進行程序起訴 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [jìnhángchéngxùqǐsù]
進行程序起訴 英文
proceeding
  • 進 : 進構詞成分。
  • 行 : 行Ⅰ名詞1 （行列） line; row 2 （排行） seniority among brothers and sisters:你行幾? 我行三。where...
  • 程 : 名詞1 （規章; 法式） rule; regulation 2 （進度; 程序） order; procedure 3 （路途; 一段路） journe...
  • 起 : 起Ⅰ動詞1 （站起; 坐起） rise; get up; stand up 2 （取出; 取走） draw out; remove; extract; pull 3...
  • 訴 : 動詞1. （說給人） tell; relate; inform 2. （傾吐） complain; accuse 3. （控告） appeal to; resort to
  • 進行 : 1 （開展） be in progress; be underway; go on 2 （從事） carry on; carry out; conduct; make 3 （...
  • 程序 : 1 （進行次序） order; procedure; course; sequence; schedule; ground rule; routing process 2 [自動...
  • 起訴 : [法律] sue; prosecute; charge; bring a suit against sb ; bring an action against sb ; file a laws...
  1. Firstly, some basic concepts are not clear, such as what is the status of the company under liquidation, how to define the action of the industrial - commercial authority ' s invalidation of the license of the company, whether or not the share holders can sue to disincorporate the company, is it legal to dissolve a company without liquidation, what is special liquidation, under what situation will a company be obliged to disincorporate, who will be responsible for liquidation after the dis incorporation, etc. secondly, some primary legislative principles about disincorporation and liquidation that are adopted in foreign countries are not established in china, such as a company must be liquidated before disincorporation except for acquisition, the company remains valid during the liquidation until it finishes the invalidation registration, an ordinary liquidation must be replaced by a special liquidation under the instruction of the court when there is an impediment or a fraud, the company should apply to the court for bankruptcy when it is found that its debt is over its asset during the liquidation, the number of people execute liquidation can be several or just one, companies applied for annulment shall be judged by the court and must be liquidated, etc. thirdly, china does n ' t have some of the fundamental rules that are specified in the laws of foreign countries, such as the rule of disincorporation registration, the rule that the company should sue to let the court judge for disincorporation if there is a deadlock between share holders, the rule of credit trade - off in special liquidation, the rule that people who execute the liquidation are jointly responsible for compensating the loss of the third party caused by their activities that are illegal or vicious, the rule of special liquidation, the rule of the representation of the people who execute the liquidation, the rule of the court supervising the liquidation in an inactive way, the rule of how long the accounts and documents should be kept after disincorporation, etc. because of the lack in research and legislation, the system for companies leaving the market is highly disorganized, which harmed the interest of the creditors and relevant people, increased the risk of market exchange, damaged the order of the market economy and the ethic of doing business, wasted the resources of the society, and impaired the authority and seriousness of the law

    再次，國外立法上的一些基本制度我國沒有，如解散登記制度，股東出現僵局訴請法院判決解散制度，特別清算中的債權協定製度，清算人因違法或惡意對第三人承擔連帶賠償責任制度，司法特別清算制度，清算人的代表性制度，法院消極監督清算制度，帳薄及文件在公司解散后保存法定期限制度等。由於理論研究和立法的不足，造成了我國公司法人退出市場機制的嚴重混亂，損害了債權人和利害關系人的利益，增加了市場主體交易不安全感，破壞了市場經濟秩序和商業道德，浪費了社會資源，削弱了法律的權威性和嚴肅性。文章認為，完善我國公司解散和清算制度，應借鑒和引進發達國家的法學理論和法律制度，統一我國有關解散和清算立法，在基本概念、基本原則、基本制度、基本程序諸方面進行統一規范，填補立法空白，創設法院解散公司制度，廢除行政特別清算制度代之以司法特別清算制度，健全和嚴格違反清算規定的法律責任制度（包括民事責任，刑事責任，行政責任，改變現行行政處罰范圍偏廣，民事賠償范圍偏窄，刑事追究空白太多的不協調狀況） ，從而構築起科學的公司解散和清算制度，使之符合我國經濟生活的客觀需求，符合市場經濟發展的基本方向，並與國外立法通例趨同。
  2. The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure

    以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導，結合我國的國情，對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善，在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子；在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念，以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實；在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則；在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據，其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據，增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度，補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的，取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定，改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。
  3. On the basis of forefathers " research results, the author combes and concludes the single file clause of sporadically appeared on its legislation. combining the relevant literature, the author tests and analyses the local criminal judicial proceedings, and finds that from the prosecuting to the accepting, inquisiting and finally to the judgement, it forms a set of intact and close workflow, all links with one another, ensuring the smooth enforcement of national judicial power

    筆者在前人研究成果的基礎上，通過對其立法上散見的單行條款進行梳理、歸納，並結合相關文獻，考析其地方刑事訴訟程序，能夠發現從起訴到受理，到審訊，到判決，形成一套完整細密的工作流程，環環緊扣，保障著國家司法權力的順暢行使。
  4. Usually there is a certain interval between the investigating & prosecuting apparatus instituting a proceeding and the court formally holding a hearing in public prosecution case. during the interval the judge will conduct a series of judicial action, that is to examine the complaint case to decide if it is necessary to open a hearing and also make procedural preparation for the hearing, this procedure is called pre - court examination procedure of public prosecution case

    公訴案件從檢察機關提起公訴到法院正式開庭審判之間，通常有一定時間間隔，在此期間，法官一般要進行一系列訴訟活動，主要是對起訴案件進行審查，決定是否開庭審判及為開庭審判做程序上的準備，這種程序，稱為公訴案件的庭前審查程序。
  5. In the article the ways of hearing are put forward to take establishing administrative collateral civil proceedings as fundamental mode, to take hearing of division between correlative administrative dispute and civil dispute as well as investigating civil dispute with correlatively administrative dispute together as supplementary mode on the basis of using numerous viewpoints in both domestic and overseas academic circles and practical circles as well as judgments in practice for reference so that the problem of correlatively administrative dispute and civil dispute may be solved effectively under different circumstances

    現實生活中，基於相同的法律事實而同時引起行政爭議與民事爭議的現象大量存在，對這種具有內在關聯性的行政爭議與民事爭議如何進行審理，是近年來理論界和實務界研討的熱點問題。行政訴訟與民事訴訟的區別在於所解決爭議的性質不同，然而在訴訟實踐中，有些行政爭議與民事爭議經常交織在一起，出現了難以區分訴訟屬性以及如何適用程序的問題。
  6. This dissertation just undertakes the analysis and demonstration and put forward my own opinion according to the nature and the status of raising civil lawsuits by procuratorial organs and their rights and obligations in concrete lawsuits procedure. finally, i give my suggestion that we should found the systam of civil law sules raised by procuratorial organs through legisla tion as soon as possible

    本文結合學術界的各種理論觀點，就我國檢察機關提起民事訴訟的性質、地位及在具體的訴訟程序中應享有的權利和應承擔的義務進行分析論證，提出自己的觀點和認識，最後作者建議應盡快從立法上確立我國檢察機關提起民事訴訟制度。
  7. The meaning and value from civil prosecution starting to analyse the existing system of civil prosecution theoretical basis, the procuratorial organs inspected foreign civil proceedings legislative provisions on the establishment of civil prosecution in our system and the need for feasibility ( that is based on reality ), explored building two key issues civil prosecution system ( that is, the scope and legal status of the case ), finally, building on a number of procedural issues specific arrangements

    本文從民事公訴的含義和價值出發，分析了民事公訴制度存在的理論基礎，考察了中外檢察機關提起民事訴訟的立法規定，闡述了在我國建立民事公訴制度的必要性與可行性（即現實依據） ，探討了建構民事公訴制度的兩個關鍵問題（即案件范圍和法律地位問題） ，最後就建構中的一些程序性問題進行了具體安排。
  8. The third chapter explores the procedural design of the system of civil suit filed by procuratorial organ

    第三章對檢察機關提起民事訴訟的程序設置進行探索。
  9. First, this part discusses two questions of much dispute : the scope of civil suit filed by procuratorial organ and the legal status of civil public prosecution. second, it addresses the ideas to solve questions in procedural design

    首先對檢察機關提起民事訴訟的范圍和其在民事公訴中的法律地位，這兩個爭議較大得問題進行探討；然後對程序設置中的具體問題提出構想；最後提出確立該制度的立法建議。
  10. The reform of civil and economic hearing method does start from proof liability. but there are still many insufficiencies which directly effect the morale of the person concerned, the faith of the person concerned towards our litigation institution, and the course of litigation, even threaten the smooth execution of court decisions. at the same time, the better implementation of proof liability by the person concerned also depends on a better procedural safeguard

    文章認為舉證責任一向是民事訴訟中的重要問題，我國的民事、經濟審判方式改革即起因於舉證責任，但在作為舉證責任核心的舉證責任分配方面，尚存在諸多不足，如果不能克服這些不足，將直接影響到當事人的情緒，影響到當事人對我國訴訟制度的信任度，以及訴訟的進程，甚至威脅到判決能否順利執行等等，故需要我們盡快加以解決，同時當事人能否較好地履行舉證責任，還取決于良好的程序保障。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書