代位權利 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [dàiwèiquánlì]
代位權利
英文
right of subrogation-
The author considers the legal system of intellectual property right is opening so that the domain name should be included as a kind of independent right. in the following parts of the essay, the author explores the fundamental causes of conflict and re - classifies the types of conflict between domain name and trademark, reanalyzes the similarity and the difference between domain name and trademark, makes comparison between the three major domain name dispute resolutions that have already been provided ( udrp, acpa and the domain name disputes solution of china ), it can provide ground for an effective method for solution. at last, the thesis baldly points out that it should stand an independent legal status in ip law
故，筆者欲突破在商標及商標法框架下研究域名的思維定勢，重新審視域名法律地位、分析其法律屬性;以域名與商標沖突為典型，研究導致沖突的原因;從平等中立的角度，以貫穿經典案例的方法重新劃分沖突分類:以橫向比較分析的研究方法評介全球具有代表性的沖突解決方案和我國新的域名政策以及司法解釋，為正確提出解決方案建立基礎;探討域名爭議解決的主要原則，分析域名在我國的立法模式;最後，筆者將在全文分析的基礎上，嘗試提出域名權利問題，以期能從根本上尋求解決域名的法律保護以及沖突的公平解決的合理機制。The grounds based on which the insurance subrogation right is established are : torteous acts, breaches of contract, acquiring profits improperly and without legal basis and general averages
保險代位求償權形成的事由有：侵權行為、違約行為行為、不當得利和共同海損。With regard to the lack of corresponding entity right backing for " execute the third party " according to the procedure law in current chinese creditor ' s subrogation system ; the inconsistence between the ent ity law and the procedure law for the conditions to exercise creditor ' s subrogation ; the obscure effect of the exercising of the creditor ' s subrogation ; the indefiniteness of right and status of the parties in the subrogation proceeding and so on, it is suggested that amend the civil code, confine the creditor ' s subrogation system, coordinate the rules in entity law and procedure law related to the debtees " to exercise their subrogation, define the creditor ' s subrogation, the right and obligation of related parties in the procedure, perfect the rules in procedure law in order to provide proceeding procedure security for the realization of the creditor ' s subrogation
並針對我國現行債權人代位權制度在程序法中「執行第三人」缺乏相應實體權利依據、實體法與程序法有關債權人代位權行使條件規定不一致、債權人行使代位權效力不清、當事人在代位權訴訟中的地位和權利不明確等諸多缺欠，提出了制定民法典確定債權人代位權制度、協調實體法和程序法中關于債權人行使代位權的規定、明確債權人代位權訴訟相關當事人的權利義務、完善程序法規定為債權人代位權實現提供訴訟程序保障的意見。In this period, chinese and western legal cultural conflicts occurred in such areas as " rule by law " and " rule by man ", " legal instrumentalism " and " supremacy of law ", " ethics standard " and " right standard ", rank, justice, and equality due to the differences between chinese culture and western culture in the following aspects : historical and cultural traditions, folk psychology, political systems, and the development stages of society
這一時期，中西方在不同的歷史文化傳統、不同的民族心理、不同的政治制度和不同的社會發展階段的時代背景之下，其法律文化在人治觀與法治觀、法律工具論與法律至上論、倫理本位與權利本位、等級名分與正義、平等等領域產生了全面的文化沖突與碰撞。Moreover, our laws provide more, strict pledge requirements on foreign investment enterprises. part five states the rights and the obligations of the pledger and the pawnee in share right pledge. part six clarifies the validity scope of the share right pledge, focusing on the validity to the secured creditors " right and the subject matter
第六部躺明股踉押具腕括的幾怕面的效力，著重論述了股權質押對所邯債權范圍的效力及販物的效力，前者主要包括主債權、利息、違約金、損害賄鈾實獅權的費用，後者一鵬括質物、革息及代位物。It is from our country ’ s tax law administrative realm, use summarized, compared and more empirical methods make a legal analysis with the definition, nature, the exercise of the tax subrogation in the theory. at the same time in practice provide some useful comments and suggestions for the tax subrogation system
根據新《中華人民共和國稅收徵收管理法》第五十條的規定，稅收代位權是指，對于拖欠稅款的納稅人到期的債權等財產權利，稅務機關可以依法向納稅人的債務人追索以抵繳稅款。The claimant ' s interests can be damaged not only because of the heir ' s behavior, but also because of the decedent ' s behavior before death, for which subrogation and abatement should be vested in the claimant
遺產債權人的利益不僅可以因繼承人的行為受損，也有可能因為被繼承人的生前行為哪，剛一產覦人以代位權辱0湖權。On the procedure hand, i hold : the creditor brings a suit as plaintiff because he has the benefit of the suit ; the first debtor does not have to take part in the suit, if he does, the identity is determined subject to the concrete situation ; if the debtor brings a subrogation suit, the first debtor can not bring the suit based on the same debt ; the debt that the creditor subrogates should be a whole one ; the jurisdiction of subrogation is normal district jurisdiction, etc. following that, i bring out my own imagine about the foundation of subrogation rights of debtor system
在程序法方面，筆者認為：債權人基於訴的利益而作為原告提起代位權訴訟，主債務人無必要必須參加訴訟，如參加，也應根據案件的具體情況及當事人的不同權利主張，確定其訴訟地位；債權人提起代位權訴訟后，主債務人就該代位權行使范圍內所享有的訴權自行消滅；債權人可代位行使的債權應以完整債權為限；代位權訴訟標的只限於債權人以自己名義對次債務人主張之權利；代位權訴訟之管轄實質上是一種一般地域管轄。Section one is developed based on the extent to which the insurance subrogation right can be exercised. the author states that the exercise of this right should be limited by the assured ' s direct right to claim and to the amount the insurer has paid the assured
第一節圍繞保險人的行使權利范圍展開，保險人的代位權范圍不僅應當受到被保險人的直接求償權的限制，而且還應受其已作保險賠償額的限制。Enlightened by the ideas of " action indirecte " and " rights of subrogating action " in legislation abroad, the author interrogates the idea that subrogating rights is substantive rights, suggesting that subrogating rights be defined as rights of procedural sense in substantive laws, and analyses the noncausal management feature of subrogating action with reference to the civil juristic principles of noncausal management
受域外立法例中「間接訴權」 、 「代位訴權」等提法的啟示，對「代位權為實體權利」的觀點提出了商榷意見，認為應當將代位權界定為「實體法中程序意義上的權利」 ；借鑒無因管理的民法學原理，分析了代位訴訟的「無因管理」屬性。The third chapter discusses the problems occurred in the trial of the case in respect of chain voyage charter party prior to implementation of contract law as well as the shipowner how to exercise the right of subrogation provided by contract law to protect it ' s creditor1 rights under chain voyage charter party
第三章探討了以往海事法院在審判連環航次租船合同案件中遇到問題，以及船東如何運用新合同法中規定的代位權制度來保護自己在連環航次租船合同中的債權利益不受侵害。Of course, there are some exceptions in discussing the requirements of subrogation objects, this article firstly argues that subrogation is different from object of subrogation, and then thinks that the objects of subrogation should include creditor ' s right in rem right of the real claim subrogation right of rescission right of civil procedure and so on
在代位權客體要件里，本文先區分了債權代位權對債權代位權客體是兩個截然不同的概念，然後認為，代位權客體的范圍應包括債權、物權及物上請求權、債權代位權、撤銷權、訴訟上等權利，但是應排除專屬于債務人的三類權利和形成權。On the substance hand, i hold : subrogation rights of debtor is a kind of conditional and statutory content of creditor " s right ; it needs subjective and objective condition, for example, the first debtor ' s should be due, etc ; the result of exercising the subrogation is that the second debtor clears the debt to the first debtor not the creditor
在實體法方面，筆者認為：債權人代位權實質上是一種附一定條件的法定的債權權能，其構成應滿足一定的要件，其中包括主債務人能行使而不行使到期債權，債權人遭受了遲延履行的實際損害，其代位債權必須是非專屬于主債務人的既存的合法的財產性權利等，債權人代位權的行使結果是次債務人向主債務人清償債務，債權人不能獨占該財產以充抵自己的債權。Then, the author explains the dual features of the creditor ' s status as the plaintiff and the secondary debtor ' s status as the defendant, and makes much effort to expound the debtor ' s position in the litigation, the author holds that the main debtor ' s position in the litigation varies according to his standpoints : if he has objection to the subrogating rights, his position is common defendart, whereas he is a third person without independent pleading right, if othenvise
其次，對債權人原告地位的雙重屬性和次債務人的被告地位作了論述，花了大量筆墨對債務人的訴訟地位進行探討。主張債務人的訴訟地位因債務人的立場不同而異：如果債務人對代位權有異議，其訴訟地位為共同被告：如果債務人對代位權沒有異議，其訴訟地位為權利義務型的無獨立請求權的第三人。At the same time, the paper suggest that the norm for the intervenor of right to be determined is to find whether he have rights on the material law to restrict the jusdispodendi of the one party and the norm for another to be determined is to find whether there are legal facts need to be found with no contradiction in the two jural relation
與此同時，認為權利參加型第三人的確認標準為：就本訴訟訴標的，第三人在實體上是否享有針對被參加人不當處分行為的代位權或撤銷權；而義務參加型第三人的確認標準為：本訴法律關系和第三人參加的另一法律關系之間是否存在著需要合一確認的法律事實。Guarantor hereby waives any defense arising by reason of any claim or defense based upon an election of remedies by buyer ， which ， in any manner impairs ， affects ， reduces ， releases ， destroys or extinguishes guarantors subrogation rights ， rights to proceed against seller for reimbursement ， or any other rights of the guarantor or against any other person or security ， including ， but not limited to ， any defense based upon an election of remedies by buyer under the provisions of applicable state law ， orof the united states
擔保人據此放棄就買方基於其選擇的救濟措施而產生的任何主張或抗辯提出任何抗辯，盡管買方採取的救濟措施已損害、影響、減少、解除、破壞或消滅了擔保人的代位權、起訴賣方以求償的權利或其他權利，或是針對其他人或擔保物的權利，擔保人放棄的抗辯包括但不限於，基於買方根據適用的州法或合眾國法規定採取救濟措施而產生的任何抗辯。And it can be as objects of subrogation right, right hypothec and can realize value of the right by transfer in the property right areas. chapter 3 focuses on the limitation of right of formation
同時，具有可轉讓性質的財產性形成權不僅可以成為代位權的客體、權利質權的客體，而且可以通過權利移轉來實現此類形成權的價值。This article from the exercising area of subrogation, comparative law, litigation economy, the social effect of subrogation exercising, the restriction on the debtor ' s right and equality of creditors ' right, proves that the direct - discharge is more excellent than the rule of warehousing through nine different angles of view
本文從代位權的行使范圍、比較法學、訴訟經濟、行使代位權可能產生的社會效果、對債務人處分權利的限制以及債權平等多個視角對兩種學說進行考量，力證直接受償原則優于入庫原則。The contemporary civil procedural law sets up the principle of good faith because of the following reasons : it possesses the characteristics, which the basic principle of the civil procedural law should have, and three functions, with which it can prevent the rights of action and trial from being abused, uniquely explain the statutory law, and supplement the missing meaning of it. the principle is the result of adjustment and influence by the concept of the rights in the standard of society and the idea of action
現代民事訴訟法確立誠信原則的法律依據如下：它具有民事訴訟法基本原則應有的屬性和三大功能，其獨特的防止訴權和審判權的濫用，解釋成文法和規定欠缺的補充功能不可替代，是民事訴訟程序公正價值目標要求，社會本位權利思想及訴訟理念調整影響的結果，是現代公法與私法的融合、實體法和程序法相互彌補的產物。Subrogation is a kind of substantive right, it is established on special basis, and the purpose of it is not to protect all the creditors ' rights
代位權是一種實體性權利，它在我國的確立有其特殊的基礎，其設立的目的並不在於保護所有債權人的一般債權。分享友人