969 international convention on civil liability for oil pollution damage and the 1971 international convention on the establishment of an international fund for compensation for oil pollution damage, another is established by the oil pollution act of 1990 of america, combine with the oil pollution compensation cases in recent years, introduce the present situation of oil pollution compensation in our country, discuss several problems in practice of oil pollution compensation, such as the scope of oil pollution compensation, the claimant of oil pollution compensation, the responsible party and liability of oil pollution compensation, the evidence of oil pollution damage case, the limits on liability of oil pollution compensation, present that our country would draft the oil pollution compensation law according to the principles of the oil pollution act of 1990 of america and establish the complete oil pollution compensation regime, which the responsible party and the user of oil joint compensa te the oil pollution damage, expect to completely settle the problems of oil pollution compensation
本文比較《 69民事責任公約》 、 《 71基金公約》及其議定書和美國《 1990年油污法》建立的兩套油污損害賠償的法律制度，結合近年來油污損害賠償的案例，介紹了我國油污損害賠償的現狀，並就油污染損害賠償實踐中的油污損害賠償范圍、油污損害賠償的索賠主體、油污損害賠償主體和責任、油污損害案件的證據問題、油污損害賠償的責任限制幾個具體法律問題展開討論，提出我國可以重點參照美國《 1990年油污法》制定專門的《油污損害賠償法》 ，建立由污染責任人和油類受益人共同賠償的完整油污損害賠償制度，以期徹底解決油污損害賠償的問題。 -
Touching upon yang jingyu in the past, attention is all in his contribution of resisting against japan and unyielding national integrity, it is for he in in of being in two party two alliance relation forming process, blood of countries historical status apply ink to paper few, the reason is the shortage of the historical data naturally
以往論及楊靖宇，注意力全在他的抗日功績和堅貞不屈的民族氣節，對他在中朝兩黨兩國血盟關系形成過程中的歷史地位著墨極少，原因自然是史料的缺乏。 -
Based on the existentialist analysis of suffering and struggle by meggie, the heroine in the thorn bird, in her four important stages of development, the paper suggests that the thorn bird has created a modern tragedy entirely different from classic tragedy : while either of the two parties in a clash in the latter presents its own rational ethical power, the party meggie confronts is a series of absurdities, which ultimately destroy her happiness
摘要本文從存在主義視角分析了《荊棘鳥》女主人公梅吉一生四個重要階段的遭遇和抗爭，證明這部小說創造了完全不同於古典悲劇的現代悲劇：構成古典悲劇沖突的雙方各自具有倫理力量的合理性，而梅吉的沖突對象則是無窮無盡的荒誕，而且正是這種荒誕最終毀滅了她的幸福。 -
The second is the comparison between the two administrative patterns. the paper states the commonness from the three respects of administrative leader power expansion, value orientation and administrative levels, the difference from the theoretical foundation, relations between government and party, executive foundation and outcome of social development. lastly, the paper makes a conclusion betweens pattern is intergradations on the basis of the commonness and difference
本文從行政首長權力拓展、價值取向、行政層次結構等三個角度探討了其共同性；差異性則從理論基礎、黨政關系、行政系統內外交流程度、行政依據、社會發展結果等五個方面加以研究，最後，在深入分析共同性和差異性的基礎上，得出「兩合」型行政管理模式是過渡形態的結論。 -
Section one in this paper brief1y reviews the discussion and the testing practices of the reduction of state - - ho1ding shares since the party ' s congress in september l999, analyses the reason why the government enactment - - - - the regu1atory scheme for co11ecting socia1 security fund by reducing the state - - ho1ding shares ( proyisiona1 ) - - - - fai1s to work, and exp1ains the necessity of re - - solving the prob1em of state - - ho1ding shares and non - - tradab1e shares. in this section some basic solutions and princip1es are proposed on the issues of state - - holding shares and non - - tradab1e shares. section two makes comparative studies and case - - ana1yses of the a1ternative so1utions for the prob1em of state - - ho1ding shares outside the nation, and then sums up the worthy experiences and 1essons
本文第一部分對1999年9月黨的十五屆四中全會以來國有股減持問題的前期討論與試點實踐進行了簡單的回顧，剖析了《國有股減持籌集社會保障資金暫行管理辦法》運作失敗的原因，並進一步分析了解決國有股及非流通股問題的必要性，歸納了解決問題的市場基本共識及所應遵循的基本原則；第二部分則對境外國有股減持問題的處理方式進行了深入的比較研究和案例分析，從而歸納總結出值得借鑒的經驗和教訓；第三部分在前兩部分的基礎上，提出以協議轉讓補償方案作為解決國有股減持進而非流通股流通問題的主體方案，並對該方案進行了具體設計和實例演示，最後對其綜合評價。 -
Third, the paper made concrete analysis in the initiation of " three representatives " ideology about human developing theory. this ideology improved human developing theory of marxism from the advanced quality of party, from the essence requests of new socialism, and from the combination of two historical processes
三是對「三個代表」重要思想在人的全面發展理論上的創新作了具體的分析，指出這一思想從黨的性質的高度、從社會主義新社會本質要求的高度，以及從兩個歷史過程辯證統一的高度，對馬克思主義關於人的全面發展理論所作的創新和發展。 -
At the same time, the paper suggest that the norm for the intervenor of right to be determined is to find whether he have rights on the material law to restrict the jusdispodendi of the one party and the norm for another to be determined is to find whether there are legal facts need to be found with no contradiction in the two jural relation
與此同時，認為權利參加型第三人的確認標準為：就本訴訟訴標的，第三人在實體上是否享有針對被參加人不當處分行為的代位權或撤銷權；而義務參加型第三人的確認標準為：本訴法律關系和第三人參加的另一法律關系之間是否存在著需要合一確認的法律事實。 -
This paper includes the following two main parts : to explicate validity on the contract benefited to the third party by analyzing regulations and case - laws ; from philosophy of law to reveal the reasons why the parties and the third party consciously perform the contract and why rules can force them to perform the contract. then on the basis of theoretical analysis mentioned above this paper provides some suggestions of legislation on the contract benefited to the third party
本文旨在通過對各國立法和判例的分析來闡述為第三人利益合同所具有的效力內涵；並從法哲學的角度來探究當事人、第三人為什麼會自覺遵守該合同和為什麼法律會強制他們遵守該合同等有關效力根源的問題；進而在理論分析的基礎上，對我國的為第三人利益合同制度提出相關的立法建議。 -
Because our legal system belong to the common law, but anticipatory breach is the characteristic of english - american law, can anticipatory breach solve the problems in common law ? when the anticipatory breach is introduced, are there conflicts in the institution ? how to improve the anticipatory breach with these projblems with some faults and shortcomings ? this paper inquires these things in three parts. starting bread with the two outside forms of the auticipatory and the two outside forms of the auticipatory non - permermance, the first part of the passage inquires the value and the orcial base of the anticipatory breach by surveyingjit ' s origination and changing process under the origination and changing process under the special historical background. by comparing the anticipatory breach with counterargument right for security, the second part states a viewpoint that the former is superior is superior to the latter in protection parties " lawful rights though there are many similarities and differences between them. from this, we can come to a comclusion that the counterargument right for security is no substition for conticipetory breach and that the former should be part of the latter. the third party gives a detailed explanation of anticipatory breach in english ? american law systems in chinese system of anticipatory breach. finally, the anther makes some important suggestion : first, the subject of counterargument right for security should be attend to either party of the contract
其價值在於使受害方能提前獲得法律上的救濟，防止其蒙受本來可以避免的損失。第二部分筆者通過對預期違約與不安抗辯權的比較研究，對我國《合同法》應如何處理、協調來自不同法系的這兩項並不完全相同的法律制度的關系提出了自己的觀點。筆者認為不安抗辯權是通過對合同利益期待權的保護，實現法律「公平」和「安全」的價值，而預期違約除標示上述價值目標外，更是法律對「效率違約」這一經濟理論的認可，顯示了法律對「效益」這一價值目標的追求，從而提出預期違約與不安杭辮權二者制度功能相似而制度構造不同，預期違約制度較之不安杭辮權更有利於保護當事人的合法權益，由此得出我國《合同法》中不安抗辮權不僅不能替代預期違約，而是預期違約應該吸納不安抗辮權的結論
分享友人