lapse of law 中文意思是什麼
lapse of law
解釋
法律的失效-
I had often stood on the banks of the concord, watching the lapse of the current, an emblem of all progress, following the same law with the system, with time, and all that is made ; the weeds at the bottom gently bending down the stream, shaken by the watery wind, still planted where their seeds had sunk, but erelong to die and go down likewise ; the shining pebbles, not yet anxious to better their condition, the chips and weeds, and occasional logs and stems of trees that floated past, fulfilling their fate, were objects of singular interest to me, and at last i resolved to launch myself on its bosom and float whither it would bear me
我常站在康科德河的岸邊，望著逝去的流水- - -它是一切過程的象徵，和宇宙，和時間及一切造物受同一法則的支配；那河底的水草隨著水流輕柔地彎曲，彷彿受到水底清風的吹拂，此刻還在水底紮根，但不久后就會凋零並隨波濤逝去；那閃亮的鵝卵石- - -它們還不急著尋找更好的去處，那砂石碎屑、藤蔓野草，和那偶爾從水面漂過、奔向命運盡頭的圓木、樹干，都使我產生了極大的興趣，我最終決定泛舟于康科德河的胸膛之上，隨它將我載去任何地方。 -
The implementation of this system for more man ten years clearly shows that the multi - channel institution of retrial does not produce the desired effects. the present retrial system modelled itself mainly on that of the former soviet union, its operation in china gives rise to more state intervention than individual disposal, more layman recognised truth than truth recognised by law, seeking justice in substantial law more than legal procedure, and finally brings about " numerous applicants, unlimited lapse of time, high frequency, confused jurisdiction, unmethodical causes of action "
現行民訴法實施十多年的司法實踐表明發動再審程序主體的多元性並沒有產生預期的效果，由於現行的民事再審主要是參照前蘇聯模式，在再審程序的啟動上，強調國家干預權，忽視當事人處分權；在事實認定上，追求客觀真實，忽視法律真實；在糾錯上，注重實體公正，忽視程序公正；從而導致在實際操作中出現了啟動再審的「主體無限、時間無限、次數無限、審級無限、理由或條件無限」的不良現象。 -
Lapse of law
法律的失效 -
Clause 6 in a dispute arising out of a technology contract, where infringement of the right of a party occurred before the operative date of the contract law, if there was a lapse of more than one year between the date on which the party knew or should have known that its right was infringed and the operative date of the contract law, the people ' s court will no longer enforce such right ; where the lapse was less than one year, the time limit during which the party may bring a suit shall be two years
第七條技術進出口合同爭議當事人的權利受到侵害的事實發生在合同法實施之前，自當事人知道或者應當知道其權利受到侵害之日起至合同法施行之日超過兩年的，人民法院不予保護；尚未超過兩年的，其提起訴訟的時效期間為四年。 -
Clause 7 in a dispute arising out of a technology import / export contract, where infringement of the right of a party occurred before the operative date of the contract law, if there was a lapse of more than two years between the date on which the party knew or should have known that its right was infringed and the operative date of the contract law, the people ' s court will no longer enforce such right ; where the lapse was less than two years, the time limit during which the party may bring a suit shall be four years
第七條技術進出口合同爭議當事人的權利受到侵害的事實發生在合同法實施之前，自當事人知道或者應當知道其權利受到侵害之日起至合同法施行之日超過兩年的，人民法院不予保護；尚未超過兩年的，其提起訴訟的時效期間為四年。 -
Clause 6 in a dispute arising out of a technology contract, where infringement of the right of a party occurred before the operative date of the contract law, if there was a lapse of more than one year between the date on which the party knew or should have known that its right was infringed and the operative date of the contract law, the people ‘ s court will no longer enforce such right ; where the lapse was less than one year, the time limit during which the party may bring a suit shall be two years
第六條技術合同爭議當事人的權利受到侵害的事實發生在合同法實施之前，自當事人知道或者應當知道其權利受到侵害之日起至合同法實施之日超過一年的，人民法院不予保護；尚未超過一年的，其提起訴訟的時效期間為兩年。
分享友人