庭審 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [tíngshěn]
庭審
英文
court hearing-
Ung absconded from bail amid the court trial
黃於法庭審訊中途棄保潛逃。Before she can be arraigned. you see
然後才能參加庭審了解了?The next day, monday, was the first sitting of the assizes
第二天是星期一,是法庭開庭審判日子。The case will come on for trial tomorrow.
這個案件明天將開庭審理。Form a collegial panel to conduct the trial
組成合議庭開庭審理After the war, conventional war crimes by the japanese, categorized as class b and class c, were handled in local trials throughout asia
二次大戰后,日本人犯下的普通戰爭罪(歸類為乙級、丙級戰犯)由亞洲各國法庭審理。China revised the law of criminal procedure in 1996, which processed a little big reformation to the original criminal procedure system by absorbing and borrowing some effective procedures of the law system of the great britain and the usa. on the aspect of criminal justice, the justice method is from the original way of interrogation that is dominated by judge, to the present counterplot system that is dominated by both accusing party and accused party on lawcourt. this kind of inquire method on the lawcourt shall be more beneficial to protect the right of accused party and has the promoting function to realize the fair of justice
我國1996年修訂的《刑事訴訟法》 ,對原來的刑事訴訟制度進行了較大的改革,在某些方面借鑒和吸收了英美法系國家有益的做法,表現在刑事審判方式上,就是從以前由法官主導的審問制向由控辯雙方主導的對抗制進行轉變,對抗制的庭審方式應該更加有利於保障被告人的訴訟權利,對實現司法公正起到促進作用。He was tried by a county court in october, and convicted of illegally accepting $ 1. 6m in deposits from local residents
10月在縣法庭開庭審理,指控他的罪名是在當地非法集資1百60萬美元。The civil division hear appeal from the county court and the high court ; the criminal division hear appeal from the crown court. from the court of appeal, appeal lie to the house of lord
民事上訴庭審理來自郡法庭和高等法院的上訴;刑事上訴庭受理來自巡迴刑事法院的上訴。His case was brought up before the court.
他的案子已送交法庭審理。When does your case come before the court ?
你的案子什麼時候開庭審訊?General characteristics : person deictic words are much less used in legislative texts than those used in judicial and enforcement processes ; person deictic words in court hearings or legal literary works are much more frequently used than those used in jurisprudential texts
共性特點:立法語言人稱指示語的使用頻率低於司法語言和執法語言;法庭審理和法制文學作品中人稱指示語的使用頻率高於法律科學語言。Anna nicole smith is on the docket in two courtrooms
關于安娜.妮可.史密斯的官司分別在兩個法庭審理。So of course the citizen was only waiting for the wink of the word and he starts gassing out of him about the invincibles and the old guard and the men of sixtyseven and who fears to speak of ninetyeight and joe with him about all the fellows that were hanged, drawn and transported for the cause by drumhead courtmartial and a new ireland and new this, that and the other
接著就高談闊論起「常勝軍」啦,激進分子171啦,六七年那幫人172啦,還有那些怕談到九八年173的人什麼的。喬也跟他扯起那些為了事業經臨時軍事法庭審判而被絞死開膛或流放的人們,以及新愛爾蘭,新這個,新那個什麼的。The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure
以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導,結合我國的國情,對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善,在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子;在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念,以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實;在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則;在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據,其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據,增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度,補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的,取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定,改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。Set out from the peculiar procedure value, function and purpose of the public prosecution, the construction of the concrete mode of this system should be followed the principles of judicial examination on the subject, and substantive examination on the range and the rules avoiding the forejudge, basing on fact and taking law as criterion, in order to accord with the legal spirit and procedural theory of the public prosecution
從公訴審查特有的訴訟價值、功能和目的出發,公訴審查制度具體模式的構建應當遵循審查主體上的司法審查原則、審查范圍上的以定罪為中心的實體審原則、排除庭審法官預斷的原則以及以事實為根據以法律為準繩的原則和及時審理原則等,以符合公訴審查制度所內涵的法律精神和訴訟理念。Criticism of formalism in criminal court trials
刑事庭審質證形式主義現象之批判Next, ( normal procedure ) general court is assure order of front courtyard careful, the presiding judge is checking the court is made after party record general still was not pressed to the litigant of front courtyard on time be less than front courtyard to handle without warrant refus, make judgment by default
其次, (正規程序)一般法院為保證庭審秩序,審判長在核對當事人之後並作法庭記錄將仍未按時到庭的訴訟當事人按無正當理由拒不到庭處理,作缺席判決。With the ways of our countrys criminal litigation court trials changing from inquisitorial proceedings to adversary procedures and the progressing of the criminal jurisdiction reformation, discovery is becoming an unavoidable issue in criminal litigation in our country. in practice, many jurisdictional authorities in our country have tried to explore and try it since 1999. this article, through comparing the discovery system among britain, america and japan, through analyzing the present actual situation of our countrys criminal litigation and from the aspects of the litigation modes, jurisdiction justice and the necessity for deepening the reformation of criminal trials, has proved that it is necessary and emergent in practice and applicable in theory to establish the discovery regime in our country
隨著我國刑事訴訟法庭審判方式由審問制向對抗制的轉變和刑事審判方式改革的進一步深化,證據展示便成為刑事訴訟中的一個不可迴避的問題,實踐中不少司法機關從1999年始即已進行了證據展示的探索和嘗試,本文從英美日國家的證據展示制度的規定和比較入手,通過對我國刑事訴訟運作現狀的分析,從刑事訴訟模式、訴訟公正價值觀和深化刑事審判方式改革的角度,論證了證據展示制度在我國的建立具有現實上的必要性、緊迫性和理論上的合理性,並在此基礎上對證據展示的主體、責任、內容作了理論上的探討研究。On rules of leading questions
以刑事庭審方式改革為背景分享友人