死刑存 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [sǐxíngcún]
死刑存
英文
capital punishment debate-
View from the economic, political and social backgrounds of present stage, the condition to abolish death penalty is far from being mature, but the system of death penalty in our country is born several defects, so we should strictly restrict the object and accusal that applied to death penalty through legislation and justice, demolish the procedure for judicial review of death penalty, carry out the system of the third instance as the final and add the institution of pardon
從我國現階段的經濟、政治與人文背景看,廢除死刑的條件尚不成熟,但我國的死刑制度存在不少缺陷,應從立法與司法上對死刑適用的對象,適用的罪名,加以嚴格限制,取消死刑復核程序,對死刑案件實行三審終審制度,增設死刑赦免制度。Those who believe in capital punishment may have arguments for its retention.
那些相信死刑的人可能有保存死刑的理由。His views on capital punishment are unpalatable to many
他對死刑存廢的見解許多人都不以為然In part ii, the eight circumstances in article 263 of criminal law are illustrated. in the author ' s view, these eight circumstances are just sentencing circumstances for sentence between 10 years imprisonment and death penalty. they are not punishment enhancement elements
在第二部分,筆者對刑法第263條規定的8種情節進行了闡述,認為刑法第263條規定的8種情形只是在10年至死刑之間選擇量刑的量刑情節,而非所謂的加重處罰情節,這8種情形本身不存在既遂、未遂問題,只有構成與否的問題。In 1764 becalia published study on crime committing and penalty and claimed the abolishment of death penalty, since then a worldwide debat e over the abolishment of death penalty started, the basic viewpoints of the two contradictory parties are of partial reasonability from their own standpoint, however the abolishment of death penally is an inevitable outcome of civilization development of human society
自從1764年,貝卡利亞發表《論犯罪與刑罰》主張廢除死刑以來,引發了一場世界范圍的死刑存廢之爭,雙方的基本觀點各有其合理性。但是,死刑的廢除是人類社會文明發展的必然結果。In june 2006, the repatriation of lai chang xing was again blocked, this case reflects three major legal impediments as china extraditing economic criminals in exile, i. e. the absence of extradition treaty, the issue of capital punishment, and the question on the fairness of china ' s justice system
摘要2006年6月,賴昌星遣返再次遇阻,此案折射出我國引渡外逃經濟罪犯存在三大主要法律障礙:引渡條約的缺位;死刑問題;司法公正問題。Human ’ s instinct of revenge will not be satisfied and justice will not be realized due to the abolishment of death penalty. on the contrary, death penalty abolishment advocates believe that death penalty is not the necessary way to punish the committer and there are some other punishments to execute revenge
死刑存置主義論者認為「殺人者死」是人的本能報復願望,如果廢除了死刑就失去了對殺人者施用罪有應得的報復手段,公正的觀念無法實現,作為人的本能的正當報復願望也將無法得到滿足。Problems in the procedure of death penalty review
死刑復核程序中存在的問題The existing problem of the procedure for the review of death sentence and prefect idea
死刑復核程序現存問題及完善之構想Reflection on the debate of the abolishment of death penalty
對死刑存廢論爭的思考Analyses the value of death penalty
關于死刑存廢的理性思考Logical debate on the reservation or abolishment of death penalty the query of feasibility
死刑存廢的邏輯辯論可行性問題Controversy of reserve or abolish of death penalty and the function of death penalty
第三部分,死刑存廢之爭和死刑功能。Dispute existing and abolishing in long - drawn - out death penalty, enable our having to face how to realize and appraise death penalty
摘要曠日持久的死刑存廢之爭,使我們不得不面對如何認識和評價死刑。Accordingly, the abolition of the death penalty will also be an inevitable conclusion. with the conclusions of the right to life is absolute commentators
如果說筆者對死刑存廢方面有所傾向的話,那就是認為現在談廢除死刑為時過早。Since the beginning of modern times, scholars in western societies began to reform the death penalty system or want to abolished it. at the same time, some scholars propose the retention death penalty position
根據人道主義、報應主義、功利主義的立場,把我國當前死刑存廢爭論中採取的主要觀點進行了歸納,並由此總結出研究現狀中存在的不足。The focus of debate on the retention or abolition of the death penalty, primarily focused on the following two concepts. they are the absolute and relative of life right, and utilitarianism and retributivism
本文並非要得出死刑本身是否存廢的結論,而是旨在通過對人道主義、報應主義、功利主義的綜合比較,得出我國研究死刑存廢問題應採取功利主義作為主要立場的結論。On the contrary, if the right to life as a relative concept, even if the death penalty imposed on other criminals is improper, the death penalty is imposed on murderers legitimate, natural and inevitable. retentionist commentators take this view
這不僅是直覺上認為我們的社會現狀不具備廢除死刑的條件,而且,從我國內部對于死刑存廢的研究上,可以看出研究者們對我國社會的認識還需要深入和細致。Since death penalty cannot be abolished currently, a rational attitude is how to correctly apply it. thus the application of death penalty has become a subject of study full of practical significance. a thorough study of the application of death penalty can provide a more scientific instruction for correctly applying death penalty, achieving judicial justice and preventing from wrong use of death penalty
本文立足於國內外的死刑研究成果,以刑罰基本理論為基石,運用對比分析、實證分析、規范分析等方法對死刑存廢問題、中國死刑存在價值、死刑政策、死刑適用標準、死緩適用問題以及若干死刑適用具體問題逐一進行了較為深入的系統研究。However, in fact, commentators of absolute and relative of life right often embarrassed to realize that the death penalty in reality possess a powerful deterrent, and sometimes had to apply the death penalty. therefore, utilitarianism and retributivism has become a major controversy positions
功利主義因其自身包含的注重社會整體利益、理性評價選擇制度的理論,有利於對死刑研究採取實證、科學的態度,因此,筆者認為,這是對我國死刑存廢研究最佳的理論基礎。分享友人