教唆犯 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [jiāosuōfàn]
教唆犯
英文
abettor-
On the cognizance of the unfinishedness of an abettor
論教唆犯未完成形態的認定Chapter iv : the constitution of instigation
第四部分:教唆犯的成立要件Chapter ii : the nature of instigation
第二部分：教唆犯的性質。Chapter iii : the concept of instigation
第三部分:教唆犯的概念Abettors of crime put youngsters up to all sorts of evil while staying in the background themselves.
教唆犯自己不出頭，專唆使青少年干壞事。Different people play different role in the common crime, and undertake different responsibility
共同故意傷害的實行犯、教唆犯、幫助犯的實行過限分別承擔不同責任。Based on the analysis of autonomous attributes of abettors, this paper analyses the inherent unification of special attributes of abettors : joint crime, inchoate crime and quantity of crime
摘要在教唆犯獨立性質基礎之上，教唆犯的共犯形態、未完成形態、罪數形態的內在統一，構成教唆犯的特殊形態。The third section explores the nature of the instigator in our nation ' s criminal law
第三部分我國刑法理論上教唆犯性質之檢討。The second section is concerned with joint crime theory related to the instigator in civil law
第二部分大陸法系有關教唆犯的共同犯罪理論。" what has become of danglars, the instigator, and therefore the most guilty ?
「騰格拉爾，那個教唆犯，就是那個罪名最重的人，他怎麼樣了？ 」How to delimit the quality of instigator directly influences the delimitation of the nature of joint crime
教唆犯的性質的定位直接影響著共同犯罪的性質的定位。Since the concept of instigator can be ascertained through explaining the concept of instigation, we can also observe that " an instigation is an offence carried out to instigate someone to commit a crime.
同時，由於教唆犯既可以從行為人的角度理解，也可以從行為的角度理解，所以教唆犯的概念可表述為:教唆犯是教唆他人犯罪的人（或行為） 。There are various statements, of instigator, which are somewhat different. the received definition of instigator, namely " an instigator is a person who instigates someone to commit a crime ", is concise but adequate to reveal the connotation of instigator, so it is a rather ideal statement
國內有幾種關于教唆犯的概念的表述，這些表述有其不同之處，其中通說所認同的「教唆犯是教唆他人犯罪的人」的表述是最為簡潔的表述，同時也能夠揭示教唆犯的應有內涵，與其他幾種表述比較，是更為可取的一種定義。On the definition of the nature of abettors in criminal law of our country
論我國刑法中教唆犯性質之界定An independent re - interpretation of abettor and analysis of its feasibility
教唆犯獨立性新釋及其可行性評估Nevertheless, the theories concerning joint crime is at issue
但學界有關教唆犯的理論卻眾說紛紜，莫衷一是。Two : instigating a crime
第二，教唆犯罪There are several viewpoints about the nature of instigation
對于教唆犯的性質，國內外刑法學界存在著迥然不同的幾種看法。Instigation has only independence but not dependence from the following angles : revised constitution of crime can directly be utilized to convict ; instigation has serious harmfulness, violates the social relations protected by criminal law and deserves conviction and penalty itself ; to ponder over the circumstances of instigatee during conviction does not indicate the dependence of instigation ; there is causality between instigation and the harmful consequences brought by the crime committed by the instigatee ; literate dependence is not equal to the dependence of instigation ; insisting on the independence of instigation will not lead to convicting by thought ; to recognize the independence of instigation is required by the principle of personal responsibility ; it is a worldwide tendency to accept the independence of instigation in legislation
從下列八個方面可以得出教唆犯只應具有獨立性，而不具有從屬性：修正的犯罪構成可直接作為定罪的根據；教唆犯罪具有嚴重的社會危害性，本身就侵犯了刑法所保護的社會關系，具有犯罪性和可罰性；教唆犯的定罪、處罰要考慮到被教唆人的情況，但這並不是教唆犯從屬性的體現；教唆行為對被教唆人實施的犯罪所造成的危害結果具有原因力；文理上的從屬性並不能證明教唆犯具有從屬性；教唆犯獨立性說並不是主觀歸罪；堅持教唆犯獨立性說是貫徹刑法個人責任的要求；教唆犯獨立性說是各國立法的趨勢。This section firstly discusses divergence of views in academic circles of china, and, rejecting the former method of research on the instigator that did not differentiate whether the instigated committed the crime of instigation or not and distinguishing the two cases of instigation, redefines the scope and nature of the instigator
這一部分從我國學界認識上的分歧談起，拋開了學界過去研究教唆犯不分被教唆者犯與沒犯被教唆之罪而籠統地對教唆犯研究的方法，釐清了教唆犯的兩種不同情況，對教唆犯的范圍、性質進行了重新定位。分享友人