訴狀要點 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [sùzhuàngyāodiǎn]
訴狀要點 英文
point of pleadings
  • 訴 : 動詞1. （說給人） tell; relate; inform 2. （傾吐） complain; accuse 3. （控告） appeal to; resort to
  • 狀 : Ⅰ名詞1 （形狀） form; shape 2 （情況） state; condition; situation; circumstances 3 （陳述事件或...
  • 要 : 要動詞1. （求） demand; ask2. （強迫; 威脅） force; coerceⅡ名詞（姓氏） a surname
  • 點 : Ⅰ名詞1 （液體的小滴） drop （of liquid） 2 （細小的痕跡） spot; dot; speck 3 （漢字的筆畫「、」）...
  • 訴狀 : [法律] plaint; indictment
  • 要點 : 1. （主要內容） main points; key point; essentials; pivot; gist 2. （重要的據點） key strongpoint
  1. On the basis of above - mentioned analysis, this article has studied the discovery system about its subject, liabilities and content in theory. meanwhile considering the actual situation of criminal litigation in our coun try, with reference to the scientific and reasonable elements of overseas adversary systems, the article has constituted and designed a complete discovery system, including the time, place, measures, methods of discovery, the limitation, exception, the examination of disputes and the legal effect of breach of discovery system

    同時，本文結合我國刑事訴訟的特點和司法現狀，在借鑒、吸收國外當事人主義證據展示制度中科學、合理的要素基礎上，對我國證據展示的程序，包括展示的時間、地點、方法、方式，限制、例外、爭議的審查及違反證據展示制度的法律後果等作了較為全面的構建和設計。
  2. Therefore, based on the theories of procedure law, evidence law and forensic authentication, as well as in view of problems and actualities in practice, the introduction of this thesis sets its aim of writing, i. e. first, systematically summarizing the main contents on which expertise is reviewed and evaluated ; second, putting forward a constructive system of review and evaluation of expertise, which tends to be practical in judicial practice

    本文引言在吸收訴訟法、證據法和司法鑒定相關理論的基礎上，針對現實狀況和現存問題，結合自己的理解和思考確定了文章的寫作方向，即：以解決現實問題為基本出發點，著重對鑒定結論審查評斷的主要內容和司法實踐中的操作程序進行一個較為全面的總結和系統的制度設計。
  3. Evidence system is one of the most important questions in the civil proceedings and standard of proof is an important question in the evidence system. the civil procedure law applies the standard of " highly probable " in civil litigations. this article points out that it is not reasonable to adopt the " highly probable " standard in all civil litigations. firstly, this article mentions the important meaning of standard of proof in judicial proof. secondly, it pionts out the flaws in the standard of proof in civil litigation in our country. thirdly, it introduces the standard of proof in civil litigation in common law and civil law countries and analyzes the similar and different points in the standard of proof. finally this article points out several suggestions to rebuild the system of standard of proof. lt suggests we should construct a system which considers the " highly probable " standard as a principle and adopts other forms of standard of proof in sepcial civil cases. and we can build this reasonable system by means of legislation and case law

    但在所有民事案件中均劃一適用較高程度的蓋然性作為證明標準是不合理的。文章首先闡明了民事訴訟證明標準在訴訟證明中的重要意義，然後對於我國有關民事訴訟證明標準的現狀及其缺陷作了一個概括，接著文章對于兩大法系民事訴訟證明標準的異同進行了介紹以及比較分析，最後提出了對于構建一個科學的民事訴訟證明標準體系的幾點建議。文章建議應當通過立法以及判例制度來建立一個以較高程度的蓋然性為原則的多元的證明標準體系。
  4. Opinions : first, this part is trying to verify that the american collective lawsuits originate from the bil 1 of peace of the equit times

    本部分重要觀點為：第一，本文考證出美國集團訴訟源於衡平法時期的訴狀。
  5. We need to pay sufficient attention as to efficiently maneuver our country ’ s justice resource and to form a firm shield of law against damage on the environment as a public interest. it is emphasized in this thesis that the system of environmental civil litigation for the public interest should be set up in our country to meet the necessity for environmental remedy at law. comparative analysis has been employed to investigate some other countries ’ theory and practice on the system of environmental civil litigation for the public interest

    文章從分析環境民事公益訴訟制度的先決問題? ?公共利益入手，運用比較分析的方法，考察了各國有關環境民事公益訴訟制度的立法與實踐，並從理論方面闡述了在我國建立環境民事公益訴訟的制度的理論基礎;用實證分析的方法研究了我國目前環境民事公益訴訟的現狀，以我國的現實說明我國建立環境民事公益訴訟制度的必要性，進而對我國建立環境民事公益訴訟制度提出了幾點設想。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書