濫用訴訟權利 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [lànyòngsùsòngquánlì]
濫用訴訟權利 英文
abuse of process
  • 濫 : 動詞（泛濫） overflow; flood; inundateⅡ形容詞（差的; 陳腐的） shoddy; hackneyed; stale; trite Ⅲ副...
  • 用 : Ⅰ動詞1 （使用） use; employ; apply 2 （多用於否定: 需要） need 3 （敬辭: 吃; 喝） eat; drink Ⅱ名...
  • 訴 : 動詞1. （說給人） tell; relate; inform 2. （傾吐） complain; accuse 3. （控告） appeal to; resort to
  • 訟 : 動詞1. （打官司） bring a case to court 2. （爭辯是非） dispute; argue
  • 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] （秤錘） counterpoise; weight （of a steelyard）2 （權力） power; authority 3 （...
  • 濫用 : abuse; misuse; use indiscriminately
  • 訴訟 : [法律] lawsuit; litigation; legal action; judicial action; action
  • 權利 : rightinterest
  1. Principle of faith vs abuse of civil procedure

    誠實信用原則對訴訟權利濫用之制衡
  2. In the forth part, the writer discusses the conditions when judge exercises the right of discretion in allocating the burden of proof. there are four conditions as followed : l, court proceeding and court debate have ended ; 2, non liquet ; 3, not regulated by law ; 4, not regulated by judicial interpretation

    在論述遵循誠實信用原則時，作者認為應考慮以下幾個方面:一是以不正當方法形成有利於自己的訴訟狀態;二是惡意訴訟;三是濫用訴訟權利、拖延訴訟;四是翻悔自認;五是提供證據的不正當行為。
  3. The author analyses the necessity of theoretical research on apr, and she also presents the research method is comparative analysis

    提出研究當事人濫用訴訟權利的必要性，以及提出本文研究當事人濫用訴訟權利的方法，即比較法研究的可行性。
  4. Therefore, in this article, the author does the theoretical research on apr by comparative analysis. and on this basis, she gives her own idea about how to constrain abuse of procedural rights in our judicial system

    因此，本文嘗試對當事人濫用訴訟權利及其相應的法律規制進行比較法研究，並在此基礎上，嘗試建構我國規制當事人濫用訴訟權利的體系。
  5. The third part : constraint thesis. after discussing theoretical basis of constraint of apr, the author generalizes two main model of constraint of apr in the world

    並著重在分析和比較世界主要國家對當事人濫用訴訟權利之法律規制的基礎上，歸納的出規制當事人濫用訴訟權利的兩大模式。
  6. Due to lack of our theoretical research on abuse of procedural rights ( apr ), lack of structural legal constraint of apr, abuse of procedural rights is common in our judicial practices

    但由於我國對當事人濫用訴訟權利理論研究的缺乏，再加之規制當事人濫用訴訟權利的法律制度又存在結構性缺陷，從而造成我國這方面的研究處于空白。
  7. The restraints towards the parties for its action behavior, including : a ) the parties cannot use improper conducts to file a lawsuit with actual malice, b ) they cannot abuse their rights of action and misrepresent before courts to influence its judgment, c ) they will not lose their rights of action, and d ) estoppel ; 2

    誠實信用原則的適用具體體現在： 1對當事人訴訟行為的約束，包括：禁止不正當行為惡意製造訴訟狀態，禁止濫用訴訟權利，禁止虛假陳述影響法院正確判決，禁反言，訴訟上權能喪失。
  8. In order to balance equity and efficiency and realize balance mechanism, the company legislation should construct a double system of encouraging and holding : widen plaintiff and appeilee qualification ; ease the cost of plaintiff to depress sill of shareholders deputy litigation ; establish preceding procedure and litigation cost guarantee system ; restrain dealing right og plaintiff shareholders ; defini

    為了兼顧公平與效率，公司立法應當努力構築良好的激勵和約束的雙重機制:告資格，置程序，擴大被告范圍，減輕原告的費用負擔，以降低股東代表訴訟的門檻;放寬原設立前設立訴訟費用擔保制度，限制原告股東的處分權利，明確股東敗訴時的賠償責任，以防止股東代表訴訟的濫用。
  9. From a microcosmic view, the article adopts analyzing methods of illustration, induction and comparison. at the same time, it exerts the logic reasoning rules, from small issues to large ones, from phenomena of a problem to its essences, as well as from construction of a specific patent claims to deduction of different systems for defending patent infringement claims. in addition, in consideration of the complexity and diversity of patent infringement defense systems, the article classifies and specifies them from different angles, and at the end of the article, conceives the future legislation pattern of china regarding patent infringement defense

    第三章如何構建專利侵權抗辯制度體系著眼于權利要求解析，借鑒外國的先進立法和實務經驗，結合中國實際，將專利侵權抗辯制度系分為合同抗辯、訴訟時效抗辯、證據抗辯、訴訟主體資格抗辯、禁止反悔抗辯、濫用專利權抗辯、不侵權抗辯、不視為侵權抗辯、已有技術抗辯以及專利無效抗辯等十個具體制度，並側重於中國特色和專利特點兩個層面，對它們進行了深入探討和分析。
  10. If we ignored the unity of the two above, and insisted on restraining the defendant ' s procedure rights in order to punish offenders efficiently, the abuse of judicial power and higher rate of mistaken cases would appear. at the same time, the goal of controlling the crime efficiently would be hard to attain. on the other hand, if the defendant ' s interests were absolutely superior to the interests of the society and its other members, the substantive reality and the value of criminal procedure would not be ensured and the order of the law would be in the failure of safeguarding

    忽視兩者的統一性，主張為高效率的懲治犯罪而限制被告人的訴訟權利，會產生司法權濫用的弊害，並導致較高的錯案率，其高效率抑制犯罪的目的的實現也會受到妨礙；反之，如果將被告人利益置於絕對優越的地位，使之凌駕于社會及其他成員的利益之上，則會貶抑實體真實及刑事程序價值，法律秩序得不到有效維護。
  11. The derivative action system is helpful to protect the legal interests of the corporation and a few shareholders, and restrict the senior partner, director and the manager to abuse the managerial authority

    股東派生訴訟制度有利於維護公司和中少數股東的合法權益，限制大股東、董事及經理濫用公司經營權，保證公司健康運作。
  12. The contemporary civil procedural law sets up the principle of good faith because of the following reasons : it possesses the characteristics, which the basic principle of the civil procedural law should have, and three functions, with which it can prevent the rights of action and trial from being abused, uniquely explain the statutory law, and supplement the missing meaning of it. the principle is the result of adjustment and influence by the concept of the rights in the standard of society and the idea of action

    現代民事訴訟法確立誠信原則的法律依據如下：它具有民事訴訟法基本原則應有的屬性和三大功能，其獨特的防止訴權和審判權的濫用，解釋成文法和規定欠缺的補充功能不可替代，是民事訴訟程序公正價值目標要求，社會本位權利思想及訴訟理念調整影響的結果，是現代公法與私法的融合、實體法和程序法相互彌補的產物。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書