私益訴訟 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [sīyìsùsòng]
私益訴訟 英文
actiones privatae
  • 私 : Ⅰ形容詞1 （個人的） personal; private 2 （自私） selfish 3 （暗地裡; 私下） secret; private 4 （...
  • 益 : Ⅰ名詞1 （好處） benefit; profit; advantage 2 （姓氏） a surname Ⅱ形容詞（有益的） beneficialⅢ動詞...
  • 訴 : 動詞1. （說給人） tell; relate; inform 2. （傾吐） complain; accuse 3. （控告） appeal to; resort to
  • 訟 : 動詞1. （打官司） bring a case to court 2. （爭辯是非） dispute; argue
  • 訴訟 : [法律] lawsuit; litigation; legal action; judicial action; action
  1. Class action, orgnization action, relator action and mass action are concrete patterns of public interest action. public interest action ' s effective motion depends on some factors, such as the ideological trend of wellfare county, lawey ' s pleading for public interest, the private ' s active participation and relevant system " s coordination

    集團訴訟、團體訴訟、民眾訴訟、檢舉人訴訟等都是公益訴訟的具體形態。公益訴訟的良好運行需要有福利國家的社會思想基礎、律師的公益辯護、私人的積極參與和相關制度的配臺等多種因素的共同作用。
  2. Indeed, in savigny ' s cosmopolitan and universalist milieu, there are no room for forum protectionism ; private international law should not be concerned with promoting the forum ' s interests as such but should instead aspire to ensure that each multi - state dispute is resolved in the same way regardless of where it is litigated

    事實上，在薩維尼的世界主義和普遍主義的理論中，法院的保護主義沒有空間；國際私法不應關注于促進法院的利益，而應是熱望確保每一個多國爭端不論其訴訟地在何處，都能以相同的方式解決。
  3. To restructure the basic principles of the civil mediation system, perfect the procedural rules, truly implement principles of self - willingness and judgement authority, so as to restore the original requirements of a mediation system. to implement a policy of limited case review, so as to maintain the effect of the mediation agreement, and the authority of a court mediation. meanwhile, to give the litigants certain subsidy rights, so as to achieve a balance between the litigation interests and private law interests

    要重新構建民事訴訟模式，完善民事訴訟證據規則，固定法官的中立角色，減少調解過程中的強制；要建立多元化的替代性糾紛解決機制，使民事訴訟調解制度更具系統化；要重構民事調解制度的基本原則，完善程序性規定，落實自願原則和處分權原則，還調解制度本來的要求；要實行有限再審，維護調解協議的效力和法院調解的權威，同時，給予當事人一定的救濟權利，實現訴訟利益和私法利益的平衡。
  4. Thirdly, the author makes it clear that " civil public interest litigation " will be established in two ways : suit by prosecutor and by individual, and analyses them in general. last but not the lest, the article tries to give some analysis of concrete aspects in " civil public interest litigation ", which is divided in fore parts : the fundamental way to build it, the clarity of cases permitted to such litigation, the pre - trial procedures and rational rules on legal costs

    首先明確民事公益訴訟的原告資格問題，認為包括檢察機關和個人;其次探討民事公益訴權的問題，從檢察機關和個人起訴兩方面討論了這種權利的理論差茹出;再次從宏觀角度論述了民事公益訴訟的兩種外在形式:公訴與私訴並存的機制，並且簡要分析了各自的相應內容;最後從四個方面探討了民事公益訴訟的幾個具體程序問題。
  5. Just as the professor cappelletti said, as the modernized society complicates day by day, the individual behavior is very apt to damage public interests, it has already proved, the harm of this kind of interests ca n ' t relieve fundamentally to strengthen management by the government independantly that the various countries practiced. making traditional showing to putting only one a piece of lawsuit cases between two a piece of specific partieses considering is already not complete

    正如卡佩萊蒂教授所論述的，隨著現化社會日益復雜化，個私行為很容易損害公共利益，而各國實踐都已證明，這種利益的損害單靠政府加強管理不能從根本上得到救濟，並且使得傳統的把一個訴訟案僅放在兩個特定當事人之間考慮的框架已不完備。
  6. The public interest litigation is the parallel to the personal interest. the public interest litigation distinguish from the personal interest litigation

    公益訴訟區別于私益訴訟，有其內在的質的規定性。
  7. The theory of negation insists that it is only a moral duty for the subjectivities of lawsuits to be in good faith, because the principle will seriously damage the debate principle and disposition principle of the civil procedural law. on the contrary, the theory of admitting regards the principle as a basic principle of private law, so that it shall dominate all jurisdictions and cannot be infringed by the parties for their own interests

    否定說認為訴訟主體遵守誠信應只是道德上的義務，該原則將會對民事訴訟法的辯論和處分原則產生極大破壞；肯定說則認為誠實信用原則作為私法領域的基本原則，應當支配一切法域，訴訟程序應不允許當事人為了自己的利益違背誠信原則。
  8. According to the nature to solute the dispute and the law which will be used, the public interest litigation can be divided into three kind : the criminal public interest litigation, the civil public interest litigation and the administrative public interest litigation

    按其解決糾紛的性質和適用法律的不同，公益訴訟有刑事公益訴訟、民事公益訴訟和行政公益訴訟之分。公益訴訟是與私益訴訟相比較而存在的。
  9. According to the jurist ' s argumentation such as zhou nan, the public good lawsuit was originated from the law of rome, " as to private benefit lawsuit, a kind of lawsuit on regard protecting public good as purpose, beside the specific stipulation of law, all citizens can mention "

    根據周祖等法學家的論述，公益訴訟起源於羅馬法， 「是相對私益訴訟而言的，以保護公益為目的，除法律有特別規定者外，凡市民均可提起」的一種訴訟制度。
  10. Validity of the contract benefited to the third party derives from respects to the parts, and developments on spirits of autonomy of private law. and this also stems from demands on protecting reliance interests of the third party, reducing cost of litigations and tempering social injustice

    對為第三人利益合同的承認來源於對當事人意思的尊重和對私法自治精神的弘揚；同時對為第三人利益合同的承認也是社會發展的客觀需要，它有助於對第三人信賴利益的保護，也能更有效的減少訴訟成本和實現社會公正。
  11. An interesting new washington state court suit raises an important question : if a retailer benefits from collecting personally identifiable information about its customers, does it have a corresponding duty to use such data to alert its customers that products they ' ve bought have been recalled for health or safety reasons

    華盛頓洲法院的一起有趣的訴訟提出了一個非常重要的問題：如果零售商從其收集的顧客之可確認的私人信息中獲益的話，那麼當顧客購買的產品因為健康或安全問題被找回時，它是否有相應的義務利用這些數據來警示顧客？
  12. It has also been increasingly felt that pil is being misused by the people agitating for private grievance in the grab of public interest and seeking publicity rather than espousing public cause

    越來越多的人認為，公益訴訟正被濫用，假藉公益而鼓動私怨、追求名氣而非擁護公利。
  13. Do class actions, convert quote duty, set up discovery and separate conciliation from trial, etc. i would like to take this occasion to extend my sincere and genuine to mr. zuo weimin whose support is indispensable for the writing of this article. meanwhile i should also thank all the teachers of shi chuan university law institute because their edifies and helps

    在具體制度上，本文詳細探討了鼓勵私人提起訴訟和檢察官作為公益代表人提起訴訟的范圍、訴訟權利及限制，探討了在訴訟程序方面應做的相應改革，如集團訴訟的可操作性，舉證責任的倒置，證據開示制度的建立以及調審分離、多調少審等。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書