訴案范圍外 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [sùànfànwéiwài]
訴案范圍外 英文
ultra petita
  • 訴 : 動詞1. （說給人） tell; relate; inform 2. （傾吐） complain; accuse 3. （控告） appeal to; resort to
  • 案 : 名詞1 （長桌） table; desk 2 （案件） case; law [legal] case 3 （案卷; 記錄）record; file 4 （提...
  • 范 : 名詞1 [書面語] （模子） pattern; mould; matrix 2 （模範; 榜樣） model; example 3 （范圍） boundar...
  • 圍 : Ⅰ動詞1 （四周攔擋起來 使裡外不通; 環繞） enclose; surround; corral 2 （繞; 裹） wrap Ⅱ名詞1 （四...
  • 外 : Ⅰ名詞1 （外面） outside; external side 2 （外國） foreign country 3 （以外） besides; beyond; in ...
  1. The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure

    以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導，結合我國的國情，對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善，在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子；在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念，以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實；在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則；在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據，其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據，增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度，補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的，取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定，改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。
  2. The business scope of this law firm includes : the providing of legal services for international companies, groups, investment individuals including those from hong kong, macao, and taiwan who have investment and trade in china ; the working as an agent in the settlement of trademark disputes ; working in dissolution and liquidation for the foreign investment enterprises ; working as agents in the arbitration and litigation for the adjustment and restructure of the company s property right ; assignment and auction of the company s property right, purchase annexation, merger and separation of the company, assignment of the stocks and shares of the company, economic and trade affairs, and investment disputes

    業務范圍包括：辦理中國境外含港澳臺公司集團投資基金個人在華投資貿易的法律事務服務商標事務代理外商投資企業解散清算事務公司產權結構調整與重組轉讓拍賣公司的收購兼并合併與分立以及公司股權的轉讓，商事經貿投資爭議仲裁與訴訟的代理業務。該所成立以來，已為多家境外著名公司商社在華投資提供了優質的法律服務，起草制訂合同章程等重要法律文件辦理在京的法律事務辦理國際商事及投資爭議仲裁案件及對外資企業進行解散和清算。
  3. Legal aid is available for civil proceedings in the district court, the court of first instance and the court of appeal both part of the high court, and the court of final appeal

    援助范圍包括在區域法院、高等法院原訟法庭及上訴法庭，以及在終審法院進行的民事訴訟。此外，亦包括部分審裁處的法律程序及死因裁判法庭的若干案件。
  4. Legal aid is available for civil proceedings in the district court, the court of first instance and the court of appeal ( both part of the high court ), and the court of final appeal

    援助范圍包括在區域法院、高等法院原訟法庭及上訴法庭，以及在終審法院進行的民事訴訟。此外，亦包括部分審裁處的法律程序及死因裁判法庭的若干案件。
  5. The firm renders full range of legal services for trademark, patent, copyright, trade secrets, unfair competition, customs protection, intellectual property litigations and commercial investigation for both domestic and foreign clients in china or throughout the world

    本公司的業務范圍主要涉及商標、專利、版權的國內外注冊、續展、變更、許可、轉讓、爭議、侵權訴訟等；同時，本公司還為企業提供知識產權策劃、企業形象策劃、侵權調查、打假、海關備案及其他與知識產權有關的法律咨詢服務。
  6. The problem brought by correlation between the disputes is to increase difficulties in hearing of a case so that there are flaws arising out of existing laws and rules in force, bringing about conflict between the disputes as a result of disposal. there are mainly two means of settlement overseas to dispose of such correlative disputes as follows : hearing of division is adopted in the countries that are in the continental law system represented by france ; administrative collateral civil proceedings is adopted in the countries that

    筆者在借鑒了以法國、英國為代表的域外國家處理此類關聯爭議的解決方法，以及我國理論界和實務界處理此類關聯爭議的主要觀點的基礎上，詳細論述了建立行政附帶民事訴訟這一基本模式和關聯的行政爭議與民事爭議分案審理及民事訴訟一併審查相關行政爭議兩種補充模式的現實意義及可行性，重點分析了三種審理模式的適用范圍及成立條件。
  7. By so doing, the completeness of the civil procuratorial rights can be kept and the incorrect judgments and decisions by the courts can be corrected in time. ( b ) the people ' s procuratorates should have the right to protest against not only those that have taken effect but also these civil judgments that have not taken effect yet so as to lower the procedural costs. ( c ) it is important to prescribe clearly that the cases being protested by the procuratorates should be retried by the people ' s court that accepts such protests, ( d ) it is necessary to broaden and perfect the ways in which civil procuratorial supervisions are carried out and make it a st andard legal practice for the procuratorial organs to take legal proceedings, take part in the proceedings and raise procuratorial suggestions

    一是民事檢察監督的形式過于單一，僅規定了人民檢察院對人民法院確有錯誤的民事判決、裁定有權提出抗訴這一種監督方式，除此之外並未規定其他的監督途徑；二是民事檢察監督的范圍過于狹窄，僅規定對已經發生法律效力的判決、裁定有權提出抗訴，而對未發生法律效力的判決、裁定能否監督未作規定，不僅如此，最高人民法院還不斷地作出司法解釋，對檢察機關可以抗訴的民事裁定的范圍逐步加以限制；三是基層人民檢察院沒有抗訴權，使大量案件集中在市級以上人民檢察院；四是人民檢察提出抗訴后，案件由哪一級人民法院再審，未作明確規定，造成了審級上的混亂。
  8. Part three : study of appellate body ' s legal quality. after carefully comparation with the domestic court, international court of justice and international center for settlement of investment disputes ( icsid ) on the subject of process, jurisdictional limits, and other subjects, we can know the legal quality of appellate body more clearly

    作為國際爭解決的新生事物，上訴機構與國內法院的區別主要在於審查范圍和判決的法律效力上。與國際法院的主要區別在於後者受理的案件僅限於國家提起，其判決不存在上訴的問題，另外，國際法院的成員比上訴機構的成員具有更強的穩定性和更廣泛的代表性。
  9. The meaning and value from civil prosecution starting to analyse the existing system of civil prosecution theoretical basis, the procuratorial organs inspected foreign civil proceedings legislative provisions on the establishment of civil prosecution in our system and the need for feasibility ( that is based on reality ), explored building two key issues civil prosecution system ( that is, the scope and legal status of the case ), finally, building on a number of procedural issues specific arrangements

    本文從民事公訴的含義和價值出發，分析了民事公訴制度存在的理論基礎，考察了中外檢察機關提起民事訴訟的立法規定，闡述了在我國建立民事公訴制度的必要性與可行性（即現實依據） ，探討了建構民事公訴制度的兩個關鍵問題（即案件范圍和法律地位問題） ，最後就建構中的一些程序性問題進行了具體安排。
  10. Issues to be reviewed included preliminary vetting of the merits of an application ; the eligibility criteria for joining the panel of counsel ; assignment of cases to lawyers not on the panels ; frequency of progress reports ; time taken by lad to review its decision not to grant legal aid following issue of a counsel s certificate stating that the applicant had a reasonable chance of success in the intended appeal to cfa and possible expansion in the scope of the scheme

    檢討的事宜包括初步審查申請的成功機會納入大律師名冊的資格準則外判案件予非名冊律師進度報告的次數如發出大律師證明書證明申請人上訴至終審法院將有合理成功機會，法援署覆核其拒批法援的決定所需的時間，以及計劃可能擴大的范圍。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書