amplify necessary rules and regulations 中文意思是什麼

amplify necessary rules and regulations 解釋
健全合理的規章制度
  • amplify : vt 1 擴大,放大。2 引伸,詳述。3 【電學】增強(電流等)。4 誇大。vi 引伸,詳說,作進一步闡述 (on...
  • necessary : adj 必要的 不可缺的;必須的 強迫的;必然的 必定的。 a necessary result 必然的結果。 a necessary e...
  • rules : 安全法規
  • and : n. 1. 附加條件。2. 〈常 pl. 〉附加細節。
  • regulations : 法令法規 只具備基本的法律常識
  1. It is necessary to adopt efficient institutional arrangement to avoid supervisors loafing on their job, being captured or obtaining private interest with their power. it include form, amplify and carry out all kinds of rules and regulations strictly in daily work, form incentive mechanism that combine standing wage with incentive wage and promotion system, and reinforce punishment to whom obtain private interest with their power

    必須採取有效的制度安排,克服監管者偷懶、 「被俘」及以權謀私等行為的發生,包括建立健全和嚴格執行各種日常工作中的規章制度,建立工齡工資、激勵工資與提拔制度緊密結合的激勵機制,加大對以權謀私的懲處力度等。
  2. Currently, in china and even in the world, the credit crisis has been an important issue concerning whether the market economy can run in a healthy way. it is imperative to establish a insurance market which needs amplify necessary rules and regulations. being an important principle of the insurance law, the principle of utmost good faith has not been established in the insurance law, and it will definitely influence the legal practice of insurance cases

    當前在我國乃至全世界誠信危機已經成了關系市場經濟能否健康發展的重要問題,我國迫切需要建立保險市場,而完善的保險市場又需要健全合理的保險法律制度,最大誠信原則作為保險法的重要原則在我國涉及保險的各項法律中都沒有確立,這樣顯然會影響保險立法的科學性和法律適用的正確性。
  3. How to use of the currently in effect criminal procedure expert testimony system in the normal way, administrative control expert testimony institution and office workers, amplify necessary rules and regulations of the actuating of expert conclusion 、 implement of expert conclusion 、 argumentation of expert conclusion 、 authentication of expert conclusion ; up to protect litigation rights of parties in action, get on the stick of administration of justice 、 successfully achieve an end of administration of reasonable judgment all along is the focal point of the work and difficult point in our expert testimony system structure. in this paper, coupling our current the present situation of criminal expert testimony, to perfect the legal system, to resolve the problems of expert testimony system, the writer tried to study some problems of giving some enlightenment to the theory and practice of judicial appraisal institution, relate and analyze it and set forth the views and opinions on the settlement of some matters with six parts

    本文從分析刑事司法鑒定及其程序入手,比較兩大法系關于刑事司法鑒定的啟動、實施、質證、認證與採信等司法證明各環節的制度規定,透視我國刑事司法鑒定程序存在的基本問題,在此基礎上提出:規定鑒定期限、對無鑒定結果不能進入訴訟或準司法程序的情況,當事人可以申請公證機關公證鑒定啟動程序的真實性和合理性、建立鑒定人出庭作證制度、裁判者對鑒定結論認證通過質證程序形成心證的過程及理由應做出公開說明等有利於我國刑事司法鑒定程序改革的具體構想。
分享友人