證明標準 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [zhèngmíngbiāozhǔn]
證明標準 英文
standard of proof
  • : Ⅰ動詞(證明) prove; verify; demonstrate Ⅱ名詞1 (證據) evidence; proof; testimony; witness 2 (...
  • : Ⅰ形容詞1 (明亮) bright; brilliant; light 2 (明白;清楚) clear; distinct 3 (公開;顯露在外;不隱...
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] (樹梢) treetop; the tip of a tree2 (枝節或表面) symptom; outside appearance; ...
  • : Ⅰ名詞1 (標準) standard; guideline; criterion; norm 2 (目標) aim; target Ⅱ動詞1 (依據; 依照)...
  • 證明 : 1 (表明 、 斷定真實性) prove; testify; bear out 2 (證明書或信) certificate; identification; t...
  • 標準 : (衡量事物的準則; 榜樣; 規范) standard; criterion; benchmark; pip; rule; ètalon (衡器); merits
  1. In china, under the influence of legal tradition and continental legal system, the evidence system pays more attention to substantive law rather than adjective law. in addition to the unscientific setting of the testimony standard, this evidence system influence the effect and quality of our country " s criminal trial

    在我國,由於受傳統法律思想和大陸法系據制度的影響,重實體輕程序的審判思想積重難返,加之證明標準設置缺乏科學性,嚴重影響了我國刑事審判的效率和質量。
  2. I presented these conceptions which related to the standard of proof, just as the discretional evaluation of evidence, objective of proof, value of the

    第六,提出了建立「以高度蓋然性為主,其它證明標準為輔」的證明標準新模式,以及適用於民事訴訟的具體情況。
  3. As the important constituent of the presumption rule, fact presumption is a rule of when the fact prove falls into the difficult position, according to the deduction by the common sense, the judge forms a temporarily inner conviction to the factum probandum under the proof standard, and shifts the subjective burden of proof between the litigants, thus helps the part to overcome the condition of facts prove

    作為事實認定的重要組成部分,事實推定是裁判者在案件事實的陷入困境時,根據經驗法則進行推理,在證明標準之下,暫時形成對案件待事實的心,並在當事人之間轉移主觀責任,從而避免訴訟陷入僵局,排除當事人舉困難的法則。
  4. The criteria of civil lawsuit should be of subjectivity and objectivity : subjective criterion is operating criterion and objective criterion is validating one ; should be dialectical unification of monistic criterion and hiberarchy of subjective criterion

    證明標準既有主觀,又有客觀;主觀是操作,客觀是衡量;應是客觀的一元化與主觀的層次性的辯統一。
  5. In the first part, the writer will deny the existing of nonliquet which is generally accepted. for this goal the paper will in the first instance introduce two concepts : judicial syllogism and standard of proof

    在第一部分中,筆者首先介紹了兩個基礎性的概念? ?司法三段論和證明標準,為下文反駁「真偽不」的客觀存在打下基礎。
  6. The points about the certificate standard contain objective truth, proof on a balance of probabilities, many levels of structures theory and negation theory, but these theories deserve the study

    目前有關民事訴訟證明標準的學說主要有客觀真實說、或然性權衡說、多層次說和否定說,但這些學說都值得商榷。
  7. The main contents of the reform of trial preceding in economic case is the reform of the system of the evidence. adjustment of the standard of proof in chinese is to built dualistic system for procedural standard of proof. so the proof on the balance of probabilities will be the procedural standard in chinese civil procedure

    我國目前正在進行的民事審判方式改革,主要是據制度方面的改革,以形成符合我國國情的民事證明標準,本文試從對民事證明標準概念,證明標準據制度上的意義和證明標準模式的評析,揭示我國奉引的一元制證明標準的弊端,並結合國情,得出我國應建立高度蓋然性的民事證明標準的結論,並指出該證明標準在實踐中的可行性和相應的配套制度的建設。
  8. In civil lawsuit, the setting of the criteria of civil lawsuit should be of dialectical unification of subjectivity and objectivity 、 justness and efficiency 、 commonness and individuality. in the subjective sense, we should judge their credibility, adherent to, no suspicion of intime conviction principally and suspicion of intime conviction subsidiarily in psychology ; to proof beyond a reasonable doubt in logic 、 to highly probability and preponderance of probability. in the objective sense, we should employ subjective facts as ratifying criterion

    具體到民事訴訟中,證明標準設置應以主觀與客觀的辯統一、公正與效率的辯統一、共性與個性的辯統一為原則,在主觀方面,堅持心理學上以內心確信無疑為主體、內心確信有疑為補充,邏輯學上依次以排除一切合理懷疑、高度蓋然性、優勢蓋然性為進行裁斷;在客觀方面,以「客觀真實」為衡量
  9. Finding the fact is the intention in civil procedure law. the evidence is the center for civil procedural safeguards

    據制度是訴訟程序的核心,而證明標準又是據制度的核心內容。
  10. In the thesis, the concept, classification and origin of standards of proof are generalized ; the logical characteristics of proof of china and western are revealed ; logic forms as well as advantage and disadvantage of the proofs of “ probability ”, “ beyond reasonable doubt ” and “ subjective truth ” is demonstrated

    本文概述了訴訟證明標準的概念、分類和淵源;揭示了中西證明標準的邏輯特點;論了蓋然性、排除合理懷疑、客觀真實等的邏輯基礎及其優劣。
  11. Evidence system is one of the most important questions in the civil proceedings and standard of proof is an important question in the evidence system. the civil procedure law applies the standard of " highly probable " in civil litigations. this article points out that it is not reasonable to adopt the " highly probable " standard in all civil litigations. firstly, this article mentions the important meaning of standard of proof in judicial proof. secondly, it pionts out the flaws in the standard of proof in civil litigation in our country. thirdly, it introduces the standard of proof in civil litigation in common law and civil law countries and analyzes the similar and different points in the standard of proof. finally this article points out several suggestions to rebuild the system of standard of proof. lt suggests we should construct a system which considers the " highly probable " standard as a principle and adopts other forms of standard of proof in sepcial civil cases. and we can build this reasonable system by means of legislation and case law

    但在所有民事案件中均劃一適用較高程度的蓋然性作為證明標準是不合理的。文章首先闡了民事訴訟證明標準在訴訟中的重要意義,然後對於我國有關民事訴訟證明標準的現狀及其缺陷作了一個概括,接著文章對于兩大法系民事訴訟證明標準的異同進行了介紹以及比較分析,最後提出了對于構建一個科學的民事訴訟證明標準體系的幾點建議。文章建議應當通過立法以及判例制度來建立一個以較高程度的蓋然性為原則的多元的證明標準體系。
  12. And it is also reflected by the suitability of the conditions of the criminal detention and the pinciple of writ. finally it is reflected by the duration of the criminal detention and the standard of proof of the detention and the rights of the detainees are apporpiate. the proportion principle is adopted in the whole process of the legislation and adjudication of the criminal detention. this article analyzes the necessity and feasibility of the creation of the proportion principle in our system of criminal detention. then this article designs the means of the criminal detention according to the proprotion principle. finally this article points out that the most important effect of this principle is to encourage the conception renovation and notion review of the criminal legislation and adjudication. if we have no renovation in the ideas we will never reach the original aim of this principle even if we had the best design

    西方主要法治國家在刑事拘留類強制措施中都體現了比例原則的精神實質,主要表現為刑事拘留的執行與批分離,實行令狀主義,刑事拘留的條件適當,刑事拘留的羈押期間、證明標準和被拘留者的權利符合比例。比例原則完全貫穿于刑事拘留的立法和司法當中。在此基礎上,本文分析了比例原則在我國刑事拘留制度中確立的必要性和可行性,並以比例原則的精神對我國刑事拘留措施進行了設計。
  13. Though criminal standard of proof is hotly debated in the law of evidence, its viewpoint is diversified, especially in the standard of proof of present public prosecution and guilt decision

    雖然,刑事證明標準在當前據法學研究中較為熱烈,但是,觀點紛紜,分歧顯,尤其是在刑事訴訟過程中對提起公訴的證明標準應否與有罪判決的證明標準要求一致方面討論得尤為激烈。
  14. On litigation division system at the investigation phase

    偵查終結的要求與證明標準
  15. On evidence regulations and its scientific standards

    試論據規則及其證明標準的科學性
  16. The nature and method of judicial proof determines the possible degree that judicial proof may reach, and the standard of judicial proof has to be enacted under this epistemological prerequisite

    摘要訴訟的本性及適合於訴訟的方法規定了訴訟可能達到的程度,此為訴訟證明標準設定的認識論前提。
  17. The standard of proof makes great sense to substantive law and procedural law

    證明標準對實體法和程序法都有重要的意義。
  18. Though detailed study of the standard of criminal proof helps to reduce the rate of these verdicts, it cannot resolve the problem in all because of the unavoidable shortcomings of the standard of proof. finally, the author advocates that precedent system should be established to accumulate judicial experience on rules of discerning ‘ doubts ’. meanwhile, the author strives to figure out primary rules of discerning ‘ doubts ’ from the misjudged cases

    筆者認為建立證明標準案例指導制度,積累司法經驗,尤其是總結排疑規則才是消解存疑判決現象的根本之道,筆者在對案例指導制度建立的必要性與可行性進行分析論的基礎上,提出規范案例指導制度的一些設想,並根據有限的錯案對排疑規則的建立進行了初步的探索。
  19. " the theory of legal facts " which has assimilated rationality of testimonology of western nations and their institutions, from the subjective process of lawsuit cognition, find a new research perspective and domain. however, it aggrandizes its relativity of cognition, neglect its absoluteness ; it emphasizes axiology and neglect the dialectical unification of axiology and epistemology

    「法律真實說」汲取西方國家訴訟據法學理論和制度的合理性,從訴訟認識的主觀過程,為訴訟證明標準的研究洞開了新的視域,但誇大了認識的相對性,忽視了認識的絕對性;強調價值論,忽視了認識論與價值論的辯統一。
  20. On the criteria of proof in auditing

    論審計據的證明標準
分享友人