物上請求權 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [wùshàngqǐngqiúquán]
物上請求權
英文
claim against a proprietary right- 物 : 名詞1 (東西) thing; matter; object 2 (指自己以外的人或與己相對的環境) other people; the outsi...
- 上 : 上名詞[語言學] (指上聲) falling-rising tone
- 請 : 動詞1. (請求) request; ask 2. (邀請; 聘請) invite; engage 3. (招待; 款待) entertain 4. [敬] (用於希望對方做某事) please
- 求 : Ⅰ動詞1 (請求; 要求) ask; beg; request; entreat; beseech : 求人幫忙 ask sb a favour; ask a favou...
- 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] (秤錘) counterpoise; weight (of a steelyard)2 (權力) power; authority 3 (...
- 請求權 : claims
- 請求 : ask; request; demand;beg:請求寬恕ask for forgive ness; 請求某人幫忙 ask a favour of sb ; 請求一項...
-
Furthermore, it analyzed the conflict in terms of the change of movable real right in the two systems and the effect of explanation and deploitation in terms of inscape of improper benefiting, scope of application and the effect of correcting the benefit imbalance which is caused by improper benefiting towards the system of non - reason of real right, and opened out the intrinsic relations between he system of non - reason of real right and the system of improper benefiting. the fourth part of the paper mainly analyzed our legislation pattern of real right alteration and the attitude towards non - reason of real right action in the field of civil law, and set forth the aim and existing obstacles in transplanting real right action and non - reason theory, and then pointed out, from the judge of theory, there are some factors of real right action in our exiting civil legislation and the biggest obstacle for transplanting the theory lies in the matter of cognition
關於物權行為無因性制度與不當得利制度的比較,主要分析了物權行為無因性在給付不當得利的構成要件、適用范圍等方面的解釋和開拓作用,以及不當得利制度對於物權行為無因性制度所引起的利益失衡的平衡作用,指出物權行為無因性與不當得利之間存在著某種內在聯系,在不承認物權行為無因性原則的立法例中,不當得利請求權處于輔助地位,在適用中多受限制;在以物權行為無因性原則為特徵的立法例中,不當得利制度在理論上具有圓通性,在實務上功能突出,成為救濟物權行為無因性所導致的利益失衡狀態的有效措施。In our future real right law, there should be some limitations to the open objects, hut nor the open contents in the property register of immovables ; lawsuit time limit should not he applied to return protoplast right of applicant ; we had better constitute positive prescription system ; powerless punish should not affect the force of contracts when the endorser has no right, but the transferee is well - meaning ; there should be proper toleration to the unanimous consent principle on punishing mutual thing ; we should prohibit mortgaging to some movable property which has no way to open ; there should not be the time limitation when mortgager realizes the hypothec after the fulfilling tern ; of primary creditor ' s rights is over, except that mortgager is not the debtor ; when the debtor do not refund the debt, the mortgager cannot get the guaranty directly, but he may put in for the court to auction guaranty
摘要我國未來物權法,對于不動產登記簿的開放對象應當有所限制,但對于開放內容不應有所限制;物權人的返還原物請求權不應當適用訴訟時效;應當建立取得時效制度,並應區分一般動產、準不動產、未登記不動產而規定不同的成立條件;在動產的轉讓人為無權處分而受讓人為善意的情況下,轉讓人與受讓人之間的合同是否有效不應當以「無權處分」為條件,只有在轉讓合同無效的情形下,受讓人取得標的物的所有權才是依善意取得制度的取得,此時的取得是原始取得;在共同共有的情形下,原則上處分共有物應當經共有人全體一致同意,但應容有若干例外;不應當規定居住權;動產抵押的公示方式問題無法徹底解決,如果規定動產抵押,應當實行登記要件主義,適于烙印、打刻或貼標簽的動產,應當採取烙印、打刻或貼標簽的方式,其他無法解決公示方式的動產應當禁止抵押;主債權履行期屆滿后,抵押權人行使抵押權,原則上不應當有一個時間限制,但抵押人非為債務人時可容有例外;在債務人不償債時,抵押權人不能直接讓抵押人交出抵押物,實現抵押權,但可以持抵押權登記簿副本直接申請法院拍賣抵押物。Then this paper points out that bankruptcy recall right stems from civil - law - based claim right by analyzing and comparing the theory of private right and the theory of the opposition right. finally it analyzes the chief characteristics of the bankruptcy recall right
通過對「私權說」和「異議權說」的分析比較,指出破產取回權的法律性質應當採用「私權說」 ,即破產取回權是基於民法上的物的請求權而發生的權利,是一種民事實體法上的請求權。On the fact and right of domination to things
兼論物權的排他性與物上請求權Writer ' s view of point is that delivery of cargo without original bills of lading has the character of breaching of the contract, because releasing cargo against original bills of lading is carrier ' s legal liability in carrying out the carriage of goods by sea. also it has the character of action in tort, as if the actions violate the civil law of liability in tort, the doer shall take on the liability of compensation. however when actions are both of breach and in tort, the chinese law gives the victim the rights to choose to sue in tort or of breach, but some limitations in applying substantive law
第二章論述無單放貨的法律性質,筆者認為,無單放貨具有違約性,因為保證憑正本提單交付貨物是承運人在履行海上貨物運輸合同中的一項法定義務;無單放貨具有侵權性,只要無單放貨行為構成承擔侵權行為民事責任的要件,無單放貨行為人就必須承擔賠償責任;同時,無單放貨的違約性和侵權性可能構成責任競合時,我國法律允許受害人可以選擇一個訴因行使其請求權,但對實體法請求權的選擇,法律作出了一定范圍的限制;最後,無單放貨在某種程度上促進了航運業的發展,我們不能一概加以否定,無單放貨在特定情況下具有一定的合理性。At first, there ' re some suggestions on amending articles of the definition of real law, the evidence qualification of real estate register, the effect of the good faith protection of the real estate registration, the fault responsibility of registration structure, the possession reformulation, the state ownership of water resources, the state ownership of wild animals and plants resources, the state ownership of public facilities, bona fide acquisition, transfer of right to land contracted management, mortgage and etc
物權定義建議增加排他性效力;建議修改物權定義、不動產登記簿的證據資格、不動產登記的善意保護的效力,登記機構的過錯責任、佔有改定、水資源屬于國家所有、野生動植物資源屬于國家所有,公共設施屬于國家所有,善意取得、承包經營權轉讓、抵押等條文;建議增加關于宗教財產歸屬、取得時效、營業質權等規定;建議刪除第三十九條、第四十二條關於物上請求權之規定,刪除第十五章即居住權的規定。The basic regulation of the cpvr deals with civil law claims, infringements and jurisdiction
歐盟植物品種權中關於民法上的請求權、侵權以及審判的部分。Part three petition right on property based on ownership
第三部分基於所有權而生的物上請求權。Part two general theories on system of petition right on property
第二部分物上請求權的一般理論。Part four petition right on property based on real right of the other party
第四部分基於他物權的物上請求權。Part one historical evolution of the system of petition right on property
第一部分物上請求權制度的歷史演進。In the end of this part, the author studies the limitation and expansion of petition right on property
最後,筆者還對物上請求權的限制與擴張進行了探討。It is the basic rule of the working of market economy. system of petition right on property, as the peculiar system that protects property right in law of property right
物上請求權制度作為大陸法系國家民法特有的對物權進行保護的制度,是物權法的重要組成部分。In the light of such reason, the thesis, aiming at providing some valuable references both to the legislation of law of property right in our country and to the judicial practice, preliminarily studies some basic problems on system of petition right theoretically and practically
有鑒如此,本文著力從理論和實踐兩個方面對物上請求權制度一些基本問題進行了較為深入的分析研究,以期能對我國物權法的制定及司法實踐有所裨益。Of course, there are some exceptions in discussing the requirements of subrogation objects, this article firstly argues that subrogation is different from object of subrogation, and then thinks that the objects of subrogation should include creditor ' s right in rem right of the real claim subrogation right of rescission right of civil procedure and so on
在代位權客體要件里,本文先區分了債權代位權對債權代位權客體是兩個截然不同的概念,然後認為,代位權客體的范圍應包括債權、物權及物上請求權、債權代位權、撤銷權、訴訟上等權利,但是應排除專屬于債務人的三類權利和形成權。Finally, the author expresses her idea of whether restitution petition right is one kind of petition rights on property both in theory and in instances, pointing out petition rights on property both in theory and in instances, pointing out that restitution petition right shall be the same in nature as damages petition right instead of one kind real petition rights
最後,筆者還對恢復原狀請求權是否為物上請求權的一種,不僅從理論上而且還從實務上以案例分析的方式闡明自己的觀點,指出恢復原狀請求權應與損害賠償請求權為相同性質,不可能成為物權請求權的一種。We should reconstruct an uniform administration to manage lost property all over the country, and every regional police and police station is a principal part of this administration, which provides informational channel about losing, picking up and returning property
此外,本文主張對遺失物與遺忘物進行區別的立法保護,遺失物拾得人被賦予報酬請求權及附條件所有權,而遺忘物拾得人則不享有上述權利。The responsibility of the moral injury compensation consists of four factors : the tort, the injury fact, the causality between the tort and the fact and the infringer " s subjective trespass. the natural person enjoy the right of request for moral injury because of the damage of personal right. the topic, how to determine the subject position of the artificial person, the vegetable person and the disable person is discussed in this paper theoretically
精神損害賠償責任的構成要件由侵權行為、精神損害事實、侵權行為與精神損害之間有因果關系、行為人主觀上有過錯等四個方面構成。自然人因人身權遭受非法侵害,享有精神損害賠償請求權,法人、植物人及喪失行為能力的精神病人的主體地位如何,本文從理論上進行了探討。The truth of its protection of the transaction safety is that through the special stipulations in jus law, the third party can acquire the ownership or other rights of the object, thus to prevent the exertion of former obligee ' s right of the real claim. therefore, the legal basis of the system of acquisition with good faith is the special stipulations in law
其交易安全保障的作用原理是:基於對善意第三人的信賴利益的考量,通過物權法的特別規定,直接賦予善意第三人以標的物的所有權或其他權利,從而阻卻原權利人物上請求權的行使。故善意取得存在的理論基礎宜解為法律的特別規定。Second, discusses the imputation of the liability of trademark right, and points out : it is practicable to establish the system of " right of the real claim " or " right of intellectual property claim ", with succeeding and perfecting the system of liability for tort at the same time ; the compensation for damage of infringement of trademark right should take the principle liability for fault as the main liability principle and the principle liability for fault inferred as a complement. third, discusses the excuses which may be as a plea in the action of the infringement of trademark right, such as fair use, prior right, forfeiter of trademark right. at last, approach the subject that how to apply and perfect legal proceedings and alter ways to the remedies of trademark right
接著,探討了侵犯商標權責任的認定,指出:可在繼承與完善我國侵權民事責任制度的同時設立物上請求權或知識產權上請求權制度來保護商標權;侵犯商標權的損害賠償宜採用過錯責任為主、過錯推定責任為輔的歸責原則;隨后,探討了侵犯商標權訴訟中可以作為抗辯的事由,如合理使用、在先權、商標權無效等;最後,探討了運用和完善訴訟和訴訟外兩種方式救濟商標權的問題。分享友人