轉承法律責任 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [zhuǎnchéngfǎlǜzérèn]
轉承法律責任 英文
vicarious liability
  • 轉 : 轉構詞成分。
  • 承 : Ⅰ動詞1 （托著; 接著） bear; hold; carry 2 （承擔） undertake; contract （to do a job） 3 （客套話...
  • 法 : Ⅰ名詞1 （由國家制定或認可的行為規則的總稱） law 2 （方法; 方式） way; method; mode; means 3 （標...
  • 律 : Ⅰ名1 （法律; 規則） law; rule; statute; regulation 2 （律詩的簡稱） short for lüshi 3 （姓氏） a ...
  • 責 : Ⅰ名詞（責任） duty; responsibility Ⅱ動詞1 （要求做成某事或行事達到一定標準） demand; ask for; req...
  • 任 : 任名詞（姓氏） a surname
  • 法律 : law; statute法律保護 legal protection; 法律程序 legal procedure; 法律承認 de jure recognition （...
  • 責任 : 1. （應做的事） duty; responsibility 2. （應承擔的過失） responsibility for a fault or wrong; blame
  1. This thesis points out that those five countries mentioned above have " citizen lawsuit " legal provision, which is based on environmental right. group lawsuit is or going to be the important form of environmental lawsuit. in order to lighten the sufferers " cause and effect testimony - offering responsibility, those countries confess in their legal precedent or legislation the theory of probability, medical cause, effect and indirect disproof, and implement the invert testimony - offering responsibility or shifting principle

    指出幾國均存在以環境權為基礎的「公民訴訟」法律條款；集團訴訟成為環境訴訟的重要形式；為了減輕環境侵權受害人的因果關系舉證責任，蓋然性說、疫學因果關系說、間接反證說等大都得到了各國判例乃至立法的承認，各國普遍實行了舉證責任倒置或轉移原則。
  2. On the base of the general principle in the civil law such as equality, voluntary, justness, trust, and none - abuse right, the main relieve means are compensation of property damage and adopt the other responsible approach. we improve the law system of personality right from consummating the right of name and portrait, agreement with the transfer of the part personality right, to regulating the relative heritance of the relative personality right in china

    在遵循平等、自願、公平、誠信和權利不得濫用等民法基本原則的基礎上，對侵害人格權商品化的救濟方式應以財產損害賠償為主、兼采其他責任方式，並從完善姓名權、肖像權等人格權制度，承認部分人格權的可轉讓性，規定有關人格權的相對可繼承性等方面完善中國的人格權法律制度。
  3. The turnaround of american tort law from traditional to modern embodied the trend from restricting tortuous liability to expanding. the basic reason of the trend was the transformation of economy and society in the advent of 20th century. at that time, the appeal court of new york became the pioneer in the innovation of american tort law by its eminent economic status and relatively exoteric judicial tradition. on the basis of refuting the formalism legal thought, cardozo carried on and develop the realistic legal thought of holmes and pound. meanwhile, he took full advantage of this practical legal thought in the field of american tort law

    美國的侵權行為法由傳統向現代的轉向體現為從限制侵權責任到擴大侵權責任的趨勢，而這一趨勢的產生又是以19世紀末20世紀初美國經濟和社會的轉型為根本動因的。 20世紀初，紐約上訴法院以其顯赫的經濟地位、相對開放的司法傳統，而成為美國侵權行為法變革的先導。在批判形式主義法律思想的基礎上，卡多佐繼承和發展了霍姆斯、龐德等人的現實主義法律思想，並將這種務實的法律思想充分體現在了侵權行為法領域的實踐和創新中。
  4. Fourth, after comparing china ' s sub - mortgage with the outer world ' s, the author fully analyzes the requisites to constitue a liability sub - mortgage. in order to consummate the system of the pledge rights, the author points out the defects in our legislation and poses that we should set up the liability sub - mortgage in our country

    第四，在比較中外法律體系關于轉質權的不同規定后，對責任轉質的構成要件進行了深刻的分析，指出我國《擔保法》及最高人民法院的司法解釋不承認責任轉質的立法缺陷，提出了在我國建立責任轉質的必要性和可能性，意在進一步完善我國的質權制度。
  5. Consulting the foreign experience of legislation, it has been a legislative trend to establish the system of vicarious liability of employers. this discourse, attempts to deepen the discussion through the comprehensive analysis on foreign legislative examples and thoughts about systems of vicarious liability of employers, as well as the combination of our county " s present legislative and judicial situations

    借鑒國外的立法經驗，建立完備的僱主轉承責任制度已是立法所趨，本文試圖通過對國外僱主轉承責任制度的立法體例及法律思想進行綜合分析，並結合我國立法和司法實踐的現狀，對如何構建我國的僱主責任制度作一詳細探討。
  6. It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason

    論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多，相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出，如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士，翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物，由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多，但在《民事證據法（草案） 》的擬定過程中，並未采責任倒置的地位，這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學選擇，誠然，舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險，而「倒置」規則的設計，則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼，在理解何為舉證責任倒置時，本文著重以民事法為主線，指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任，而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔，舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異，但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值，在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形，一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形，而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所有要件，對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定，若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證，在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時，從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則，公平原則，訴訟經濟原則，保護弱者原則等，基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念，其次立法應避免求大求全，再次要配合實體法的發展，最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。
  7. The key of emphasizing the administrative - persons responding is to protect all civil right and make it true, which not only change the status of misusing the power, but also remedy the legal shortage. the chapter is to let the court neutral to protect civil rights through prosecuting the administrative ? persons, which should know the power is owned by people. the article is divided into three parts. firstly, there is an introduce of the backdrop about lawmaking and theory correlative. secondly, i demonstrate some doubts from the economic and valuable point. then, go along the setup of the responsible system

    以連雲港奧凱事件為典型，背景篇的介紹只是在說明一個事實:我國法律體系缺乏對行政人個人行政法律責任的統一而嚴格的規定，致使現實中行政人越權、濫權及不作為的案事件層出不窮，理論上基本概念的不清晰更是為實踐的好轉製造了不小的障礙;方法篇的分析意在解決這樣的問題，即行政人為什麼要承擔個人的行政法律責任
  8. First, enacting a " biosafety law " as a framework for the laws of the biosafety management ; second, making special laws on the biosafety management, or supplying with the existing laws which are in connected with biosafety problems ; third, making laws on genetically modified organisms environmental impact and safety assessment, cross - border transfer of the management of biotechnology, genetically modified organisms labelling management, and other areas of laws and regulations to face biosafety problems recently ; then, giving some suitable advices on the main issues of biotechnology that damage the legislation and the disputes of procedures legislative ; last, pointing out other

    首先，應當制定一部《生物安全法》作為框架性的生物安全管理法律;其次，制定各領域的生物安全專項管理法律，或對原有的有關法律進行補充;再次，提出制定轉基因生物環境影響和安全評價、生物技術成果越境轉移管理、轉基因生物標簽管理等方面的法律、法規，應對目前生物安全的主要問題，並對生物技術損害法律責任的承擔和糾紛處理程序立法提出建議;最後，指出其他部門立法中有關生物安全方面應當進行的修改，包括知識產權法中的基因專利方面，民法中有關基因隱私權方面，刑法中的基因犯罪方面，等等。
  9. In the part of " ingredients ", this paper discusses the four elements which constitute the concept of bona fide possession of bill rights : valid endorsement, untitled endorser, endorsee with goodwill, and reasonable consideration, on the basis of the legislation of different countries in light of relative cases. in the part of " legal consequence ", this paper stresses t he relationship between true beneficiary and endorses in goodwill. the author insists that the endorsee in goodwill has the final right to gain the rights of bill, and the true beneficiary, ca n ' t claim for recovery or compensation

    在構成要件部分，筆者以各國票據立法為基礎，結合案例分析，重新闡釋了票據權利善意取得的四個構成要件，即有效票據轉讓行為、讓與人無處分權、受讓人善意和相當對價；在法律後果部分，筆者在強調了票據權利善意取得制度旨在調整真正權利人與善意受讓人的關系，使善意受讓人得以終局地取得票據權利，真正權利人不得對其請求回復和賠償之外，對該制度所引發的間接後果，即真正權利人與無處分權人、無處分權人與善意受讓人之間的利益分配和責任承擔進行了全面分析。
  10. On the basis of first - hand materials that is acquired from many enterprises, the thesis analyzes the existing problems and reason of cfo ' s transformation, focuses on cfo ' s position in corporate governance, cfo ' s status in organizational structure and the inevitability of cfo ' s transformation, discusses the professional responsibility, honesty responsibility and legal responsibility on cfos, and suggest that salary incentive model should be associated with operational performance and diversified

    在調查取得第一手資料的基礎上，深入分析了總會計師轉型存在的問題以及原因。重點探討了總會計師在公司治理中的定位、在企業組織結構中的地位以及角色轉換的必然性；研究了股份制企業總會計師承擔的職業責任、誠信責任及法律責任；提出應對總會計師採取多元化、與業績掛鉤的薪酬激勵方式。
  11. The corporation personality system is undoubtedly the basis in the legal system that supports the modern market economy, because its three pillars, that is the separation of company ' s property and shareholder ' s property, corporation independent personality and limited responsibility assumed by shareholder, assure the addition and efficiency of property rights flow, help the products turn to the wealth and make the circle of expansive reproduce continue smoothly

    在支撐現代市場經濟的法律制度中，公司法人制度無疑是中流砥柱，因為公司法人制度的三大支柱：公司財產與股東財產分離、公司獨立人格和股東承擔有限責任，有力地保證了產權流轉的增值和富有效率地進行，使產品最終變成財富，社會擴大再生產的循環得以繼續進行。
  12. Of all the legal systems that prop up modern market economy, the corporate personality system is a mainstay doubtlessly, and the three major pillars of the corporation system, the property of the corporation separated from the shareholders " property, a independent personality the corporation having, and the undertaking limited liability for the shareholder, which have vigorously promoted all the business transactions to carry through efficiently and the property right to increase its value in flowing

    在支撐現代市場經濟的法律制度中，公司法人制度無疑是中流砥柱，公司法人制度的三大支柱：公司的財產與股東財產相分離、公司具有獨立的人格和股東承擔有限責任，有力地促進了交易富有效率的進行和產權流轉的增值。
  13. “ party b guarantees that he is the legitimate owner of the know - how and technical documentation supplied to party a in accordance with the contract, and that he has the right to transfer them to party a, if the third party accuses party b of infringement, party b shall take up the matter with the third party and bear all the legal and economic responsibility arising therefrom

    乙方保證本合同規定提供的一切專有技術和技術資料的合法所有者並有權向甲方轉讓，如果發生第三方指控侵權，由乙方負責與第三方交涉並承擔法律上和經濟上的全部責任。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書