起訴要點 的英文怎麼說

中文拼音 [qǐsùyāodiǎn]
起訴要點 英文
action point
  • 起 : 起Ⅰ動詞1 （站起; 坐起） rise; get up; stand up 2 （取出; 取走） draw out; remove; extract; pull 3...
  • 訴 : 動詞1. （說給人） tell; relate; inform 2. （傾吐） complain; accuse 3. （控告） appeal to; resort to
  • 要 : 要動詞1. （求） demand; ask2. （強迫; 威脅） force; coerceⅡ名詞（姓氏） a surname
  • 點 : Ⅰ名詞1 （液體的小滴） drop （of liquid） 2 （細小的痕跡） spot; dot; speck 3 （漢字的筆畫「、」）...
  • 起訴 : [法律] sue; prosecute; charge; bring a suit against sb ; bring an action against sb ; file a laws...
  • 要點 : 1. （主要內容） main points; key point; essentials; pivot; gist 2. （重要的據點） key strongpoint
  1. Based on the frequent occurrence of international aerial crimes, the rampancy and cruelty of criminals and the reality of brutal consequence, the essay analyses the features of the crime of aircraft hijacking, the crime of imperiling international civil aerial security and the crime of obstructing international aerial navigation with the component terms from three important international conventions on punishing aerial crimes in order to help people to appreciate the appearance and the essence of typical international aerial crimes deeply, to regard the motion of the crimes and to overwhelm the offence forcefully. based on the core of the legislative status of international civil aerial security, the jurisdiction of the aerial crimes, one emphasis of the article is to clarify concrete clauses on jurisdiction in the three conventions and analyses the important principle of " aut reddere, aut punire ". based on the problems on the jurisdiction of crimes in international society, it quests the implementation of t he principles of jurisdiction, pleading and extradition in the three conventions deeply

    基於目前國際社會航空犯罪時有發生，犯罪分子猖獗狠毒，危害後果十分殘重的現實，本文從國際社會關于懲治航空犯罪的三個重要國際公約（東京、海牙、蒙特利爾公約）中規定的各種航空犯罪的定義入手，深入展開了對劫持航空器罪、危害航空器飛行安全罪、危害國際民用航空機場安全罪的犯罪特徵及其構成條件的分析，以期幫助人們更深刻認識這些典型的國際航空犯罪的表現及其實質，嚴密注視這些犯罪的動向，對其進行及時有力的打擊；鑒于國際民用航空安全法律地位問題的核心是解決航空犯罪的管轄權問題，本文重點闡釋了三個公約關于管轄的具體規定，並側重分析了「或引渡或起訴」的重要原則；鑒于目前國際社會打擊國際航空犯罪管轄方面存在諸多實際問題，本文對公約規定的管轄、起訴、引渡原則的實現方式作了深入探討；鑒于各國在國內立法上對于空中犯罪的懲治、對違約國的制裁、對這類犯罪的預防措施等方面存在一些漏洞，本文根據目前掌握的一些資料，在獨立思考的基礎上，提出了一些不成熟的看法及建議，以期對國際社會懲治航空犯罪貢獻自己微薄之力。
  2. I ' ve drafted a very strong letter of complaint ; do you think i should tone it down a bit

    我起草了一封措詞強烈的投訴信；你看是否要口氣緩和一點？
  3. The right of person of the change that be torn open has the following : ( 1 ) acquire compensatory right lawfully ; in talk things over conditionally when agreeing, can undertake property right exchanges ; ( 2 ) execute property right to exchange, when the person that tear open change cannot offer house of property right exchange, requirement having right tears open change person to provide room of have enough to meet need ; ( 3 ) disagree to evaluating a report, classics party talks things over to still was not solved, can xiang yuan tears open change to evaluate an orgnaization to apply for check ; check result and evaluate a result formerly abhorrent, classics party talks things over to still do not amount to what see into consistent meaning to still can apply for technical appraisement ; ( 4 ) the manner that dismantles change to find a place for with respect to compensation with the person that tear open change, price talks things over when amounting to an agreement, application having right is in charge of office ruling ; ( 5 ) the disaffected of the adjudication that tear open change that makes to be in charge of mechanism place, authority is sued to people court, also authority perhaps applies for to reconsider to concerned branch appeal ; ( 6 ) authority obtains the allowance that tear open change to expend ; ( 7 ) do not tear open change lawfully to tearing open change person, can request to be in charge of mechanism to give administration punishment to tearing open change person ; ( 8 ) when because tear open change to the person cannot be fulfilled or cannot be fulfilled in the round, tearing open change agreement, authority applies for to concerned branch is solved or be sued to people court with respect to concerned matters concerned ; ( 9 ) other reach the right that enjoys according to it lawfully

    被拆遷人的權利有以下幾點： （ 1 ）依法獲得補償的權利；在有條件並協商一致時，可以進行產權調換； （ 2 ）實行產權調換的，拆遷人不能一次提供產權調換房屋時，有權要求拆遷人提供周轉房； （ 3 ）對評估報告有異議的，經當事人協商仍未解決，可以向原拆遷評估機構申請復核；復核結果與原評估結果不一致的，經當事人協商仍達不成一致意見的還可申請技術鑒定； （ 4 ）與拆遷人就補償拆遷安置的方式、價格協商達不成協議時，有權申請主管機關裁決； （ 5 ）對主管機關所作的拆遷裁決不服的，有權向人民法院起訴，也有權向有關部門申訴或者申請復議； （ 6 ）有權獲得拆遷補助費； （ 7 ）對于拆遷人不依法拆遷的，可以請求主管機關對于拆遷人給予行政處罰； （ 8 ）因拆遷人不能履行或者不能全面履行拆遷協議時，有權就有關事宜申請有關部門解決或者向人民法院起訴； （ 9 ）其他依法及依約享有的權利。
  4. This article is mainly a discussion on the spiritual damage compensation for close relatives of victim under the situations of damage to right of life, damage to the right of health and damage to the right of personality of the dead, which is based on an introduction and comparison of the concerned foreign legal regulations and academic theories and in combination with the legal practice in china wherefore the author put forwards his own ideas as following : first, under the condition that there is a distance of time between inj ury and death, the close relatives of the dead shall inherit the right of claim for spiritual damage compensation of the dead for the suffering before his death, in addition to their own intrinsic right of claim for spiritual damage compensation ; the second, under the condition that the inflictor has caused the disablement of the sufferer or serious damage to his health, the close relative in a limited cycle of the sufferer should be granted with the right of claim for spiritual damage compensation, which is confirmed in law and becomes a practice in foreign countries ; the third, since the aim of the law to protect the personality of the dead from infringement is to protect the benefits of the close relatives of the dead and to maintain public benefits, is constituted on the personality of the dead the close relative of the dead may initial legal proceeding for spiritual damage compensation

    本文重點探討的就是公民生命權受到侵害、健康權受到侵害、 「死者人格」受到侵害這三種情形下的受害人近親屬的精神損害賠償請求權問題。探討以介紹和比較國外相關法律規定和學術理論為前提，結合我國的實際情況，從理論與實踐相結合的角度對以上各問題分別進行了分析，並提出了作者自己的一些見解：第一、在公民從受傷害到死亡有一段時間距離的情形下，死者的近親屬除依法享有其固有的精神損害賠償請求權以外，還可以繼承死者生前就其所受之精神損害而享有的精神損害賠償請求權；第二、在加害人的行為已造成直接受害人殘疾，或者是造成其健康嚴重受損的其他後果的情形下，我國應在借鑒國外已有立法和判例的基礎上，賦予一定范圍內的受害人近親屬以精神損害賠償請求權；第三、法律保護死者人格不受侵害的目的是為了保護死者近親屬的利益和維護公共利益，一般情形下，只要死者近親屬能證明其訴訟主體的合法性，能夠證實侵害「死者人格」的行為已構成侵權，即可推定死者近親屬因此而遭受了精神痛苦? ?無須舉證的「名義上的精神損害」 ，死者近親屬即可提起精神損害賠償之訴。最後，本文認為，加強對受害人近親屬的權利和利益保護問題的研究，既有一定的必要性，同時又具有十分重要的現實意義。
  5. One day, when he was seven years old, he came to the curate of palestrina, and asked to be taught to read ; it was somewhat difficult, for he could not quit his flock ; but the good curate went every day to say mass at a little hamlet too poor to pay a priest and which, having no other name, was called borgo ; he told luigi that he might meet him on his return, and that then he would give him a lesson, warning him that it would be short, and that he must profit as much as possible by it

    這件事多少有點困難，因為他不能離開他的羊群，那位好心的教士每天要到一個小村子里去做一次彌撒。那個小村子太窮了，養不起一個教士，也沒有什麼正式的村名，叫博爾戈。他告訴萬帕說，他每天從博爾戈回來的時候可以見他一次，利用那個時間教他一課，並且預先告訴他，只能教短短的一課，他一定要特別用功，來利用這短短的見面的時間。
  6. Though criminal standard of proof is hotly debated in the law of evidence, its viewpoint is diversified, especially in the standard of proof of present public prosecution and guilt decision

    雖然，刑事證明標準在當前證據法學研究中較為熱烈，但是，觀點紛紜，分歧明顯，尤其是在刑事訴訟過程中對提起公訴的證明標準應否與有罪判決的證明標準要求一致方面討論得尤為激烈。
  7. " as the eleventh hour struck, he entered with a swaggering air, attended by two of the most dissolute and reckless of his boon companions. she stretched out her arms to him, but they seized hold of her, and one of the three - none other than the accursed benedetto exclaimed, - put her to torture and she ll soon tell us where her money is

    當可憐的愛蘇泰站起來正要上前去擁抱她的浪子的時候，這三個惡棍捉住了她，其中的一個，或許就是那個混小子，我現在想起來還不免心驚膽戰的，他大聲說道，我們來讓她吃點苦頭，那樣她就會乖乖地告訴我們錢在哪兒啦。
  8. Get yourself used to the idea and reward yourself abundantly. tell yourself, if you wake up early today, im going to give you a double bagel or one more cup of cafe latte

    要讓自己習慣早起，你可以好好地獎勵自己一番，告訴自己：如果你今天能早一點起床，我就給你一個特大號的焙果麵包似甜甜圈的硬麵包，或是多一杯拿鐵咖啡。
  9. You may not transfer your domain name registration to another registrar during a pending administrative proceeding brought pursuant to paragraph 4 or for a period of fifteen business days as observed in the location of our principal place of business after such proceeding is concluded

    在依照章節4提起的未決行政訴訟期間或訴訟結束后的十五（ 15 ）個工作日期間（見我方主要辦公地點） ，你方不可以轉換你方的注冊域名到其他的注冊機構。
  10. You may not transfer your domain name registration to another holder during a pending administrative proceeding brought pursuant to paragraph 4 or for a period of fifteen business days as observed in the location of our principal place of business after such proceeding is concluded ; or during a pending court proceeding or arbitration commenced regarding your domain name unless the party to whom the domain name registration is being transferred agrees, in writing, to be bound by the decision of the court or arbitrator

    在下列情況下，你方不可以轉讓你方的注冊域名給別的持有人（ i ）依照章節4提起的未決行政訴訟期間或訴訟結束后的十五（ 15 ）個工作日期間（見我方主要辦公地點） ；或（ ii ）由於你方的域名而提起的的未決的法庭訴訟或仲裁期間，除非接受注冊域名轉讓的一方書面同意服從法庭或仲裁人的決議。
  11. So, this thesis demonstrate the requirement of present public prosecution from four aspects. first, simply introduce the conception of standard of proof, foreign criminal standard of proof and ours also introduced, second, discuss present public prosecution ' s special position and clarify the specialty of present public prosecution from comparison of foreign requirement ; third, it lay more emphasis on the basis of present public prosecution ; lastly, install, the " two fundamental " should be the requirement of our present public prosecution from theory and practice

    首先，簡述證明標準的內涵和國外刑事證明標準的基本表述以及我國刑事訴訟證明標準的基本理論及法律規定；其次，從提起公訴的特徵出發，論證了提起公訴的特殊地位，同時對比國外提起公訴證明標準的要求，闡明了我國提起公訴證明標準的特殊性和法律規定的基本概況；第三，著重論述了我國提起公訴證明標準的要求應確立的根據；最後，從我國司法實踐著手，理論聯系實際地確立我國提起公訴證明標準的要求應為「兩個基本」的觀點。
  12. The research and practices for the civil litigation for securities tort compensation is been highly developed in those developed country with rule of law, but still a fresh subject in china. the civil litigation for securities tort compensation is a very large topic, the article only focuses on several hot debated questions

    證券民事侵權賠償訴訟涉及的范圍較廣，本文僅選擇了若干熱點問題進行了探討，這些問題對于真正賦予證券市場受害投資者提起民事訴訟的權利，切實保護投資者利益非常重要。
  13. I would also like to inform you that the product is not made in our cheese factory but in a different site altogether

    我也想要告訴你，這個產品並不是在我們起士工廠製造的.而完全是在另一個地點
  14. Legal investigation begins with the crime inspection which directly affects the subsequent legal procedures such as prosecution, trial, etc

    摘要犯罪現場勘查是偵查活動的起點，其成功與否直接關繫到起訴、審判等程序。
  15. By reviewing a civil lawsuit case of fake credit card use, combining common practice and basing on relevant law regulations, three focuse issues are put forward in this article, that is : commercial customers have or not have the duty to examine and compare the signature with pos signature ; how to identify the responsibility when credit card is lost, pilfered and credit transaction taken play before credit card holder reporting the loss of credit card in the condition of secret code plus signature ; the relevant departments have or not have the suitable law basis to the disputes arising from " wrong tally signature "

    摘要回顧一起關于信用卡冒用訴訟案的案例，結合工作實踐，立足相關的法律法規，提出關于「簽名爭議」的三個焦點問題，即商戶有無義務認真審查信用卡背面的簽名與pos單上的簽名一致；對于「密碼簽名」的信用卡，發生失竊、冒用等情況，在掛失前已產生非本人交易時，責任如何界定；對于由「簽名不符」引發的爭議，相關部門有無適用的法律依據。
  16. At present, the main problem that have been encountered in the implementation of the securities law, is the difficulties in giving proof, making compensation and the dilemma of litigation procedure. the amount of civil litigation under the securities law has grown rapidly in recent years. there are two different types of tort : one is general tort, the other is special trot

    當前對證券發行或交易中的侵權行為進行民事賠償存在的問題主要有三點，一是舉證難，廣大投資者缺少證據告倒上市公司；二是賠償難，賠償主體難確定，提起賠償的請求權人難確定，賠償金額難確定；三是採取何種訴訟方式有待進一步探討；四是維護司法公正與維護社會穩定難兩全。
  17. Tell us what bug 1234 is and tell us a little bit about the changes that were necessary to fix it

    告訴人們1234號錯誤內容並且告訴人們一點關于這個錯誤的修正引起的重要變化。
  18. With the co - operation of the two, the icac investigation finally came to a conclusion and the case was referred to the legal department for further action. on 2 november 1987, the legal department instituted prosecution against offenders

    獲得兩名主要污點證人的合作，廉署總結調查，案件交由當時的律政署處理，一九八七年十一月二日，律政署決定對有關人等提出起訴。
分享友人
分享到 Line

分享到臉書