判刑前審查 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [pànxíngqiánshěnzhā]
判刑前審查 英文
presentence
  • 判 : Ⅰ動詞1 （分開; 分辨） distinguish; discriminate 2 （評定） judge; decide 3 （判決） sentence; con...
  • 前 : Ⅰ名詞1 （在正面的） front 2 （次序在先的） first; top 3 （過去的; 較早的） ago; before; preceding...
  • 審 : Ⅰ形容詞（詳細; 周密） careful Ⅱ動詞1 （審查） examine; go over 2 （審訊） interrogate; try 3 [書...
  • 查 : 查名詞1. [植物學] （山查） hawthorn; haw2. （姓氏） a surname
  • 判刑 : pass a sentence; sentence
  • 審查 : examine; investigate; check
  1. Through comparative analysis, which focused on the victim ’ s dissentient in the stage of censor prosecution, the stage when the decision of the first trial doesn ’ t take effect and already took effect, and on the basis of using the legislative and judicial experiences of other countries, the plan of specific relief system on the victim ’ s right to prosecute was brought out

    通過比較分析，以被害人對于刑事訴訟中國家公訴機關審查起訴階段、一審判決作出未生效之前和判決已生效三個不同階段司法機關作出的決定或裁判的異議進行分析，在借鑒其他國家的立法和司法實踐經驗基礎上，提出了被害人追訴權救濟的具體制度方案。
  2. The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure

    以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導，結合我國的國情，對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善，在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子；在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念，以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實；在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則；在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據，其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據，增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度，補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的，取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定，改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。
  3. In 1996, the amendment of criminal procedure law did n ' t allow the investigating and prosecuting apparatus deporting prosecuting roll before courtroom judgment, limited the extent and deepness of court examination to public prosecution, improved the opposability of courtroom judgment. however, in the practice of justice, because lots of judge ca n ' t make use of the time of courtroom judgment efficiently, it ' s difficult to grasp the facts of law case in courtroom judgment. so, chief judge allways accept and reuse prosecuting roll after courtroom judgment

    我國1996年修正的刑事訴訟法在立法層面上否定了檢察機關在法庭審理前移送控方案卷，限制了法院對公訴案件庭前審查的廣度和深度，強化了法庭審判的對抗性：然而，在司法實踐中，由於許多法官不能有效利用法庭開庭審判階段的時空范圍，難以在庭審中準確把握案件事實，致使審案法官在庭審結束後接受並利用控方案卷的情況長期存在。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書