非有意侵權 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [fēiyǒuyìqīnquán]
非有意侵權
英文
innocent infringement- 非 : Ⅰ名詞1 (錯誤) mistake; wrong; errors 2 (指非洲) short for africa 3 (姓氏) a surname Ⅱ動詞1 ...
- 有 : 有副詞[書面語] (表示整數之外再加零數): 30 有 5 thirty-five; 10 有 5年 fifteen years
- 意 : Ⅰ名詞1 (意思) meaning; idea 2 (心愿; 願望) wish; desire; intention 3 (人或事物流露的情態)su...
- 侵 : Ⅰ動詞(侵入) invade; intrude into; infringe upon Ⅱ形容詞(接近) approaching Ⅲ名詞(姓氏) a surname
- 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] (秤錘) counterpoise; weight (of a steelyard)2 (權力) power; authority 3 (...
- 有意 : 1 (有心思) have a mind to; be disposed to; be inclined to 2 (故意) intentionally; purposely; ...
-
User explicitly acknowledges and agrees that, except as expressly provided in the preceding paragraph, to the fullest extent allowed by law, hktb shall not be obligated or liable for any direct damages, contract damages, indirect damages, incidental damages, consequential damages, special damages, exemplary damages, warranty, tort including negligence damages, product liability damages or liabilities including, but not limited to, loss of digital content, prints, digital storage media, revenue and or profit, etc damages arising with respect to your use of discoverhongkong. com e - invites and the service, even if we have been advised or have knowledge of the possibility of such damages
用戶明確確認及同意,除非前文各段有明確規定,否則在法律許可的最大限度下,香港旅遊發展局無需就閣下使用discoverhongkong . com e請卡及本服務而引起的任何直接損害賠償合約損害賠償間接損害賠償附帶損害賠償相應損害賠償特別損害賠償懲罰性損害賠償保證侵權包括疏忽損害賠償產品責任損害賠償或法律責任包括但不限於數碼內容列印本數碼儲存媒體收益及或利潤的損失而承擔任何責任,即使香港旅遊發展局已獲知會或已知悉該等損害賠償的可能性亦然。The most important is to prelect the benefits of creditors. however in practice, the phenomenon of violating creditor ' s rights is always happened. the abusing of rights of bankruptcy is a illegal act. nowadays, the bankruptcy liquidation system of our country is not so perfect, which leads to no particular law to practice. there are enterprises take advantage of it, so they can evade their debts. this phenomenon influences the rights of creditors badly. this essay firstly introduces the expression of damaging the rights of creditors in enterprise bankruptcy, and then further analyses it. this essay analyses the protection of the rights of creditors from these aspects that system of bankruptcy truslee, creditor autonomy, discontinuation of execution, legal responsibility. by seting up a perfect system of bankruptcy truslee, we can contral insolvent properties efficiently
破產是一種保護,破產法的基本原則是既保護債權人也保護債務人的利益,其中重在保護債權人的利益,而實踐中由於種種原因,債權人的利益被侵犯的不正常情形屢屢發生,其中破產權利的濫用更是一種惡意逃債的違法行為。目前我國的破產清算制度和法律體系還很不完善,尤其是非全民所有制企業法人的破產清算制度尚未完全建立,實踐中普遍缺乏可供操作的法律、法規的具體規定,從而導致了利用公司破產、被吊銷等以達到逃避債務目的的現象非常普遍,嚴重損害了債權人的利益。本文從企業破產過程中損害債權人利益的表現入手,對我國企業破產實踐中的損害債權人利益的原因進行剖析。Legal purposes : we will not disclose any of your personal information unless we have your permission or in special cases where we fully believe in good faith that the disclosure of your information is necessary to identify, contact or bring legal action against those who may be violating the terms of service of the website or may be causing interference with the rights or property of the website
合法目的:我們將不泄露您的個人資訊,除非我們有您的同意,或在特殊案件下,我們依誠信原則相信,資訊的公開對于指認聯絡或控訴那些違反本網站服務條款或可能造成侵犯本網站權利或財產權的人士,是必要的。It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason
論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多,相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出,如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士,翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物,由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多,但在《民事證據法(草案) 》的擬定過程中,並未采責任倒置的地位,這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學選擇,誠然,舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險,而「倒置」規則的設計,則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼,在理解何為舉證責任倒置時,本文著重以民事法為主線,指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任,而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔,舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異,但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值,在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形,一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形,而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所有要件,對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定,若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證,在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時,從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則,公平原則,訴訟經濟原則,保護弱者原則等,基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念,其次立法應避免求大求全,再次要配合實體法的發展,最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。Abstract : the offence of infringing trade secret means the ac t of falsely obtaining, leaking out, using or permitting the other to use the righter ' s trade secret an d having resulted in heavy and great losses to the righter. its subject is mixed subject, containing both certain special subject and certain general subject. its mens rea may be both guilty intention, containing both direct intention and indi r ect intention, and guilty fault, containing both negligent fault and reckless fau l t. on the objective aspect its establishment is not necessarily signed by the “ h aving resulted in heavy and great losses to the righter ”. its direct object is t he righter ' s right to his trade secret, containing the righter ' s special ownin g right or using right and the right of keeping the secret to the trade secret
文摘:侵犯商業秘密罪是指非法獲取、披露、使用或者允許他人使用權利人的商業秘密,給權利人造成重大損失的行為;其主體是混合主體,既包括一定的特殊主體,又包括一定的一般主體;其主觀方面既可以是故意,包括直接故意和間接故意,又可以是過失,包括疏忽大意的過失和過于自信的過失;其在客觀方面並不必然以「給權利人造成重大損失」為成立犯罪的標志;其直接客體是權利人對商業秘密的權利,包括對商業秘密的所有權或使用權以及保密權。Section one includes the concept and historical development of the crime of occupation ; section two elaborates on the constitution of the crime of occupation, indicating that the object of the crime of occupation refers to the ownership of property of others, and the target of the crime refers to the property taken care of and the left and the hidden property ; as far as the objective factors of the crime of occupation is concerned, it can refer to having done or having - not done, which includes illegal occupation for personal use, refusing to return or refusing to hand over and huge amount. as for the subjective factor, it is intentional for illegal occupation. the subject of the crime refers to the ordinary subject
全文分為以下四部分:一、侵占罪的概念和歷史沿革,該部分首先對有關侵占罪概念的各種不同表述方式進行分析比較,明確了侵占罪的概念,並結合古今中外刑法中有關侵占罪的立法,全方位詳述了侵占罪的發展沿革;二、侵占罪的犯罪構成,該部分通過對侵占罪的犯罪構成進行詳盡的分析研究,指出侵占罪的客體為他人財物所有權,其犯罪對象為代為保管的他人財物和他人的遺忘物或埋藏物,遺忘物與遺失物不宜作嚴格的區分;就侵占罪客觀方面而言,其行為方式既可以是作為,也可以為不作為,包含非法佔為己有、拒不退還或拒不交出、數額較大三個方面;其主觀方面為故意,並且出於非法佔有的目的;該罪的主體為一般主體。Although there is no the description of " for the purpose of illegal possession " in the fads about the crime, the crime can not be tenable without the purpose. on the other hand, the crime of fraud on letter of credit leaves from common fraud crime, which is a crime for the purpose of illegal possession with direct intent. on some occasion, there is a division of accomplished cffense and unaccomplished offense in crime of fraud on letter of crfdit. the act of counterfeiting a letter of credit and using it afterwards, and the act of using a noneffec tive credit, and the act of defrauding a bank to open a credit or using fraudulent clause in credit somewhat should be punished seriously by our country ' s criminal law
信用證詐騙罪所侵犯的客體是國家對信用證的管理制度以及公私財產所有權,其客觀行為表現包括使用偽造、變造的信用證或者附隨的單據、文件進行詐騙活動、使用作廢的信用證進行詐騙活動、騙取信用證進行詐騙活動以及以其他方法進行信用證詐騙活動,信用證詐騙罪的犯罪主體包括自然人和單位,主觀上屬于直接故意,要求行為人具有非法佔有的目的。在司法實踐中,應注意信用證詐騙罪與非罪、與彼罪的區分認定,以及對罪數形態、共同犯罪和既未遂形態的認識。Restorative criminal responsibility needs and can obtain the reasonable annotation in elementary theory issues of criminal law, such as the law profit, crime essence, criminal activity legal relationship and legal responsibility : ( 1 ) the crime of violating the individual law profit is not the violation that aims at the abstract national or social entity, but aims at the individuals ; ( 2 ) " inspiring the authority " is not the basic task of the modern civil rights criminal law, maintaining victim ' s rights and interests and safeguarding that of criminal ’ s are “ two sides of the whole body ” of modern criminal law functions, neglecting any side at the same time inevitably enable the criminal judicature not to sink into region of the righteousness ; ( 3 ) in the concrete criminal activity legal relationship, the crime victim is the natural subject, the related country judicial organ is the subject of investigating the crime responsibility, or that of the judgment or execution, country in the overall significance cannot become the subject ; ( 4 ) repair and compensation of the crime harm is by no means a matter of civil liability, but is the basic entity burden of the legal responsibility which the criminal must shoulder
恢復性刑事責任需要且能夠在法益與犯罪本質、刑事法律關系及刑事責任等刑法基本理論問題上得到合理詮釋: ( 1 )侵害個人法益犯罪並不是針對抽象的國家或社會實體的侵害,而是針對私人的侵害; ( 2 ) 「重振權力」不是現代民權刑法的基本任務,保障與維護受害人和犯罪人合法權益是現代刑事法功能之一體兩面,忽視任何一面勢必使刑事司法陷於不義之境地; ( 3 )在具體刑事法律關系中,犯罪受害人是當然主體,有關國家司法機關是犯罪責任之追訴或裁判或執行主體,整體意義上的國家並不能成為主體; ( 4 )犯罪損害的修復與賠償並非民事責任的事情,而是犯罪人應當擔負的刑事責任之基本的實體性負擔。The bureau that keep watch reminds consumption, if encounter following item but to superintendency department complaint handling : business of insurance of insurance device and agency of insurance individual agent breaks the law mediumly, violate compasses act ; create insurance device illegally ; run insurance wu or insurance intermediary business illegally ; as a result of insurance company sale member intended in the process that exhibit property or error, misdirect consumer or enroach on insurance join the action of right beneficial ; the irregularity of insurance device and its branch chief, violate compasses act ; shenzhen protects inspect bureau the staff member breaks the law, violate discipline and act of neglect one ' s duty ; the criticism that works to insurance, opinion and proposal ; other concerned enroach on is sure to join the action of right beneficial
保監局提醒消費,假如碰到下列事項可向監管部門投訴處理:保險機構及保險個人代理人經辦保險業務中的違法、違規行為;非法設立保險機構;非法經營保險業務或保險中介業務;由於保險公司營銷員在展業過程中故意或過失,誤導消費者或侵害保險合法權益的行為;保險機構及其分支機構負責人的違法、違規行為;深圳保監局工作人員違法、違紀和失職行為;對保險工作的批評、意見和建議;其他有關侵害保險合法權益的行為。The integrated analyzing and sorting toward ids data, the accurate forecasting of the intruders and common visitors etc, all come down to the multiple data conformity disposal. therefore, it is vitally important to develop a perfect nonlinear conformity disposal method. however, some favorable characters of ann can content these ids working demands perfectly, in additon, the capability of nonlinear mapping of ann also make sure that the system can execute simple or complex classification and save the information into the coefficent of connecting power, maintain the network robust and fault toleration. so more and more people alter one after another their working focus to the nonlinear mathematic model based on the ann in order to resolve the complex problems in ids system much better
入侵檢測工作屬于分類識別問題,其中存在著大量的非線性問題,對入侵檢測資料進行綜合分析與分類,準確判別惡意訪問和正常訪問等都涉及到多資料的整合處理,因此研製理想的非線性整合處理方法是非常必要的,而神經網路由於其內在的對不確定性的學習與適應能力,恰好能滿足入侵檢測工作分類識別的需求,另外神經網路的非線性映射能力也是保證其成功實現各種簡單或復雜分類的主要原因,它將信息分散式存儲于連結權系數中,使網路具有較高的容錯性和魯棒性。The restatement of the law, second, torts stipulates the following factors which should be considered, the already existed highly dangerousness to certain people, land, or animal ; the higher probability of the act to cause damages ; unavoidablility of the danger in spite of reasonable awareness ; the act being of unusual use ; conducting the act in an unreasonable place ; the value to the public. a for the theoretical basis of the liability of danger, german scholar mr. j. esser, in his book ? he basis and development of the liability of danger ?,
如何確定某種危險活動是否具有異常危險時,美國《侵權行為法(第二次)重述》 520條規定應考慮如下因素:存在對某人人身、土地或動物的某種損害的高度危險程度;該行為產生損害的機率很大;通過盡到合理的注意仍無法避免該危險;該行為為非通常使用;該活動在從事的地點不合適;該活動對于公眾的價值。Thus there are two areas of concern : firstly, although criminal prosecutions or administrative means have already been carried out, the infringement has occurred and the interests of the obligee has been violated. without setting definite areas of indemnification due to the infringement, the interests of the obligee cannot be assured and on the other hand, it can not prevent further torts. secondly, in evaluating the indemnification of the torts, there is no standard or scope which can cause difficulty in judicial judgment, especially in the evaluation of the intangible injury or the injury which cannot be enumerated, and in the evaluation of the evidence that causes injury
在過去多年的司法實踐表明,單憑刑事和行政手段,未必能完全保護知識產權權利人之利益,這里有兩個方面思考:第一,即使作出了刑事和行政手段,有關的侵害行為可能已經作出,並導致權利人利益受損,在沒有規范侵權人需要為侵權行為所承擔的賠償范圍,一方面未能保障權利人之利益,另一方面也未能產生阻嚇作用,提升預防功能;第二,對侵權行為進行損害賠償計算時,並沒有統一標準和范圍,對于司法審判造成一定難度,尤其是對于非財產損害之計算、造成損失之舉證和無法列明之損失各個方面,也使法官在確定損害賠償金額時,需要考慮和注意的問題。The former means the concerned party has legal reason and means to gain access to the trade secrets of others but has the obligation to keep these secrets confidential. once he violates the obligations by disclosing, utilizing or allowing others to utilize the trade secrets to his knowledge, his act will constitute trade secret torts ; while in the latter case, the concerned party acquires or gains access to others " trade secrets by means of disclosure by non - right - holder, emphasizing the illicit aspect of actor
前者意味著相對人對他人的商業秘密雖是合法獲知,但卻負有一定的保密義務,一旦其違背了這種義務,披露、使用或允許他人使用其所掌握的商業秘密,就會構成對他人商業秘密權的侵犯,而在後一種情況下,相對人對他人的商業秘密是以非權利人披露的方式獲知或掌握的,強調的是行為人行為的不正當性。分享友人