獨立的侵害 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [dúlìdeqīnhài]
獨立的侵害 英文
independent injury
  • 獨 : Ⅰ形容詞（一個） single; only; sole Ⅱ副詞1 （獨自） alone; by oneself; in solitude 2 （唯獨） only...
  • 立 : 動1 （站） stand; remain in an erect position 2 （使豎立; 使物件的上端向上） erect; stand; set up...
  • 的 : 4次方是 The fourth power of 2 is direction
  • 侵 : Ⅰ動詞（侵入） invade; intrude into; infringe upon Ⅱ形容詞（接近） approaching Ⅲ名詞（姓氏） a surname
  • 獨立 : 1. （單獨站立） stand alone 2. （自主自立; 不受人支配） independence 3. （不依靠他人） independent; on one's own
  1. Instigation has only independence but not dependence from the following angles : revised constitution of crime can directly be utilized to convict ; instigation has serious harmfulness, violates the social relations protected by criminal law and deserves conviction and penalty itself ; to ponder over the circumstances of instigatee during conviction does not indicate the dependence of instigation ; there is causality between instigation and the harmful consequences brought by the crime committed by the instigatee ; literate dependence is not equal to the dependence of instigation ; insisting on the independence of instigation will not lead to convicting by thought ; to recognize the independence of instigation is required by the principle of personal responsibility ; it is a worldwide tendency to accept the independence of instigation in legislation

    從下列八個方面可以得出教唆犯只應具有獨立性，而不具有從屬性：修正的犯罪構成可直接作為定罪的根據；教唆犯罪具有嚴重的社會危害性，本身就侵犯了刑法所保護的社會關系，具有犯罪性和可罰性；教唆犯的定罪、處罰要考慮到被教唆人的情況，但這並不是教唆犯從屬性的體現；教唆行為對被教唆人實施的犯罪所造成的危害結果具有原因力；文理上的從屬性並不能證明教唆犯具有從屬性；教唆犯獨立性說並不是主觀歸罪；堅持教唆犯獨立性說是貫徹刑法個人責任的要求；教唆犯獨立性說是各國立法的趨勢。
  2. The charter of the united nations specifically stipulates that the united nations and its members shall refrain from any action against the territorial integrity or political independence of any of its members or any state and shall not intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state

    聯合國憲章明確規定：聯合國和它的成員國不得侵害任何會員國或國家之領土完整或政治獨立，不得干涉在本質上屬于任何國家國內管轄的事件。
  3. This layout can stop the internal arc fault expansion ; can avoid harmful moisture, small animal and dusty interferences. it also has good perfomiance and high reliability. because the heat cannot transmit to the outside of the bus room, a good operation environment for the low space can be obtained

    主母線室置於箱體頂部一個單獨的金屬封閉的間隔內，並與10kv開關室、儀表室等間隔相互獨立，為同類產品首創；這種結構可以防止內部電弧故障的擴大化，避免「火燒聯營」事故；防護性能好，防潮、防小動物侵害、防積塵，運行可靠；由於母線室的隔熱作用，為下層空間創造了一個較好的運行環境。
  4. By investigating the historical development of joint torts, the comparison of several department laws, different demands of instituting joint torts and single tort, legislation and judicatory practice, and analysizing former scholars " wrong cognitions about joint torts, the writer get the essence of joint torts ( the definition of joint torts ). joint torts mean that several tortfeasors have or do n ' t have joint subjective faults, but either their behaviors and invading consequents or only their invading consequents of respective behaviors are related together objectively and undividedly in same invading event. joint torts include joint torts with related faults and joint torts without related faults

    通過對共同侵權行為的歷史發展、幾個部門法的比較、共同侵權行為與單獨侵權行為的構成的不同要求、立法與司法實踐等方面進行考察，分析以往學者對共同侵權行為構成的認識誤區，得出共同侵權行為的本質應該是，即共同侵權行為的定義為：共同侵權行為指數行為人具有共同的主觀過錯，或者沒有共同的主觀過錯，但是數行為人的行為和侵害後果，在同一侵害事件中，客觀地聯繫到了一起，不可分割，或者僅僅是數行為人各自行為的侵害後果，在同一侵害事件中，客觀地聯繫到了一起，不可分割。
  5. Return trademark infringement indemnity return the matter of principle of, this text from fault predict outcome principle is a very much the principle of, the fault predicts outcome the principle in the aspects of the special function of the trademark infringement indemnity realm a few ly detailed argument the trademark infringement indemnity returns the principle - fault predicts outcome the principle

    對于商標侵權損害賠償的歸責原則問題，本文從過錯推定原則是一獨立的歸責原則，過錯推定原則在商標侵權損害賠償領域的獨特作用幾個方面詳細論證了商標侵權損害賠償的歸責原則?過錯推定原則。
  6. That is why there is uniform legal system as " tort of interference " to solve the problem on the third party infringes the creditor ' s right and we should use it for reference. the writer considers that the behavior of infringing the creditor ' s right is the third party, who knows the situation of debt relation and wants to infringe it, induces the debtor to breach the contract or block the creditor from exercising his right

    經過比較研究，在第三人侵害債權的構成問題上，筆者認為侵害債權行為是由第三人在明知債權存在並意欲侵害債權的主觀心態驅使下而為的引誘違約或阻礙債權實現的侵權行為，可為第三人所侵害的債權包括合法成立的債權和預期合同關系及商業利益，當侵害債權的行為造成對債權的實質損害時，侵權人應當獨立地直接對債權人承擔侵權責任。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書