criminal fact 中文意思是什麼
criminal fact
解釋
犯罪事實-
From the fact of the often - happened campus murdering case in us and several criminal fastigiums in japan, it can be seen that juvenile delinquency has become the centurial problem harassing the modern society
從美國頻繁發生的校園槍殺案件，到日本的幾次犯罪高峰，青少年犯罪已成為困擾現代社會的一大世紀難題。 -
In the matter of fact, the theory of fault not only reflects the basis of related criminal liability and the theory of criminal law. its formation and development has a close relation with its coeval historical background and cultural source
事實上，罪過理論不僅集中反映了相關的刑事責任根據理論和刑法學說，而其之形成與沿革，更與其同時代的歷史背景和思想文化淵源有著不可分割的臍帶聯系。 -
The common characteristic of the traditional theories about the act researches is researching the concept of act in criminal law with the restrained thinking way of monism, i. e. onefold factual, onefold valued, or fact - value integrative methodology, which result in that it can not explain some especial act forms in the criminal laws, that it only explain those narrowly but can not withstand careful analysis, or that it only extends to explain all kinds of act forms, which does not accord with the daily thinking manners. this paper recognizes and redefines the concept of act in the research of the criminal law based on the suspicion and consideration of research methodology, in a fact - value segregative dualistic thinking way, in relation to analyse and comprehension of characteristic of some special act forms, such as " holding ", " omission "
傳統的行為理論的研究都有這樣一個共同的特點，即局限於一元論的思維方式，以單純事實的，單純價值的，抑或事實? ?價值一體化的方法論，來研究刑法理論中的「行為」概念，結果導致要麼是無法解釋刑法上特殊的行為形式，要麼只是表面上牽強附會卻經不起深入推敲，要麼僅追求能有張力地解釋各種行為方式卻脫離了人們認識的思維習慣。本文正是基於對研究方法的質疑和反思，採用事實? ?價值分離的二元論思維方式，結合分析理解「持有」 、 「不作為」等刑法中特殊行為形式的特徵，重新認識和界定了刑法理論研究中的「行為」概念。 -
Procedural defense is a new kind of modern defense. it does not refer to the substantial defense against the prosecution, nor does it refer to presenting evidence and reasons to prove the innocence of the accused, the pettiness of his crime and the need for a mitigated punishment or exemption from criminal responsibility. in fact, the procedural defense directly aims at the procedures of the special organs by pointing out and proving their procedural irregularities that may result in the exclusion of the prosecutive evidence, or even may result in the termination of the whole prosecution in the interests of the accused
程序性辯護是現代刑事辯護的一種新的類型，它不是針對檢控方的控訴內容，也不是提出證據和理由證明被追訴人無罪、罪輕或者應當減輕、免除其刑事責任，它直接針對刑事訴訟專門機關的訴訟程序，希望通過指出和證明追訴機關程序違法而使對辯方不利的證據被排除，或者違法程序被宣告無效甚至整個追訴程序被依法終結，從而達到有利於被追訴人的目的。 -
Notwithstanding the fact that some sharp practices do not amount to criminal deception, the
雖然取巧的經營手法未算刑事詐騙，但 -
In continental law system countries, burden of proof includes burden of adducing evidence, burden of persuasion. burden of adducing evidence means that the subjects in criminal procedure who initiate trial procedure and require the courts to judge according to their demands or subject whom there is presumption against must adduce adequate " evidence of the fact to prove that the evidence is on the demand of proof. otherwise the subjects will fail in the suit
筆者認為，刑事訴訟證明責任，是指在刑事訴訟中引起審判程序啟動並要求法院依其主張裁判或存在對其不利之法律推定的刑事訴訟主體，必須就其主張的對定罪量刑具有決定作用的待證特定事實或者為推翻不利的推定事實提出足夠證據，並利用證據對該事實或或者為推翻不利的推定事實加以證明到法律規定的程度。 -
Websites that make qq code theft software available for downloading or that host black market of qq code transactions are in fact providing tools and a market for criminal activities, and as such will very likely be subject to prosecution in the near future
那些提供盜號軟體下載和交易黑號碼的網站，其實也是在涉嫌提供犯罪工具，極有可能會在類似案件中承擔連帶責任。 -
In the author ’ s opinion, there are two causes for the birth of this concept, one is that the differentiation between the indirect intention and recklessness is almost impossible both in theory and in administration of justice, which in fact, has been studied for hundreds of years without unquestioning conclusion and therefore was considered by germany criminal law experts as one of the most difficult questions in criminal theory
如果這些問題得不到完滿地解釋與妥善地解決，不僅不利於學術研究的發展，而且將直接影響司法實踐的正常運作。進一步地理論研究與相關的司法解釋表明，許多情況下，同一具體罪名的罪過形式的確可能有跨種越類的兩種，既有間接故意，又有過失。 -
In sentencing the criminal. the judge took into account the fact that it was his first offense
在判決的時候，法官會將他是初犯考慮進去。 -
In the third chapter, i have analyzed specifically the factors that establishment of possession in criminal law need in our country. understanding of possession ' s fact and intention should be consistent with our legal system and convention of controlling and dominating property. different possession should have different specific contents in relationship of controlling and dominating property
第三章具體分析了我國刑法上佔有的成立在客觀支配狀態和佔有意思上的要求，認為這應當同我國的法律體系和佔有支配習慣聯系起來，並且，不同類型的佔有在控制支配關系的具體內容上應當有著不同的要求。 -
The fact that cases of ipr have been divided into three types and accepted by three division ( civil, criminal, and administrative ) respectively, cannot satisfy the needs to protect ipr actively and then to make our citizens more creative
摘要我國目前由刑事審判庭、民事審判庭和行政審判庭分別審理相關知識產權案件的知識產權司法保護模式，已不能適應積極保護知識產權、建設創新型國家的需要。 -
In fact, impossibility has its unique value and is associated with many criminal fundamental principals such as subjective and objective culpability, constitution of a crime. it should not belong to attempted crime and cannot be regarded guilt in every instance, or safeguard and protection function of criminal law cannot be realized at the same time
其實，不能犯不應從屬于犯罪未遂，它有其獨立的存在價值，並與主客觀相一致、犯罪構成等諸多基本理論淵源深厚，不能簡單粗暴地一律視為犯罪處理，否則，刑法保障和保護功能的一致性就無從體現。 -
The so - called possession of criminal, criminal law expressly refers to the illegal acts were in fact prohibited by law holdings of domination and control as the objective element of a category of crime
持有型犯罪，是指刑法明文規定以行為人非法支配和控製法律禁止持有物作為客觀構成要件的一類犯罪。 -
In this part, firstly, the writer expounds the double layers mode - the cause in fact and the cause in law and the theories of the causalities ; secondly, the writer analyses the legislation of mpc of u. s. a, and points out the legislation of the double layers cause and the regulations of the causality from objective side, the limitation from the subjective side have scientific value, which theoretical research on the criminal law causality in our country can use for reference
該部分首先介紹了英美法系因果關系研究的雙層模式? ?事實和法律原因和英美法系因果關系的學說；其次，對美國《模範刑法典》因果關系立法予以分析，指出其雙層次原因的立法以及從客觀面對因果關系的規定、從主觀面對因果關系限定很有科學性，對我國刑法因果關系的理論研究與立法具有借鑒意義。 -
Part : fix on the fact error limit in the criminal law. first of all, this sect ion contrast the difference against the statue error of fact error, think that the fact error is happening in knowledge to the natural nature of fact, the statue error is happening in knowledge to fact statue nature, the former lays special emphasis on the error the cognition on, the latter lays special emphasis on to the error which evaluated
第二部分：刑法中的事實認識錯誤的界定。首先，這一部分比較了事實認識錯誤與法律錯誤的區別，認為事實認識錯誤是對行為的自然性質發生了不正確的認識，法律錯誤是對行為的法律性質發生了不正確的認識，前者側重於認知上的錯誤，後者側重於評價上的錯誤。 -
It has full jurisdiction to determine any matter of law or fact, whether civil or criminal and this extends to questions regarding the constitutionality of any law
高等法院對任何法律案件無論是民事糾紛或是犯罪案件以及任何法律的合法性問題都有完全的裁判權。 -
Finally, fix the fact error limit, think that such ought to consist of three kinds of forms : target error, strike error and the causation error. be living on this base, get off a definition to the fact error, namely, fact error in the criminal law is that action man is living to implement in the process willfully committed a crime, constitute to committing a crime that the fact that does not need the statue rating happens correctly not understanding in the important document, the criminal fact that the criminal fact that action man who arouses anticipates against practice happens not unanimously
最後，確定了事實認識錯誤的范圍，認為其應包括三種類型：對象錯誤、打擊錯誤和因果關系錯誤。在此基礎上，給事實認識錯誤下了一個定義，即刑法中的事實認識錯誤是指行為人在實施故意犯罪過程中，對犯罪構成要件中不需要法律評價的事實發生不正確認識，引起的行為人預想的犯罪事實與實際發生的犯罪事實之間的不一致。第三部分:事實認識錯誤的處理原則。 -
In this part, the following problem is discussed : the difference in the theory of the criminal causality ; the difficult point that should be overcome in theory, namely, the distinction between existence and value in civil law, the distinction between the cause in fact and the cause in common law and the distinction between the philosophy and the criminal law in russia and china ; the philosophical foundation of the study on causality, namely, rationalism philosophy of civil law, empiricism philosophy of common law and marxist philosophy in russia and china
『該部分論述了下列問題:刑法因果關系理論上的不同點:理論上應克服的難點，即大陸法系的存在論和價值論的二元區分、英美法系事實原因和法律原因的二元區分、俄羅斯和我國的哲學因果關系和刑法學因果關系的二元區分;因果關系研究的哲學根基?大陸法系的理性主義哲學、英美法系的經驗主義哲學、俄羅斯和我國的馬克思主義哲學。 -
First of all, to the mainland law is fastened that the criminal law a learned man handles the unpack criticizing that fact error some kinds of doctrines have been carried on the profile to that section, to think in the handle identical constitutes in the fact error inner place the important document, legally to accord with the teachings to accord with teachings more rightful than concrete ; be living to handle in the fact error that the difference constitutes between the important document, legally accord with the teachings to accord with teachings more advisable than abstracting. afterwards, doctrine over the combination, elaborate the target error separately. strike error and the causation error handle
首先，該部分對大陸法系刑法學者處理事實認識錯誤的幾種學說進行了簡要的評析，認為在處理同一構成要件內的事實認識錯誤上，法定符合說比具體符合說更為合理;在處理不同構成要件間的事實認識錯誤上，法定符合說比抽象符合說更為可取。然後，結合以上學說，分別闡述了對象錯誤、打擊錯誤和因果關系錯誤的處理原則，並著重翻退了我國刑法學界爭議較大的同一構成要件內的打擊錯誤的處理原則，主張在發生同一構成要件內的打擊錯誤的情況下，行為人應對實際發生的侵害結果承擔故意既遂的罪責。 -
Further, an applicant in a criminal case could apply for more than one counsel certificate in respect of the same case if there was a change in the law by retrospective legislation or by court or in fact since the last certificate
再者，假如自發出上一份證明書以來，有關法律已遭更改無論透過有追溯力的立法或基於法庭判決，或事實出現變動，則刑事案件上訴人可就同一案件申請多於一份大律師證明書。
分享友人