比較刑法 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [bǐjiàoxíngfǎ]
比較刑法 英文
comparative penal law
  • 比 : Ⅰ動詞1 （比較; 較量高下、 長短、距離、好壞等） compare; compete; contrast; match; emulate 2 （比...
  • 較 : Ⅰ動詞1 （比較） compare 2 [書面語] （計較） dispute Ⅱ副詞（比較） comparatively; relatively; fair...
  • 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 （由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱） law 2 （方法; 方式） way; method; mode; means 3 （標...
  • 比較 : 1 （對比） compare; compare with; contrast; parallel （with）; comparison; by comparison; in comp...
  1. This article starts with the origin of result - aggravated crime, and advancing the concept of result - aggravated crime by analyzing, contrasting and researching the basic theory of result - aggravated crime in foreign criminal law. the author give a comprehensive dissertation and analysis on the classify of result - aggravated crime and uncompleted - pattern of it, viz. whether existing uncompleted - pattern of result - aggravated crime, and on coacting offence, and the distinguish of correlational criminal conformation

    本文從結果加重犯的源起入手，通過對外國刑法中結果加重犯的基本理論問題進行分析、對比和研究，對結果加重犯的概念提出了自己的觀點，並對結果加重犯的分類、未遂問題，即是否存在未遂問題和結果加重犯的共同犯罪問題及其與相關犯罪形態的界定等問題進行了較為全面的論述和分析，在文章的最後還對我國刑法中有關結果加重犯的規定作出了評析並提出相關的完善建議。
  2. Secondly, to consummate the theory of fault to lay a more solid foundation, the article carried a comprehensive and thorough excavation on the coeval historical condition and cultural sources of each theory of fault lack of feelings. third, the article explained that because the theory development and the practice need, taking feelings into the theory of fault is urgency and necessity. at last, the article analyzed the contemporary scholar of criminal law failure in taking feelings into theory of fault, and had pointed out the road bring feelings into theory of fault

    本文首先通過三個層次的分析，表明了傳統罪過理論的不足之處，以及情感因素在傳統罪過理論分析中的尷尬處境;並對各個歷史形態的罪過理論的形成及其情感因素缺失的歷史條件和思想文化淵源進行了比較全面和深入的挖掘，以探源把脈，以能為進一步完善罪過理論奠定一個比較堅實的認識基礎;然後，說明了由於理論的發展和實踐的需要，罪過理論中納入情感因素的迫切性和必要性;最後，文章具體分析了當代刑法學者為將情感因素納入罪過理論所做努力之所以失敗的原因，進而提出了筆者自己對這一理論問題的解決方案。
  3. Judges meet regularly to compare sentences.

    法官們定期開會，比較課刑情況。
  4. According to the principle of " the synthetic distribution of punishment ", the author poses the concept of " the circumstance of distribution of punishment ", and taking the error making method, compares the " robbery of housebreaking " with there circumstances : the criminate, the sentencing, and the distribution of punishment, it is conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " should not be regarded as the circumstances of crime or the sentencing discretion, even though there are some barriers in the theory conclusions as a circumstance of distribution of punishment, so we can conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " can not be considered as the legal circumstances, it must be the circumstance of distribution of punishment even if it is regarded as the legal circumstances. in the process of jurist and legislation, we must strictly grasp the approval standards of the " house ", recognize and deploy the legal sentence of " robbery of housebreaking " correctly,

    根據「統一配刑論」的原理，筆者提出了「配刑情節」的概念，並採取歸謬法，將「入戶搶劫」同時置於定罪、量刑、配刑三種語境下進行比較，得出「入戶搶劫」既不應該是犯罪情節，也不可能是量刑情節，作為配刑情節也存在理論障礙的結論，進一步推斷出「入戶搶劫」不應該作為法定情節，即使作為法定情節也應該是配刑情節的結論，而且在司法和立法中應從嚴把握「戶」的認定標準，正確認識和配置「入戶搶劫」的法定刑，防止罪刑失衡，還對具體案件和審判實踐中要解決的幾個問題提供了參考方案。
  5. And the author advises that the criminal legislation on security crime of china should be completed from the following respects : ( 1 ) the improvement on the system of security crime, which includes the increasing of name of security crime and rearrangement on terms of security crime. the author thinks that some new security crimes should be prescribed in the criminal legislation on security crimes, especially about security crimes happened during curb exchange, during short - line exchange, during the use of security fund. ( 2 ) the improvement on the ways to undertake criminal responsibility of security crime

    筆者根據現實生活中存在的嚴重證券違法現象，提出在現行《公司法》 、 《刑法》 、 《證券法》規定的證券犯罪的基礎上增設一些證券犯罪，尤其是在目前的證券市場中比較猖獗的場外交易犯罪行為、短線交易犯罪行為以及改變募股資金用途犯罪行為，除此之外，還應當規范各個證券犯罪條文，使其互相照應。
  6. Through comparative analysis, which focused on the victim ’ s dissentient in the stage of censor prosecution, the stage when the decision of the first trial doesn ’ t take effect and already took effect, and on the basis of using the legislative and judicial experiences of other countries, the plan of specific relief system on the victim ’ s right to prosecute was brought out

    通過比較分析，以被害人對于刑事訴訟中國家公訴機關審查起訴階段、一審判決作出未生效之前和判決已生效三個不同階段司法機關作出的決定或裁判的異議進行分析，在借鑒其他國家的立法和司法實踐經驗基礎上，提出了被害人追訴權救濟的具體制度方案。
  7. The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure

    以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導，結合我國的國情，對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善，在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子；在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念，以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實；在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則；在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據，其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據，增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度，補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的，取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定，改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。
  8. Yet analyzed in the light of the theory concerning chinese criminal law, its limitations will show in the indefiniteness of its nature and status, the confusion of its standards

    但結合我國的刑法理論來分析，期待可能性理論也有其自身的局限性，具體表現為期待可能性的性質和地位無法界定，標準比較混亂。
  9. With the ways of our countrys criminal litigation court trials changing from inquisitorial proceedings to adversary procedures and the progressing of the criminal jurisdiction reformation, discovery is becoming an unavoidable issue in criminal litigation in our country. in practice, many jurisdictional authorities in our country have tried to explore and try it since 1999. this article, through comparing the discovery system among britain, america and japan, through analyzing the present actual situation of our countrys criminal litigation and from the aspects of the litigation modes, jurisdiction justice and the necessity for deepening the reformation of criminal trials, has proved that it is necessary and emergent in practice and applicable in theory to establish the discovery regime in our country

    隨著我國刑事訴訟法庭審判方式由審問制向對抗制的轉變和刑事審判方式改革的進一步深化，證據展示便成為刑事訴訟中的一個不可迴避的問題，實踐中不少司法機關從1999年始即已進行了證據展示的探索和嘗試，本文從英美日國家的證據展示制度的規定和比較入手，通過對我國刑事訴訟運作現狀的分析，從刑事訴訟模式、訴訟公正價值觀和深化刑事審判方式改革的角度，論證了證據展示制度在我國的建立具有現實上的必要性、緊迫性和理論上的合理性，並在此基礎上對證據展示的主體、責任、內容作了理論上的探討研究。
  10. I'm comparing only your ignorance and mine about penal institutions.

    我只是拿你我兩人對刑法機構的無知作個比較罷了。
  11. Comparative study on criminal legislation of crimes of manipulating securities and future trading price

    期貨交易價格罪刑事立法比較研究
  12. A contrastive study of unaccomplished crimes between the criminal laws in the continental law system and those in the aglo - american law system

    大陸法系國家刑法與英美法系國家刑法中犯罪未完成形態比較研究
  13. How to use of the currently in effect criminal procedure expert testimony system in the normal way, administrative control expert testimony institution and office workers, amplify necessary rules and regulations of the actuating of expert conclusion 、 implement of expert conclusion 、 argumentation of expert conclusion 、 authentication of expert conclusion ; up to protect litigation rights of parties in action, get on the stick of administration of justice 、 successfully achieve an end of administration of reasonable judgment all along is the focal point of the work and difficult point in our expert testimony system structure. in this paper, coupling our current the present situation of criminal expert testimony, to perfect the legal system, to resolve the problems of expert testimony system, the writer tried to study some problems of giving some enlightenment to the theory and practice of judicial appraisal institution, relate and analyze it and set forth the views and opinions on the settlement of some matters with six parts

    本文從分析刑事司法鑒定及其程序入手，比較兩大法系關于刑事司法鑒定的啟動、實施、質證、認證與採信等司法證明各環節的制度規定，透視我國刑事司法鑒定程序存在的基本問題，在此基礎上提出:規定鑒定期限、對無鑒定結果不能進入訴訟或準司法程序的情況，當事人可以申請公證機關公證鑒定啟動程序的真實性和合理性、建立鑒定人出庭作證制度、裁判者對鑒定結論認證通過質證程序形成心證的過程及理由應做出公開說明等有利於我國刑事司法鑒定程序改革的具體構想。
  14. A comparison between accomplice and criminal responsibility of civil - law system

    大陸法系共犯與刑事責任之比較
  15. The unilaterally common crime is a technical term within the criminal law of continental law system, being called " the latent common offender " criminal law of anglo - american law system, so - called and unilateral common crime be points a square to know perfectly well the another place at carrying out the crime but give the contribution secretly of circumstance

    片面共犯是刑法理論中爭議比較大的一個問題，它是一種古老的社會存在現象，但卻是一個理論新問題。從理論研究的角度而言，學說的爭論總是為了某些相關實際問題的解決而展開的。
  16. It is generally known that the legal environment in china processes its own characteristics due to the cultural and traditional differences between the chinese and western legal systems, and the construction of the criminal justice administration system was started only dozens of years ago, therefore, compared to the complete judicial systems in some western countries, the chinese system has some improper and imperfect parts in its structure, and some regulations seem too abstract and principled

    由於我國法律文化傳統與西方國家不同，法治環境有著自己特色而且新中國刑事訴訟法制建設也只有短短的幾十年時間，與其他國家完備的訴訟法制相比較，我國刑事訴訟中許多規定顯得過于抽象和原則，制度的構造上也有不合理、不完善之處。
  17. This essay plans to compare international criminal tribunal in the former yugoslavia ( icty ) and international war crimes tribunal in rwanda ( ictr ) with international criminal court ( icc ), and then discusses how to coordinate international and national jurisdictions

    從對前南和盧安達兩個法庭與國際刑事法院的管轄權的比較，分析國際性法院如何與國內法院的管轄權進行協調，以及何者更為優先的問題。
  18. Long with the development of the modern administration method, guarantees morely to the private benefits, request the nation undertake more indemnification duty, for this, the nation compensates the indemnification scope of the method to expand increasingly, this have become a fact for not undeniable fact. but conduct and actions the nation compensates the composing important item of the method, coming to a decision the breadth that compensate the scope directly narrow. this text around the nation compensates the composing important item of the duty, distinguishing from carry out the job behavior and return the principle of responsibilities, spirit indemnity to launch the treatise with duty exception four problems. pass to talk about to proceed the introduction, compare to the advanced method in abroad academic theories, analysis, analyze at the same time our country the nation compensates the shortage of the method, conceiving at from now on, our country the nation compensates the method how to proceed the mo dification perfect, with betterly conformance the development current that nation indemnification, expand gradually nation indemnification the scope of the duty, betterly the benefits of the opposite person in protection

    本文圍繞著國家賠償責任的構成要件，分別從執行職務行為、歸責原則、精神損害賠償和責任例外四個問題展開論述。通過對國外先進法學理論進行介紹、比較、評析，同時分析我國國家賠償法中的不足，設想在今後，我國國家賠償法如何進行修改和完善，以更好地順應國家賠償的發展潮流，逐步拓展國家賠償責任的范圍，更好地保護相對人的權益。執行職務行為是國家賠償責任構成要件的首要內容，在理論界和司法實踐中，爭論最多、難度最大的是關于職務行為和個人行為的區分問題，以及公安行政行為和刑事偵查行為的區分問題。
  19. Comparative penal jurisprudence

    比較刑法學
  20. The third chapter further points out some deficiency in 《 interpretation of intellectual property right 》 the fourth chapter deals with the problem that comparing with the cognizance of the identical trademark in civil field, whether the cognizance of the identical trademark in criminal law has the particularity

    第四章通過比較刑法中商標相同認定是否具有相對于商標民事領域中商標相同、近似認定而言的特殊性，進一步分析了如何體現這種特殊性，並指出了我國刑法中商標相同認定在標準和模式上存在的缺陷。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書