羅馬法的學者 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [luómǎfǎdexuézhě]
羅馬法的學者 英文
civilian
  • 羅 : 羅名1 （捕鳥的網） a net for catching birds 2 （篩子） sieve; sifter; screen 3 （質地稀疏的絲織品...
  • 馬 : Ⅰ名詞1 [動物學] （哺乳動物） horse 2 （象棋棋子） horse one of the pieces in chinese chess3 （姓...
  • 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 （由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱） law 2 （方法; 方式） way; method; mode; means 3 （標...
  • 的 : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
  • 學 : Ⅰ動詞1 （學習） study; learn 2 （模仿） imitate; mimic Ⅱ名詞1 （學問） learning; knowledge 2 （學...
  • 者 : Ⅰ助詞1 （用在形容詞或動詞後面 或帶有形容詞或動詞的詞組後面 表示有此屬性或做此動作的人或事物） 2 ...
  • 羅馬 : 1 （古代羅馬帝國） roman2 （義大利首都） rome羅馬帝國 [歷史] roman empire; 羅馬法 [法律] roman la...
  • 學者 : scholar; learned man; man of learning
  1. The origin of separation system can be traced back to ancient rome and the position of it was established by canon law in the age of medieval europe. the separation system was thereafter gradually developed and improved by legislators and jurists in all the countries

    別居制度源於古羅馬，中世紀歐洲的寺院法確立了別居制度在離婚制度中的地位，世界各國的立法者、法學家不斷將其發展和完善。
  2. During the years 1954 - 64 he gave annual lessons to fulbright scholarship holders in rome

    在1954 - 1964年間，他在羅馬給傳爾布萊特法案基的獎學金獲得者授年度課。
  3. This article contains three parts, namely, preface, body and conclusion. the preface mainly introduces the discussing subject and writing purposes of this article. body is divided into four parts : from the beginning of actio in rem and actio in personam in roman law, the first part detailedly inspects and analyses the formation process of the dual rights system in historical research methods ; the second part discusses the theoretical framework of the dual rights structure from the aspect of system ; the third part mainly analyses the middle rights and the integration of real rights and creditor ’ s rights and the reasons for the emergence of these phenomena, pointing out that the emergence of these phenomena is unevitable in civil law system which ajusts social relationship with systematic code, and how

    正文分為四個部分:第一部分採用歷史研究的方法，從羅馬法上的對人之訴和對物之訴出發，對物債二分體系的形成過程進行了細致的考察和分析;第二部分從體系化的角度討論了物債二分體系的理論構成，對其理論架構進行了總體上的研究;第三部分著重分析了物權與債權的融合和中間狀態及其出現這些現象的原因，指出在運用體系化的方法調整社會關系的過程中，出現物權和債權中間狀態的權利形態是不可避免的現象，並對如何正確看待這些問題進行了論證;第四部分在前文論述的基礎上，對我國一些學者提出的制定財產法和設立財產法總則的觀點的可行性進行了分析，指出無論是從我國大陸法系的傳統還是從技術層面來看，制定財產法或設立財產法總則都是不可行的。
  4. Finally, the author analyzes a few arguments of the theory of juristic act of real right most favored and points out the faults of them and holds that mancipatio and cessio injure in roman law or gewere in germanic law can be regarded as the embryo at most of the theory of juristic act of real right because there exists a great or even substantive distance between the above forms and the juristic act of real right as a product of modem law, the juristic act of real right acquires no complete form in ancient law systems

    最後，基於前述的探討，筆者分析了目前學界流行的關於物權行為起源的幾個論斷，明確指出了其疏漏所在，認為羅馬法上曼兮帕蓄、擬訴棄權和日耳曼法上物權移轉的方式最多只能稱為物權行為的肇端或雛形，離我們現在理解的「物權行為」尚有較大的甚或實質性的距離，物權行為是近代法的產物，在古代法律制度中沒有完整的形態。
  5. Chapter two, sometimes is the common topic to civil law scholars, but the studying products fall short of depth and width, so this chapter is governed by the historic overview and comparative method, under the base of examining the development and vicissitude of roman trust notion, probing into why the civil law did n ' t develop and shape the institution of trusts like anglo - saxon jurisdictions, meantime collecting and analyzing the various experiences and lessons from a number of civil law countries, not only including mixed - system jurisdictions ( scotland, quebec ) influenced by common law tradition far - reachingly, but also including the various effects of the trust law codified by pure civil law countries ( liechtenstein, japan, latin american countries ), and the developments of domestic trust in holland and italy under the rectification of the trust hague convention, ad hoc, including the experiences and lessons of non - recognition trust countries ( germany, france, switzerland ) that they had been penetrating into the notions in civil codes, all is intended to " portrayed " the competitive panorama between civil

    第二章「信託觀念與民法傳統的沖突和融合」 ：這一主題一直是民法學者探討的核心問題，本部分採取了歷史考察的方法和比較分析的方法，在考察羅馬法中的信託觀念的發展和變遷的基礎上，探討了為什麼民法傳統沒有發展出如普通法系一樣的信託的若干原因，同時一廣泛地涉獵了民法法系各國繼受和發展信託觀念的不同的經驗和教訓，不僅包括深受普通法系影響的混合法系（蘇格蘭和魁北克）在民法傳統的物權法匡架中發展信託的獨特經驗，而且考察了純粹民法傳統的國家（列支敦斯登、日本和拉丁美洲國家以法典繼受信託的不同的效果，以及在1984年《關于信託的法律適用和承認的公約卜v發展國內信託例證?一荷蘭和義大利，更包括了對于沒有接受普通法系信託而在民法典中挖掘信託觀念的德國、法國和瑞十的經驗和問題，並意圖勾畫民法傳統中的信託與普通法系的信託相競爭的全景，介刑」析眾多經驗和教訓i的基礎上為我國《信託法》的發展提供借鑒。
  6. More than a decade later de boer met another of us ( hale ) at an archaeological site in portugal where hale, who is an archaeologist, sought de boer ' s geological opinion on the evidence for earthquake damage at an ancient roman villa

    10多年後，狄波爾在葡萄牙的一個考古地點遇到考古學家赫爾（本文另一位作者） ，那時赫爾為了某個羅馬古宅受地震損壞的證據，向狄波爾請教地質學上的看法。
  7. According to the jurist ' s argumentation such as zhou nan, the public good lawsuit was originated from the law of rome, " as to private benefit lawsuit, a kind of lawsuit on regard protecting public good as purpose, beside the specific stipulation of law, all citizens can mention "

    根據周祖等法學家的論述，公益訴訟起源於羅馬法， 「是相對私益訴訟而言的，以保護公益為目的，除法律有特別規定者外，凡市民均可提起」的一種訴訟制度。
  8. This text is written at the the enlightenment of 《 access to justice and the welfare state 》 written by mauro cappelletti, the famous italian jurist and 《 rome law 》 written by professor zhou nan and draw the relevant contents of the theseses of domestic scholars

    本文是受義大利法學家莫諾?卡佩萊蒂等編著的《福利國家與接近正義》 、周?教授等編著的《羅馬法》及美國學者波斯納的《法律的經濟分析》等著作的啟示並吸取上述著作和國內一些學者論文中的相關內容寫成的。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書