注冊在先原則 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [zhùcèzàixiānyuánzé]
注冊在先原則 英文
principle of first a lication
  • 注 : Ⅰ動詞1 （灌入） pour; irrigate 2 （集中） concentrate on; fix on; focus on 3 （用文字來解釋字句）...
  • 冊 : Ⅰ名詞（冊子） volume; book Ⅱ量詞copy
  • 先 : 名詞1 （時間或次序在前的） earlier; before; first; in advance 2 （祖先; 上代） elder generation; ...
  • 原 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （最初的; 原來的） primary; original; former 2 （沒有加工的） unprocessed; raw Ⅱ動詞（原...
  • 則 : Ⅰ名詞1 （規范） standard; norm; criterion 2 （規則） regulation; rule; law 3 （姓氏） a surname Ⅱ...
  • 注冊 : logon; post; charge of registration; register
  1. Principle of first application

    注冊在先原則
  2. Principle of first

    注冊在先原則
  3. Article 25 where two or more enterprises dispute over one same or similar enterprise name already registered, the competent registration authority shall make a decision according to the principle of earlier registration

    第二十五條兩個以上的企業因已登記注冊的企業名稱相同或者近似而發生爭議時，登記主管機關依照注冊在先原則處理。
  4. And on the basis of that, it is of great significance to achieve healthy development of the profession. the dissertation defines the law concepts relative to cpa civil liability firstly, then it focuses on the analysis of the following controversial areas in law : definitive principles for auditing tort liability, the judging criteria of fault etc., and it states the legal status of independent auditing standards from the perspective of law ; further, to complete the law analysis, the dissertation analyzes definitive principles of the cpa ’ s legal liability and the game between the interest of social publics and the interest of cpa from the perspective of economics. then, by reviewing different legal status of generally accepted auditing standards in different historical periods in american, the author studies the legal status of independent auditing standards in china regarding our specific legal and economic environment

    本文首先從注冊會計師民事法律責任相關的法律概念入手，重點對審計侵權責任的歸責原則、過錯判斷標準等一些在法學界存在爭議的關鍵領域展開分析，從法律角度闡述了獨立審計準則法律地位問題;進而從經濟學的視角對注冊會計師民事責任歸責原則和社會公眾與注冊會計師的利益博弈展開了分析，作為對法律分析的輔證;然後在考察借鑒不同歷史時期美國獨立審計準則法律地位的基礎上，結合我國特定的法律和經濟等環境，對我國獨立審計準則的法律地位問題進行了研究，認為:獨立審計準則具有一定的法律地位，應當作為我國注冊會計師法律責任認定的一般原則，但並非判斷注冊會計師執業時是否存在「過失」的唯一基準。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書