證據開示 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [zhèngkāishì]
證據開示 英文
disclosure of evidence
  • : Ⅰ動詞(證明) prove; verify; demonstrate Ⅱ名詞1 (證據) evidence; proof; testimony; witness 2 (...
  • : 據Ⅰ動詞1 (占據) occupy; seize 2 (憑借; 依靠) rely on; depend on Ⅱ介詞(按照; 依據) according...
  • : Ⅰ動詞(擺出或指出使人知道; 表明) show; indicate; signify; instruct; notify Ⅱ名詞1 [書面語] (給...
  • 證據 : evidence; proof; testimony
  1. When the proof revelation system has been established, the rate of courtroom adjudgement has been increased, the rule of positive wordage has been prescribed by lawmaking. then, the judge of first instance can give up the use of prosecuting roll

    只有建立證據開示制度、提高當庭宣判率、立法明文規定直接言詞原則,才能使一審法官放棄對控方案卷的使用有可依的程序和制度基礎。
  2. Talk about the system of showing evidence in criminal suit

    論刑事訴訟中的證據開示制度
  3. Discovery is an important system in civil procedure of common law countries and it plays an irreplaceable role therein

    證據開示制度是英美民事訴訟的一項重要制度,在英美民事訴訟中發揮著無可替代的作用。
  4. Currently, due to the epistemically warp in the theory 、 the faultiness in systematic designation and the roughness in systematic stipulation, have our country had caused some problems in the circulating of criminal evidence open system

    目前,由於理論認識上的偏差、體制設計不夠完善以及制度規定不夠具體,致使我國在有關刑事證據開示制度的運行中存在一些問題。
  5. This paper aims at the follow goals : first, it gives a general introduction of the u. s. discovery system and its extraterritorial application, revealing the production, scope and limits of the extraterritorial effect of discovery, so that we can understand the extraterritorial application of discovery from the lay of system framework

    本文的研究目的主要有:第一,概括介紹美國的證據開示制度及其域外適用的具體情況,揭證據開示域外效力的產生、范圍及其受到的限制,進一步從制度架構的層面上理解美國證據開示程序的域外適用。
  6. The pre - trial review aims to, not to solve the question whether the defendant is guilty or not in advance, but to investigate according to the facts and the law whether the suitable reasons or the basis of accusing the defendant exist, so as to secure the reasonablitiy and justification of the criminal prosecution. although the pre - trial review procedure is not the independent procedure just like the investigation, prosecution and adjudication, but is the indispensable part of the complete trial procedure

    本文比較分析了外國刑事庭前審查程序的特點及程序價值,在此基礎上探討庭前審查的性質、功能和原則,認為預審程序是對公訴權濫用的有效制約機制,應堅持程序參與、程序公、控辯平等、效率的基本原則,並充分發揮程序過濾、程序分流、證據開示、明確爭點、程序準備五大功能。
  7. Researches on our system of discovery of criminal evidence

    我國刑事案件證據開示制度探討
  8. The feasibility of the evidence exhibition

    論刑事證據開示制度的可行性
  9. On the open - showing system of criminal evidence

    論刑事證據開示制度
  10. Probing into some problems of criminal evidence discovery system

    對刑事證據開示制度幾個問題的探討
  11. Comparative research in procedure of public summons of criminal evidence

    刑事證據開示程序比較研究
  12. Analysis on the evidence discovery system of euramerican civil litigation

    歐美民事訴訟庭前證據開示制度評析
  13. Perspective on the discovery of criminal evidence and its introduction in china

    引進刑事證據開示制度之我見
  14. A comparative study on the discovery of criminal evidence between america and japan

    美國和日本刑事證據開示制度比較研究
  15. Thinking of several problems about setting the system of displaying criminal evidence

    關于建立刑事證據開示制度若干問題的思考
  16. Client will pay all legal costs and expenses relating to this case, including filing fees, fees of service, fees for expert witnesses, investigation expenses and expenses of discovery proceedings

    委託人須支付所有與案件相關的費用,包括訴訟費、送達費、聘請專家人費、調查費和證據開示程序費用。
  17. The countries of civil law system do not have the discovery, but have systems with similar functions

    大陸法系國家雖沒有證據開示制度,但具有類似功能的制度設計。
  18. With the introduction about other nations " measures against extraterritorial discovery and the reservation clause of the hague evidence convention, and considering the actual situation of our country, the author put forward some proposals against u. s. extraterritorial discovery

    本文圍繞域外證據開示沖突的產生和表現形式,在介紹其他國家的對抗措施和《海牙取公約》的保留條款的同時,結合我國的實際情況,提出一些對策。
  19. Problems and their solutions in the current system of disclosure of evidence in criminal cases

    當前刑事證據開示中存在的問題及對策
  20. Do class actions, convert quote duty, set up discovery and separate conciliation from trial, etc. i would like to take this occasion to extend my sincere and genuine to mr. zuo weimin whose support is indispensable for the writing of this article. meanwhile i should also thank all the teachers of shi chuan university law institute because their edifies and helps

    在具體制度上,本文詳細探討了鼓勵私人提起訴訟和檢察官作為公益代表人提起訴訟的范圍、訴訟權利及限制,探討了在訴訟程序方面應做的相應改革,如集團訴訟的可操作性,舉責任的倒置,證據開示制度的建立以及調審分離、多調少審等。
分享友人