法院處理違法的人 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [yuànchǔwéiderén]
法院處理違法的人 英文
the courts deal with those who break the law. sell at reduced prices
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱) law 2 (方法; 方式) way; method; mode; means 3 (標...
  • : 名詞1 (院子) courtyard; yard; compound 2 (某些機關和公共處所的名稱) a designation for certain...
  • : 處名詞1 (地方) place 2 (方面; 某一點) part; point 3 (機關或機關里一個部門) department; offi...
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (物質組織的條紋) texture; grain (in wood skin etc ) 2 (道理;事理) reason; logic; tru...
  • : 動詞1. (不遵照; 不依從) disobey; defy; violate 2. (離別) part; leave; be separated
  • : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
  • 法院 : court of justice; law court; court; courthouse
  • 違法 : break the law; be illegal
  1. Finally, delivery of cargo without original bills of lading promote the development of shipping in a way in practice, it has reasonability in existence. chapter three is writer ' s study for 10 leading cases of chinese maritime court and court of cassation concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading, writer conclude as follows : chinese courts are inclined to regard it as breach of contract but not in tort in judicial practice ; chinese courts allow the plaintiff to choose to sue in tort or of breach ; chinese courts have abandoned the viewpoint of " who holder the bills who must have the right to sue " or " who holder the bills who must win the case " ; and in many cases concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading, the court ignored plaintiff ' s actions against the carrier, it proved that carrier can escape reasonability of delivery of cargo without original bills of lading in some cases

    第三章論述我國海事及其上級就無單放貨案件審審判實踐研究,通過對十個判例分析、歸納,筆者認為,在司實踐中,越來越傾向于將無單放貨糾紛視為運輸合同糾紛,而不認定為侵權行為糾紛;允許原告起訴時以侵權起訴或約起訴作出選擇;對提單持有訴權認定,已經不採用「誰持有提單誰就有訴權」與「誰持有提單就能保證勝訴」觀點;有諸多無單放貨訴訟案例以被駁回起訴為結局,證明了無單放貨在特定情況下性以及承運有避免承擔責任可能性。
  2. The courts deal with those who break the law.

    法院處理違法的人
  3. Firstly, some basic concepts are not clear, such as what is the status of the company under liquidation, how to define the action of the industrial - commercial authority ' s invalidation of the license of the company, whether or not the share holders can sue to disincorporate the company, is it legal to dissolve a company without liquidation, what is special liquidation, under what situation will a company be obliged to disincorporate, who will be responsible for liquidation after the dis incorporation, etc. secondly, some primary legislative principles about disincorporation and liquidation that are adopted in foreign countries are not established in china, such as a company must be liquidated before disincorporation except for acquisition, the company remains valid during the liquidation until it finishes the invalidation registration, an ordinary liquidation must be replaced by a special liquidation under the instruction of the court when there is an impediment or a fraud, the company should apply to the court for bankruptcy when it is found that its debt is over its asset during the liquidation, the number of people execute liquidation can be several or just one, companies applied for annulment shall be judged by the court and must be liquidated, etc. thirdly, china does n ' t have some of the fundamental rules that are specified in the laws of foreign countries, such as the rule of disincorporation registration, the rule that the company should sue to let the court judge for disincorporation if there is a deadlock between share holders, the rule of credit trade - off in special liquidation, the rule that people who execute the liquidation are jointly responsible for compensating the loss of the third party caused by their activities that are illegal or vicious, the rule of special liquidation, the rule of the representation of the people who execute the liquidation, the rule of the court supervising the liquidation in an inactive way, the rule of how long the accounts and documents should be kept after disincorporation, etc. because of the lack in research and legislation, the system for companies leaving the market is highly disorganized, which harmed the interest of the creditors and relevant people, increased the risk of market exchange, damaged the order of the market economy and the ethic of doing business, wasted the resources of the society, and impaired the authority and seriousness of the law

    再次,國外立一些基本制度我國沒有,如解散登記制度,股東出現僵局訴請判決解散制度,特別清算中債權協定製度,清算或惡意對第三承擔連帶賠償責任制度,司特別清算制度,清算代表性制度,消極監督清算制度,帳薄及文件在公司解散后保存定期限制度等。由於論研究和立不足,造成了我國公司退出市場機制嚴重混亂,損害了債權和利害關系利益,增加了市場主體交易不安全感,破壞了市場經濟秩序和商業道德,浪費了社會資源,削弱了權威性和嚴肅性。文章認為,完善我國公司解散和清算制度,應借鑒和引進發達國家論和律制度,統一我國有關解散和清算立,在基本概念、基本原則、基本制度、基本程序諸方面進行統一規范,填補立空白,創設解散公司制度,廢除行政特別清算制度代之以司特別清算制度,健全和嚴格反清算規定律責任制度(包括民事責任,刑事責任,行政責任,改變現行行政罰范圍偏廣,民事賠償范圍偏窄,刑事追究空白太多不協調狀況) ,從而構築起科學公司解散和清算制度,使之符合我國經濟生活客觀需求,符合市場經濟發展基本方向,並與國外立通例趨同。
  4. Article 22 if the trustee disposes of the trust property against the purposes of the trust or causes losses to the trust property due to violation of the management duties or improper handling of the trust affairs, the trustor has the right to apply to the people ' s court for withdrawing the disposition ; he also has the right to ask the trustee to revert the trust property or make compensation ; if the transferee accepts the trust property though he is fully aware that it is against the purposes of the trust, he shall return the trust property or make compensation

    第二十二條受託反信託目分信託財產或者因背管職責、信託事務不當致使信託財產受到損失,委託有權申請撤銷該分行為,並有權要求受託恢復信託財產原狀或者予以賠償;該信託財產受讓明知是反信託目而接受該財產,應當予以返還或者予以賠償。
  5. Article 23 if the trustee disposes the trust property against the purposes of the trust or is at serious fault when managing, utilizing or disposing of the trust property, the trustor has the right to remove the trustee according to the provisions of the trust documents or apply to the people ' s court to remove the trustee

    第二十三條受託反信託目分信託財產或者管運用、分信託財產有重大過失,委託有權依照信託文件規定解任受託,或者申請解任受託
  6. Part one : thc conccpt and valuc analysis of judicial review system of constitutionality judicial review system of constitutionality is a fundamental system with legal sense to prevent violation of the constitution, which refers to that specially designated state organs examine and conduct whether certain legis1ation or certain acts are constitutional or not. ( generally it refers to the acts of state organ leaders, but in some states, it also includes the acts of political parties, for instance, germany l l l constitutional court can exaxnine the organianion and acts of political pwties. )

    第一部分:憲審查制度概念與價值分析憲審查制度是指由特定國家機關對某項立或者某種行為(通常為國家機關領導行為,有些國家還包括政黨行為,例如德國憲可以審查政黨組織和行為)是否合憲所進行具有律意義審查和一種基本制度,是一種為防止憲而設立專門制度。
  7. Of the nonperformance after did not come to an agreement via mediation or coming to an agreement, public security mechanism ought to according to the regulation of this law manages behavior person to give punishment to violating public order, inform party to be able to mention to people court lawfully with respect to civil controversy civil suit

    經調解未達成協議或者達成協議后不履行,公安機關應當依照本規定對反治安治行為給予罰,並告知當事可以就民事爭議依提起民事訴訟。
分享友人