案件正在審理中 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [ànjiànzhēngzàishěnlǐzhōng]
案件正在審理中 英文
suit pending
  • 案 : 名詞1 （長桌） table; desk 2 （案件） case; law [legal] case 3 （案卷; 記錄）record; file 4 （提...
  • 件 : Ⅰ量詞（用於個體事物） piece; article; item Ⅱ名詞1. （指可以一一計算的事物） 2. （文件） letter; correspondence; paper; document
  • 正 : 正名詞（正月） the first month of the lunar year; the first moon
  • 審 : Ⅰ形容詞（詳細; 周密） careful Ⅱ動詞1 （審查） examine; go over 2 （審訊） interrogate; try 3 [書...
  • 理 : Ⅰ名詞1 （物質組織的條紋） texture; grain （in wood skin etc ） 2 （道理;事理） reason; logic; tru...
  • 案件 : law case; case; legal case
  • 正在 : in process of; in course of
  1. According to the principle of " the synthetic distribution of punishment ", the author poses the concept of " the circumstance of distribution of punishment ", and taking the error making method, compares the " robbery of housebreaking " with there circumstances : the criminate, the sentencing, and the distribution of punishment, it is conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " should not be regarded as the circumstances of crime or the sentencing discretion, even though there are some barriers in the theory conclusions as a circumstance of distribution of punishment, so we can conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " can not be considered as the legal circumstances, it must be the circumstance of distribution of punishment even if it is regarded as the legal circumstances. in the process of jurist and legislation, we must strictly grasp the approval standards of the " house ", recognize and deploy the legal sentence of " robbery of housebreaking " correctly,

    根據「統一配刑論」的原理，筆者提出了「配刑情節」的概念，並採取歸謬法，將「入戶搶劫」同時置於定罪、量刑、配刑三種語境下進行比較，得出「入戶搶劫」既不應該是犯罪情節，也不可能是量刑情節，作為配刑情節也存在理論障礙的結論，進一步推斷出「入戶搶劫」不應該作為法定情節，即使作為法定情節也應該是配刑情節的結論，而且在司法和立法中應從嚴把握「戶」的認定標準，正確認識和配置「入戶搶劫」的法定刑，防止罪刑失衡，還對具體案件和審判實踐中要解決的幾個問題提供了參考方案。
  2. The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure

    以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導，結合我國的國情，對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善，在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子；在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念，以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實；在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則；在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據，其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據，增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度，補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的，取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定，改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。
  3. The civil case judgment direct procedure is a legal procedure that rectifies to produce effect to judge the mistake, although it is not a case to take up necessarily through the procedure, is also not litigant to review the class independently, it developped the positive effect towards protecting the legal rights of the party concerned, guarantee judicatory fairly, because some judgment of now direct procedure provision too principle, or not complete and not reasonable, practice to win to also bring the operational difficulty and not norm, also obstructed the wrong function of the 糾 of the procedure of direct of judgment full to some extent exertive

    民事審判監督程序是糾正生效裁判錯誤的法定程序，雖然它不是案件審理的必經程序，也不是訴訟的獨立審級，但其對保護當事人合法權益，保障司法公正，發揮了積極作用，但由於現在有些審判監督程序規定的過于原則，或不完整不合理，實踐中也帶來操作上的困難和不規范，在一定程度上也阻礙了審判監督程序的糾錯功能的充分發揮。
  4. The good faith under civil procedural law means the courts of law, the parties, and other litigant participants must be fair, honest and virtual, when they are hearing cases or participate in legal actions

    民事訴訟法中誠實信用，指法院、當事人和其他訴訟參加人在審理民事案件和進行民事訴訟行為時必須公正、誠實和善意。
  5. The paper introduces the origin, development of system of plea bargaining and functions of inquisitor, counsel for the defense, discusses the rationality and limitation of the system, puts forward the applying range of plea bargaining, judge ' s force in normal checkup and affirm the plea bargaining contract, the elementary assuming that counsel and the victim should take part in the plea bargaining

    文章介紹了辯訴交易制度的淵源、發展以及檢察官、辯護律師、法官在辯訴交易中的作用，探討了辯訴交易制度的合理性和缺陷，提出我國若引進辯訴交易制度應限定適用辯訴交易的案件范圍、法官正式審查並確認辯訴協議的效力、辯護律師和被害人應參與辯訴交易的初步設想。
  6. The structure of the paper is following : the first part is to put forward the problem. the problem of the substantive trial procedure of the bankruptcy case is arose not only because the parties cannot take part in the proceed of judgement, but also because the rules of reconsider deprive the parties of the procedural remedy rights

    文章從一則案件寫起，說明現在對破產案件中出現的實體問題的審理中出現的問題，主要是不符合程序公正的要求，表現在當事人不能參與到裁判的形成過程中;復議制度實際剝奪了當事人的程序救濟權;裁判文書的使用不符合民事訴訟法的基本原理。
  7. At present, experts always refer legal opinion to the court about the case that is being heard in the judicial practice

    目前，在司法實踐中廣泛存在專家就正在審理的案件向法院提交法律意見書的現象。
  8. The honest and trustworthy principle in civil action means the court, the party and other participators in civil ligation must be justify, honest and goodwill in trying the civil case and doing c ivil action

    民事訴訟中的誠實信用原則是指法院、當事人以及其它訴訟參與人在審理民事案件和進行民事訴訟時必須公正和誠實善意。
  9. In 1996, the amendment of criminal procedure law did n ' t allow the investigating and prosecuting apparatus deporting prosecuting roll before courtroom judgment, limited the extent and deepness of court examination to public prosecution, improved the opposability of courtroom judgment. however, in the practice of justice, because lots of judge ca n ' t make use of the time of courtroom judgment efficiently, it ' s difficult to grasp the facts of law case in courtroom judgment. so, chief judge allways accept and reuse prosecuting roll after courtroom judgment

    我國1996年修正的刑事訴訟法在立法層面上否定了檢察機關在法庭審理前移送控方案卷，限制了法院對公訴案件庭前審查的廣度和深度，強化了法庭審判的對抗性：然而，在司法實踐中，由於許多法官不能有效利用法庭開庭審判階段的時空范圍，難以在庭審中準確把握案件事實，致使審案法官在庭審結束後接受並利用控方案卷的情況長期存在。
  10. Article 3. during the trial process the judge shall abide by recusation principle. a judge shall disqualify himself mi a lawsuit in which the judge ' s impartiality might reasonably be questioned

    第三條法官在審判活動中，除了應當自覺遵守法定迴避制度外，如果認為自己審理某案件時可能引起公眾對該案件公正裁判產生合理懷疑的，應當提出不宜審理該案件的請求。
  11. The value of pretrial procedure. pretrial procedure is the litigation activity in which parts of the cases will be solved before brought to court after the people ' s court accepts it, under the instruction and supervision of judges, in order to justly and efficiently get ready for a centralized trial at court through exchanging opinions and claims between clients, collecting and exchanging evidences, sifting and separating evidences to exclude some undisputable evidences, facts and requests, making clear of the facts, evidences and focus of dispute

    審前程序是指人民法院受理民事案件后至開庭審理前，在法官的指導監督下，通過當事人相互交換各自的主張、請求，收集、交換證據，發揮過篩分流作用，使一部分案件于庭前獲得解決，對需要開庭審理的案件通過排除無爭議的證據、事實、主張，明確事實問題、證據問題和案件的爭議焦點即審理對象，為公正高效地集中庭審作好準備的訴訟活動。
  12. In view of the disadvantages of the latter two doctrines, we regard the practical measuring in penal interests as the theoretical basis of justified act. in the aspect of the act ’ s denotation, there are legitimate defense doctrine, excluding social harmful conducts doctrine, ground for elimination of illegality doctrine, and justified act doctrine

    理論研究的最終目的是為了指導司法實踐，通過本文的論述，期望能推動法令行為理論在刑事司法實踐中的廣泛應用和充分完善，從而在刑事審判中促進相關案件公正解決的真正實現。
  13. After that, the issue from the international treaty law and the international private law is emphasized and the conclusion is that the court must hear the cases strictly in accordance with the governing law which is directed by the conflict rules in the relevant domestic laws

    最後得出結論：在我國船舶油污民事賠償責任案件的審理過程中，法院應嚴格根據我國相關法律中的沖突規范指引找到正確適用的準據法，並應嚴格適用該準據法審理案件。
  14. The author issued that a case ca n ' t be heard by a court that is a abstract organization, on the country, the independence of judge is the presumption that the judge performs the duties of his office, so we should advocate the independence of judge in china from a long term point of view

    筆者認為，一件案件是不可能由法院這一抽象的集體來審理的，法官獨立是法官正確行使審判權的前提，中國從長遠的角度來看應當確認法官獨立制度，但因為目前中國法官整體的理性不夠以及法官獨立的社會的監督不健全等因素的存在，應當採用合議庭獨立的方式作為過渡。
  15. In a word, it is the purpose and significance that, by discussing the questions, the article will provide a kind of theoretic thought for the judicial practice on establishing a set of self - contained and equitable system of burden of proof in collision actions between ships. so far, there is no maritime statute regulating the burden of proof of the plaintiff and defendant in collision cases of ships, furthermore, few theories about it in academe in our nation

    同時，應該深入研究主宰碰撞領域的國際大法《 1972年國際海上避碰規則》及其修訂本的各項規定，以便為我國司法界形成一套完備的，以民訴法中舉證責任制度為原則但又具船舶碰撞訴訟特色的，兼顧船舶碰撞案件審理的涉外性和特殊性，公正均衡的船舶碰撞舉證責任制度提供一種理論思路，此乃本課題研究的目的和意義所在。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書