訴訟進行中 的英文怎麼說
中文拼音 [sùsòngjìnhángzhōng]
訴訟進行中
英文
ad litem- 訴 : 動詞1. (說給人) tell; relate; inform 2. (傾吐) complain; accuse 3. (控告) appeal to; resort to
- 訟 : 動詞1. (打官司) bring a case to court 2. (爭辯是非) dispute; argue
- 進 : 進構詞成分。
- 行 : 行Ⅰ名詞1 (行列) line; row 2 (排行) seniority among brothers and sisters:你行幾? 我行三。where...
- 訴訟 : [法律] lawsuit; litigation; legal action; judicial action; action
- 進行 : 1 (開展) be in progress; be underway; go on 2 (從事) carry on; carry out; conduct; make 3 (...
-
In all capital or criminal prosecutions a man has a right to demand the cause and nature of his accusation, to be confronted with the accusers and witnesses.
在所有死刑或刑事訴訟中,個人有權要求知道被控告的原因與性質,有權要求與控告者和證人進行對質。This chapter mainly analyzes and appraises the regulation of domination, suit way, preceding procedure, accuser and appellee in the effective procedural mechanism of civil liabilities of misrepresentation in securities market
本章針對現有證券市場虛假陳述民事賠償訴訟機制中的管轄、訴訟方式、前置程序、原告和被告的確定等進行了剖析和評價。To solve the problem of high rate of custody in criminal action, the thesis gives speculation to perfect the system of criminal compulsory measure and suggestion to mechanism of procuratorial work
摘要針對刑事訴訟中羈押率高的現狀,以減少羈押為目標對刑事強制措施體系完善進行了可行性構想,對改革和改善檢察工作機制提出了意見和建議。It consists of eight parts : from part one to part six the following are analysis and studies such as the definition and scope of products both at home and abroad, the definition and norms of judgement of the product defects, the imputation principle of pl, the subject of pl, the pl cause of counterplea, the compensation for damages of pl. etc. in part seven is a brief comparison between responsibility of quote and lawsuit limitation. and a conclusion is drawn from the above seven parts which will gives us some ideas about what we should learn and what will make it perfect for our pl
第一部分至第六部分依次就中外產品責任法中產品的定義和范圍、產品缺陷的定義和判斷標準、產品責任的歸責原則、產品責任主體、產品責任的抗辯事由、產品責任的損害賠償進行了比較研究並就以上各方面我國產品責任立法必須完善之處分別在各部分進行了闡述;第七部分就產品責任訴訟中的舉證責任和訴訟時效進行了簡略的比較;結語部分就上述七部分我國產品責任法的可供借鑒之處和完善進行了結論性的綜述。Through comparative analysis, which focused on the victim ’ s dissentient in the stage of censor prosecution, the stage when the decision of the first trial doesn ’ t take effect and already took effect, and on the basis of using the legislative and judicial experiences of other countries, the plan of specific relief system on the victim ’ s right to prosecute was brought out
通過比較分析,以被害人對于刑事訴訟中國家公訴機關審查起訴階段、一審判決作出未生效之前和判決已生效三個不同階段司法機關作出的決定或裁判的異議進行分析,在借鑒其他國家的立法和司法實踐經驗基礎上,提出了被害人追訴權救濟的具體制度方案。On the basis of reviewing history and comparative study, this paper examines the system of trial by default in our country ; at the same time using foreign experiences for reference, combines the specific situations in our judicial practice, then raises a tentative idea to reconstruct the system of trial by default in our country : to build a system of trial by default making the doctrine of ex parte debate as main part and doctrine of trial by default as supplement part ; at the same time to perfect the legislative stipulations on standards of default determination, procedural applications and remedies of trial by ex parte debate and trial by default, examinations of evidence in trial by default, in pursuit of forming an intact system structure, giving full play to the functions of system of trial by default and fulfilling the value target of civil proceedings
因此,加強對我國缺席審判制度的研究,具有重要的理論和實踐價值。本文在歷史回顧和比較研究的基礎上,對我國的缺席審判制度進行了審視;同時借鑒國外的經驗,並結合我國司法實踐的具體情況,提出了重構我國缺席審判制度的設想:建立一種以一方辯論主義為主體,缺席判決主義為補充的缺席審判制度;同時完善缺席的認定標準、一方辯論判決與缺席判決程序的適用與救濟、缺席審判中的證據審查等方面的立法規定,以形成一個完整的制度體系,充分發揮缺席審判制度的功能,實現民事訴訟的價值目標。The current public prosecution mode in our country took shape from the past whole case - examine mode in the base of the thinking to get ride of the drawbacks in the past. in practice, it has not only become effective and cause out a lot of new defaults, for example, the definition of the main evidence is not clear, the transfer range of the case files is unclear and the stipulate of the examine consequence is not enough. in order to reform and perfect the current public prosecution mode, we should regard the theory of the public prosecution as guide, combine our country ' s conditions, on methodology jump out of the circle relatively drawing lessons from the past, on the procedural theory, change the idea that the forejudge caused from the substantive examination and clarify the objective fact the current public prosecution include the essential substantive examination, in practice regard legitimacy, rationality and flexibility as the principle of law enforcement before the law to revise, in legislation define the concept of the main evidence clearly, add the regulation to dispatch the examine judge and the trial judge, regulate the treatment methods after examination and revise some rules about the summary procedure
以公訴審查制度的訴訟理念為指導,結合我國的國情,對現行公訴審查模式的改革和完善,在方法論上跳出以往比較借鑒的圈子;在訴訟理念上改變過去庭審法官預斷必然緣于實體性審查的觀念,以澄清現行公訴審查模式包括必要的實體審的客觀事實;在實踐中以合法性、合理性和靈活性作為立法修改前的執法原則;在立法上明確界定主要證據的范圍是對證明犯罪是否成立起主要作用或有重要影響的證據,其中既包括有罪證據也包括無罪證據,增加規定公訴審查法官與正式庭審法官分立制度,補充規定對公訴審查后開庭審理之外的其它情況的處理方法以及對於人民法院在審理過程中發現不宜適用簡易程序的,取消原刑訴法應當按照一般公訴案件適用的普通審判程序重新審理的規定,改為由審理該案件的獨任審判員以外的審判員重新組成合議庭對該案件進行重新審理等。Based on these defects, the article put forward some legal countermeasures to perfect the acclp for nine aspects in order to motive the acclp " s successful conduction. the nine aspects are : borrowing the western countries " acclp " s advanced experience ; building up the correct concept of acclp, decentralizing the high - centralized stockholder " s structure, re - distributing the power of company " s institutional framework and establishing the legal proceedings system during the stockholders in order to protect middle and little stockholder " s profits ; joint liability for guarder " s of the board and legal person " s personality deny system ; improving the framework of the board of directors ; perfecting the market mechanism
在此基礎上,本文從借鑒發達國家公司法人治理結構的先進經驗;樹立公司法人治理結構的正確理念;分散高度集中的股權結構;重新配置公司內部權力結構;建立股東代表訴訟制度,保護中小股東的利益;建立監事(會)連帶賠償制度;建立公司法人人格否認制度;改善董事會結構;完善市場機制等九個方面提出了完善我國公司法人治理結構的法律措施,以便推動我國公司法人治理的順利進行。Finally, the author analyses the absolute states of plural litigation ' s which maybe formed in subrogating action and method to deal with them
最後,對代位訴訟過程中可能形成數訴的具體形態和處理辦法進行了分析。第四部分:代位訴訟的訴訟標的。The secord part describes the present primary situations of administrative litigations ad defendant is public security agency. the following four points are plaled emprasis on concluding the abnormd withdrawl of cases, the avoidarce of administrative litigation in the name of criminal litigation, the lag of the legis lation of administrative laws and the ambiguity of prof responsibility and soon
第二部分概述公安行政訴訟運行的概況,並重點對公安行政訴訟中存在的問題進行分析:非正常撤訴率高,公安機關借刑事偵查名義規避行政訴訟,公安機關勞動教養敗訴案件增多(Evidence system is one of the most important questions in the civil proceedings and standard of proof is an important question in the evidence system. the civil procedure law applies the standard of " highly probable " in civil litigations. this article points out that it is not reasonable to adopt the " highly probable " standard in all civil litigations. firstly, this article mentions the important meaning of standard of proof in judicial proof. secondly, it pionts out the flaws in the standard of proof in civil litigation in our country. thirdly, it introduces the standard of proof in civil litigation in common law and civil law countries and analyzes the similar and different points in the standard of proof. finally this article points out several suggestions to rebuild the system of standard of proof. lt suggests we should construct a system which considers the " highly probable " standard as a principle and adopts other forms of standard of proof in sepcial civil cases. and we can build this reasonable system by means of legislation and case law
但在所有民事案件中均劃一適用較高程度的蓋然性作為證明標準是不合理的。文章首先闡明了民事訴訟證明標準在訴訟證明中的重要意義,然後對於我國有關民事訴訟證明標準的現狀及其缺陷作了一個概括,接著文章對于兩大法系民事訴訟證明標準的異同進行了介紹以及比較分析,最後提出了對于構建一個科學的民事訴訟證明標準體系的幾點建議。文章建議應當通過立法以及判例制度來建立一個以較高程度的蓋然性為原則的多元的證明標準體系。Subject to provisions of the act but without prejudice to any indemnity to which a director may otherwise be entitled, every director or other officer or auditor of the company shall be indemnified out of the assets of the company against liability incurred by him in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, in which judgment is given in his favor or in which he is acquitted or in connection with any application in which relief is granted to him by the court from liability for negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust in relation to the affairs of the company
根據法案的規定? ?但該條款對于任何一位公司董事(或領導,見後面解釋)可能以其他方式應獲得的賠償沒有任何偏見(見後面解釋) ? ?每一位公司的董事或其他主管人員或審計員,對於他進行訴訟辯護中? ?無論是民事訴訟,還是刑事訴訟? ?所帶來的債務,應以公司的資產進行賠償,只要該訴訟的判決為此人勝訴或被判無罪,或此人與任何被法庭判定他免於承擔與公司事務有關的任何瀆職、違約、失職或違反信託義務等責任的申請有關。The former features in the initiative of exercising the right to prosecute, the higher speed of prosecutors holding case facts and evidence in addition to the higher efficiency of litigious proceedings, but it is likely to bring about clashes between investigative and prosecutorial organs, in turn, weaken the function of prosecution as a whole
偵檢結合較為密切的模式,更能充分體現國家行使追訴權的主動性,有助於檢察官更迅速地把握案件的事實和證據,使訴訟進程更加快捷和高效。其缺陷在於容易產生較多的磨擦,反過來削弱整體的追訴功能;偵檢結合較為鬆懈的模式,偵查機關往往能集中精力,排除外在的影響,迅速偵破案件。In the article the ways of hearing are put forward to take establishing administrative collateral civil proceedings as fundamental mode, to take hearing of division between correlative administrative dispute and civil dispute as well as investigating civil dispute with correlatively administrative dispute together as supplementary mode on the basis of using numerous viewpoints in both domestic and overseas academic circles and practical circles as well as judgments in practice for reference so that the problem of correlatively administrative dispute and civil dispute may be solved effectively under different circumstances
現實生活中,基於相同的法律事實而同時引起行政爭議與民事爭議的現象大量存在,對這種具有內在關聯性的行政爭議與民事爭議如何進行審理,是近年來理論界和實務界研討的熱點問題。行政訴訟與民事訴訟的區別在於所解決爭議的性質不同,然而在訴訟實踐中,有些行政爭議與民事爭議經常交織在一起,出現了難以區分訴訟屬性以及如何適用程序的問題。An eligible judge should be confident, before contract - interpreting, about the expecting target of contract - interpreting. a clear target is the precondition of research on methodology and value accessing of contract - interpreting. then what is the target of contract - interpreting
本文展開了合同解釋方法論的研討,認為法官在訴訟程序中解釋合同,無非是要形成法律事實,並以此為基礎,進行法律判斷來完成訴訟的最終使命。It is also an inevitable outcome from administering country by law to administering educational institutions by law, and then to administering educational litigation by law. thirdly, the author finds the legal basis from laws and rules in force that the educational rights is actionable ; and points out that to bring the educational - rights into the scope of administrative litigation accords with not only the spirit and objective of legislation, but also the principle the spirit and objective of legislation, but also the principle of expanding the scope of administrative litigation ; and then makes a concise exposition the educational rights is actionable
再者,從現有法律、法規規定中「咬文嚼字尋找出受教育權是可訴的法隴據,並指出將受教育權納入行政訴訟受案范圍,既符合行政訴訟法的立法精神和宗旨,也符合行政訴訟受案范圍逐步擴大的原則,並接著對受教育權的可訴性進行了簡要論證。最後,對橢行政訴訟案件類型進行歸類,以進一步明確我國教育行政訴訟的受案范圍。First, it analyzes the general theories of the derivative action which includes the definition, features, origination and the values of its system, esp. the legal basis and the characteristic of the derivative action and compare it with the direct lawsuit by the shareholders. the second part draws the natural conclusion according to the regulations of the major issues in the derivative action system of each country, and the influence and meaning for our study, in order to help us have a further, deeper knowledge
首先,文章對股東派生訴訟的一般理論,包括股東派生訴訟的概念和特徵、起源石貞一七學位論文卜丁a只t r 』 51 『 1iesis一及其制度價值,尤其是股東派生訴訟的法理依據、性質及其與股東直接訴訟的比較,作了詳盡的分析:在此基礎上,文章第二部分就各國相關法律對股東派生訴訟制度中主要問題的規定及其借鑒意義進行了適當的歸納和總結,以期望能幫助我們對該制度有更深刻、更具體的認識。This dissertation just undertakes the analysis and demonstration and put forward my own opinion according to the nature and the status of raising civil lawsuits by procuratorial organs and their rights and obligations in concrete lawsuits procedure. finally, i give my suggestion that we should found the systam of civil law sules raised by procuratorial organs through legisla tion as soon as possible
本文結合學術界的各種理論觀點,就我國檢察機關提起民事訴訟的性質、地位及在具體的訴訟程序中應享有的權利和應承擔的義務進行分析論證,提出自己的觀點和認識,最後作者建議應盡快從立法上確立我國檢察機關提起民事訴訟制度。After that, the thesis discusses the main shortages of chinese current system of civil litigation expenses in seven aspects. part four : the suggestion of improving chinese system of civil litigation expenses. based on the studies ahead, the thesis provides that the directorial ideology - protecting the right of sue - should be found, and that the power of legislating rules of civil litigation expenses should be hold by the peoples " congress
最高人民法院制定民事訴訟費用規則不僅缺乏法律明文授權,又難以擺脫追逐自身利益的動機,影響到民事訴訟費用規則的中立性; 2 、訴訟費用范圍過窄,當事人為進行訴訟自行支出的必要費用及律師費用都因不能納入訴訟費用范圍而無法在當事人間分擔,使得權利人通過司法渠道實現權利的成本增加,妨礙了當事人行使其訴權,也使真正權利人的權利價值縮水。The rules of judicial ethics preclude posner from commenting publicly on pending or impending litigation or participating in politics, as by endorsing candidates
(司法職業道德使得波斯納不能公開評論進行中或將要進行的訴訟,也不能像支持某一候選人那樣參與到政治中。 )分享友人