法院的見解 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [fǎyuàndejiànjiě]
法院的見解
英文
consultary response- 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 (由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱) law 2 (方法; 方式) way; method; mode; means 3 (標...
- 院 : 名詞1 (院子) courtyard; yard; compound 2 (某些機關和公共處所的名稱) a designation for certain...
- 的 : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
- 見 : Ⅰ動詞1 (看到; 看見) see; catch sight of 2 (接觸; 遇到) meet with; be exposed to 3 (看得出; ...
- 解 : 解動詞(解送) send under guard
- 法院 : court of justice; law court; court; courthouse
- 見解 : view; opinion; understanding; idea; thesis
-
The intermediation conduct in courts in our country is a typical way of leading the nonlawsuits method in adr into lawsuits, that is, a judge performs some intermediation conduct between the two litigants as the intermediator
四、國內外相關制度的介紹、比較西方一些國家和地區像我國那樣完全與審判過程融為一體的法院調解很難找到,但由法官主持以促成當事人達成協議為目的的糾紛解決程序卻也常見。This makes the intermediation system to be the most characteristic one in our civil case judgment however, along with the diversification of the society value, the dispersion of the society construction and the concretization of the society relationship, not only because the finite judicial resources ca n ' t bear the increasingly dilating issues, but also because of the awakening of the party concerned corpus consciousness, the intermediation system in operation already ca n ' t approach the requirements of the society for dispute solving with fair and efficiency, and this inevitably request adjusting and reconstructing the intermediation system of our court. from here caused the dispassionate considerations of the numerous scholars. they bring upped the standpoint of different views, surrounding the " retain ", " discard " and " reformulate "
然而,隨著社會價值的多元化、社會結構的分散化和社會關系的契約化,不僅有限的司法資源已不堪日益膨脹的糾紛所帶來的重負,更由於當事人主體意識的覺醒,使得現行調解制度已無法面對社會對于糾紛解決的公正和效率的要求,這必然要求調整和重構我國法院的調解制度,並由此引發了眾多學者的冷靜思考,圍繞法院調解制度的「存」 、 「廢」 、 「改」 ,提出了很多見仁見智的觀點。Whether writing a demand letter to a contract breacher, an advice letter to a client, or a cover letter to a court clerk, the letter fails if the person receiving it cannot understand what it says
其實,不管是給違約者的正式請求書、給客戶的意見書,還是給法院書記員的說明書,只要收信人不能理解其說了些什麼,那這樣的律師函是不合格的。Research background in may, 1992, the criterion for stock company and the 13 documents attached prescribed that four kinds of stockholder ' s rights which are stocks for nation, corporation, public and foreign fund coexist in china ’ s securities business. until november, 2003, the chairman of negotiable securities surveillance management committee, shangfulin, stated publicly that there are existing the problem of the stockholder ' s rights minute sets 。 from then now, this term is used in the professional field and in the market. the state department admits the problem and put forward the guide policy to solve it
一、研究背景自1992年5月《股份公司規范意見》及13個配套文件出臺,明確規定在我國的證券市場有國家股、法人股、公眾股、外資股四種股權形式並存,到2003年11月證監會主席尚福林公開發表觀點說中國的股市存在股權分置的問題,由此,在學界、市場逐步採用了「股權分置」的說法,再到國務院承認中國股市存在股權分置的問題,並積極提出解決的方針。The right of person of the change that be torn open has the following : ( 1 ) acquire compensatory right lawfully ; in talk things over conditionally when agreeing, can undertake property right exchanges ; ( 2 ) execute property right to exchange, when the person that tear open change cannot offer house of property right exchange, requirement having right tears open change person to provide room of have enough to meet need ; ( 3 ) disagree to evaluating a report, classics party talks things over to still was not solved, can xiang yuan tears open change to evaluate an orgnaization to apply for check ; check result and evaluate a result formerly abhorrent, classics party talks things over to still do not amount to what see into consistent meaning to still can apply for technical appraisement ; ( 4 ) the manner that dismantles change to find a place for with respect to compensation with the person that tear open change, price talks things over when amounting to an agreement, application having right is in charge of office ruling ; ( 5 ) the disaffected of the adjudication that tear open change that makes to be in charge of mechanism place, authority is sued to people court, also authority perhaps applies for to reconsider to concerned branch appeal ; ( 6 ) authority obtains the allowance that tear open change to expend ; ( 7 ) do not tear open change lawfully to tearing open change person, can request to be in charge of mechanism to give administration punishment to tearing open change person ; ( 8 ) when because tear open change to the person cannot be fulfilled or cannot be fulfilled in the round, tearing open change agreement, authority applies for to concerned branch is solved or be sued to people court with respect to concerned matters concerned ; ( 9 ) other reach the right that enjoys according to it lawfully
被拆遷人的權利有以下幾點: ( 1 )依法獲得補償的權利;在有條件並協商一致時,可以進行產權調換; ( 2 )實行產權調換的,拆遷人不能一次提供產權調換房屋時,有權要求拆遷人提供周轉房; ( 3 )對評估報告有異議的,經當事人協商仍未解決,可以向原拆遷評估機構申請復核;復核結果與原評估結果不一致的,經當事人協商仍達不成一致意見的還可申請技術鑒定; ( 4 )與拆遷人就補償拆遷安置的方式、價格協商達不成協議時,有權申請主管機關裁決; ( 5 )對主管機關所作的拆遷裁決不服的,有權向人民法院起訴,也有權向有關部門申訴或者申請復議; ( 6 )有權獲得拆遷補助費; ( 7 )對于拆遷人不依法拆遷的,可以請求主管機關對于拆遷人給予行政處罰; ( 8 )因拆遷人不能履行或者不能全面履行拆遷協議時,有權就有關事宜申請有關部門解決或者向人民法院起訴; ( 9 )其他依法及依約享有的權利。The vice president of the supreme people s court, prc, mr wan e - xiang, visited the department on march 31 to learn about the legal aid system in hong kong. he was received by the director of legal aid, mr benjamin cheung ( left )
中國最高人民法院副院長萬鄂湘於三月三十一日到本署訪問,了解香港的法律援助制度,獲署長張景文(左)接見。One not a party to a case who volunteers to offer information on a point of law or some other aspect of the case to assist the court in deciding a matter before it "
據此可以理解,所謂的「法庭之友」 ,通常是對特定案件的事實或法律問題具有專業特長或獨到見解的專業人士,其向法院提供的報告將有助於法庭加深對特定案件的理解從而形成公正合理的判斷。This thesis is divided into five parts. in the first part, through the comparison between mortgage and the pledge rights, and drawing lessons from wang limin ( professor of china people ' s university ) ' s idea, the author gives a definition to the pledge rights : it ' s the rights that when the debtor does n ' t fulfill his obligation, the creditor can be given the legal rights to take possession of a house or some other property as a security for payment of money lent. then the author makes further explanation to the pledge rights from the which analyzes the legal meaning of returing the security wantonly, although the supreme court made it clear that " after the creditor returned the security to the debtor, and comfronts the third person based on the pledge rights, the court will not support it ", thecourt did n ' t explicit whether the pledge rights dies out or is invalid. the author poses out when in this situation, the pledge rights dies out
如在論述動產質權實現條件時,分析了我國《擔保法》第七十一條的不足之處並提出了自己的見解:職權人只能在非自身的原因未能受到清償時才能實現其質權;質權實現時質物價值超過約定價值的部分應歸出質人所有;而質權人怠於行使質權而使質物價值下跌的,質權人應承擔賠償責任。再如在分析任意返還質。物的法律意義時,針對最高人民法院盡管在其司法解釋中明確了「質權人將質物返i 」 a碩士學住論文v不示yw訂比』 sn正狠還于出質人後,以其質權對抗第三人的,人民法院不予支持」 ,但沒有明確此種情況下,質權是消滅還是無效的缺陷,筆者提出了質權人將質物返還于出質人或質物所有人的質權消滅的觀點。Decision of the supreme people ' s court and the ministry of justice on further strengthening the people ' s mediation and maintaining social stability
最高人民法院司法部關于進一步加強人民調解工作切實維護社會穩定的意見In deciding whether to negotiate for an out - of - court settlement in medical malpractice claims, the hospital authority ( ha ) would normally act on the advice of the legal advisor appointed by the insurer of its medical malpractice policy
在決定是否與申索人商討尋求庭外和解時,醫院管理局(醫管局)通常會依照其醫治失當保單承保機構所委派的法律顧問的意見行事。In light of different viewpoints on enlarging the scale, there have cropped up numerous haphazard, perceptional and even assumptive ideas and methods of work in higher vocational colleges in competition with each other, which will undoubtedly bring nothing but harm to the offering of new specialities - a most important and severe matter concerning the development of colleges
基於高職院校在相互競爭中對擴大規模的不同見解,出現了許多盲目的,感性化的甚至是想當然的想法和做法,這對于增設專業這一事關學校發展的至關重要的嚴肅問題,無疑是有百害而無一益的。First way that the european court of justice considers the case is if there is a reference from a national court, a national court has the trademark issue before it and it asks the european court for guidance at how a particular provision of national law should be interpreted
第一種方式是國內法院在審理一個商標案件的時候可能要求歐共體法院來提出自己的意見,就是當國內法院面臨一個商標問題,他覺得國內商標法中某一條需要得到解釋的時候,他希望歐共體法院能給出一個指引。分享友人