面部表情程序 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [miànbùbiǎoqíngchéngxù]
面部表情程序 英文
facial affect program
  • 面 : Ⅰ名詞1 （頭的前部; 臉） face 2 （物體的表面） surface; top 3 （外露的一層或正面） outside; the ri...
  • 部 : Ⅰ名詞1 （部分; 部位） part; section; division; region 2 （部門; 機關或組織單位的名稱） unit; mini...
  • 表 : Ⅰ名詞1 （外面;外表） outside; surface; external 2 （中表親戚） the relationship between the child...
  • 情 : 名詞1 （感情） feeling; affection; sentiment 2 （情分; 情面） favour; kindness; sensibilities; fe...
  • 程 : 名詞1 （規章; 法式） rule; regulation 2 （進度; 程序） order; procedure 3 （路途; 一段路） journe...
  • 面部 : face
  • 表情 : 1 （表現出的思想感情） expression; countenance; look 2 （表達感情） express one s feelings; 表情...
  • 程序 : 1 （進行次序） order; procedure; course; sequence; schedule; ground rule; routing process 2 [自動...
  1. It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason

    論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多，相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出，如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士，翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物，由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多，但在《民事證據法（草案） 》的擬定過程中，並未采責任倒置的地位，這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學選擇，誠然，舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險，而「倒置」規則的設計，則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼，在理解何為舉證責任倒置時，本文著重以民事法為主線，指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任，而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔，舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異，但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值，在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形，一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形，而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所有要件，對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定，若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證，在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時，從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則，公平原則，訴訟經濟原則，保護弱者原則等，基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念，其次立法應避免求大求全，再次要配合實體法的發展，最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。
  2. This paper is consisted of two major parts : one deals with the general working performance of the fmghp by setting up mathematic model and developing computer procedure, getting the datum related to the capillary flow and heat transfer, analysing the working characteristics of fmghp in different working temperature, heat flux and inclination angle etc. in this part, the prediction of capillary and boiling limit are also included. the other major part studies the flow and heat transfer characteristics in the micro - film region formed by the meniscus attached on the metalic fin in the micro rectangular groove. investigations on the influence of width of groove and other factors on heat transfer in this region have been made. the importance of this micro - region in the heat transfer of the entire heat pipe has been unveiled. the heat transfer characteristics gotten by this research could be used in design and application and also optimization of this kind of fmghp

    本文在大量查閱現有國內外文獻的基礎上，總結並綜合前人有關微槽平板熱管理論研究方面的成果，對單面刻有槽道的微槽平板熱管進行了較為深入和細致的研究。本文的研究共分兩大部分，其中第一部分考察了該型熱管的整體工作表現，通過建立數學模型和開發相應的計算程序，得到了熱管內部毛細流動和傳熱的數據，分析了熱管在不同工作傾角、不同加熱熱流以及不同工作溫度等情況下工作特性的變化規律，考察了汽液界面上的剪切作用對熱管傳熱量的影響，並且進一步在理論上預測了該型熱管的毛細和沸騰極限。
  3. There are inevitable connections and essential distinctions between statement review and audit. there are both components of independent audit principles, and they are both used to assure the legitimacy of accounting statement but statement review is that cpa, accepting the entrusting, mainly executes inquiring and analyzing program to illustrate whether there are the circumstances that statement review offend the enterprise accounting rules and other financing accounting laws and rules. while accounting statement auditing is that cpa, entrusted according to the laws regulating, executes auditing and gives opinions to the statement and other data and economic activities reflected by these data

    報表審閱與報表審計有著必然的聯系和本質的區別：報表審閱和報表審計都是獨立審計準則的組成部分，都是為了保證會計報表的合法性和真實性；但是會計報表審閱是指注冊會計師接受委託，主要通過實施查詢和分析性程序，說明是否發現會計報表在所有重大方面有違反企業會計準則以及國家其他有關財務會計法規規定的情況，而會計報表審計指注冊會計師依法接受委託，對被審單位的會計報表和其他資料及其所反映的經濟活動，進行審查並發表意見。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書