親合定律 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [qīndìng]
親合定律 英文
affinity law
  • : 合量詞(容量單位) ge, a unit of dry measure for grain (=1 decilitre)
  • : Ⅰ形容詞1 (平靜; 穩定) calm; stable 2 (已經確定的; 不改變的) fixed; settled; established Ⅱ動詞...
  • : Ⅰ名1 (法律; 規則) law; rule; statute; regulation 2 (律詩的簡稱) short for lüshi 3 (姓氏) a ...
  1. The main types of college teachers ’ appointment contract include : the college teachers ’ of the fixed deadline, the college teachers ’ appointment contract of the deadline to complete the certain work, and the college teachers ’ appointment contract of the special attendance, and also we can get another two types of college teachers ’ appointment contract, which are individual college teachers ’ appointment contract and collective college teachers ’ appointment contract, according to the number of people in one party ; they must be work out by the strict written form, and must pass through the offer and the acceptance step, and don ’ t acknowledge the legal effect of the factual appointment contract ; after the appointment contract becomes effective, the higher college as the appointed party and the teacher as engaged party should completely fulfill the right and obligation provisions in the contract under the instructions of the three principles : fulfill personally, comprehensively, cooperatively. in which, the teachers ’ rights and obligations include : enjoy and undertake the rights and obligations as the specialist engaged in education, teaching and the scientific research ; may change or terminate the contract on the basis of the bilateral consultation, but dismissal and resignation must conform to the agreement or the legal matter ; in the liabilities for breach the contract, be headed by the practical fulfillment, including other two remedial way which are damage compensation and penalty ; in the dispute solution, must establish the perfect concrete mediation system, the arbitration and the civil lawsuit system

    高校教師聘任同主要類型為固期限的高校教師聘任同、以完成一工作為期限的高校教師聘任同和特殊照顧的高校教師聘任同,也可依據同當事人一方人數的多寡不同,也可將個人高校教師聘任同和集體高校教師聘任同;其應當以嚴格的書面形式訂立,須經過要約、承諾步驟,且不應當承認事實聘任同的法效力;聘任同生效后,作為聘任方的高等學校和受聘方的教師應當在自履行、全面履行和協作履行三大原則的指導下完全履行同中所約的權利義務條款,其中教師的權利義務內容包括作為一般公民和作為從事教育教學及其科研活動的專業人員所應享有或者承擔的權利義務;經過雙方的協商可以變更或者終止同,但解聘和辭聘必須符或者法的事由;在違約責任形式上,應當確立以實際履行為首,包括損害賠償、違約金等三種補救方式;在爭議解決方式上應當建立健全具體的調解制度、仲裁和民事訴訟制度。
  2. This article is mainly a discussion on the spiritual damage compensation for close relatives of victim under the situations of damage to right of life, damage to the right of health and damage to the right of personality of the dead, which is based on an introduction and comparison of the concerned foreign legal regulations and academic theories and in combination with the legal practice in china wherefore the author put forwards his own ideas as following : first, under the condition that there is a distance of time between inj ury and death, the close relatives of the dead shall inherit the right of claim for spiritual damage compensation of the dead for the suffering before his death, in addition to their own intrinsic right of claim for spiritual damage compensation ; the second, under the condition that the inflictor has caused the disablement of the sufferer or serious damage to his health, the close relative in a limited cycle of the sufferer should be granted with the right of claim for spiritual damage compensation, which is confirmed in law and becomes a practice in foreign countries ; the third, since the aim of the law to protect the personality of the dead from infringement is to protect the benefits of the close relatives of the dead and to maintain public benefits, is constituted on the personality of the dead the close relative of the dead may initial legal proceeding for spiritual damage compensation

    本文重點探討的就是公民生命權受到侵害、健康權受到侵害、 「死者人格」受到侵害這三種情形下的受害人近屬的精神損害賠償請求權問題。探討以介紹和比較國外相關法和學術理論為前提,結我國的實際情況,從理論與實踐相結的角度對以上各問題分別進行了分析,並提出了作者自己的一些見解:第一、在公民從受傷害到死亡有一段時間距離的情形下,死者的近屬除依法享有其固有的精神損害賠償請求權以外,還可以繼承死者生前就其所受之精神損害而享有的精神損害賠償請求權;第二、在加害人的行為已造成直接受害人殘疾,或者是造成其健康嚴重受損的其他後果的情形下,我國應在借鑒國外已有立法和判例的基礎上,賦予一范圍內的受害人近屬以精神損害賠償請求權;第三、法保護死者人格不受侵害的目的是為了保護死者近屬的利益和維護公共利益,一般情形下,只要死者近屬能證明其訴訟主體的法性,能夠證實侵害「死者人格」的行為已構成侵權,即可推死者近屬因此而遭受了精神痛苦? ?無須舉證的「名義上的精神損害」 ,死者近屬即可提起精神損害賠償之訴。最後,本文認為,加強對受害人近屬的權利和利益保護問題的研究,既有一的必要性,同時又具有十分重要的現實意義。
分享友人