known liability 中文意思是什麼
known liability
解釋
已知負債-
It is well known financial business usually has higher asset - liability ratio. once it is lost, it will lead to financial risks
金融企業通常具有較高的資產負債率，一旦其資產經營出現巨大損失，就可能產生很大的金融風險。 -
Led by the legendary bill lerach, plaintiff lawyers have lobbied ferociously for the principle of going after third parties, known as “ scheme liability ”
在傳奇人物比爾?里瑞奇領導下，原告方律師已經在強烈支持第三方所謀求的原則，即所謂的債務配置。 -
Corporate fund also known as the common fund, the fund refers to itself as a limited liability company, the company through the issuance of stocks or benefit vouchers way to raise funds
公司型基金又叫做共同基金，指基金本身為一家股份有限公司，公司通過發行股票或受益憑證的方式來籌集資金。 -
Each party forever releases and discharges the other from all claims, debts, allegations, actions, causes of action and demands, whether known or unknown, arising form or in connection with the claim and existing as at the date of this settlement agreement, including without limitation any liability for legal costs connected with or arising out of the subject matter of the claim
各方永遠免除和解除另一方因主張引起或與之有關的及在本協議之時存在的一切索賠、債務、指控、訴訟、訴訟事由和要求（無論是已知的抑或未知的）應承擔的責任，包括但不限於承擔與主張的表的有關的或因之引起的法律費用的任何責任。 -
The cardholder andor the company shall immediately inform the bank if the pin is made or suspected to have been made known to any other person and the cardholder and the company herein agree to accept full and sole responsibility for all consequences, loss andor liability incurred as a result of the pin being known to another person for whatever reason and shall indemnify the bank for any loss or damage incurred by reason thereof
如持卡人發現或懷疑其私人密碼被泄露予其他人，持卡人及或公司須立即通知本銀行。倘若持卡人之私人密碼不論因任何原因泄露予其他人，持卡人及公司須完全承擔一切由此而引致之損失及或其他責任，並須全數賠償銀行因此而引起之一切損失。 -
The cardholder shall immediately inform the bank if the pin is made or suspected to have been made known to any other person and the cardholder herein agrees to accept full and sole responsibility for all consequences, loss andor liability incurred as a result of the pin being known to another person for whatever reason and shall indemnify the bank for any loss or damage incurred by reason thereof
如持卡人發現或懷疑其私人密碼被泄露予其他人，持卡人須立即通知本銀行。倘若持卡人之私人密碼不論因任何原因泄露予其他人，持卡人須完全承擔一切由此而引致之損失及或其他責任，並須全數賠償銀行因此而引起之一切損失。 -
Concretely speaking, the doctrine of no - fault liability apply to use infringement, selling infringement, commodity name or mounting infringement, innuendo trademark infringement and well - known trademark infringement, but the doctrine of liability for wrongs apply to the identification of trademark infringement, assisting infringement and domain name infringement
具體的說就是：使用侵權行為、銷售侵權行為、商品名稱或裝潢侵權行為、影射商標侵權行為和馳名商標侵權行為適用無過錯責任原則；而商標標識侵權行為、輔助侵權行為及域名侵權行為適用過錯責任原則。 -
Because use infringement, selling infringement, commodity name or mounting infringement, innuendo trademark infringement and well - known trademark infringement already occupy the majority of trademark infringement, the author holds that the liability principle applied to trademark infringement mainly is the doctrine of no - fault liability, secondly is the doctrine of liability for wrongs
因為商標使用侵權行為、銷售侵權行為、商品名稱或裝潢侵權行為、影射商標侵權行為和馳名商標侵權行為這五種形式已經占據了商標侵權行為總數的絕大部分，因此，本文認為：商標侵權行為主要適用無過錯責任原則，其次是過錯責任原則。 -
The second part will analyze a certain number of issues which exist in our current administer justice identification institution comprehensively, including several main disadvantages under current institution, such as the deluge in artificial distinguish identification potency, multiple identification and repetitive identification, dependence in identification, identifiers " avoidance of the obligation to appear in court to give evidence, not making the identification conclusion known to the public, the identification procedures " innormality, the chaos of the identification startup subject and lacking identification liability mechanism
第二部分全面剖析我國現行司法鑒定製度存在的若干問題，分析了包括人為區分鑒定效力、多頭鑒定和重復鑒定泛濫、鑒定職能不獨立、鑒定人普遍迴避出庭作證義務、鑒定結論不公開、鑒定程序不規范、鑒定啟動主體角色混亂以及鑒定責任機制缺乏等現行制度下的主要弊端。並認為對這些問題，絕不能機械、片面地作評價，必須結合司法鑒定的基本性質去分析，才能找其背後之深層次原因，從而為改革方案的合理設計和選擇提供正確指導。 -
In the last chapter, some hot issues which is the ongoing rules of china which is insufficient, indefinite or nothing, such as the special protection of well - known trade marks, malicious registration of domain names, prior right and the liability principles of action for infringement of a mark, are probed here. and some ideas and suggestion are put forward to improve the system
文章最後一部分對我國現行法規范不夠完善、或不太明確甚至閥如的熱點問題，諸如馳名商標的特殊保護、域名搶注、在先權以及商標侵權行為的歸責原則等進行了探討，並提出了進一步完善這些制度的設想和見解，
分享友人