civil litigation 中文意思是什麼

civil litigation 解釋
民事訴訟
  • civil : adj 1 市民的，公民的；民用的；【法律】民事的；根據民法的，法律規定的。2 國內的，國民間的。3 有禮...
  • litigation : n. 訴訟，起訴。
  1. On the civil litigation brought by procuratorates

    檢察機關提起民事訴訟問題探析
  2. The center of civil judicial reformation is to reappraise the value of civil litigation procedure

    民事審判方式改革的核心問題就是要重新評價程序價值。
  3. Adversary system or verhandlungsmaxime, which guides the modern civil procedure, and the aim of trial of fact in civil litigation, decide the value direction, the way and the content of the rules of collecting documentary evidence

    指導現代民事訴訟的基本法理當事人主義，以及關於民事訴訟事實審理的目的取向，都決定著書證收集制度的價值取向、運作方式和內容。
  4. The exclusion of illegal evidence in civil litigation

    民事訴訟非法證據排除規則研究
  5. Study of witness competency in civil litigation

    論民事訴訟中證人的主體適格性
  6. New development in the evidence system of civil litigation

    兼述舉證時限與證據交換制度
  7. On the exclusive rule of illegal evidence in civil litigation

    淺議民事非法證據排除規則
  8. Investigating the unlawful evidence - collecting in civil litigation

    民事訴訟非法取證探析
  9. Some issues on evidence legislation in civil litigation

    淺析民事訴訟證據立法中的幾個問題
  10. Application of electronic evidence in china ' s civil litigation

    電子證據在民事訴訟中的運用
  11. Structure of environmental civil litigation for public advantages

    論環境公益訴訟機制的構建
  12. These measures include : make the system of securities laws to perfect, consummate the institutions of the legal person in the listed companies, base securities regulatory authority to regulate the securities market according to law, maintain order of the securities market and ensure the lawful operation of the same, reinforce continuing disclosure of information and the system of financial and accounting reports, make the listed companies shall immediately submit an ad hoc report on the details of such major event to the securities regulatory authority and to the stock exchanging and the same known to the general public, promote investors consciousness of protecting themselves and consummate the civil litigation mechanism to gain compensation and damages, make use of the press to supervise the stock market and reinforce punishment to the persons who act securities fraud

    在這些原則的指導下，本文提出了一套規制證券欺詐的具體法律措施.包括健全證券法律體系，做到證券欺詐的規制有法可依;完善上市公司的法人治理結構，建立完善的證券監管體系，尤其對證券業協會的性質、功能和職責從法律上給予明確界定以確保充分發揮證券行業的自律作用，最大限強化信息披露責任，嚴格會計制度，力求信度地避免證券欺詐行為發生;強化信息披露貢任，產格會計刷度，刀水侶息準確，披露及時;增強廣大中小投資者的自我保護意識，完善賠償訴訟機制;依法賦予新聞媒體輿論監督權，充分發揮新聞媒體監督作用;深入研究證券欺詐者心理規律，加強法律懲治力度
  13. The acts of court are judicial acts aiming at resolving dispute, while the administrative acts are performing acts. litigants " acts are based on the right of access to justice, which is a procedural right. as to the scope of acts in civil litigation, it should not include all the behaviors that have the procedural results, and only the acts that have expected results in procedural law, can be included

    訴訟行為的性質因行為主體的不同而不同：法院的訴訟行為是一種公法行為，表現為針對糾紛的居中裁判行為，裁判性是其區別於行政行為的關鍵點；當事人的訴訟行為則以訴權為權利基礎，訴權是一種程序上的權利，以私人謀取公法效果為目的，這決定了當事人的訴訟行為的程序l性，是一種對應于審判行為的私人程序性行為。
  14. However, in our country, civil litigation theories have paid scant attention to acts of litigation, which is very disproportionate to the position of its basic theory

    訴訟行為理論就是從宏觀上概括地、抽象地研究訴訟行為，尋求行為規律，以之為理論和實踐服務。
  15. Besides the object of the theory as an essential element to civil procedure, the theory is helpful to carry the procedure ideals through. the practical significance is the theory can establish a theoretical foundation for civil procedural lawmaking. invalidation of acts system in civil litigation system has been established in the civil countries to punish illegal acts, and in our country, it requires civil procedural law to explicitly prescribe the results of the invalidation on most occasions

    訴訟行為理論還有積極的實踐意義，它可以為訴訟立法提供深厚的理論基礎，訴訟行為的成立、有效要件完全可以為立法利用；訴訟行為無效制度是制裁程序違法最有效的措施，立法上明確劃定無效訴訟行為的范圍可以增強訴訟法的可操作性，遏製程序違法現象；研究訴訟行為還可以促進司法規范化和效率化。
  16. The establishment of this litigation system is to settle the across cases between administrative controversies and civil controversies. “ administrative litigation law ” currently in operation doesn ’ t make out detailed and definite regulations. the regulation in item 61 in “ administrative procedural law ” is not a complete civil litigation attached to administrative litigation system. in order to carry out the institution in operation in practice, we must research the concept, characteristics, conditions and ranges of civil litigation attached administrative litigation and make out corresponding theoretical summary as a result of offering theoretical guidance for consummation of administrative litigation system in our country

    而我國現行《行政訴訟法》並沒有對行政附帶民事訴訟制度作出具體明確的規定， 《若干解釋》第61條的規定又不是完整的行政附帶民事訴訟制度，為了使實踐中該制度的操作過程能有所遵循，我們必須對行政附帶民事訴訟的概念、特點、條件、范圍以及一般程序等進行研究，並作出相應的理論概括，從而為完善我國的行政訴訟制度提供理論指導。
  17. On the jurisdiction conflicts and coordination of the civil litigation concerning foreign affairs

    論涉外民事管轄權的沖突與協調
  18. On the construction of system for preserving acts of civil litigation

    在民事訴訟法中設立行為保全制度初探
  19. Research on civil litigation rights of women in qing dynasty - based on the documents and verdict materials

    以檔案與判牘資料為研究對象
  20. Evidence system is one of the most important questions in the civil proceedings and standard of proof is an important question in the evidence system. the civil procedure law applies the standard of " highly probable " in civil litigations. this article points out that it is not reasonable to adopt the " highly probable " standard in all civil litigations. firstly, this article mentions the important meaning of standard of proof in judicial proof. secondly, it pionts out the flaws in the standard of proof in civil litigation in our country. thirdly, it introduces the standard of proof in civil litigation in common law and civil law countries and analyzes the similar and different points in the standard of proof. finally this article points out several suggestions to rebuild the system of standard of proof. lt suggests we should construct a system which considers the " highly probable " standard as a principle and adopts other forms of standard of proof in sepcial civil cases. and we can build this reasonable system by means of legislation and case law

    但在所有民事案件中均劃一適用較高程度的蓋然性作為證明標準是不合理的。文章首先闡明了民事訴訟證明標準在訴訟證明中的重要意義，然後對於我國有關民事訴訟證明標準的現狀及其缺陷作了一個概括，接著文章對于兩大法系民事訴訟證明標準的異同進行了介紹以及比較分析，最後提出了對于構建一個科學的民事訴訟證明標準體系的幾點建議。文章建議應當通過立法以及判例制度來建立一個以較高程度的蓋然性為原則的多元的證明標準體系。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書