appellate body 中文意思是什麼
appellate body
解釋
上訴受理機構-
This thesis is mainly on the standing appellate body of dsb
本文以上訴程序為研究對象，分為六個部分進行探討。 -
Chapter iv introduces the common doctrine that there is not a de jure stare decisis in the dsm according to the text of the wto, the viewpoint of appellate body and the allegation of some scholars, and then questions the reasons by which of the common doctrine excludes the system of stare decisis. this chapter continues to examine the practice of wto adjudic
第四章首先根據wto的約文、上訴機構的觀點和學者們的主張，闡述了在wto爭端解決中不存在法律上先例制度的通說，並對學說上主張wto排斥先例制度的理由提出質疑，進而通過考察wto爭端解決實踐，得出了wto爭端解決中存在事實上遵循先例的結論，並進一步探討了在wto爭端解決中確立正式先例制度的意義和必要性以及諸先例之間的位階關系等問題。 -
These organizations are called amicus curiae, they have intervened many of disputes and submit the brief directly to the panel and the appellate body ; meanwhile, the panel and the appellate body either decline or accept submission or draw up special procedure for the amicus curiae brief
Wto的諸協定，特別是《關于爭端解決規則與程序的諒解》 （簡稱dsu ）中沒有關於法庭之友的規定，但是法庭之友主動向專家組、上訴機構提交意見，介入爭端解決機制已經是不爭的事實。 -
The chief executive - in - council is the appellate body for hearing appeals against decisions made by the hkma
行政長官會同行政會議是上訴機構，負責聆訊申請推翻金管局所作決定的上訴。 -
The symbol of the appellate review in wto dispute settlement mechanism is the standing appellate body which is set up to check up the decision made by the panel
Wto爭端解決機制上訴審的標志是其所設立的專事審查專家小組決定的常設上訴機構。 -
Panel of experts shows strongly international judicial characteristic in the procedural respect. standing appellate body is not an appeal court but a legislative review procedure
專家組只是在其技術方面，展示了較強的國際司法特性；上訴機構不是上訴法院，只是一個法律復查程序。 -
The thesis is divided into six parts in addition to the introduction, which has about 40, 000 words. part one : the characteristics of dsb and the appellate body
其次，相比較gatt項下較分散的爭端解決機制， wto爭端解決機制將該組織項下的各項協議的爭端解決統一起來，實現了爭端解決機制的單一化。 -
And the appellate body itself is also a characteristic. the report of the applellate body is final and authoritive, the working procedures for applellate review requires that the working process be timely and secretely
在分析了wto爭端解決機制的特點后，筆者認為上訴程序也有自己獨特的特點，即終局性、權威性、時限性和保密性。 -
It was recognized by the panel and appellate body that unforeseen developments must be demonstrated as a matter of fact though they are not independent conditions for the application of a safeguard measure
Wto的專家組和上訴機構多次確認了這一點，即「不可預見的發展」雖然不是採取保障措施的獨立條件，但其必須要作為一個事實問題得到證明。 -
Appellate body also has corrected the legal mistakes appeared in the panel process, maintained integrity of wto regulations, established the principles like burden of proof and judicial economy, which now are widely used in the dsb process
維護了wto規則的統一性。上訴機構還通過對. 「影響羊毛衫進口的措施案」的審理確立了盯0爭端中的舉證原則和司法經濟原則。 -
The appellate process has properly dealed with the relation between world trade and envirmental protection. non - government organization and private attorneys have taken part in the dsb under the approval of the appellate body
通過對「美國石油標準案」 、 「海龜/海蝦」案的介紹，闡述了上訴機構在世界貿易組織現存的法律框架內適當地處理了國際貿易與環境保護之間的關系。 -
Thus, in the view of the author, judical interpretation in wto is the comprehendsion and illustration of panel and appellate body applying to the wto law. considering the wide range law of wto covered, the author focus on the field of anti - dumping law, probes how the panel and appellate body to interpret this agreement relying on the winded up cases of anti - dumping dispute
考慮到研究的可行性和具體性，在本文第二章，筆者選定反傾銷這一領域，以專家小組、上訴機構在已結的反傾銷爭端案件所做的司法解釋為研究依據，意圖探討他們是怎樣做出這些解釋，運用了哪些解釋規則，並進而加深對wto反傾銷領域法律適用的理解。 -
Under the retaliation system, in order to assure the implementation of the recommendations or the rulings of the panel or the appellate body that the dsb had adopted, the winning party can ask the dsb to entitle it for the suspension of concessions or other obligations, that is retaliation
在wto爭端解決機制下，為了保證dsb通過的專家小組或者上訴機構的裁決得到遵照執行，當敗訴方拒絕履行裁決時，勝訴方可以請求dsb授權對該敗訴方中止減讓或者其他義務，即進行報復。 -
The effect of the dsb reports, including panel and appellate body reports generally are performed in good faith. the fourth part compares the concepts of direct application, direct invocability and direct effect. tough many countries denied the direct effect of wto agreement, by virtue of political econiny and the precisionor other attributes of the language of specific portions, direct effect should be accepted in domestic law to honor its obligations
第四部分比較了wto協議的直接效力與直接適用、可援用性等概念的區別，考察了對美、歐、日等主要締約方的實踐情況，針對其否定wto協議的直接效力的觀點進行了原因分析，提出賦予wto協議直接效力是橢遵守條約義務的重要保障。 -
The contribution that quantitative economic analysis has done to the wto dispute settlement reflect in two areas : the first is to quantify the outcome of carrying out the policy measure on trade, as to determine the level of national impairment, basing on which the panel, appellate body and arbitrator can exact the level of retaliation ; the second is quantify the outcome of competition between the import and domestic, then can obtain the demand situation of certain product
量化經濟分析方法在wto爭端解決實踐中已經有所體現，其主要應用於對wto規則的解釋和對成員利益減損的計算方面，但仍存在嚴重的弊端。本文主要採用綜合研究和實證分析的方法，對量化經濟分析對wto爭端解決的貢獻、適用范圍以及如何用量化經濟分析的方法解決貿易爭端進行了深入討論和研究。 -
Apart from all these systemic problems, a major new problem is emerging in the operation of the panel and appeal process. the panels and the appellate body ( ab ) very often engage in very substantial interpretations of the provisions of the wto agreements
作者在闡述了特殊和差別待遇的含義及其產生背景之後，對dsu中的特殊和差別待遇具體條款進行了詳細解讀，主要從這些條款的內容，含義及其貫徹執行情況等方面來進行。 -
Part three : study of appellate body ' s legal quality. after carefully comparation with the domestic court, international court of justice and international center for settlement of investment disputes ( icsid ) on the subject of process, jurisdictional limits, and other subjects, we can know the legal quality of appellate body more clearly
作為國際爭解決的新生事物，上訴機構與國內法院的區別主要在於審查范圍和判決的法律效力上。與國際法院的主要區別在於後者受理的案件僅限於國家提起，其判決不存在上訴的問題，另外，國際法院的成員比上訴機構的成員具有更強的穩定性和更廣泛的代表性。
分享友人