breach of contract 中文意思是什麼

breach of contract 解釋
背約，毀約
  • breach : n 1 （對法律、義務等的）破壞，違犯，違背，不履行；（對他人權利等的）侵害，侵犯。2 （友好關系的）...
  • of : OF ＝Old French 古法語。
  • contract : n 1 契約，合同。2 婚約。3 承包（合約）。4 【法律】契約法。5 【牌戲】定約，合約橋牌。6 〈主英方〉...
  1. Discussing about anticipatory breach of contract

    淺論預期違約責任
  2. On the regime of anticipatory breach of contract

    芻議預期違約制度
  3. On the system of anticipatory breach of contract

    論預期違約制度
  4. Finally, delivery of cargo without original bills of lading promote the development of shipping in a way in practice, it has reasonability in existence. chapter three is writer ' s study for 10 leading cases of chinese maritime court and court of cassation concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading, writer conclude as follows : chinese courts are inclined to regard it as breach of contract but not in tort in judicial practice ; chinese courts allow the plaintiff to choose to sue in tort or of breach ; chinese courts have abandoned the viewpoint of " who holder the bills who must have the right to sue " or " who holder the bills who must win the case " ; and in many cases concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading, the court ignored plaintiff ' s actions against the carrier, it proved that carrier can escape reasonability of delivery of cargo without original bills of lading in some cases

    第三章論述我國海事法院及其上級法院就無單放貨案件審理的司法審判實踐研究，通過對十個法院判例的分析、歸納，筆者認為，在司法實踐中，法院越來越傾向于將無單放貨糾紛視為運輸合同糾紛處理，而不認定為侵權行為糾紛；法院允許原告起訴時以侵權起訴或違約起訴作出選擇；法院對提單持有人的訴權認定，已經不採用「誰持有提單誰就有訴權」與「誰持有提單就能保證勝訴」的觀點；有諸多的無單放貨的訴訟案例以被法院駁回起訴為結局，證明了無單放貨在特定情況下的合理性以及承運人有避免承擔責任的可能性。
  5. The donator should compensate the loss of reliance interest arising from the execution of the right of revocation for his breach of contract

    任意撤回權的行使雖為法定，但贈與人亦應賠償受贈人因此所遭受的信賴利益損失，且其責任基礎不是一般所認為的締約過失責任而應是違約責任。
  6. Exclusion clauses seek to exclude the party, from breach of contract, or, limiting his liability on a breach of contract

    不屬保險范圍事項的條款：致力於減除合同違約方的違約責任或限定他們的責任。
  7. Sue to the court directly : agreement should be in duplicate, that ought to do not have your copartner autograph in your hand, but the another autograph on that agreement of company of illative and oriental meal is hind add ; you can be sued to the court, tell its break a contact, ask its are returned join in administration fee, bear responsibility of breach of contract and your loss

    直接向法院起訴：協議書應是一式兩份，你手中的那份應當沒有你合伙人的簽名，可推定東方餐飲公司的那份協議書上的另一簽名是后添加的；你可起訴至法院，訴其違約，要求其退還加盟治理費，並承擔違約責任和你的損失。
  8. I open a restaurant at signing contract of commodity chummage room to use as with landlord on november 18, 2006 ( at that time is the restaurant that makes over others ), this inn is in sha wan one in postern, my set up shop is less than a month, one in close, the business all the time very poor, but my chummage is handed in to all the time on june 20, 2007, on june 12 i move one part thing come home, because do not have a place to live at that time, live in inn all the time, after landlord sees, get on door lock instantly, cause me to cannot enter store, owe the charge of electricity that has a many month at that time, the water of 4 months is expended, landlord looks for me now must the evidence that i sign a beak a contract, otherwise continues to lease room set up shop, otherwise he i am sued in order to default water and electricity for cost, because water and electricity expends him to already was cleared on june 15, he defaults landlord of water charge of electricity to authority locks up the door in the regulation in the contract, the contract is written closely password code, urgent at that time set up shop, did not look careful, look now evil spirit eye, the penalty due to breach of contract in contract provision and amerce number are incomputable, i want to remove now contract, do not know what to idea there is

    我於2006年11月18日與房東簽訂了商品房租房合同用作開飯館（當時是轉讓別人的飯館） ，此店在沙灣一中后門，我開店不到一個月，一中封閉，生意一直很差，但我的房租一直交至2007年6月20日，在6月12日我將一部分東西搬回家，因為當時沒地方住，一直住在店裡，房東看到后立即將門鎖上，致使我無法進店，當時欠有一個多月的電費，四個月的水費，現在房東找我非要我簽一個違約的證據，要不繼續租房開店，要不他以拖欠水電費為由起訴我，因為水電費他已於6月15日交清，他在合同中規定拖欠水電費房東有權鎖門，合同寫得密密碼碼，當時急著開店，沒看仔細，現在一看煞了眼，合同條款中的違約金和罰款數都數不清，我現在想解除合同，不知有什麼辦法？
  9. However, the law ' s contents about anticipatory breach of contract is not rich enough : law provisions appearrelaxing and out of order and law terms do not mean the same

    一、不安抗辯權與明示預期違約的比較兩者的適用條件、行使依據、權屬性質均不同，兩者的差異比較明顯。
  10. Distress or seizure of property was the mode of satisfaction for breach of contract.

    扣押或佔有財產是對違反合同而獲取補償的一種方法。
  11. Basis " orders of sell of access of land of shenzhen special economic zone " the seventeenth regulation, contract of sell one ' s own things should have the following and main provision : ( one ) the full name of bilateral party or name, address ; ( 2 ) a ground date of access of land of sell one ' s own things, area ; ( 3 ) land is used year period reach case stop time ; ( 4 ) the amount of gold of land access sell one ' s own things, money is planted, pay kind and time ; ( 5 ) the time of consign land ; ( 6 ) point of program, municipal design ; ( 7 ) project complete is referred check and accept time ; ( 8 ) municipal facilities form a complete set builds obligation ; ( 9 ) land of use photograph adjacent and viatic limitation ; ( 10 ) the project that builds accessary, add establishment and obligation ; ( 11 ) responsibility of breach of contract ; ( 12 ) party thinks necessary other item

    根據《深圳經濟特區土地使用權出讓條例》第十七條的規定，出讓合同應具備以下主要條款： （一）雙方當事人的姓名或者名稱、地址； （二）出讓土地使用權的宗地號、面積； （三）土地使用年期及起止時間； （四）土地使用權出讓金的數額、幣種、交付方式及時間； （五）交付土地的時間； （六）規劃、市政設計要點； （七）項目竣工提交驗收時間； （八）市政設施配套建設義務； （九）使用相鄰土地和道路的限制； （十）建設附屬、附加設施的項目及義務； （十一）違約責任； （十二）當事人認為必要的其他條款。
  12. The provision of article 77 of cisg, which stipulates the mitigation duty of the aggrieved party, is one of significant limitations on article 74 of cisg, which establishes the principle of a general right to damages as a consequence of breach of contract

    公約第77條規定的減損原則是對國際貨物銷售合同損害賠償的重要限制。但該條規定是原則性的、概括性的，需在實踐中具體化。
  13. The rule of mitigation doctrine is applied when the following are satisfied. ( 1 ) the damage is resulted from the breach of contract by the party in breach, ( 2 ) the aggrieved party does not take reasonable steps to mitigate the damage, and ( 3 ) thus makes the damage aggravated

    減損規則的適用條件有三，一是損害的發生由違約方所致，二是受害方未採取合理措施防止損害擴大，三是損害因受害方未採取合理措施而擴大。
  14. Where a party ' s breach harmed the personal or property interests of the other party, the aggrieved party is entitled to elect to hold the party liable for breach of contract in accordance herewith, or hold the party liable for tort in accordance with any other relevant law

    第一百二十二條因當事人一方的違約行為，侵害對方人身、財產權益的，受損害方有權選擇依照本法要求其承擔違約責任或者依照其他法律要求其承擔侵權責任。
  15. It points out that the institution of anticipatory breach of contract should be applied in case of renunciation ( express anticipatory breach of contract ), while the institution of the right to plea of unease applied in case of impossibility of performance ( implied anticipatory breach of contract ). an amendment advice is raised towards articles 68, 69, 94, and 108 of the contract law of china based on this conclusion

    最後，針對我國的具體情況，認為拒絕履行（明示預期違約）適用預期違約制度，履行不能（默示預期違約）適用不安抗辯權制度，並以此為理論基礎對我國合同法第68條、第69條、第94條、第108條提出了完善建議。
  16. 3 no period of grace may be granted to the seller by a court or arbitral tribunal when the buyer resorts to a remedy for breach of contract

    如果買方對違反合同採取某種補救辦法，法院或仲裁庭不得給予賣方寬限期。
  17. 3 no period of grace may be granted to the buyer by a court or arbitral tribunal when the seller resorts to a remedy for breach of contract

    如果賣方對違反合同採取某種補救辦法，法院或仲裁庭不得給予買方寬限期。
  18. The theory of fault in the process of contacting and negotiation for contract was mentioned by germen jurits rudolf vou jhering in 1861. its meaning is when one party ' s civil wrong broke the statutory duty of reasonable care arisen from the principle of good faith, during the process of contacting and negotiation for contract, and cause other party ' s interests or reliance interest damages, the former must compensate for the later ' s loss. statutory obligation for fault in the process of contacting and negotiation for contract is different from that for breach of contract and that for tortuous acts

    本文主要從以下幾個方面對締約過失責任理論、法律制度方面需完善的問題進行探討：一、對締約過失責任的概念和構成進行探討：二、對締約過失責任中缺失的對精神損害救濟的法律規定問題進行全面、系統的分析、論述；三、論述了締約過失責任與違約責任並存和競合的情形，在合同法上應允許締約過失責任與違約責任的並存、競合，充分保護權利人的合法利益；四、對締約過失責任法律制度應注重對締約過失行為的監控問題進行探討。
  19. Article 21. if both parties breach the contract, each shall be commensurately liable for the breach of contract that is its responsibility

    第二十一條當事人雙方都違反合同的，應當各自承擔相應的責任。
  20. In the 19th century, the britain court differentiated th contract terms as " condition " and " warranty ". if a party to a contract violated the condition terms, which was regarded as substantial breach of contract, the other party woud consequently claim the rescission of a contract and do so, but only had the right to ask for compansation, if the warranty terms violated

    19世紀，英國法院將合同條款依其重要程度區分為「條件」和「擔保」兩類，當事人違反「條件」條款將構成根本違約，非違約方可以因此而解除合同；而當事人「擔保」條款時，非違約方無權解除合同，只能請求損害賠償。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書