敗訴案件 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [bàisùànjiàn]
敗訴案件 英文
defeat suit
  • 敗 : Ⅰ動詞1 （打敗） defeat; beat 2 （失敗） fail 3 （解除; 消散） break; counteract 4 （敗壞; 毀壞） ...
  • 訴 : 動詞1. （說給人） tell; relate; inform 2. （傾吐） complain; accuse 3. （控告） appeal to; resort to
  • 案 : 名詞1 （長桌） table; desk 2 （案件） case; law [legal] case 3 （案卷; 記錄）record; file 4 （提...
  • 件 : Ⅰ量詞（用於個體事物） piece; article; item Ⅱ名詞1. （指可以一一計算的事物） 2. （文件） letter; correspondence; paper; document
  • 敗訴 : lose a lawsuit敗訴案件 defeat suit; 敗訴方 party losing the lawsuit; 敗訴人 defeated suitor; lose...
  • 案件 : law case; case; legal case
  1. It will take a share in the compensation awarded in successful cases to pay the defendants legal cost in unsuccessful ones

    該計劃將會分享成功案件所獲判的補償，用於支付敗訴案件中被告人的法律費用。
  2. The secord part describes the present primary situations of administrative litigations ad defendant is public security agency. the following four points are plaled emprasis on concluding the abnormd withdrawl of cases, the avoidarce of administrative litigation in the name of criminal litigation, the lag of the legis lation of administrative laws and the ambiguity of prof responsibility and soon

    第二部分概述公安行政訴訟運行的概況，並重點對公安行政訴訟中存在的問題進行分析：非正常撤訴率高，公安機關借刑事偵查名義規避行政訴訟，公安機關勞動教養敗訴案件增多（
  3. When have analyzed the method of alleviating the patient ’ s burden of proof, specific methods are proposed. author suggest that court should accept the sue only if the patient prove the cause to the degree the average person regard the cause true, the burden of proof is bored on medical organization when the being proving fact provided by patient is highly possible ; the burden of proof is bored on patient when being proving fact provided by patient is less possible but the fact is only clue and medical organization take on responsibility of explanation ; and the burden of proof is bored on the patient when the fact is impossible. author proposed also method to form a complete set, which is establishing the principle of free prove, dividing the cause into cause in fact and cause in law and establishing the standard for possibility

    筆者在分析了減輕患者證明責任的途徑之後，提出了完善醫療糾紛訴訟中證明責任分配的具體方法:將《最高人民法院關于證據的若干規定》第四條第八款修改為:患者就醫療行為向法院提起訴訟，必須就醫療方存在過錯或者損害與醫療行為之間存在事實上的因果關系的證明達到依一般人的觀點，可以合理懷疑的程度時，法院才能受理;對患者提出的有爭議的待證事實，具有高度的蓋然性的，由醫療方承擔證明責任，事實真偽不明時，由醫療方承擔敗訴風險;對待證的事實蓋然性較低，但該事實是唯一具體線索的可能性時，由醫療方承擔解明義務，在醫療方已經盡了解明義務而事實仍然真偽不明時，仍由患者承擔敗訴風險;對蓋然性很低的案件，由患者承擔證明責任。
  4. It is not many scholars to clearly prove the opinion of shifting the burden of proof, on the contrary the contradictory scholars are more prominent, for example the vice professor of southwest politics and law university, chengang, wuyue who translates and introduces the burden of proof of germany, because them there are more and more people support the opposite opinion, while in the draft of " civil evidence code ", the traditional idea win, in this draft the legislator abides by the present justice and our country ' s native circumstance, they made an scientific choice, of course, the burden of proof will directly influence the party " s possibility of losing the lawsuit, while the regulation of shifting the burden of proof increases the plaintiff ' s opportunity to win a lawsuit. to explain what is the shifting of burden of proof, the paper use the civil law as the example to point out the " reverse " is not entirly relieve the plaintiff s obligation of producing evidence, but in certain extent and in certain range make the defendant bear the burden of producing those proofs from the reverse way, which are originally beard by the plaintiff. in the three proceeding law, shifting the burden of proof have some differences, but the interior spirits are coincident - for the values of social justice and the legal reason

    論證舉證責任倒置的學者觀點明確並且論證十分充分的不多，相反卻是對此著書立說予以反駁的學者較為突出，如西南政法大學的副教授陳則博士，翻譯並介紹德國證明責任學說的吳越先生均是目前國內對舉證責任倒置持否定態度的代表人物，由於他們的推動使得國內持此說的人越來越多，但在《民事證據法（草案） 》的擬定過程中，並未采責任倒置的地位，這樣的立法選擇是建立在對我國法律實現的本土環境客觀認識的基礎上的科學選擇，誠然，舉證責任的分配直接影響到當事人在訴訟中的敗訴風險，而「倒置」規則的設計，則在此問題上增加了原告勝訴的籌碼，在理解何為舉證責任倒置時，本文著重以民事法為主線，指出這種「倒置」並非全部免除原告的證明責任，而是在一定范圍與一定程度上將通常應由原告負擔的舉證責任轉由被告從反方面承擔，舉證責任倒置在三大訴訟法中所體現的具體情形有所差異，但它們的內在精神是一致的?法律的理性與社會公平價值，在民事訴訟中舉證責任倒置的情形，一般總是將其局限於特殊侵權情形，而忽略了民事合同違約責任的訴訟中的原告也無須對被告應承擔違約責任的所有要件，對被告主觀上的過錯實行推定，若被告予以否定則應對其無過錯的證據舉證，在設置舉證責任倒置的規則時，從各國的立法經驗與法的內在價值要求可以總結出以下幾個原則:程序法與實體法結合原則，公平原則，訴訟經濟原則，保護弱者原則等，基於此完善舉證責任倒置的規則時首先應肯定舉證責任倒置的概念，其次立法應避免求大求全，再次要配合實體法的發展，最後還可以在司法領域嘗試判例的指導意義。
  5. The courts judge according to burden of proof that the party who has the burden of proof will fail if the fact to be proved is still in doubt

    法官在案件待證事實真偽不明、訴訟程序用盡的條件下，將以證明責任為依據，判決承擔證明責任的一方敗訴。
  6. The case was eventually dismissed in june for insufficient evidence

    最終這起案件因證據不足而敗訴。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書