證據審判 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [zhèngjùshěnpàn]
證據審判 英文
certificate trial
  • 證 : Ⅰ動詞（證明） prove; verify; demonstrate Ⅱ名詞1 （證據） evidence; proof; testimony; witness 2 （...
  • 據 : 據Ⅰ動詞1 （占據） occupy; seize 2 （憑借; 依靠） rely on; depend on Ⅱ介詞（按照; 依據） according...
  • 審 : Ⅰ形容詞（詳細; 周密） careful Ⅱ動詞1 （審查） examine; go over 2 （審訊） interrogate; try 3 [書...
  • 判 : Ⅰ動詞1 （分開; 分辨） distinguish; discriminate 2 （評定） judge; decide 3 （判決） sentence; con...
  • 證據 : evidence; proof; testimony
  1. In china, under the influence of legal tradition and continental legal system, the evidence system pays more attention to substantive law rather than adjective law. in addition to the unscientific setting of the testimony standard, this evidence system influence the effect and quality of our country " s criminal trial

    在我國，由於受傳統法律思想和大陸法系證據制度的影響，重實體輕程序的審判思想積重難返，加之證明標準設置缺乏科學性，嚴重影響了我國刑事審判的效率和質量。
  2. When the proof revelation system has been established, the rate of courtroom adjudgement has been increased, the rule of positive wordage has been prescribed by lawmaking. then, the judge of first instance can give up the use of prosecuting roll

    只有建立證據開示制度、提高當庭宣判率、立法明文規定直接言詞原則，才能使一審法官放棄對控方案卷的使用有可依據的程序和制度基礎。
  3. Adjudicative facts mean the judgments or presumptions made by the trier of fact about the objective facts concerning the case, on the basis of the evidences, through the procedure

    裁判事實是事實審理者通過法定程序，在證據的基礎上，對案件涉及的客觀事實所作的一種認定或推定。
  4. On the basis of reviewing history and comparative study, this paper examines the system of trial by default in our country ; at the same time using foreign experiences for reference, combines the specific situations in our judicial practice, then raises a tentative idea to reconstruct the system of trial by default in our country : to build a system of trial by default making the doctrine of ex parte debate as main part and doctrine of trial by default as supplement part ; at the same time to perfect the legislative stipulations on standards of default determination, procedural applications and remedies of trial by ex parte debate and trial by default, examinations of evidence in trial by default, in pursuit of forming an intact system structure, giving full play to the functions of system of trial by default and fulfilling the value target of civil proceedings

    因此，加強對我國缺席審判制度的研究，具有重要的理論和實踐價值。本文在歷史回顧和比較研究的基礎上，對我國的缺席審判制度進行了審視；同時借鑒國外的經驗，並結合我國司法實踐的具體情況，提出了重構我國缺席審判制度的設想：建立一種以一方辯論主義為主體，缺席判決主義為補充的缺席審判制度；同時完善缺席的認定標準、一方辯論判決與缺席判決程序的適用與救濟、缺席審判中的證據審查等方面的立法規定，以形成一個完整的制度體系，充分發揮缺席審判制度的功能，實現民事訴訟的價值目標。
  5. The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure

    以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導，結合我國的國情，對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善，在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子；在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念，以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實；在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則；在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據，其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據，增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度，補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的，取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定，改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。
  6. Hearing factualism has been approved widely, which emphasizes that the adjudication from the court should base on the facts heard in the court and that the trial should be direct and the parties perform it in person

    摘要聽證事實主義強調法院的裁判要以法庭聽證的事實為依據，強調審判的直接性和親歷性，因而被廣泛認同。
  7. As to the related judicial principals and evidential rules, the author thought we should drawup the principle of directness and oral and the regulation of hearsay evidence

    關于建立相關審判原則和證據規則的問題，本文認為交叉詢問適用嚴密的審判原則、證據法則和技術性規則，否則難以
  8. The pentagon is releasing its manual for handling upcoming trials the terror suspects. it would allowed suspects to be convicted and perhaps executed using hearsay evidence and some coerced testimony

    五角大樓出臺了用於接下來審判嫌疑恐怖分子的手冊。該手冊通過不確鑿的證據和一些強制性供詞，使嫌疑犯證明有罪甚至可能被行刑。
  9. The pentagon is releasing its manual for handling upcoming trials of terror suspects. it would allow suspects to be convicted and perhaps executed using hearsay evidence and some coerced testimony

    五角大樓發行了關于如何處理即將來臨的恐怖嫌疑犯審判的手冊.該手冊會允許對嫌疑犯定罪，也許可以根據謠傳的證據和強行逼供的口供處死嫌疑犯
  10. With the ways of our countrys criminal litigation court trials changing from inquisitorial proceedings to adversary procedures and the progressing of the criminal jurisdiction reformation, discovery is becoming an unavoidable issue in criminal litigation in our country. in practice, many jurisdictional authorities in our country have tried to explore and try it since 1999. this article, through comparing the discovery system among britain, america and japan, through analyzing the present actual situation of our countrys criminal litigation and from the aspects of the litigation modes, jurisdiction justice and the necessity for deepening the reformation of criminal trials, has proved that it is necessary and emergent in practice and applicable in theory to establish the discovery regime in our country

    隨著我國刑事訴訟法庭審判方式由審問制向對抗制的轉變和刑事審判方式改革的進一步深化，證據展示便成為刑事訴訟中的一個不可迴避的問題，實踐中不少司法機關從1999年始即已進行了證據展示的探索和嘗試，本文從英美日國家的證據展示制度的規定和比較入手，通過對我國刑事訴訟運作現狀的分析，從刑事訴訟模式、訴訟公正價值觀和深化刑事審判方式改革的角度，論證了證據展示制度在我國的建立具有現實上的必要性、緊迫性和理論上的合理性，並在此基礎上對證據展示的主體、責任、內容作了理論上的探討研究。
  11. How it would be a weakness in the government to break down in this attempt to practise for popularity on the lowest national antipathies and fears, and therefore mr. attorney - general had made the most of it ; how, nevertheless, it rested upon nothing, save that vile and infamous character of evidence too often disfiguring such cases, and of which the state trials of this country were full

    如果政府竟想借最卑下的民族對立情緒和畏懼心理做文章來進行壓制，樹立威信檢察長先生對此曾大加渲染，那恐怕只會成為政府的一種弱點。可惜這種做法除了證詞那邪惡的不光彩的性質只會歪曲這類案件的形象之外全無根據。它只能使我國的國事審判里充滿了這類案件。
  12. In continental law system countries, burden of proof includes burden of adducing evidence, burden of persuasion. burden of adducing evidence means that the subjects in criminal procedure who initiate trial procedure and require the courts to judge according to their demands or subject whom there is presumption against must adduce adequate " evidence of the fact to prove that the evidence is on the demand of proof. otherwise the subjects will fail in the suit

    筆者認為，刑事訴訟證明責任，是指在刑事訴訟中引起審判程序啟動並要求法院依其主張裁判或存在對其不利之法律推定的刑事訴訟主體，必須就其主張的對定罪量刑具有決定作用的待證特定事實或者為推翻不利的推定事實提出足夠證據，並利用證據對該事實或或者為推翻不利的推定事實加以證明到法律規定的程度。
  13. When investigation is not monitored with adjudicative power, the findings in such an investigation may be directly used as adjudicatory evidence, adjudicatory justice, judicial independenc e, and the defendant ' s right of defense will be entirely undermined

    當偵查不受審判權監控並且偵查所獲可以直接用作審判證據時，審判公正，司法獨立和被告人的抗辯權就都遭到了根本的破壞。
  14. However, either party to a legal or administrative action may serve and file a notice of appeal to invite the court of appeals ( in new york state, the appellate division of the supreme court for a given judicial department ) to review a trial result de novo, re - examining the same evidence upon which the trial judge ruled, possibly to substitute a more appropriate result

    但是，無論是在州法院，還是在聯邦法院，或是在行政程序當中，當事人任何一方都有權利提出上訴，也就是要求上訴法院或上訴機構對原審法院或原審行政機構程序中的證據進行重新審查，以期推翻或修改原審判決或裁決。
  15. The main contents of the reform of trial preceding in economic case is the reform of the system of the evidence. adjustment of the standard of proof in chinese is to built dualistic system for procedural standard of proof. so the proof on the balance of probabilities will be the procedural standard in chinese civil procedure

    我國目前正在進行的民事審判方式改革，主要是證據制度方面的改革，以形成符合我國國情的民事證明標準，本文試從對民事證明標準概念，證明標準在證據制度上的意義和證明標準模式的評析，揭示我國奉引的一元制證明標準的弊端，並結合國情，得出我國應建立高度蓋然性的民事證明標準的結論，並指出該證明標準在實踐中的可行性和相應的配套制度的建設。
  16. Judicial notice, which is also known as " judicial cognition ", is an important rule in civil procedural law as well as a key issue in evidence act

    摘要司法認知，又稱為「審判上的知悉」 ，是民事訴訟法的一項重要制度，也是證據學上一個重要問題。
  17. According to the civil procedure act and relevant laws of china, occasional evidence presentation had been put into judiciary practices for a long time, which brought great difficulties in the implementation of proof burden system and caused poor efficiency and a waste of judiciary resources

    按照我國《民事訴訟法》及相關法律規定，在我國的民事司法實踐中長期以來實行的是「證據隨時提出主義」 ，這使得我國的舉證責任制度無法落到實處，並由此暴露出「證據突襲」 、重復審理等弊端，造成審判效率低下、司法資源嚴重浪費。
  18. Judicial identification refers to a kind of acts of checking evidence, during the course of action ， in which an identifier with expertise appointed or invitated by judicial organs after the application of the parties or without the application, with scientific technological methods complying with the provisions of the criminal procedure law, draws a judgment conclusion. [ 1 ] judicial identification serves the acts of investigation, procuratoration, justice and execution and serve their acts of collecting, examing and checking evidence, which is a link in judicial acts

    司法鑒定是在訴訟過程中，對于案件中的某些專門性問題，按訴訟法的規定，經當事人申請，司法機關決定，或司法機關主動決定，指派、聘請具有專門知識的鑒定人，運用科學技術手段，對專門性問題作出判斷結論的一種核實證據的活動[ 1 ] 。司法鑒定是為偵查、檢察、審判、執行活動服務的，為其收集證據、審查核實證據，是司法活動中的一個環節或鏈條。
  19. If the court finds there is enough evidence against lubanga to warrant a full trial it would be the first at the i. c. c. since it started work in 2002

    如果法庭認為有足夠的證據審判盧班加，這將是國際刑事法庭2002年開始運作以來的第一起審判。
  20. This dissertation approaches the principle from the perspective of criminal judge and investigates the normal court procedure of public prosecutive cases

    本文所論證的證據裁判原則，以刑事審判為視角，以普通程序的公訴案件的法庭審理階段為考察對象。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書