權利客體 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [quánlìkètǐ]
權利客體
英文
object of right-
Compared with the civil contract and the traditional administrative act, the administrative contract is of its own characteristics of the subject, the object and the relation of rights and obligations. based on the above, this article analyzes the legal position of the administrative contract
行政合同與民事合同及傳統意義上的行政行為相比較,在主體、客體和權利義務方面具有自身的特點,在此基礎上分析行政合同的法律定位問題。The thesis lists five natures of the natural resources, on the base of which it discusses the merits and defects of the monopoly model and binary model, then presents the necessity of constructing a “ trisect model ” of real right system of natural resources. by making the comparison of nature and the objects between the civil real right system and the real right system of natural resources, this article believes that the real right system of natural resources, the need to implement the sustainable development strategy, is a new independent social right different from the civil real right system
本文深入的分析了自然資源的五大特徵(屬性) ,並以此為基點批判「一元」模式和「二元」模式的弊端與缺陷,提出構建「三元」模式自然資源物權制度的必然性;通過民事物權與自然資源物權在性質與客體兩方面的比較,認為自然資源物權是獨立於民事物權的新型權利,是環境危機背景下的可持續發展戰略的必然要求,屬于社會權,其制度構建應有別于作為私權代表的民事物權。The pledge right of intellectual property is one kind of pledge rights, it thus has the characteristics of property right, mortgage, subordinacy, and priority of payment, which are held by normal pledge right. because the subject - matter of intellectual property is a kind of chose in action, it therefore has some features different from other rights and duties in its object, way of establishing, and way of realization
知識產權質權是權利質權的一種,因而具有物權性、擔保性、從屬性、優先受償性等一般質權的特徵,但由於知識產權標的物為一種無體財產權,因而其在客體、設定方式、實現方式上有著不同於其他權利質權的特徵。On the basis of larenz ’ s sequence theory of object of right and layer theory of the first chapter of this article, the author argues that the substantial object of security rights should be the ownership and other property rights
作者以拉倫茨的權利客體順位理論以及在第一章所討論的權利客體的層次為基礎論證了擔保物權的實質權利客體應該是所有權和其他的財產權利。The author expounds subject, object and content of civil legal relation of spiritual damage
明確了精神損害賠償法律關系的權利主體、客體范圍和內容。The third part has analyzed the basic reasons for development of the present chinese political rights. these reasons have been demonstrated by means of the subject, the object and the content of rights
第三部分分析了當代中國政治權利發展的基本原因,涉及權利主體、權利客體、權利內容等方面。Practically and broadly speaking, intellectual property rights conflicts refer to not only conflicts between intellectual property rights but also conflicts between intellectual property rights and none intellectual property rights ( such as some civil rights and social public rights )
知識產權權利客體與權利的相對分離造成客體的利用效能增加,再加之知識產品的公共產品屬性使得知識產權權利大量衍生,現代意義上的知識產權是一個「權利束」 。Compared with the legislations in other countries or areas and regulation in our country, the author focuses on subject of rights, object of rights, condition and ways of obtaining rights, contents of rights, limitation on rights, duration of protection and protection of law
本部分結合國外立法,對布圖設計權的權利主體、權利客體、權利取得方式、保護期限、權利內容、權利限制及法律保護等進行研究,以揭示我國與國外在布圖設計保護制度方面的異同。This dissertation is about the object of security rights. chapter one of the article analyzes the basic content and notion of the object of right. after explaining the relationship between several similar concepts about object, the author provides many kinds of opinions about object of right, and at last draws such a conclusion at this point as follows : the object of right we usually talk about includes vache, right and act
文章首先對客體、標的、對象的關系進行了簡單界定,然後論述了對權利客體認識的多種不同觀點,並闡釋了筆者自己的認識:即我們通常所講的權利客體是權利本身所直接指向的對象,是最高層也是最後一層的客體,既包括物,也包括權利、行為,這要依據權利的性質和內容來判斷。With the background of the contrary of the theory of the object of rights and the humanist idea of personality is the essence of person, chinese legal researchers crate the abstract concept " personality interest " as the objects of the personality rights and the personality rights legal relationship to achieve the objective of protecting the personality
摘要在將人格視為人之根本的人文主義理想與權利客體理論矛盾的背景下,為了實現對人格的全面保護,我國學者採用了「人格利益」這一抽象概念作為人格權與人格權法律關系之客體。As for the measures in phase of legislation, it includes determining the limitation of rights, perfecting searching system of object of rights, confirming the legal principle of resolving conflicts etc. as for the measures in phase of remedy, it includes confirmed rights by relevant authorities, opposition procedure, interested person ' s application to relevant authorities for protection, as well as lawsuit arbitration etc. the thesis will analyze and study such conflicts by means of analyzing case and legal reasoning, in order to find out the ways by which the conflicts and contradictions will be resolved
立法方面的任務是確定權利的界限、完善權利客體的檢索審查機制、確認解決沖突的法律原則等,通過建立理想的確權模式來避免未來可能產生的權利沖突。法律救濟措施包括有關部門主動確權、異議程序、當事人向有關部門提出權利保護申請、訴訟或者仲裁等方面,目的在於通過具體的法律實踐,對權利沖突進行調和和整理,使調整各類權利的法律規范體系得以順利實施。從法律運行的角度看,商標權與字號權、域名權等相關權利的沖突既有立法的原因,又有執法、守法的原因。Then, the author shows us the significance of distinguishing the substantial object and formal object of security rights. chapter four of the article discusses the influence of the review of the security rights ’ object on the definition of “ thing ( sache ) ” and “ the object of thing ” in real right law
然後筆者論述了區分擔保物權實質客體和形式客體的意義:旨在更好的掌握所有權以外的其他權利作為擔保物權客體的情形、區分權利載體和權利客體、區分物上的所有權和使用權、期待權等擔保物權客體形態。Therefore by using comparative analysis, this paper distinguishes the real right of natural resources from the real right on right nature, right object, right content and limited settlement, holding that the real right of natural resources is a kind of social rights and differs from the real right which has civil attribute
為此,運用比較分析的方法,嚴格區分了自然資源物權與民事物權的權利性質、權利客體、權利內容與權利的處分限制,認為自然資源物權是社會權,而不同於民事物權的私權屬性。In the author ’ s point of view, the concerning issue involves perception of the legal attributes of intellectual property, thus a perspective of comparison between property and intellectual property would be a significant way to perceive the issue ; then the thesis compares the property and intellectual property in details in aspects of legal objects, definition, attributes, content and the remedies with a conclusion that the intellectual property has no essential difference with the property law, while general principles of the property law could act as a direct guide to intellectual property, and this is a rational foundation for intellectual property being stipulated in the chinese civil code ; lastly the thesis expounds the rationalism of intellectual property being stipulated in the chinese civil code and the general mode
對此,筆者認為,知識產權在民法典中立法地位問題,涉及對知識產權的法律屬性和特點的認識,因此,從知識產權和物權的比較角度來認識知識產權,無疑會是研究確立知識產權在民法典中立法地位的一個很好的視角。接著將知識產權和物權就權利客體、二者的概念,權利性質,權利內容,權利救濟這幾個方面加以比較探討。在此筆者得出認識:作為規范無形財產之支配、利用關系的法律,知識產權法與規范有形財產歸屬關系的物權法並無本質區別,物權法的基本原則,對于知識產權應當具有直接的指導作用,這使將知識產權納入民法典具有合理基礎。The duty to its property which the property rights main body is property all people, the property rights object is the property, the property rights content is property all people which enjoy the right and non - property all people has the obligation of not to encroach
所有權的主體是財產所有人,所有權的客體是財產,所有權的內容是財產所有人對其財產所享有的權利和非財產所有人負有不得侵犯的義務。It had stipulated the archives property rights legal relationship, here subject of object is file all people, the voluntary main body is outside all people unspecific anybody, the object is the archives, the property rights legal relationship content is file all people to the file which has enjoys the right which holds, the use, the income and punishes
它規定了檔案所有權的法律關系,這里的權利主體是檔案的所有人,義務主體是所有人以外不特定的任何人,客體是檔案,所有權法律關系的內容是檔案所有人對所擁有的檔案享有的佔有、使用、收益和處分的權利。But because object of the intellectual property right is the intelligence achievement that have not the material form, its right range is relatively wide, the form of expression of encroaching right is complicated and various, give encroachment of right of it assert, which make it difficulty to assert encroachment of right and comfirm the compensate for losses
然而由於知識產權的客體本身是不具有物質形態的智力成果,其權利范圍又相對較廣,侵權的表現形式復雜多樣,因此給它的侵權認定及其確定賠償損失帶來很大困難。Invention patent, utility patent and design patent are regarded as patent ' s object by our patent law. meanwhile, the ranges of the patent ' s object are confined by our patent law, which is embodied in fifth and twenty - fifth clauses
我國專利法將發明專利、實用新型、外觀設計作為專利權的客體,並對專利權客體范圍進行了限定,主要涉及專利法第五條、第二十五條。Rights which could conflict with trademark right mainly include right to trade name, rights of special name, packaging or ornament of well - known merchandise, personal rights related to marks, geographical indication, industrial design patent, copyright, domain name, name of newspapers or periodicals and rights of other names etc. those are external reasons that concurrent stipulation of different laws ( on some certain rights ), shortcomings and conflicts of laws themselves and making use of legal rights in evil
文字、圖形、形狀等既可以成為商標權的客體,也可以分別成為企業名稱、外觀設計、網路域名等權利的客體,造成不同權利請求權之間的矛盾。能夠與商標發生沖突的權利主要有:字號權、知名商品權、人身權中的標識性權利、地理標志權、外觀設計專利權、著作權、域名權、報刊名稱及其他名稱權等。And it can be as objects of subrogation right, right hypothec and can realize value of the right by transfer in the property right areas. chapter 3 focuses on the limitation of right of formation
同時,具有可轉讓性質的財產性形成權不僅可以成為代位權的客體、權利質權的客體,而且可以通過權利移轉來實現此類形成權的價值。分享友人