criminal justice administration 中文意思是什麼

criminal justice administration 解釋
犯罪管理
  • criminal : adj. 犯罪的；刑事上的；〈口語〉惡劣的，蠻不講理的。n. 罪犯，犯人。 a habitual criminal慣犯。 a war criminal戰犯。n. -ist 刑事學家，罪犯學家。
  • justice : n 1 正義，公道；公正，公平。2 正確；妥當，確實。3 正當（理由），合法。4 審判，司法。5 審判員，法...
  • administration : n 1 管理，掌管，經營；〈英國〉行政，施政。2 行政機關，局[處、署]；〈A 主美〉政府。3 給與；施行。4...
  1. State functionary with special capacity as criminal body are of great importance both in criminal legislation and in administration of justice

    國家工作人員是我國刑法上的特殊身份犯罪主體，在刑法立法與司法中極為重要。
  2. With an eye to the systematic of judicial interpretation, the inherent requirement of judicial independence, the nature of criminal adjudication, the accordance of power and responsibili ty, and the semanteme of judicial independence, the author finds out that the principle of " the people ' s courts shall exercise judicial power independently " shall also include the personal independence of individual judges. on this basis, the author reviews the adjudicative power endowed with the adjudicatory committee by law and holds that this provision has its historical significance, yet its application in today brings more malpractice than benefits. its application goes against the justness, the quality and the efficiency of the administration of justice, and goes against the realization of other important functions of the adjudicatory committee, the improvement of the skills and abilities of the judges

    在此基礎上，筆者對我國法律賦予審判委員會實質意義上的裁判權的規定進行了評析，認為，審判委員會行使裁判權，雖然有其存在的歷史原因，但在現在已經是弊大於利，它不利於司法公正，不利於保證案件質量，不利於提高訴訟效率，不利於提高訴訟效益，不利於審判委員會其他職能的正常發揮，不利於提高法官素質，理論界和實務界提出的種種保留審判委員會的裁判權的主張，並不能克服審判委員會行使裁判權的弊端，因此，應當取消審判委員會的裁判權（不是廢除審判委員會） ，法定的裁判者只能是負責個案審判的法官和人民陪審員。
  3. How to use of the currently in effect criminal procedure expert testimony system in the normal way, administrative control expert testimony institution and office workers, amplify necessary rules and regulations of the actuating of expert conclusion 、 implement of expert conclusion 、 argumentation of expert conclusion 、 authentication of expert conclusion ; up to protect litigation rights of parties in action, get on the stick of administration of justice 、 successfully achieve an end of administration of reasonable judgment all along is the focal point of the work and difficult point in our expert testimony system structure. in this paper, coupling our current the present situation of criminal expert testimony, to perfect the legal system, to resolve the problems of expert testimony system, the writer tried to study some problems of giving some enlightenment to the theory and practice of judicial appraisal institution, relate and analyze it and set forth the views and opinions on the settlement of some matters with six parts

    本文從分析刑事司法鑒定及其程序入手，比較兩大法系關于刑事司法鑒定的啟動、實施、質證、認證與採信等司法證明各環節的制度規定，透視我國刑事司法鑒定程序存在的基本問題，在此基礎上提出:規定鑒定期限、對無鑒定結果不能進入訴訟或準司法程序的情況，當事人可以申請公證機關公證鑒定啟動程序的真實性和合理性、建立鑒定人出庭作證制度、裁判者對鑒定結論認證通過質證程序形成心證的過程及理由應做出公開說明等有利於我國刑事司法鑒定程序改革的具體構想。
  4. It is generally known that the legal environment in china processes its own characteristics due to the cultural and traditional differences between the chinese and western legal systems, and the construction of the criminal justice administration system was started only dozens of years ago, therefore, compared to the complete judicial systems in some western countries, the chinese system has some improper and imperfect parts in its structure, and some regulations seem too abstract and principled

    由於我國法律文化傳統與西方國家不同，法治環境有著自己特色而且新中國刑事訴訟法制建設也只有短短的幾十年時間，與其他國家完備的訴訟法制相比較，我國刑事訴訟中許多規定顯得過于抽象和原則，制度的構造上也有不合理、不完善之處。
  5. In the author ’ s opinion, there are two causes for the birth of this concept, one is that the differentiation between the indirect intention and recklessness is almost impossible both in theory and in administration of justice, which in fact, has been studied for hundreds of years without unquestioning conclusion and therefore was considered by germany criminal law experts as one of the most difficult questions in criminal theory

    如果這些問題得不到完滿地解釋與妥善地解決，不僅不利於學術研究的發展，而且將直接影響司法實踐的正常運作。進一步地理論研究與相關的司法解釋表明，許多情況下，同一具體罪名的罪過形式的確可能有跨種越類的兩種，既有間接故意，又有過失。
  6. At present, the research on the retroactivity of criminal law, the field of domestic theory concentrating on more concretes problem in the administration of justice, judging the case as it stands, seldom probe into the criminal law value behind the retroactivity of criminal law, has made the trouble of attending trifles and neglecting essentials, and not solve the problem method from macroscopic

    目前，國內理論界在關于刑法的溯及力問題的研究中，多集中於司法中的具體問題，就事論事，很少探究溯及力問題背後的刑法價值取向，犯了捨本逐末的毛病，沒有從宏觀上探求解決溯及力問題的方法。
  7. Take a broad view of the legislation and practices with the administration of justice in some western main countries governed by law for the guarantee measures of ciminal suspect s right of defense from the procedure of investigation, there are some differences in excluding rule of evidence, the lawyer ’ s right and the criminal suspect law aid, etc. however, the main countries governed by law above generally approve the criminal suspect enjoys the right of denfense during the course of investigation and has all stipulated the comparatively detailed guarantee measures to this kind of right

    綜觀一些西方主要法治國家的立法規定與司法實踐，英美法系國家和大陸法系國家對于偵查程序中犯罪嫌疑人辯護權的保障措施，分別在證據排除規則，辯護律師的權利以及犯罪嫌疑人的法律援助等方面呈現出一些區別。但是兩大法系主要法治國家普遍地認可犯罪嫌疑人在偵查階段享有辯護權，而且對這種權利都規定了較為詳細的保障措施。
  8. The third part for manage illegally similar guilty administration of justice assert illegally, with guilty demarcation line, copies of crime and he guilty demarcation line, a guilty special form assert the issue to put forward the view non - around crime mainly, have analyzed the ranges of government owned corporation, enterprise on crime and non - guilty asserting, the not asserting of director, manager, interests it is illegal, question of asserting, manage the similar criminal offence and demarcation line of forbidding the illegal activities of obligation of competing industry of violating “ company law " that open more illegally

    第三部分為非法經營同類營業罪的司法認定，主要圍繞罪與非罪的界限、本罪與他罪的界限、本罪的特殊形態認定問題提出了看法，在罪與非罪的認定上分析了國有公司、企業的范圍，董事、經理的認定，非法利益、的認定問題，比較了非法經營同類營業的犯罪行為與違反《公司法》的競業禁止義務違法行為的界限。
  9. From left benny chung surveying, sabrina lau psychology criminal justice, sharon pang bba law and yan wai - lo philosophy politics public administration

    :左起鐘震南測量學;劉倬伶心理學及刑事司法;彭雪穎工商管理及法律及甄卉露哲學，政治及公共行政。
  10. Four winners were selected out of eight final contestants. they were benny chung surveying, sharon pang bba law, yan wai - lo philosophy politics public administration and sabrina lau psychology criminal justice

    四名獲勝者是鐘震南測量學;彭雪穎工商管理及法律;甄卉露哲學，政治及公共行政及劉倬伶心理學及刑事司法。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書