無形權利 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [wúxíngquánlì]
無形權利
英文
incorporeal rights-
You expressly understand and agree that accoona shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or exemplary damages, including but not limited to, damages for loss of profits, goodwill, use, data or other intangible losses even if accoona has been advised of the possibility of such damages, resulting from : the use or the inability to use the service ; the cost of procurement of substitute goods and services resulting from any goods, data, information or services purchased or obtained or messages received or transactions entered into through or from the service ; unauthorized access to or alteration of your transmissions or data ; statements or conduct of any third party on the service ; or any other matter relating to the service
您明確了解並同意，基於以下原因而造成之利潤、商譽、使用、資料損失或其他無形損失， accoona不承擔任何直接、間接、附帶、特別、衍生性或懲罰性賠償（即使accoona已被告知如前所述的賠償之可能性） （ i ）本服務之使用或無法使用， （ ii ）經由或透過本服務購買或取得之任何商品、資料、資訊或服務，或接收之訊息，或進行之交易所衍生之替代商品及服務之購買成本， （ iii ）您的傳輸或資料遭到未獲授權的存取或變造， （ iv ）本服務中任何第三人之聲明或行為，或（ v ）本服務其他相關事宜。You agree that sahaja yoga hk shall not be responsible or liable for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as the result of any such dealings or as the result of the presence of such advertisers on sahaja yoga hk. 7. you expressly understand and agree that sahaja yoga hk shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or exemplary damages, including but not limited to, damages for loss or profits, goodwill, use, data or other intangible losses, resulting from the use or inability to use the service ; unauthorized access to or alteration of your transmissions or data ; statements or conduct of any third party on the service ; or any other matter relating to the service
7 .您明確了解並同意，基於以下原因而造成之損失，包括但不限於利潤商譽使用資料損失或其他無形損失霎哈嘉瑜伽不承擔任何直接間接附帶特別衍生性或懲罰性賠償即使霎哈嘉瑜伽已被告知前開賠償之可能性亦然: i本服務之使用或無法使用， ii經由或透過本服務購買或取得之任何商品資料資訊或服務，或接收之訊息，或進行之交易所衍生之替代商品及服務之購買成本， iii您的傳輸或資料遭到未獲授權的存取或變造， iv本服務中任何第三人之聲明或行為，或v本服務其他相關事宜。This article contains three parts, namely, preface, body and conclusion. the preface mainly introduces the discussing subject and writing purposes of this article. body is divided into four parts : from the beginning of actio in rem and actio in personam in roman law, the first part detailedly inspects and analyses the formation process of the dual rights system in historical research methods ; the second part discusses the theoretical framework of the dual rights structure from the aspect of system ; the third part mainly analyses the middle rights and the integration of real rights and creditor ’ s rights and the reasons for the emergence of these phenomena, pointing out that the emergence of these phenomena is unevitable in civil law system which ajusts social relationship with systematic code, and how
正文分為四個部分:第一部分採用歷史研究的方法，從羅馬法上的對人之訴和對物之訴出發，對物債二分體系的形成過程進行了細致的考察和分析;第二部分從體系化的角度討論了物債二分體系的理論構成，對其理論架構進行了總體上的研究;第三部分著重分析了物權與債權的融合和中間狀態及其出現這些現象的原因，指出在運用體系化的方法調整社會關系的過程中，出現物權和債權中間狀態的權利形態是不可避免的現象，並對如何正確看待這些問題進行了論證;第四部分在前文論述的基礎上，對我國一些學者提出的制定財產法和設立財產法總則的觀點的可行性進行了分析，指出無論是從我國大陸法系的傳統還是從技術層面來看，制定財產法或設立財產法總則都是不可行的。While, intangible assets are apt to be subject to intercross and conflicts in that it can be held, made use of and benefited by different subjects
但是由於無形財產可同時被多個主體所佔有、使用和收益，因而更容易引發權利交叉和權利沖突。After a comparative law survey and analysis of scholars ’ opinions on this matter, i am convinced that the revocatory right refers to the right enjoyed by the beneficiary who can revoke the disposition so as to make it void, when the trustee, in breach of trust, disposes of the trust property
所謂信託受益人的撤銷權系指在信託關系中，受託人違反信託目的處分信託財產的，受益人得撤銷該處分行為使之歸于無效的權利。該撤銷權是一種形成權，其法律意義主要在於，作為一種救濟措施，可供受益人選擇以維護其信託受益權。On the basis of this point of view and theories of civil law, it points out that delivery cargo by carrier without bill of lading is the breach of contract and may be the tort, however, while by agents of the carrier, it must be tort because of the non - contractual relationship between the holder of bill of lading and him. furthermore, this article gives out the solution to them. this paper also explains the defence of the carrier in the judicial practice and the effect of exemption clause in bill of lading
在此基礎上，根據民法的基本理論，分析了不同的行為主體實施的無單放貨行為的性質，認為承運人實施的無單放貨行為對提單持有人構成了違約，並有可能對其構成侵權，因此往往形成違約責任和侵權責任的競合；而承運人的代理人或其他人因為與提單持有人之間沒有提單形成的權利義務關系，因此他的無單放貨行為只能構成侵權行為。Discriminating against this word is not to have fault originally square patent, but this one word is used at be to already covered fault oneself however nowadays, damage the excuse of other interest and public interest, convict is what already covered misdeed oneself to take off a word, and another word thought fors the time being also the chu zhong that virtually changed it, become the important affiliated to a ministry that engage in a lawsuit, deserve dimension authority did not get, become defendant instead, let a person let a person think over really with profundity discuss
歧視這詞原本是無過錯方的專利，可如今這一詞卻用於為自已掩蓋過錯，損害他人利益及大眾利益的借口，罪犯為自已掩蓋罪行的脫詞，而另一個詞維權也無形中改變了它的初忠，成為打官司的重要部屬，該得到維權沒有得到，反成被告，真讓人讓人反思與深刻的探討Since it has characteristics such as intangibility, prescription and regional definition, which real right and other civil rights do n ' t have, the possibilities and actual chances of invasions of copyrighter ' s exclusive utility are much more frequent and universal than that of the latter
由於其客體無形、具有地域性、受法定時間限制之類物權等民事權利不具有的特點，權利人的專有權范圍被他人無意及無過失闖入的可能性與實際機會，比物權等權利多得多、普遍得多。Intangible a ets include goodwill, patents, trademarks, copyrights, and franchise
無形資產包括商譽、專利權、商標、版權，以及專營權。Taking the effect of presumption of registration as its logical premise, the application of the effect of public conviction comprises the following general conditions : the protected party acting in good faith, the inconsistency between legal estate right and factual estate right, the legal acquisition of estate right of the third party, the justifiability of registration absent from " disagreement registration "
公信力一般適用條件包括受保護的人需為善意、法律物權與事實物權的不一致狀態、第三人取得物權的行為須基於法律行為、登記的正當性需無「異議登記」 。應將公信力適用上的法例外規定作為對登記權利外形相應的補強參數，以增強公信力的適用正當性，第三部分登記公信力的價值訴求。The remedy system of anticipatory breach is a new thing to china. the main purpose of this essay is to find out what is anticipatory breach of contract and the rights of the innocent party from studying continental genealogy of law, anglo - american genealogy of law, international convention and international customs. this essay includes nine parts
英美法上創立的預期毀約制度，根據不同的預期毀約情形賦予守約方在履行期限到來之前享有不同的權利：或解除合同，提起損害賠償訴訟，使守約方從無望的合同中解脫出來；或中止合同的履行，要求對方提供保證，減低守約方的不安全感。Trade secret is the intellectual creation of the proprietors as a kind of intangible property. therefore, it belongs to the intellectual property
商業秘密是權利人的智力勞動成果，屬于無形財產，因此，商業秘密屬于知識產權范疇。The extent of the common wealth should be limited and stipulated definitely, while the extent of the individual wealth should be enlarged to a certain degree. 2. the reversionary interest of marital property should be provided and the damages system should be set up
表現在:第一，我國婚後所得共同制中的夫妻共同財產范圍失之過寬，不利於保護個人財產所有權;第二，夫妻約定財產制難以適用，名存實亡;第三，缺乏對婚姻關系存續期間無形財產的保護等。Business secrets are kind of nomaterial assets. they can bring about economic benefits to the obligee
商業秘密是生產者、經營者所擁有的無形資產，它能為權利人帶來經濟利益。In the author ’ s point of view, the concerning issue involves perception of the legal attributes of intellectual property, thus a perspective of comparison between property and intellectual property would be a significant way to perceive the issue ; then the thesis compares the property and intellectual property in details in aspects of legal objects, definition, attributes, content and the remedies with a conclusion that the intellectual property has no essential difference with the property law, while general principles of the property law could act as a direct guide to intellectual property, and this is a rational foundation for intellectual property being stipulated in the chinese civil code ; lastly the thesis expounds the rationalism of intellectual property being stipulated in the chinese civil code and the general mode
對此，筆者認為，知識產權在民法典中立法地位問題，涉及對知識產權的法律屬性和特點的認識，因此，從知識產權和物權的比較角度來認識知識產權，無疑會是研究確立知識產權在民法典中立法地位的一個很好的視角。接著將知識產權和物權就權利客體、二者的概念，權利性質，權利內容，權利救濟這幾個方面加以比較探討。在此筆者得出認識:作為規范無形財產之支配、利用關系的法律，知識產權法與規范有形財產歸屬關系的物權法並無本質區別，物權法的基本原則，對于知識產權應當具有直接的指導作用，這使將知識產權納入民法典具有合理基礎。Thus, in tort cases, especially in those complicated and long - term intellectual asset cases, it is very easy to leave vacancy where law cannot regulate if an obligee gets no timely and effective provisional redress for a certain lasting tort, which will induce damage to legal rights and interests without remediation
對民事侵權案件，特別是案情復雜、訴訟周期普遍較長的知識產權案件，若權利人針對持續的侵權行為，在訴前或訴中無法獲得及時、有效的臨時性救濟，極易形成法律調整的空白，最終導致合法權益遭受無法補救的損失。This article is mainly a discussion on the spiritual damage compensation for close relatives of victim under the situations of damage to right of life, damage to the right of health and damage to the right of personality of the dead, which is based on an introduction and comparison of the concerned foreign legal regulations and academic theories and in combination with the legal practice in china wherefore the author put forwards his own ideas as following : first, under the condition that there is a distance of time between inj ury and death, the close relatives of the dead shall inherit the right of claim for spiritual damage compensation of the dead for the suffering before his death, in addition to their own intrinsic right of claim for spiritual damage compensation ; the second, under the condition that the inflictor has caused the disablement of the sufferer or serious damage to his health, the close relative in a limited cycle of the sufferer should be granted with the right of claim for spiritual damage compensation, which is confirmed in law and becomes a practice in foreign countries ; the third, since the aim of the law to protect the personality of the dead from infringement is to protect the benefits of the close relatives of the dead and to maintain public benefits, is constituted on the personality of the dead the close relative of the dead may initial legal proceeding for spiritual damage compensation
本文重點探討的就是公民生命權受到侵害、健康權受到侵害、 「死者人格」受到侵害這三種情形下的受害人近親屬的精神損害賠償請求權問題。探討以介紹和比較國外相關法律規定和學術理論為前提，結合我國的實際情況，從理論與實踐相結合的角度對以上各問題分別進行了分析，並提出了作者自己的一些見解：第一、在公民從受傷害到死亡有一段時間距離的情形下，死者的近親屬除依法享有其固有的精神損害賠償請求權以外，還可以繼承死者生前就其所受之精神損害而享有的精神損害賠償請求權；第二、在加害人的行為已造成直接受害人殘疾，或者是造成其健康嚴重受損的其他後果的情形下，我國應在借鑒國外已有立法和判例的基礎上，賦予一定范圍內的受害人近親屬以精神損害賠償請求權；第三、法律保護死者人格不受侵害的目的是為了保護死者近親屬的利益和維護公共利益，一般情形下，只要死者近親屬能證明其訴訟主體的合法性，能夠證實侵害「死者人格」的行為已構成侵權，即可推定死者近親屬因此而遭受了精神痛苦? ?無須舉證的「名義上的精神損害」 ，死者近親屬即可提起精神損害賠償之訴。最後，本文認為，加強對受害人近親屬的權利和利益保護問題的研究，既有一定的必要性，同時又具有十分重要的現實意義。Study on it doesn ’ t finalize the design yet abroad and start just in china. the question of merchandising right originated from britain and america
作為一種無形財產權，它是將蘊含商業信譽、具有商業流通價值的形象進行商業性使用的權利。Along the way, americans produced a great middle class and security in old age ; built unrivaled centers of learning and opened public schools to all ; split the atom and explored the heavens ; invented the computer and the microchip ; and deepened the wellspring of justice by making a revolution in civil rights for african americans and all minorities, and extending the circle of citizenship, opportunity and dignity to women
這一進程中，美國形成了一個龐大的中產階級和老年人保險制度；建立了無與倫比的學術中心；為全民開辦了公立黨校；分裂了原子，探測了太空；發明了計算機和集成電路；掀起了一場非裔美國人和少數民族的民權革命運動，深掘了正義的源泉；擴大了婦女公民權利和義務、就業機會和人身尊嚴。Specially in enterprise assets evaluation and item assets evaluation ( intangible assets including trademark right and petent right, etc. buldings and construction machine and equipment land use right ). add speciality in society audit financial accounting, tax consulting
專業從事企業整體評估和包括專利、商標等在內的無形資產、房屋建築物、機器設備及土地使用權等各類單項資產的評估；專業從事社會審計及財會咨詢、稅務咨詢。分享友人