procedure of court trial 中文意思是什麼
procedure of court trial
解釋
庭審程序-
We should reform and perfect the pre - court examination procedure of public prosecution case in our country by re - selecting trial model, setting up pre - court examination procedure and delegating the prejudication duty to court that file the case
應通過重新選擇審查模式，設立預審程序並由立案庭承擔預審職責等途徑對我國公訴案件庭前審查程序進行改革和完善。 -
Criminal summary procedure is a judicial procedure in contrast with the general procedure. it is a kind if simplified contentious procedure based on general procedure. there are three forms of this procedure according to different extents of simplification. the first one is simplified form for links in general procedure. the second one is omitted form for procedure of court trials. in this procedure, the course of court trial is totally omitted. the third one is plea - agreement form which refers to an agreement about the committing and sentencing between prosecutor and defense attorney or defendant. the summary procedure is regulated widely in the criminal procedure laws of such countries as britain, american, france, germany, italy, japan. the tendency of towards of the development of the summary procedure can be analyzed in three aspects
本文從刑事簡易程序的概念入手，對我國簡易程序的立法現狀加以了分析與反思，從而試圖借鑒國外簡易程序的立法經驗，以我國現有簡易程序的法律規定為基礎，構建我國「多元化」的簡易程序體系。同時，由於簡易程序中對被告人的權利作出了很大的限制，因而，本文認為從程序正義、實體正義與訴訟效率三個角度對于簡易程序的正當性基礎加以解讀是十分必要的。同時，任何一個國家的法律制度都是一個有機聯系、密切配合的整體，刑事簡易程序的良好、有效運行也離不開配套制度的支持。 -
The general requirement include the open to the party and the society, but the fundamental content means the open of trial procedure and trial decision. the open of trial procedure means the open from placing a case on file to the end of court debate and the open court proceedings is the key factor, but the open trial decision include the open declaration 、 open judge document and open judgment reasons through which realize open proceedings
一般要求包括向當事人的公開及對社會的公開，基本內容指審判過程的公開和審判結果公開，審判過程的公開指從立案直至法庭辯論結束的全部活動公開，其中法庭審理公開是關鍵；審判結果的公開包括判決的公開宣告及裁判文書的公開等形式及通過判決理由的公開實現裁判形成過程的公開等實質內容。 -
Clause 9 where as set forth in paragraph 2 of article 44 of the contract law, the relevant law or administration regulation provides that the effectiveness of a certain contract is subject to completion of the relevant approval procedure, or the relevant approval and registration procedures, if before completion of court debate by the parties in the trial of first instance, the parties still fail to carry out the relevant approval procedure, or approval and registration procedures, as the case may be, the people ' s court shall rule that the contract has not yet taken effect ; if the relevant law or administration regulation requires that a certain contract be registered without subjecting its effectiveness to such registration, then failure to effect registration shall not impair the effectiveness of the contract, provided that such failure constitutes an impediment to the conveyance of title to, or such other real right in, the subject matter of the contract
第九條依照合同法第四十四條第二款的規定，法律、行政法規規定合同應當辦理批準手續，或者辦理批準、登記等手續才生效，在一審法庭辯論終結前當事人仍未辦理批準手續的，或者仍未辦理批準、登記等手續的，人民法院應當認定該合同未生效；法律、行政法規規定合同應當辦理登記手續，但未規定登記後生效的，當事人未辦理登記手續不影響合同的效力，合同標的物所有權及其他物權不能轉移。 -
Abstract : this thesis discussed how to limit the death penalty and guarantee its quality from the perspective of procedure which includes 3 questions : first, there have several issues need to be solved for the second public hearing trial ; second, it ' s not enough to take the death penalty review power back from the high court to the supreme court ; third, it ' s so necessary to strengthen defense in the death penalty cases
內容提要：本文從三個方面討論了如何從程序上限制死刑、保證死刑案件的質量，分析了落實死刑案件二審開庭所要解決的問題，指出應利用死刑復核收回這一機會完善相關制度，並提出加強死刑案件辯護的若干建議。 -
With the improvement of reform of criminal court trial system, the current criminal procedure law bestows equal rights on the accused and the defended to provide evidence and to question the witness in the procedure of trial
摘要隨著刑事庭審制度改革的不斷完善，我國現行《刑事訴訟法》賦予了控訴方和辯護方在刑事庭審過程中雙方權利對等的提出證據權和質證權。 -
Article 177 trial of cases through summary procedure shall not be subject to the provisions of section 1 of this chapter governing the procedures of interrogating the defendant, questioning the witnesses and expert witnesses, showing the evidence, and debating in court
第一百七十七條適用簡易程序審理案件，不受本章第一節關于訊問被告人、詢問證人、鑒定人、出示證據、法庭辯論程序規定的限制。 -
In the treatise, the author believes that civil procedure for trial supervision is a procedure that people ' s procuratorate, on the basis of legal supervision rights, or a party to an action, on the basis of rights to apply for retrial, finds that there is error in a legally effective judgment or mediation agreement made by a people ' s court and asks for the court to retrial
筆者認為，民事審判監督程序是指人民檢察院基於法律監督權，當事人基於再審申請權，認為人民法院已生效的民事判決或調解協議確有錯誤，依照法定程序，要求人民法院並由人民法院依法對該案件進行再審的程序。 -
Establishing the pre - trial review procedure after the procuratorial agency ' s prosecution and before the official court trial, is the particular requirements and performance of fairness and efficiency while designing and performancing the criminal system as well as the reasonable restriction to the national power of prosecution and the proper safeguard to the dependant ` s rights in the modern society
我國1996年刑事訴訟法對原庭前審查制度作了較大修改，其弱化庭前審查程序並不符合各國立法的一般發展趨勢。針對現行刑事訴訟庭前審查程序中存在的諸多缺陷，文章最後提出了建構我國刑事預審程序的若干設想。 -
Plea bargaining refers to the criminal cases which are concluded in such a way that the charged, through his or her lawyers consulting with the prosecutor, makes a plea of guilty while the prosecutor cancels or reduces or degrades the charge, or makes suggestion of sentencing favorable of the charged to the court. plea bargaining is a special trial procedure which is stipulated in criminal procedural law of many countries, but unfamiliar in china
在刑事案件中，被指控者通過其律師與指控方進行協商，由被指控者作有罪答辯，指控方撤消指控、減少指控或降格指控，或者由控方向法院提出有利於被指控方的量刑建議，從而以此方式結案的，即為辯訴交易。辯訴交易是世界不少國家刑事訴訟法規定的一種特別審判程序，而我國對之一直很陌生。 -
Our pre - trial procedure has experienced two extreme modes from " four - step court " to " one - step court " in which the preparatory conduct is n ' t separated from the trial conduct, affecting justness and efficiency of litigation
我國審前程序的發展經歷了準備行為與審理行為不分的「四步到庭」和「一步到庭」二種極端性的模式，不利於訴訟公正和效益。 -
Summary trail of general procedure, the short form of simplified hearing method of criminal general procedure, is a reform to court trial method which simplifies court trial content of general procedure to some extent
刑事普通程序簡易化審理方式，簡稱普通程序簡易審，是在一定程度上簡化普通程序的庭審內容，是對庭審方式的一種改革。 -
They include the institution time, cause, subject, object, the competency of court of law and examination procedure, etc. however, there are great difference between the institu - tion of trial examination procedure and the institution of retrial procedure
其依新證據提起再審的有關制度，與西方國家的再審提起制度大致相當，有提起期限、事由、主體、客體、管轄法院、審查程序等。 -
Besides the different subjects men - tioned above, there are other differences, such as limita - tion without institution deadline in trial supervision pro - cedure, compare the institution causes principle, simple trial procedure, formal trial usually, essential trial by law of court ( not like institution retrial on the basis of new evidence )
但其審判監督程序的提起，與依新證據提起再審程序的區別很大，主體不同前邊已講過，還有審判監督程序的提起無期限限制，提起事由規定得比較原則、審查程序很簡單，一般為形式審查，不象依新證據提起再審那樣，法院要進行實質審查。 -
In pretrial procedure, by the way of pretrial conference, the parties and the court may schedule for collect and produce the evidence, arrange and fix the issues. then the trial procedure can concentrate on such issues and evidence to investigate and argue. under the intensive trial, the parties ’ dispute can be solved in one time
審前程序系當事人與法院通過庭審前有計劃地收集與提出證據，整理與固定爭點，使庭審程序集中於固定之爭點與證據為調查與辯論，促進審理集中化，達到紛爭一次性解決之要求，因審前之準備是否充實而有效率，對于審理集中化之成功與否，實具有決定性影響。 -
Then i compare the concept, characteristic, subject, object, the conditions on which a case is brought to court for retrial and court procedure of retrial procedure in western countries with the popular trial supervision in china, distinguish their sameness and differences, declare that i will discuss and study the compare between china and foreign countries and the innova - tion orient of the retrial procedure institution subject system in the name of the more scientific retrial procedure
其次，對西方國家的再審程序與中國現行的審判監督程序，在概念、特徵、主體、客體、提起條件、審理程序等方面作以比較，區別其異同，陳明本文要以較科學的再審程序為名，來討論、研究再審程序提起主體制度的中外比較、改革方向。 -
This thesis is laying claim to the basic way of thinking of reform as follows : institutional from the innovation of the argumentation foundation set out, " specaal relief " which sets up to take procedure justice as core to be worth discusses again a principle, with start procedure of the legal reason concretely changes in to correspond a point, strict restriction the court discuss again by oneself of job power, to norm procuratorial organ ' s legal power to bring a counter appeal, giving the party concerned start the principle qualifications of the procedure, and establish a final trial of retry principle
改革的基本思路是：從創新制度的立論基礎出發，樹立以程序正義為核心價值的「特殊救濟」再審理念，以啟動程序的法定理由具休化為切人點，嚴格限製法院自行再審的職權，規范檢察院的再審抗訴權限，賦予當事人啟動程序的主體資格，並確立再審一審終審原則。 -
The present procedure for civil trial supervision for our country refers the pattem of the soviet union, which over emphasizes state intervention ; and emphasizes that " truth " is discovered by court instead of by state
我國現行民事審判監督程序參照了前蘇聯的模式，國家干預色彩較重，強調由法院代表國家發現「真理」 。 -
As to the prosecution procedure having some problems, the article put forward that to set up the censor system of prosecution right, to set up the evidence discovery system, to absorb " plea bargain " in some degree, to change the prosecutor ' s role as parties, to set up prosecution change system and to properly restrain the supplementary investigation of court - trial case as the feasible countermeasures
摘要設立公訴權司法審查機制、建立證據展示制度、適度引入「辯訴交易」 、實行公訴人當事人化、建立公訴變更制度、適當限制庭審案件的補充偵查是完善公訴程序的可行性對策。 -
Application of summary trial of general procedure should examine whether the defendant acknowledges the guilt sincerely and voluntarily at the court hearing stage
適用普通程序簡易審方式應在法庭審理階段設立專門程序審查被告人的認罪是否真實、自願。
分享友人