訴訟程序規則 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [sùsòngchéngxùguīzé]
訴訟程序規則 英文
rule of practice
  • 訴 : 動詞1. （說給人） tell; relate; inform 2. （傾吐） complain; accuse 3. （控告） appeal to; resort to
  • 訟 : 動詞1. （打官司） bring a case to court 2. （爭辯是非） dispute; argue
  • 程 : 名詞1 （規章; 法式） rule; regulation 2 （進度; 程序） order; procedure 3 （路途; 一段路） journe...
  • 規 : Ⅰ名詞1 （畫圓形的工具） instrument for drawing circles 2 （規則; 成例） rule; regulation 3 [機械...
  • 則 : Ⅰ名詞1 （規范） standard; norm; criterion 2 （規則） regulation; rule; law 3 （姓氏） a surname Ⅱ...
  • 訴訟 : [法律] lawsuit; litigation; legal action; judicial action; action
  • 程序 : 1 （進行次序） order; procedure; course; sequence; schedule; ground rule; routing process 2 [自動...
  • 規則 : 1. （規定的制度或章程） rule; regulation; ordination; prescribed procedure; rope 2. （整齊） regular
  1. The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure

    以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導，結合我國的國情，對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善，在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子；在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念，以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實；在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則；在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據，其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據，增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度，補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的，取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定，改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。
  2. The civil case judgment direct procedure is a legal procedure that rectifies to produce effect to judge the mistake, although it is not a case to take up necessarily through the procedure, is also not litigant to review the class independently, it developped the positive effect towards protecting the legal rights of the party concerned, guarantee judicatory fairly, because some judgment of now direct procedure provision too principle, or not complete and not reasonable, practice to win to also bring the operational difficulty and not norm, also obstructed the wrong function of the 糾 of the procedure of direct of judgment full to some extent exertive

    民事審判監督程序是糾正生效裁判錯誤的法定程序，雖然它不是案件審理的必經程序，也不是訴訟的獨立審級，但其對保護當事人合法權益，保障司法公正，發揮了積極作用，但由於現在有些審判監督程序規定的過于原則，或不完整不合理，實踐中也帶來操作上的困難和不規范，在一定程度上也阻礙了審判監督程序的糾錯功能的充分發揮。
  3. Thirdly, six aspects of reconstructing hypotheses concerning the civil lawsuit attached to criminal lawsuit are put forward : to set indictment time limit between the date in which the procuratorial organization determines its public prosecution and the end of the first trial court ' s investigation on criminal cases ; to abolish the procuratorial organizati on ' s indictment power to attached to criminal lawsuit should be tried simultaneously with the criminal lawsuit ; to establish the rule of " criminal and civil dead " ; the regulate that the attached civil lawsuit should pay litigation casts ; to establish the national compensation principle of criminal victim

    三是刑事附帶民事訴訟程序的重構內容，提出了六個方面的重構設想:起訴時限限定在檢察機關決定公訴之日起至刑事案件一審法庭調查結束止、取消檢察機關的附帶民事訴訟起訴權、規定刑事附帶民事訴訟只能一併審判、確立「刑民交易」規則、附帶民事案件應當交納訴訟費、確立刑事被害人國家補償原則等。
  4. To restructure the basic principles of the civil mediation system, perfect the procedural rules, truly implement principles of self - willingness and judgement authority, so as to restore the original requirements of a mediation system. to implement a policy of limited case review, so as to maintain the effect of the mediation agreement, and the authority of a court mediation. meanwhile, to give the litigants certain subsidy rights, so as to achieve a balance between the litigation interests and private law interests

    要重新構建民事訴訟模式，完善民事訴訟證據規則，固定法官的中立角色，減少調解過程中的強制；要建立多元化的替代性糾紛解決機制，使民事訴訟調解制度更具系統化；要重構民事調解制度的基本原則，完善程序性規定，落實自願原則和處分權原則，還調解制度本來的要求；要實行有限再審，維護調解協議的效力和法院調解的權威，同時，給予當事人一定的救濟權利，實現訴訟利益和私法利益的平衡。
  5. The civil procedure law stipulates so inflexibly and corsely that it short of the reasonably and operation, especially the new trial for once more time without any limitation makes the " double trial is the last trial " system dose n ' t really exist, the finality of the verdict and authority ca n ' t assured, sometimes it is easy to result in the abuse of the power

    由於民事訴訟法對有關民事再審程序的規定過于原則和粗糙，欠缺合理性和操作性。特別是不加限制的反復再審使法院兩審終審制度名存實亡，法院判決的終局性和權威性無法保障，有時也極易導致權力濫用。
  6. As for the measures in phase of legislation, it includes determining the limitation of rights, perfecting searching system of object of rights, confirming the legal principle of resolving conflicts etc. as for the measures in phase of remedy, it includes confirmed rights by relevant authorities, opposition procedure, interested person ' s application to relevant authorities for protection, as well as lawsuit arbitration etc. the thesis will analyze and study such conflicts by means of analyzing case and legal reasoning, in order to find out the ways by which the conflicts and contradictions will be resolved

    立法方面的任務是確定權利的界限、完善權利客體的檢索審查機制、確認解決沖突的法律原則等，通過建立理想的確權模式來避免未來可能產生的權利沖突。法律救濟措施包括有關部門主動確權、異議程序、當事人向有關部門提出權利保護申請、訴訟或者仲裁等方面，目的在於通過具體的法律實踐，對權利沖突進行調和和整理，使調整各類權利的法律規范體系得以順利實施。從法律運行的角度看，商標權與字號權、域名權等相關權利的沖突既有立法的原因，又有執法、守法的原因。
  7. It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason

    論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多，相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出，如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士，翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物，由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多，但在《民事證據法（草案） 》的擬定過程中，並未采責任倒置的地位，這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學選擇，誠然，舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險，而「倒置」規則的設計，則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼，在理解何為舉證責任倒置時，本文著重以民事法為主線，指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任，而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔，舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異，但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值，在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形，一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形，而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所有要件，對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定，若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證，在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時，從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則，公平原則，訴訟經濟原則，保護弱者原則等，基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念，其次立法應避免求大求全，再次要配合實體法的發展，最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。
  8. District court civil procedure fees amendment rules 2000

    2000年區域法院民事訴訟程序費用修訂規則
  9. District court civil procedure fees amendment no. 2 rules 2000

    2000年區域法院民事訴訟程序費用修訂第2號規則
  10. Apart from the international convention that sweden is a member and the concerned regulations made by european union council, sweden courts resolve the jurisdictional issues by analogous application of the provisions in the code of judicial procedure on venue

    除了參加的有關國際公約和歐盟理事會有關規則以外，瑞典法院通常類推適用《司法程序法典》中有關法院特定管轄區的條款來解決國際民事訴訟的管轄權問題。
  11. Part iii anatomizes the causes of the crime of inquisition by torture and confession - extortion from six aspects and points out that the permeation of traditional law culture and the load of social control function are its background condition, that the warp of executing - the - law concept in the prosecutors is the individual factor for its occurrence, that the absence of the rule design for the litigation procedure and the careless omission of the law rules and regulations are the institutional causes of its occurrence, and that the lack of judicial resources is an objective factor for its occurrence

    第三部分:文章從六個方面剖析了刑訊逼供犯罪的成因，指出傳統司法文化的浸染、社會控制功能的負載乃其背景性根源;司法人員執法理念的偏差是刑訊產生的個體因素;訴訟程序規則設計的缺失、法網規制的疏漏是刑訊逼供發生的制度性原因;司法資源投入的短缺是促使刑訊發生的一個客觀因素。
  12. But after criminal put on record, namely after the case entered criminal proceeding, criterion must according to " criminal procedural law " the regulation is carried out, subpoena, arrest is passed must not exceed 12 hours

    但是刑事立案之後，即案件進入了刑事訴訟程序之後，則必須依照《刑事訴訟法》的規定執行，傳喚、拘傳不得超過12小時。
  13. Compared with the common litigation procedure and no litigation procedure the personnel litigation procedure has four notable characteristics : the limitative of the case scope 、 the body a relation litigation object has the public - spirited 、 applicable to litigation legal theory and no litigation legal theory interlaced 、 applicable to special procedure rule

    人事訴訟程序與普通訴訟程序、非訟程序相比，具有四個顯著特徵:案件范圍具有限定性、身份關系訴訟標的具有公益性、交錯適用訴訟法理與非訟法理、適用特殊程序規則。
  14. It is necessary to construct public interest litigation in china, which requires us to regulate the legislation in terms of reviewable actions, litigation subject qualification, procedural rule, res judicata, ect

    我國亟須建構公益訴訟制度，立法需要在可訴范圍、訴訟主體資格、程序規則以及判決效力范圍等方面加以規范。
  15. In hong kong, an appeal against a decision of the court of first instance of the high court is to be made to the court of appeal and the relevant procedural rules are in

    上訴在香港，如不服高等法院原訟法庭的判決，可向上訴法庭提出上訴，而有關的程序規則載于
  16. Shifting the burden of proof of is the special provision and exception of the principle of burden of proof, during drafting " civil evidence code ", divergences about how to regulate the burden of proof appear, jurists have diffirent opinions on it, this paper set out from those divergences and disputes, discussing in detail with six sections : the disputes on the shifting the burden of proof, reasonable define the conception about shifting the burden of proof, the relation of shifting the burden of proof and deduction, shifting the burden of proof in present law and regulations, the function of shifting the burden of proof and the civil cases suitable for this regulation, legislative proposition. this artical elabrates the theoretical and realistic foundation of shifting the burden of proof. moreover, shifting the burden of proof is a phenomenon of proceeding and other regulations of solution to disputation, it is not confined to those laws and regulations of procedure, but also exist in substantial law

    舉證責任倒置是舉證責任分配規則中的特殊與例外，在民事證據法的草擬過程中對舉證責任倒置的存廢與否產生了分歧，法學界對此的觀點也呈現出百花齊放的態勢，本文從舉證責任倒置爭議與分歧的觀點出發，基於舉證責任倒置存在與否的爭議、舉證責任倒置概念的合理界定、舉證責任倒置與推定的關系、舉證責任倒置在我國現行法律中的體現、舉證責任倒置的功能及可適用民事案件的具體類型、舉證責任倒置立法完善的構想共六個部分具體闡述，從理論角度、司法實踐及立法構想三個不同的視角分析舉證責任倒置在我國的存在的理論意義、現實意義與立法前景，表明舉證責任倒置不僅在我國具有立法基礎而且有實踐環境，闡述舉證責任倒置雖然是出現于訴訟或是解決爭議的其他程序中的一個現象，但它又不局限於訴訟及其他解決爭議的程序規范，從現有的法律規范及法律實踐來看，舉證責任倒置與實體法是「同呼吸，共命運」的，用句老話說就是「皮之不存，毛將焉附? 」
  17. The second part is about the theoretical base of the system of the shareholders " derivative action. the article discusses it from the substantive and procedural views. the reason that law grants shareholders the right of proceeding against directors and officers lies that shareholders are the very investors of the corporation and are closely related to the corporation, and that according to the theories of lawsuit trust and party ' s theory of broad sense the indirect party interested can also become party of litigation. the author considers that it is better to express that function of company law lies in protecting interst of minority shareholders and strengthen corporate governce. according to the fact that the shareholder ' s derivative action system consists of substansial rules and procedural rules, it analyzes faction of the system from above two aspects and points out that function of the system is not to solve conflicts among people but is to restrict or encourage the right of shareholder ' s derivative action

    法律之所以賦予股東以提起派生訴訟的權利，一方面在於股東是公司的出資人，與公司的利益息息相關，另一方面根據訴訟信託理論及廣義當事人理論，訴訟標的權利義務主體以外的非直接利害關系人也可以作為訴訟當事人，因而，股東派生訴訟中股東的訴權源於程序法的直接規定。股東派生訴訟的功能可以從不同的角度表示，我們當然可以認為其有事後救濟，事前抑制的功能，但是，筆者認為將其功能表述為保護中小股東權益及強化公司治理結構則更能反映其特性。而且根據派生訴訟制度由實體和程序兩部分構成的事實，筆者分別從兩方面分析了派生訴訟的功能，並指出股東派生訴訟的程序規則不同於一般的民事訴訟程序，其功能不在於解決當事人之間的實體糾紛，而在於約束、限制或鼓勵股東的派生訴訟提起權。
  18. Photocopies of the authorities cited ( save and except the rules of the high court and notes from the hong kong civil procedure ) should be annexed to the list of authorities

    引用的案例典據（不包括《高等法院規則》和《香港民事訴訟程序》里的注釋）的影印本須夾附於案例典據一覽表。
  19. The respondent should serve on the other side and lodge with the court skeleton argument and list of authorities and also for the court copies of authorities ( other than the rules of high court and notes from the hong kong civil procedure ) at least 48 hours before hearing ( excluding sunday and general holidays )

    答辯人須于聆訊前最少48小時（不計星期日和公眾假期）把論據大綱、案例典據一覽表，和提供給法庭的案例典據的副本（除了《高等法院規則》和《香港民事訴訟程序》里的注釋之外）送達另一方和呈交法庭。
  20. The contemporary civil procedural law sets up the principle of good faith because of the following reasons : it possesses the characteristics, which the basic principle of the civil procedural law should have, and three functions, with which it can prevent the rights of action and trial from being abused, uniquely explain the statutory law, and supplement the missing meaning of it. the principle is the result of adjustment and influence by the concept of the rights in the standard of society and the idea of action

    現代民事訴訟法確立誠信原則的法律依據如下：它具有民事訴訟法基本原則應有的屬性和三大功能，其獨特的防止訴權和審判權的濫用，解釋成文法和規定欠缺的補充功能不可替代，是民事訴訟程序公正價值目標要求，社會本位權利思想及訴訟理念調整影響的結果，是現代公法與私法的融合、實體法和程序法相互彌補的產物。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書