獨立審判權 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [dúlìshěnpànquán]
獨立審判權 英文
right of independent trial
  • 獨 : Ⅰ形容詞（一個） single; only; sole Ⅱ副詞1 （獨自） alone; by oneself; in solitude 2 （唯獨） only...
  • 立 : 動1 （站） stand; remain in an erect position 2 （使豎立; 使物件的上端向上） erect; stand; set up...
  • 審 : Ⅰ形容詞（詳細; 周密） careful Ⅱ動詞1 （審查） examine; go over 2 （審訊） interrogate; try 3 [書...
  • 判 : Ⅰ動詞1 （分開; 分辨） distinguish; discriminate 2 （評定） judge; decide 3 （判決） sentence; con...
  • 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] （秤錘） counterpoise; weight （of a steelyard）2 （權力） power; authority 3 （...
  • 獨立 : 1. （單獨站立） stand alone 2. （自主自立; 不受人支配） independence 3. （不依靠他人） independent; on one's own
  1. We should institutionally ensure that the judicial and procuratorial organs are in a position to exercise adjudicative and procuratorial powers independently and impartially according to law

    從制度上保證審判機關和檢察機關依法獨立公正地行使審判權和檢察權。
  2. The civil case judgment direct procedure is a legal procedure that rectifies to produce effect to judge the mistake, although it is not a case to take up necessarily through the procedure, is also not litigant to review the class independently, it developped the positive effect towards protecting the legal rights of the party concerned, guarantee judicatory fairly, because some judgment of now direct procedure provision too principle, or not complete and not reasonable, practice to win to also bring the operational difficulty and not norm, also obstructed the wrong function of the 糾 of the procedure of direct of judgment full to some extent exertive

    民事審判監督程序是糾正生效裁判錯誤的法定程序，雖然它不是案件審理的必經程序，也不是訴訟的獨立審級，但其對保護當事人合法權益，保障司法公正，發揮了積極作用，但由於現在有些審判監督程序規定的過于原則，或不完整不合理，實踐中也帶來操作上的困難和不規范，在一定程度上也阻礙了審判監督程序的糾錯功能的充分發揮。
  3. When investigation is not monitored with adjudicative power, the findings in such an investigation may be directly used as adjudicatory evidence, adjudicatory justice, judicial independenc e, and the defendant ' s right of defense will be entirely undermined

    當偵查不受審判權監控並且偵查所獲可以直接用作審判證據時，審判公正，司法獨立和被告人的抗辯權就都遭到了根本的破壞。
  4. The first chapter was titled " positive study of the trial power ", the second chapter " guiding thought to renew the idea of the civil trial power ", and the third " practical guarantee to exercise the civil trial power independently and impartially : profession morality of the trial subject ". the latter part was to illustrate one by one the basic parts of the civil trail power, consisting of the fourth, fifth and sixth chapters

    第一章為《審判權的實證考察入第二章為《民事審判權理念更新的指導思想入第三章為《民事審判權獨立公正行使之實踐保障：審判主體的職業道德入下篇則主要就民事審判權的基本構造進行了逐一的解析，包括第四章、第五章及第六章。
  5. This part expounds the trial committee ' s : potential and shown defects in theory and practice from five aspects, the trial committee influences the judicial independence by main depriving judge ' s independent jurisdiction, to destruct the justice of the procedure, violate such as open trial, direct words, collegiate system, according etcs basic lawsuit principle, at the same time, as further deep demonstration, the author propose the trial committee cant ensured to realize justice too

    第五部分，審判委員會的缺陷，這一部分從五個方面詳細論述審判委員會制度潛在和表現出來的理論及實踐缺陷。作者認為，審判委員會以剝奪法官獨立審判權為核心影響了司法獨立，同時構成對程序正義的破壞，違背了諸如審判公開、直接言詞、合議制、迴避等基本訴訟原則。作為深一層的論證，作者也提出了審判委員會不能充分保障實質正義的實現。
  6. Because of the negativity, neutrality, procedure, finality and firsthand experience, which the jurisdiction has, judicial independence became the mutual choice of the world

    由於審判權具有消極性、中立性、程序性、終局性和親歷性的特徵，審判獨立成為世界各國共同的選擇。
  7. The author first introduces the process of establishment of present system, it analyzes the existing problem in judicial process. it concludes : all the problems are associated with the reason that we did n ' t establish the judicial independence system, we did n ' t provide the judges with the opportunities to do their job independently. therefore, in order to accord with the new situation after the entrance to wto, realize fairness and efficiency, fasten the reform of judice, we should establish the ilndependence of judicial system

    文章首先介紹了我國現行的法院獨立審判原則的確立過程和法官獨立與我國法院獨立審判原則之區別，重點分析了我國法院獨立審判制度中存在的問題，得出結論：我國之所以在司法過程中存在法院內部司法行政化、司法權力的地方化、法官管理的公務員化、法官形象軍警化、法官構成的非專業化、法官與社會的關系親密化等問題和弊病，是因為在我國沒有把法官獨立作為一項司法制度予以確立，沒有給法官提供獨立辦案、不受任何干涉的機制保障。
  8. As we know, civil trial power is a very important part of the trial power system in a country, at the time of " administrating the country by operation of law " and constructing the socialist market economy, it can be said that whether the civil trial power can be exercised legally, independently, impartially and appropriately or not will have to do with directly the realization of the administration of law and the construction of the socialist market economy

    我們知道，民事審判權是一國審判權體系中極其重要的組成部分，在「依法治國」及建立社會主義市場經濟的今天，可以說民事審判權的是否依法、獨立、公正與適當行使將直接關涉到法治的能否實現及市場經濟的能否建立。但圃于歷史的、傳統的及其他方面主、客觀因素的制約與影響，以往我國對於民事審判權的行使效果並不盡如人意。
  9. Article 5 the people ' s courts shall exercise judicial power independently in accordance with law and the people ' s procuratorates shall exercise procuratorial power independently in accordance with law, and they shall be free from interference by any administrative organ, public organization or individual

    第五條人民法院依照法律規定獨立行使審判權，人民檢察院依照法律規定獨立行使檢察權，不受行政機關、社會團體和個人的干涉。
  10. With this conception, beijing government designed the system of justice ' s independent trial during the judicial reform to retract consular jurisdiction

    在這種觀念下，北京政府在為收回領事裁判權而實行的司法改革中，逐步構建了近代的法官獨立審判制度。
  11. But in the judicial practice, some judges still have a preference for conciliation and there are five reasons for this : the first one is the ideological reason. traditional law culture has helped the judges form particular conciliation view ; the second is the systematic reason. " the exceeding of powers " lawsuit mode has overexpanded the jurisdiction of the courts ; the third is the objective reason

    究其原因有五：一是思想上原因，傳統法律文化形成法官獨特的調解價值觀：二是體制上原因， 「超職權主義」的訴訟模式過分膨脹了法院的審判權；三是客觀上原因，市場經濟條件下的新型訴訟層出不窮使得法官應接不暇；四是立法上原因，現行立法缺乏明確的操作規程導致調解被濫用；五是自身原因，非專業化的法官隊伍習慣于以調代判。
  12. Then the author argue the rationality of civil protest system specifically, by refuting the theory of negation of the civil protest system as follows : 1. whether civil protest supervision invades the independent jurisdiction of the court ; 2. whether civil protest supervision unduly intervene the discretion of the parties ; 3

    其次，筆者具體論證了民事抗訴制度的合理性，從以下三方面逐一反駁了民事抗訴制度否定論的理由:其一，民事抗訴監督是否侵犯了法院的獨立審判權;其二，民事抗訴監督是否不當干預了當事人的處分權;其三，民事抗訴監督是否有損於法院終審權。
  13. Because the law does not clearly stipulate that the prosecutor has the power to propose to the judge the discretion in sentencing, plus there is some misunderstanding regarding the prosecutor ' s proposing power shall infringe the judge ' s independent adjudication power and compress the defence space of the attorney

    再次，論證了我國目前關于檢察官的量刑建議權的狀況，由於我國法律沒有明確規定檢察官擁有量刑建議權，並對檢察官實施量刑建議存在誤解，認為會侵犯法官的獨立審判權，同時壓縮律師的辯護空間。
  14. Take li hui juan incident as example, this part describes the shortage of the judge independence at present in our country and analyzes its reason from two perspectives of the shortage of constitutional order and the specific system. the impropriety of constitutional order is improper in the relationship of the power disposition among the jurisdiction and the leadership of chinese communist party, the supervisor of the national people ' s congress, the administrative right, the right of procuratorial work as well as the internal power disposition within the jurisdiction. in the analysis of the imperfection in specific system, this parts explains the systematic imperfection existing in such systems as the system of judge election and appointing, guarantee system, punish system

    以洛陽中院李慧娟事件為例描敘了我國法官獨立缺失的現狀，從憲法制度不完善與具體制度不健全兩個方面分析了法官獨立缺失的原因。憲法制度方面主要剖析了審判權與黨的領導、人大監督權、行政權、檢察權之間以及法院內部權力關系的錯位。具體制度方面則分析了法官選任制度、保障制度、監督制度存在的制度性不健全。
  15. Build an elisor system which is clear in the right and the duty, cooperating with each other and running in high speed. guarantee the adjudgement and the inquisitor department to exert the jurisdiction and the inquisition right independently and justly depending on the rule of law. ' reform the working mechanism and the management of the people and the property in the the elisor department, step by step to realize the separation of between the judgment and the inspection of the elisor system, no doubt that the reformation of the elisor is a big action to emphasize the development for the legal system and also guarantee the socialism market economic to be developed healthily, and it is the need of the entering into the wto

    從制度上保證審判機關和檢察機關依法獨立公正地行使審判權和檢察權。 」 「改革司法機關的工作機制和人財物管理體制，逐步實現司法審判和檢察同司法行政事務相分離。 」毫無疑義，司法改革是加強法制建設的重大舉措，是我國社會主義市場經濟健康發展的保障，也是我國適應入世后形勢發展的要求。
  16. And on the basis of that, it is of great significance to achieve healthy development of the profession. the dissertation defines the law concepts relative to cpa civil liability firstly, then it focuses on the analysis of the following controversial areas in law : definitive principles for auditing tort liability, the judging criteria of fault etc., and it states the legal status of independent auditing standards from the perspective of law ; further, to complete the law analysis, the dissertation analyzes definitive principles of the cpa ’ s legal liability and the game between the interest of social publics and the interest of cpa from the perspective of economics. then, by reviewing different legal status of generally accepted auditing standards in different historical periods in american, the author studies the legal status of independent auditing standards in china regarding our specific legal and economic environment

    本文首先從注冊會計師民事法律責任相關的法律概念入手，重點對審計侵權責任的歸責原則、過錯判斷標準等一些在法學界存在爭議的關鍵領域展開分析，從法律角度闡述了獨立審計準則法律地位問題;進而從經濟學的視角對注冊會計師民事責任歸責原則和社會公眾與注冊會計師的利益博弈展開了分析，作為對法律分析的輔證;然後在考察借鑒不同歷史時期美國獨立審計準則法律地位的基礎上，結合我國特定的法律和經濟等環境，對我國獨立審計準則的法律地位問題進行了研究，認為:獨立審計準則具有一定的法律地位，應當作為我國注冊會計師法律責任認定的一般原則，但並非判斷注冊會計師執業時是否存在「過失」的唯一基準。
  17. The author issued that a case ca n ' t be heard by a court that is a abstract organization, on the country, the independence of judge is the presumption that the judge performs the duties of his office, so we should advocate the independence of judge in china from a long term point of view

    筆者認為，一件案件是不可能由法院這一抽象的集體來審理的，法官獨立是法官正確行使審判權的前提，中國從長遠的角度來看應當確認法官獨立制度，但因為目前中國法官整體的理性不夠以及法官獨立的社會的監督不健全等因素的存在，應當採用合議庭獨立的方式作為過渡。
  18. That is, when courts practise their authorities, they subject to only to law. no other units organizations or individuals shall interfere, including the legislative organs and the ruling party. inside courts, independence means that when a judge pactise his authority, he is independent of the interference from the court heads, his other superiorsand other judges, and that courts of lower level are independent from courts of higher levels

    司法獨立是現代法治國家的重要原則，包括審判權獨立、司法的外部獨立、司法的內部獨立，即法院行使審判權只服從法律，不受任何機關、組織和個人的干涉，包括立法機關、執政黨都不能干涉，在法院內部首先是法官獨立，即法官行使審判權獨立於院長、庭長及其他法官，其次是上、下級法院之間的相互獨立，下級法院獨立行使審判權，不應受到來自上級法院的不正當干預。
  19. From the aspect of power, administrative trial power is a kind of judicial power while administrative power is a kind of state one

    行政審判權與行政權相互獨立，但密切關聯。行政審判權是一種司法權，而行政權則是一種國家權力。
  20. We need to deepen the reform of the judiciary system, optimize the distribution of judicial functions and powers, standardize judicial practices, and build a fair, efficient and authoritative socialist judiciary system to ensure that courts and procuratorates exercise their respective powers independently and impartially in accordance with the law

    深化司法體制改革，優化司法職權配置，規范司法行為，建設公正高效權威的社會主義司法制度，保證審判機關、檢察機關依法獨立公正地行使審判權、檢察權。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書