法律形式主義 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [fǎlǜxíngshìzhǔyì]
法律形式主義
英文
legal formalism- 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 (由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱) law 2 (方法; 方式) way; method; mode; means 3 (標...
- 律 : Ⅰ名1 (法律; 規則) law; rule; statute; regulation 2 (律詩的簡稱) short for lüshi 3 (姓氏) a ...
- 式 : 名詞1 (樣式) type; style 2 (格式) pattern; form 3 (儀式; 典禮) ceremony; ritual 4 (自然科...
- 義 : Ⅰ名詞1 (正義) justice; righteousness 2 (情誼) human ties; relationship 3 (意義) meaning; si...
- 法律 : law; statute法律保護 legal protection; 法律程序 legal procedure; 法律承認 de jure recognition (...
-
Judicial activism : judicial practice beyond legal formalism
司法實踐超越法律形式主義The argumentative approach to the subject is based on the theory of ideal types of law conceived by max weber p ? nonet and p ? selznick. the thread of the dissertation is the tendency of anti - formalism in modern law
以現代法律發展的反形式主義趨勢為主線,在反思民法、行政法等傳統法律模式的基礎上,從法律內容、法律推理、法律職業、法律機構幾方面展現了經濟法不同於傳統法律模式的新的法律特質。Along the thread, the author analyzes new legal characters of economic law in legal substance legal reasoning legal profession and legal institution, which are distinguished from traditionalistic law such as civil law administrative law, etc. the author puts forward a thesis that economic law is weberian substantive rational law or p ? nonet and p ? selznick ' s responsive law but not formal rational law or autonomous law
認為經濟法對法律形式主義的激烈反叛,即經濟法的實質化特點,表明了經濟法是一種馬克斯?韋伯所稱的實質理性法或者如諾內特和塞爾茲尼克所說的回應型法,而非傳統法律模式所體現的形式理性法或自治型法。Habermas ' criticism and transcendency about the law view of weber ' s pharisaism
哈貝馬斯對韋伯形式主義法律觀的批判與超越The turnaround of american tort law from traditional to modern embodied the trend from restricting tortuous liability to expanding. the basic reason of the trend was the transformation of economy and society in the advent of 20th century. at that time, the appeal court of new york became the pioneer in the innovation of american tort law by its eminent economic status and relatively exoteric judicial tradition. on the basis of refuting the formalism legal thought, cardozo carried on and develop the realistic legal thought of holmes and pound. meanwhile, he took full advantage of this practical legal thought in the field of american tort law
美國的侵權行為法由傳統向現代的轉向體現為從限制侵權責任到擴大侵權責任的趨勢,而這一趨勢的產生又是以19世紀末20世紀初美國經濟和社會的轉型為根本動因的。 20世紀初,紐約上訴法院以其顯赫的經濟地位、相對開放的司法傳統,而成為美國侵權行為法變革的先導。在批判形式主義法律思想的基礎上,卡多佐繼承和發展了霍姆斯、龐德等人的現實主義法律思想,並將這種務實的法律思想充分體現在了侵權行為法領域的實踐和創新中。The article uses the theory of act of real right to analyze the legal structure of ex - right disposal, and how to deal with ex - right disposal with the theory of act of real right
本文運用物權行為理論分析了無權處分行為的法律結構,以該理論的區分原則、形式主義原則和抽象性原則對解決無權處分行為的作用為著眼點闡述了如何採用物權行為理論解決無權處分行為。With regard to the theory of alteration of real right, the author firstly traces back to some theory on the alteration of real right in roman law and germanic law, and then tells us three theoretical patterns of alteration of real right based on the juristic acts chosen by the continental law family, finally gives us two types of construction patterns of the alteration of real right. part ii relates to the public summons of personal property right
對於物權變動理論,筆者首先追溯羅馬法和日耳曼法上有關物權變動的一些理論;接著介紹了現代大陸法系各國各自所採用的基於法律行為的物權變動的理論模式,主要有三種模式:債權意思主義、物權形式主義、債權形式主義;最後擺出了物權變動理論構建的兩種方式:以物權行為為核心的物權變動理論、以公示公信為核心的物權變動理論。Secondly, the author makes a brief introduction of the divergences for the understanding of the concept of the juristic act of real right, probes into the inner construction of the concept of the juristic act of real right, puts forward that we should combine the declaration of will and the forms and consider the legal effect to define the concept of the juristic act of real right and delineates the reasonability of this definition on the above basis, the author examines the relations between the concept of the juristic act of real right and the choice of different legislative models of patterns of real - right changing process and favors the german legislative pattern as the example to follow in our legislation
其次簡介了學界對物權行為概念的分歧,並深入剖析了物權行為概念的構成,提出了以意思表示與形式相結合,並吸納物權行為外在的法律效果來界定物權行為的概念,繼而闡釋了如此定義物權行為的合理性。並在此基礎上,探討了物權變動立法模式的選擇與物權行為概念的關系,提出了我國宜采德國式的物權變動立法模式的主張。最後歸納介紹了物權行為理論在現代法上的基本內容,即主要包括分離原則、抽象原則和形式主義原則,並探討了物權行為理論的適用范圍,提出了無因性原則的適用條件。Islamic law is a phenomenon so different from all other forms of law - notwithstanding , of course , a considerable and inevitable number of coincidences with one or the other of them as far as subject matter and positive enactments are concerned - that its study is indispensable in order to appreciate adequately the full range of possible legal phenomena
法是一種如此不同於所有其它法律形式的現象? ?毋庸置疑,盡管就其主要內容和有積極意義的法規而言,與其它法律形式中的這種或那種形式存在著相當數量的且不可避免的巧合相似之處? ?以致於對它進行研究便顯得不可或缺,以便充分理解有可能存在的法律現象的全部范圍。Islamic law is a phenomenon so different from all other forms of law ? notwithstanding , of course , a co iderable and inevitable number of coincidences with one or the other of them as far as subject matter and positive enactments are concerned ? that its study is indi e able in order to a reciate adequately the full range of po ible legal phenomena
伊斯蘭法是一種如此不同於所有其它法律形式的現象? ?毋庸置疑,盡管就其主要內容和有積極意義的法規而言,與其它法律形式中的這種或那種形式存在著相當數量的且不可避免的巧合相似之處? ?以致於對它進行研究便顯得不可或缺,以便充分理解有可能存在的法律現象的全部范圍。Legal formalism in jurisprudence
法理學中的法律形式主義In general jurisprudence, we might associate the ex post perspective with legal formalism
在一般法理學領域內,我們可能會將事後視角與法律形式主義聯系在一起。Holmes ' s critiques of legal formalism and law ' s normativity, without more, could easily be dismissed as nihilistic
如果不作進一步了解,霍姆斯對法律形式主義和法律的規范性的批評,很容易被人作為虛無主義而不予理會。Confronted with the impact and i nfluence, only do we wriggle out of the ties bound by formalism and burst through the limitations of our thought whence traditional legal mode sprung, we can better perceive economic law and legality construction of market economy in china
面對經濟法對傳統法律模式和法學知識體系的挑戰,我們只有擺脫法律形式主義的束縛,突破傳統法律模式設置的思維限制,才能更好地認識經濟法、更好地促進經濟法和我國市場經濟法制建設的發展。Negative crime and action crime are two kinds of crime forms. negative crime possesses all features of crime, its core is that it should perform particular duty but it didn ' t. negative crime divides into typical negative crime and non - typical negative crime. the causal relationship of act of omission and results of injurey possesses the features of indirect, subjective and reletion. the base of duty of action develops from form meaning to substance meaning. the duty in explicit terms, the duty caused by legal act and the duty caused by action in advance are the bases of duty of action. moral duty and custom are also the bases of duty of action. lt is a kind of legislation imagination to add the principle norm of negative crime and looking on unconcerned to others ' danger
不作為犯從其本身劃分,只能劃分為純正不作為犯和不純正不作為犯兩種形式。不作為犯的因果關系具有間接性、主觀性、關聯性的特點。作為義務的根據從形式意義向實質意義發展,不僅通說中法律明文規定的義務、法律行為引起的義務、先行行為引起的義務可以成為作為義務的根據,道德義務、良善風俗都可以成為作為義務的來源。Hart severely criticized two kinds of extreme rule patterns ormalism and skepticism with his own theory of rules as standard. he developed that legal interpreting principle was combined with " meaning concentration " and " open texture " ; dworkin strongly refuted hart ' s theory. he thought that law consists of rules, principles and policies and he expounded his elaborating and integrated legal interpretation theory
哈特以規則說為基礎,嚴厲批評了形式主義和規則懷疑主義兩種極端的規則模式,提出了法律的解釋原則是「意思中心」和「開放結構」規則形式的結合;德沃金堅決反對哈特的理論,認為法律是由規則、原則和政策構成的法律模式體系,論述了他的闡釋性的完整性的法律解釋理論。Distinguishing from formal reasoning, dialectical reasoning is a reasoning which can get definite knowledge in the discussion of problems ( topia ) by rebuttal, distinction and induction, when the legal or factual premise is absent, or the premise is controversial. in short, dialectical reasoning is an instrument to seek propositions and conclusions from possibility. in dialectical reasoning, judges often use their own judgments to find a legal or factual precondition
傳統的形式主義推理觀的機械性和局限性受到越來越多的批判,而現代法律推理學說更加關注非演繹的辯證推理在法律推理過程中的重要作用,哲學詮釋學的興起和實踐理性的復歸,也使辯證推理在各國的法律實踐中普遍運用起來,然而其明顯的價值判斷傾向使推理過程看起來過于主觀。The answers to these questions have important significance in thelegitimacy and sustainability of posner ’ s economic analysis of law, in theconnotation and extension of the definition of legal pragmatism and in theconsistency and compatibility of posner ’ s whole theory. it is not onlyrelated to posner ’ s economic analysis of law and his legal pragmatism, butalso related to the formation and development of posner ’ s whole theory. moreover, becauseofposner ’ sirreplaceablyimportantstatusinthesefields, it is even related to the whole field of economic analysis of law and legalpragmatism. however, the academe seems to have no recognition of the importanceof these issues, that most scholars ’ research on posner ( including domesticand foreign ) stillbasicallystaysinakindofsingle - anglemode, thatistosay, they either study posner ’ s economic analysis of law solely, or only discusshis legal pragmatism, ignoring the relationship between the two
本文從波斯納對自己早先提出的經濟分析法學所作的前後兩種截然不同的辯護? ?一個是基礎主義的辯護,一個是實用主義的辯護;一個是建構基礎的辯護,一個是拋棄基礎的辯護? ?出發,通過對「經濟分析法學與功利主義」 、 「經濟分析法學與新蘭德爾主義」 、 「法律實用主義與形式主義」這幾對關鍵概念之內涵及相互關系的界定,並從波氏法律實用主義對其經濟分析法學的影響,以及波氏經濟分析法學對其法律實用主義的影響這兩個方面出發,對波氏法律實用主義與波氏經濟分析法學之間的關系進行了深入的剖析,由此證明了二者之間的聯系和可調和性。Islamic law is a phenomenon so different from all other forms of law ? notwithstanding , of course , a considerable and inevitable number of coincidences with one or the other of them as far as subject matter and positive enactments are concerned ? that its study is indispensable insgroupsto appreciate adequately the full range of possible legal phenomena
伊斯蘭法是一種如此不同於所有其它法律形式的現象- -毋庸置疑,盡管就其主要內容和有積極意義的法規而言,與其它法律形式中的這種或那種形式存在著相當數量的且不可避免的巧合相似之處- -以致於對它進行研究便顯得不可或缺,以便充分理解有可能存在的法律現象的全部范圍。The third chapter expounds general principle of legal regulations of administrative monopoly, including the value aims, regulating patterns and legislative selection, definition of administrative and exemption systems
第三章論述了行政性壟斷法律規制的一般原理,包括法律規制的價值取向、規制方式與立法選擇行政性壟斷的界定以及適用除外製度,並特別指出應採取形式主義與效果主義兩者之所長來界定行政性壟斷。分享友人