職務侵權 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [zhíwùqīnquán]
職務侵權
英文
infringement committed on duty- 職 : Ⅰ名詞1 (職務; 職責) duty; job; 盡職 do [fulfil] one s duty; 失職 neglect one s duty; derelictio...
- 務 : Ⅰ名詞1 (事情) affair; business 2 (姓氏) a surname Ⅱ動詞1 (從事; 致力) be engaged in; devote...
- 侵 : Ⅰ動詞(侵入) invade; intrude into; infringe upon Ⅱ形容詞(接近) approaching Ⅲ名詞(姓氏) a surname
- 權 : Ⅰ名詞1 [書面語] (秤錘) counterpoise; weight (of a steelyard)2 (權力) power; authority 3 (...
- 職務 : post; duties; job; function
-
With the cases which are retlising to accept admirlistrative punishment, refusing to accept administratix / e coercive measures, retlising to accei ) t the resolution, issued by admin1strative organs, for changing, terminat1ng or disso1vlng some certiticate, retlising t ( ] accept the resolution, issued by administrative organs, for confirming the ownership or utilize ol natural resources. considering the fact that administrative organs infring rlghts of the aut ( ) nomous management, considering the tac1 the thrm contract is changed, abolished ( ) r interfered by administrative organs. considering adminlstrativc organs illegall } levy propertives, apportioned charges, collect capitais, or demand perform1ng other duties, considering administrative orga11s, according to the lau ", shouid issue some certificates or sanction, register some other things which have n ' t be ( : n done, applying administrative organs for performing some legal duties which have n ' t been pefformed, applying adrninistrative organs for issuing consolations, social insurances or the lowest funds of life which have n ' t been issued and considering the concrete administrative conduct of administrative organs infringes other ll legitimate rights and interests
本文運有我國有關法學理論,並結合《行政復議法》的相關規定,對行政復議范圍進行了分析和研究,其中第二章對具體行政行為的復議范圍進行了分析,包括:不服行政處罰決定的行政案件:不服行政強制措施的行政案件;不服行政機關變更、終止、撤銷有火證書的決定的案件;不服行政機關確認自然資源的所有權或者使用權的決定的案件;認為行政機關侵犯合法的經營自主權的案件;認為行政機關變更、廢止或者干涉簽訂農業承包合同,侵犯其合法權益的案件;認為行政機關違法徵收財物、攤派費用、強行集資或者違法要求履行其他義務的案件;認為符合法定條件,申請行政機關頒發有關證書或者審批、登記有關事項但行政機關沒有依法辦理的案件;申請行政機關履行某些法定職責,行政機關沒行依法履行的案件;申請行政機關依法發放撫恤金、社會保險金或者最低生活保障費,行政機關沒有依法發放的案件;認為行政機關的其他具體行政行為侵犯其合法權益的案件等。The differences are : ( i ) they holds that it is different for people to transfer the possession of rights more or less, so they entrust the state with different functions : locke thinks that men only transfer the possession of partial rights to the state, and the state must not infringe upon individual elementary rights, the state, as a certain of necessary " evil ", only bears worldly affairs ; but rousseau thinks that men transfer all rights to the state, and the state embodies men " s general wills and represents men " s common interests, so its power is limitless
不同點在於: ( 1 )兩者認為人們在簽訂契約時所轉讓的權利的多少不同,從而賦予國家的職能不同。洛克認為人們轉讓的只是部分權利,國家不得侵犯個人的基本權利,國家權力從外部受權利的制約,國家作為一種必要的惡,只承擔世俗事務;而盧梭認為人們轉讓全部權利給國家,國家體現人們的公共意志和代表人們的共同利益,其權力是不受任何限制,國家除承擔世俗事務外,還負有道德教化的任務。Article19 the legal service organization of city, district, and country federation trade union shall supply the free service to the workers and staff members who living in trouble, the labor rights and interests being infringed, labor model and the trade union functionaries whose rights and interests being infringed due to maintain the legitimate rights and interests of workers and staff members
第十九條市和區、縣總工會以及產業、行業工會的法律服務機構,為勞動權益受到侵害的困難職工、勞動模範以及為維護職工合法權益而自身權益受到侵害的工會工作人員和工會組織,無償提供法律服務。But because the legal person is a social organization composed of staff member in different posts ( including legal person organ, manager, employee, agent and subcontractor, etc. ), and has consistent management system, which complicates the settlement of the damages caused by its torts. so the first triggering questions are as follows : what kind of damages and whose tort should be assumed by which way by the legal person, and then what is the character of the liability
本文認為,僱主責任屬于替代責任的范疇,不能作為法人對無法歸咎于個人行為的侵權損害承擔責任的理論基礎,該制度中法人因對其雇員已盡注意義務和監督義務而免責的規定也不具有現實意義,所以我國未來民法典應賦予法人以侵權行為能力,它解決的問題涵蓋法人對其機關及其他工作人員因執行職務而致他人損害的責任承擔。The theories include : character of the employer ' s duty, namely it is the impinging rights " duty, not contract duty ; principles of the employer ' s returning responsibility, namely it exists the engage relation between the employer and the employee, and the reason of employee ' s hurt is happened in the scope of implementing principleship and is the enterprise ' s trouble, and also four important terms of the employer not being dismissed the duty
包括:僱主對雇員工傷事故賠償責任的性質,即這種責任為侵權責任,而非契約責任;僱主對雇員工傷事故賠償責任的歸責原則,即為無過錯歸責原則;僱主對雇員工傷事故賠償責任的構成,即僱主與雇員之間存在雇傭關系、雇員是在執行職務范圍內受害、企業事故是雇員損害的原因以及僱主須沒有免責事由四個要件。Two administrative organs or more which infringe upon the lawful rights and interests of a citizen, legal person or other organization and cause damage when exercising their joint administrative functions and powers, shall be the organs under joint compensatory obligations
兩個以上行政機關共同行使行政職權時侵犯公民、法人和其他組織的合法權益造成損害的,共同行使行政職權的行政機關為共同賠償義務機關。As a staff of the firm, except employer ’ s liability, architect should bear the personal tort liability
建築師為職員,則個人侵權責任和建築師事務所的僱主責任形成競合。Directors of dltp includes de jure directors, de facto directors and shadow directors and third parties is composed of shareholders, creditors and some special creditors, such as governmental tr. x agencies, social security departments and corporate employees. the legal nature of dltp is special liability and different from liabilities mder tort, accordingly directors have to face both the liabilities under civil law and the special liabilities under corporate law. a director is not liable to third parties except that his or her action is illegal ; he or she is guilty of wrongful intent or of gross negligence for the illegal action ; the action occurs in the course of performing his or her corporate suties ; and third parties are damaged by the action
作者指出,董事對第三人責任中的董事不僅指正式董事,而且還包括影子董事和事實董事;除了股東和一般債權人之外,第三人還包括二些特殊債權人,如稅務機關、社保機關以及雇員等;其責任性質為法定責任,但並不排除與民法侵權責任競合的可能;董事對第三人責任應包括以下要件: .董事之行為須違法、董事對其行為違法有故意或重大過失、董事之行為發生於執行職務過程中、第三人因董事之違法行為受損害;在舉證責任的分擔上應有董事證明其違法行為是否有故意或重大過失,實現這一制度的訴訟形式為第三人之訴;另外,在公司破產時應採取一些特殊措施,以保證公平受償。This kind of torts is quite different from other types in terms of the subject and the object of the tort, the principle of liability fixation, the form element and the relief form
法院的職務侵權行為是一種特殊侵權行為,此類侵權行為的侵權主體、侵權客體、歸責原則、構成要件、救濟方式等都與其他侵權行為有明顯不同。It defines mainly the following concepts and scopes such as the subject and the nature of infringement acts ( including duty acts and duty - related acts ), irregularity, and especially the exact meaning of " law " which is used to judge administrative infringement acts. the meaning of " law " varies with different means adopted by the victims for compensation and with different confirming organizations. the third part deals with judi
本部分著重對行政侵權行為的主體、侵權行為的性質(職務行為及職務相關行為) 、違法等相關概念和范圍進行了界定,提出了判斷行政侵權行為違法標準中的「法」的涵義,因受害人尋求賠償救濟途徑和違法行為確認機關不同, 「法」之涵義也不相同的新見解。Tom ( including his representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns ) hereby completely releases and forever discharges the company, its affiliated, related and subsidiary entities, and each of their present and former shareholders, officers, directors, agents, employees, attorneys, successors, and assigns ( collectively, “ released parties ” ) from all claims, rights, demands, actions, obligations, liabilities, and causes of action of every kind and character, known or unknown, mature or unmatured, which he may now have or have ever had arising from any act or omission or condition occurring on or prior to his signing this agreement, whether based on tort, contract ( express or implied ), or any federal, state, or local law, statute, or regulation and any claims for attorneys ' fees
湯姆(包括其代表人、繼承人、后繼者和受讓人在內)特此放棄和永久解除因為在其簽署本協議之時或之前發生的任何行動、疏漏或情況而導致其目前或過往對本公司及本公司關聯、相關及附屬實體以及該等公司之現有及先前的股東、高級職員、董事、代理商、雇員、律師、繼任者及委託人(統稱「被解除方」 )所主張的一切索賠、權利、要求、行動、義務、債務以及導致任一種類與性質之行動的各種已知或未知、成熟或不成熟的理由,無論該等主張基於侵權行為,合約(明示或暗示) ,或任何聯邦、州或當地的法律、法令或規章,以及關于律師費的索賠。The bureau that keep watch reminds consumption, if encounter following item but to superintendency department complaint handling : business of insurance of insurance device and agency of insurance individual agent breaks the law mediumly, violate compasses act ; create insurance device illegally ; run insurance wu or insurance intermediary business illegally ; as a result of insurance company sale member intended in the process that exhibit property or error, misdirect consumer or enroach on insurance join the action of right beneficial ; the irregularity of insurance device and its branch chief, violate compasses act ; shenzhen protects inspect bureau the staff member breaks the law, violate discipline and act of neglect one ' s duty ; the criticism that works to insurance, opinion and proposal ; other concerned enroach on is sure to join the action of right beneficial
保監局提醒消費,假如碰到下列事項可向監管部門投訴處理:保險機構及保險個人代理人經辦保險業務中的違法、違規行為;非法設立保險機構;非法經營保險業務或保險中介業務;由於保險公司營銷員在展業過程中故意或過失,誤導消費者或侵害保險合法權益的行為;保險機構及其分支機構負責人的違法、違規行為;深圳保監局工作人員違法、違紀和失職行為;對保險工作的批評、意見和建議;其他有關侵害保險合法權益的行為。Meanwhile, the modern corporation law goes a step further, it puts forward that directors should also have a obligation of care stipulated in the general law of tort for corporation creditors. directors, together with the corporation, should bear the legal liability of tort if they fail to fulfill the obligation of care, thus cause damages to creditors " interests
同時,現代公司法還進一步提出,董事對公司債權人還負有一般侵權法上的注意義務,董事在職務行為中違反注意義務,損害債權人利益的,也應同公司一起對債權人承擔侵權法律責任。While personnel of institution administrator, professional technology and skilled worker are finishing own job, in do not encroach unit intellectual property, do not reveal unit business secret, do not pound unit economy below the interest, premise that does not damage rights and interests of society and public, the strong point that can use oneself in off hours is engaged in technical development, information seeking advice, the technology serves and offer the part - time job such as the service to work, can get pluralistic pay
事業單位治理人員、專業技術人員和技術工人在完成本職工作的同時,在不侵犯單位知識產權、不泄露單位商業秘密、不沖擊單位經濟利益、不損害社會和公眾權益的前提下,可在業余時間利用自己的特長從事技術開發、信息咨詢、技術服務和提供勞務等兼職工作,並可獲取兼職報酬。分享友人