court party 中文意思是什麼
court party
解釋
朝黨英國-
Incidental appeal refers to the special appeal instituted by the appellee who is attached to the procedure for appeal, after one party ( to a lawsuit ) appealing to a higher court
摘要附帶上訴是指當事人一方上訴后，被上訴人依附於該上訴程序而提起的特殊上訴。 -
Where a party does not perform the award of the arbitration agency within the prescribed time limit, the other party may apply to a people ' s court for compulsory execution
當事人一方在規定的期限內不履行仲裁機構的仲裁決定的，另一方可以申請人民法院強制執行。 -
Firstly, some basic concepts are not clear, such as what is the status of the company under liquidation, how to define the action of the industrial - commercial authority ' s invalidation of the license of the company, whether or not the share holders can sue to disincorporate the company, is it legal to dissolve a company without liquidation, what is special liquidation, under what situation will a company be obliged to disincorporate, who will be responsible for liquidation after the dis incorporation, etc. secondly, some primary legislative principles about disincorporation and liquidation that are adopted in foreign countries are not established in china, such as a company must be liquidated before disincorporation except for acquisition, the company remains valid during the liquidation until it finishes the invalidation registration, an ordinary liquidation must be replaced by a special liquidation under the instruction of the court when there is an impediment or a fraud, the company should apply to the court for bankruptcy when it is found that its debt is over its asset during the liquidation, the number of people execute liquidation can be several or just one, companies applied for annulment shall be judged by the court and must be liquidated, etc. thirdly, china does n ' t have some of the fundamental rules that are specified in the laws of foreign countries, such as the rule of disincorporation registration, the rule that the company should sue to let the court judge for disincorporation if there is a deadlock between share holders, the rule of credit trade - off in special liquidation, the rule that people who execute the liquidation are jointly responsible for compensating the loss of the third party caused by their activities that are illegal or vicious, the rule of special liquidation, the rule of the representation of the people who execute the liquidation, the rule of the court supervising the liquidation in an inactive way, the rule of how long the accounts and documents should be kept after disincorporation, etc. because of the lack in research and legislation, the system for companies leaving the market is highly disorganized, which harmed the interest of the creditors and relevant people, increased the risk of market exchange, damaged the order of the market economy and the ethic of doing business, wasted the resources of the society, and impaired the authority and seriousness of the law
再次，國外立法上的一些基本制度我國沒有，如解散登記制度，股東出現僵局訴請法院判決解散制度，特別清算中的債權協定製度，清算人因違法或惡意對第三人承擔連帶賠償責任制度，司法特別清算制度，清算人的代表性制度，法院消極監督清算制度，帳薄及文件在公司解散后保存法定期限制度等。由於理論研究和立法的不足，造成了我國公司法人退出市場機制的嚴重混亂，損害了債權人和利害關系人的利益，增加了市場主體交易不安全感，破壞了市場經濟秩序和商業道德，浪費了社會資源，削弱了法律的權威性和嚴肅性。文章認為，完善我國公司解散和清算制度，應借鑒和引進發達國家的法學理論和法律制度，統一我國有關解散和清算立法，在基本概念、基本原則、基本制度、基本程序諸方面進行統一規范，填補立法空白，創設法院解散公司制度，廢除行政特別清算制度代之以司法特別清算制度，健全和嚴格違反清算規定的法律責任制度（包括民事責任，刑事責任，行政責任，改變現行行政處罰范圍偏廣，民事賠償范圍偏窄，刑事追究空白太多的不協調狀況） ，從而構築起科學的公司解散和清算制度，使之符合我國經濟生活的客觀需求，符合市場經濟發展的基本方向，並與國外立法通例趨同。 -
Next, ( normal procedure ) general court is assure order of front courtyard careful, the presiding judge is checking the court is made after party record general still was not pressed to the litigant of front courtyard on time be less than front courtyard to handle without warrant refus, make judgment by default
其次， （正規程序）一般法院為保證庭審秩序，審判長在核對當事人之後並作法庭記錄將仍未按時到庭的訴訟當事人按無正當理由拒不到庭處理，作缺席判決。 -
This paper gets following conclusion : first ： witness should be the people who know the fact and attest in the court or supply the evidence to the party or the court and the witness is different from the party and appraiser. witness should include unit and expert witness. but this paper does n ' t agree with the dual station in the litigation, but accept hearsay evidence
本文得出的結論有以下幾點：第一：證人應該是指「了解案件事實，並出庭作證或向當事人及人民法院提供證詞的第三人」 ，區別于鑒定人，但把單位、專家證人納入我國證人的種類，對于訴訟中的雙重身份不予承認，但對于傳聞證據則予以採信。 -
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties agree that each party has the right to seek temporary or permanent injunctive or other similar relief in any court or other authority of competent jurisdiction in respect of any claims of breach of confidentiality or ipr infringement or for an order of specific performance or other injunctive relief as permitted under applicable laws
無論本合同前述條款有何規定，雙方同意每一方均有權就任何違反保密義務或知識產權侵權的主張向任何一個有管轄權的法院或其他機關尋求臨時或永久禁令或其他類似的救濟措施，或申請實際履行的執行令或其他相關法律允許的禁令救濟。 -
Party refuses to obey first instance of local people court rules, authority is in on 10 days of since day introversion of ruling book service court of one class people mentions appeal
當事人不服地方人民法院第一審裁定的，有權在裁定書送達之日起十日內向上一級人民法院提起上訴。 -
Party refuses to obey first instance of local people court adjudicates, authority is in on 15 days of since day introversion of judgment service court of one class people mentions appeal
當事人不服地方人民法院第一審判決的，有權在判決書送達之日起十五日內向上一級人民法院提起上訴。 -
In the leading case of hochster v. de la tour, british court created the rule of repudiation in 1853, which allowed the victim to cancel contract and claim damages when the other party breached contract expressly. again in 1894 ' s mrs. single v. mr. single, british court established diminished expectation, allowing the victim to suspend his performance and to demand adequate assurance of the other party ' s performance if the other party breached main contract obligations, or to cancel contract and to claim damages when the other party failed to provide assurance of his performance
本章第二節對明示預期違約進行了分析，從以下三方面展開：一、明示預期違約規則的確立與發展英美法最早於1853年英國法院在審理霍切斯特訴戴?納?陶爾案中確立了明示預期違約規則，允許預期違約的受害方當事人在對方違反合同主要義務時解除合同，並向違約方請求損害賠償。 -
However, this scenario gradually changed when the post - emergency supreme court tackled the problem of access to justice by people through radical changes and alterations made in the requirements of locus standi and of party aggrieved
后來，當最高法院處理民眾的訴訟問題，大幅更動適法性與受害者的相關規定，上述局面逐步改觀。 -
If a defendant, private prosecutor, or a plaintiff or defendant in an incidental civil action files an appeal directly to the people ' s court of second instance, the people ' s court shall within three days transfer the petition of appeal to the people ' s court which originally tried the case for delivery to the people ' s procuratorate at the same level and to the other party
被告人、自訴人、附帶民事訴訟的原告人和被告人直接向第二審人民法院提出上訴的，第二審人民法院應當在三日以內將上訴狀交原審人民法院送交同級人民檢察院和對方當事人。 -
Article 184 if a defendant, private prosecutor, or a plaintiff or defendant in an incidental civil action files an appeal through the people ' s court which originally tried the case, the people ' s court shall within three days transfer the petition of appeal together with the case file and the evidence to the people ' s court at the next higher level ; at the same time it shall deliver duplicates of the petition of appeal to the people ' s procuratorate at the same level and to the other party
第一百八十四條被告人、自訴人、附帶民事訴訟的原告人和被告人通過原審人民法院提出上訴的，原審人民法院應當在三日以內將上訴狀連同案卷、證據移送上一級人民法院，同時將上訴狀副本送交同級人民檢察院和對方當事人。 -
However, either party to a legal or administrative action may serve and file a notice of appeal to invite the court of appeals ( in new york state, the appellate division of the supreme court for a given judicial department ) to review a trial result de novo, re - examining the same evidence upon which the trial judge ruled, possibly to substitute a more appropriate result
但是，無論是在州法院，還是在聯邦法院，或是在行政程序當中，當事人任何一方都有權利提出上訴，也就是要求上訴法院或上訴機構對原審法院或原審行政機構程序中的證據進行重新審查，以期推翻或修改原審判決或裁決。 -
Article 70 a people ' s court shall, after examination and verification by its collegiate bench, rule to cancel an award if a party to the case provides evidence proving that the arbitration award involves one of the circumstances prescribed in clause 1, article 260 of the civil procedure law
第七十條當事人提出證據證明涉外仲裁裁決有民事訴訟法第二百六十條第一款規定的情形之一的，經人民法院組成合議庭審查核實，裁定撤銷。 -
Article 71 a people ' s court shall, after examination and verification by its collegiate bench, rule not to enforce an award - if the party against whom an application is made provides evidence proving that the arbitration award involves one of the circumstances prescribed in clause 1, article 260 of the civil procedure law
第七十一條被申請人提出證據證明涉外仲裁裁決有民事訴訟法第二百六十條第一款規定的情形之一的，經人民法院組成合議庭審查核實，裁定不予執行。 -
Article 63 a people ' s court shall, after examination and verification by its collegiate bench, rule not to enforce an award if the party against whom an application for enforcement is made provides evidence proving that the award involves one of the circumstances prescribed in clause 2, article 217 of the civil procedure law
第六十三條被申請人提出證據證明裁決有民事訴訟法第二百一十七條第二款規定的情形之一的，經人民法院組成合議庭審查核實，裁定不予執行。 -
In the 19th century, the britain court differentiated th contract terms as " condition " and " warranty ". if a party to a contract violated the condition terms, which was regarded as substantial breach of contract, the other party woud consequently claim the rescission of a contract and do so, but only had the right to ask for compansation, if the warranty terms violated
19世紀，英國法院將合同條款依其重要程度區分為「條件」和「擔保」兩類，當事人違反「條件」條款將構成根本違約，非違約方可以因此而解除合同；而當事人「擔保」條款時，非違約方無權解除合同，只能請求損害賠償。 -
This makes the intermediation system to be the most characteristic one in our civil case judgment however, along with the diversification of the society value, the dispersion of the society construction and the concretization of the society relationship, not only because the finite judicial resources ca n ' t bear the increasingly dilating issues, but also because of the awakening of the party concerned corpus consciousness, the intermediation system in operation already ca n ' t approach the requirements of the society for dispute solving with fair and efficiency, and this inevitably request adjusting and reconstructing the intermediation system of our court. from here caused the dispassionate considerations of the numerous scholars. they bring upped the standpoint of different views, surrounding the " retain ", " discard " and " reformulate "
然而，隨著社會價值的多元化、社會結構的分散化和社會關系的契約化，不僅有限的司法資源已不堪日益膨脹的糾紛所帶來的重負，更由於當事人主體意識的覺醒，使得現行調解制度已無法面對社會對于糾紛解決的公正和效率的要求，這必然要求調整和重構我國法院的調解制度，並由此引發了眾多學者的冷靜思考，圍繞法院調解制度的「存」 、 「廢」 、 「改」 ，提出了很多見仁見智的觀點。 -
Court document confirms the amount of cost to be paid by one party to another after a court action
確認在訴訟后，一方當事人付給另一方當事人訟費的法院文件，簡稱為訟費評定證明書。 -
The general requirement include the open to the party and the society, but the fundamental content means the open of trial procedure and trial decision. the open of trial procedure means the open from placing a case on file to the end of court debate and the open court proceedings is the key factor, but the open trial decision include the open declaration 、 open judge document and open judgment reasons through which realize open proceedings
一般要求包括向當事人的公開及對社會的公開，基本內容指審判過程的公開和審判結果公開，審判過程的公開指從立案直至法庭辯論結束的全部活動公開，其中法庭審理公開是關鍵；審判結果的公開包括判決的公開宣告及裁判文書的公開等形式及通過判決理由的公開實現裁判形成過程的公開等實質內容。
分享友人